Literature DB >> 35502368

Deep learning reconstruction allows low-dose imaging while maintaining image quality: comparison of deep learning reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT.

Akio Tamura1, Eisuke Mukaida1, Yoshitaka Ota2, Iku Nakamura3, Kazumasa Arakita4, Kunihiro Yoshioka1.   

Abstract

We aimed to compare the radiation dose and image quality of a low-dose abdominal computed tomography (CT) protocol reconstructed with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) with those of a routine-dose protocol reconstructed with hybrid-iterative reconstruction. This retrospective study enrolled 71 patients [61 men; average age, 71.9 years; mean body mass index (BMI), 24.3 kg/m2] who underwent both low-dose abdominal CT with DLR [advanced intelligent clear-IQ engine (AiCE)] and routine-dose abdominal CT with hybrid-iterative reconstruction [adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D)]. Radiation dose parameters included volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), effective dose (ED), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). Mean image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Image noise was measured in the hepatic parenchyma and bilateral erector spinae muscles. Moreover, subjective assessment of perceived image quality and diagnostic acceptability was performed. The low-dose protocol helped reduce the CTDIvol by 44.3%, ED by 43.7%, and SSDE by 44.9%. Moreover, the noise was significantly lower and CNR significantly higher with the low-dose protocol than with the normal-dose protocol (P<0.001). In the subjective assessment of image quality, there was no significant difference between the protocols with regard to image noise. Overall, AiCE was superior to AIDR 3D in terms of diagnostic acceptability (P=0.001). The use of AiCE can reduce overall radiation dose by more than 40% without loss of image quality compared to routine-dose abdominal CT with AIDR 3D. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography (CT); advanced intelligent clear-IQ engine (AiCE); contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR); deep learning reconstruction (DLR); noise reduction

Year:  2022        PMID: 35502368      PMCID: PMC9014148          DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-1216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  23 in total

1.  Deep learning reconstruction improves image quality of abdominal ultra-high-resolution CT.

Authors:  Motonori Akagi; Yuko Nakamura; Toru Higaki; Keigo Narita; Yukiko Honda; Jian Zhou; Zhou Yu; Naruomi Akino; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Deep learning reconstruction for contrast-enhanced CT of the upper abdomen: similar image quality with lower radiation dose in direct comparison with iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Ju Gang Nam; Jung Hee Hong; Da Som Kim; Jiseon Oh; Jin Mo Goo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Deep learning reconstruction of drip-infusion cholangiography acquired with ultra-high-resolution computed tomography.

Authors:  Keigo Narita; Yuko Nakamura; Toru Higaki; Motonori Akagi; Yukiko Honda; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09

4.  Improving Image Quality and Reducing Radiation Dose for Pediatric CT by Using Deep Learning Reconstruction.

Authors:  Samuel L Brady; Andrew T Trout; Elanchezhian Somasundaram; Christopher G Anton; Yinan Li; Jonathan R Dillman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Ultra-high-resolution CT angiography of the artery of Adamkiewicz: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Kunihiro Yoshioka; Ryoichi Tanaka; Hidenobu Takagi; Yuta Ueyama; Kei Kikuchi; Takuya Chiba; Kazumasa Arakita; Joanne D Schuijf; Yasuo Saito
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Effect of patient size on radiation dose for abdominal MDCT with automatic tube current modulation: phantom study.

Authors:  Sebastian T Schindera; Rendon C Nelson; Thomas L Toth; Giao T Nguyen; Greta I Toncheva; David M DeLong; Terry T Yoshizumi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  CT iterative vs deep learning reconstruction: comparison of noise and sharpness.

Authors:  Chankue Park; Ki Seok Choo; Yunsub Jung; Hee Seok Jeong; Jae-Yeon Hwang; Mi Sook Yun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Deep learning reconstruction versus iterative reconstruction for cardiac CT angiography in a stroke imaging protocol: reduced radiation dose and improved image quality.

Authors:  Angélique Bernard; Pierre-Olivier Comby; Brivaël Lemogne; Karim Haioun; Frédéric Ricolfi; Olivier Chevallier; Romaric Loffroy
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-01

9.  Superior objective and subjective image quality of deep learning reconstruction for low-dose abdominal CT imaging in comparison with model-based iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection.

Authors:  Akio Tamura; Eisuke Mukaida; Yoshitaka Ota; Masayoshi Kamata; Shun Abe; Kunihiro Yoshioka
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.