Literature DB >> 33201790

Improving Image Quality and Reducing Radiation Dose for Pediatric CT by Using Deep Learning Reconstruction.

Samuel L Brady1, Andrew T Trout1, Elanchezhian Somasundaram1, Christopher G Anton1, Yinan Li1, Jonathan R Dillman1.   

Abstract

Background CT deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithms have been developed to remove image noise. How the DLR affects image quality and radiation dose reduction has yet to be fully investigated. Purpose To investigate a DLR algorithm's dose reduction and image quality improvement for pediatric CT. Materials and Methods DLR was compared with filtered back projection (FBP), statistical-based iterative reconstruction (SBIR), and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in a retrospective study by using data from CT examinations of pediatric patients (February to December 2018). A comparison of object detectability for 15 objects (diameter, 0.5-10 mm) at four contrast difference levels (50, 150, 250, and 350 HU) was performed by using a non-prewhitening-matched mathematical observer model with eye filter (d'NPWE), task transfer function, and noise power spectrum analysis. Object detectability was assessed by using area under the curve analysis. Three pediatric radiologists performed an observer study to assess anatomic structures with low object-to-background signal and contrast to noise in the azygos vein, right hepatic vein, common bile duct, and superior mesenteric artery. Observers rated from 1 to 10 (worst to best) for edge definition, quantum noise level, and object conspicuity. Analysis of variance and Tukey honest significant difference post hoc tests were used to analyze differences between reconstruction algorithms. Results Images from 19 patients (mean age, 11 years ± 5 [standard deviation]; 10 female patients) were evaluated. Compared with FBP, SBIR, and MBIR, DLR demonstrated improved object detectability by 51% (16.5 of 10.9), 18% (16.5 of 13.9), and 11% (16.5 of 14.8), respectively. DLR reduced image noise without noise texture effects seen with MBIR. Radiologist ratings were 7 ± 1 (DLR), 6.2 ± 1 (MBIR), 6.2 ± 1 (SBIR), and 4.6 ± 1 (FBP); two-way analysis of variance showed a difference on the basis of reconstruction type (P < .001). Radiologists consistently preferred DLR images (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.89; 95% CI: 0.83, 0.93). DLR demonstrated 52% (1 of 2.1) greater dose reduction than SBIR. Conclusion The DLR algorithm improved image quality and dose reduction without sacrificing noise texture and spatial resolution. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33201790     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020202317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  20 in total

Review 1.  Advanced CT techniques for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuko Nakamura; Toru Higaki; Yukiko Honda; Fuminari Tatsugami; Chihiro Tani; Wataru Fukumoto; Keigo Narita; Shota Kondo; Motonori Akagi; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Deep learning reconstruction allows low-dose imaging while maintaining image quality: comparison of deep learning reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT.

Authors:  Akio Tamura; Eisuke Mukaida; Yoshitaka Ota; Iku Nakamura; Kazumasa Arakita; Kunihiro Yoshioka
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-05

3.  Effect of a new deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for abdominal computed tomography imaging on image quality and dose reduction compared with two iterative reconstruction algorithms: a phantom study.

Authors:  Joël Greffier; Djamel Dabli; Aymeric Hamard; Asmaa Belaouni; Philippe Akessoul; Julien Frandon; Jean-Paul Beregi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01

4.  Commentary On: Image Quality Evaluation in Dual Energy CT of the Chest, Abdomen and Pelvis in Obese Patients with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Corey T Jensen
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.081

5.  Deep learning image reconstruction in pediatric abdominal and chest computed tomography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  Kun Zhang; Xiang Shi; Shuang-Shuang Xie; Ji-Hang Sun; Zhuo-Heng Liu; Shuai Zhang; Jia-Yang Song; Wen Shen
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-06

6.  Comparison of virtual monoenergetic imaging between a rapid kilovoltage switching dual-energy computed tomography with deep-learning and four dual-energy CTs with iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Joël Greffier; Salim Si-Mohamed; Boris Guiu; Julien Frandon; Maeliss Loisy; Fabien de Oliveira; Philippe Douek; Jean-Paul Beregi; Djamel Dabli
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

7.  Detection of urinary tract calculi on CT images reconstructed with deep learning algorithms.

Authors:  Samjhana Thapaliya; Samuel L Brady; Elanchezhian Somasundaram; Christopher G Anton; Brian D Coley; Alexander J Towbin; Bin Zhang; Jonathan R Dillman; Andrew T Trout
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-10-04

Review 8.  Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: implications for patient radiation safety.

Authors:  Jarrel Seah; Zoe Brady; Kyle Ewert; Meng Law
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 9.  Current and emerging artificial intelligence applications for pediatric abdominal imaging.

Authors:  Jonathan R Dillman; Elan Somasundaram; Samuel L Brady; Lili He
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-04-12

10.  Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo in renal and adrenal computed tomography.

Authors:  Yifan Bie; Shuo Yang; Xingchao Li; Kun Zhao; Changlei Zhang; Hai Zhong
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.