| Literature DB >> 35502350 |
Yiran He1, Wanhong Zhang1, Weiming Xu2, Xinru Sui3.
Abstract
In view of the employment difficulties of college graduates, this paper analyzes the overflow of graduates in a particular period caused by the expansion of enrollment in various colleges and universities and the social phenomenon of social positions in short supply. First, the employment status of application-oriented college students and the deficiencies of employment guidance courses are summarized. Then, deep learning technology is combined with the relevant employment concept to construct an employment training model to guide college students in employment. Besides, a questionnaire on learning effect and employment quality is designed from four perspectives: learning motivation, concentration, teaching process, and final results. The information collected through the questionnaire demonstrates that the employment quality and learning effect of male and female students are not significantly affected by gender differences. In addition, the P values of learning motivation, concentration, and teaching process are all less than 0.01, and the unstandardized coefficient of the teaching process is 0.349, which has the most significant impact on the learning effect. In short, the three factors positively affect the learning effect. Therefore, it comes to the conclusion of improving the ability and strategy of classroom employment guidance. If one wants to be successful in job hunting and career selection, it is not enough just to be competitive but also to be good at it. Being good at the competition is reflected in having good psychological quality, strength, and a good competitive state. In the job hunting and career selection competition, attention should be paid to whether the expected value is appropriate. College students should have sufficient self-awareness before preparing to submit resumes. During the interview, they should overcome emotional anxiety. If a person can treat study, work, and life in a good mood from beginning to end, he will win the competition. The research reported here can provide some reference suggestions for the employment quality of application-oriented college graduates.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35502350 PMCID: PMC9056245 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2823614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1The vicious circle of employment.
Figure 2Teachers' acceptance of employment guidance training courses.
Thinking characteristics of deep learning.
| Concept | Content |
|---|---|
| Student-centered | Learners are responsible for themselves and should engage in learning with interest in improving the quality and effect of learning. Teachers guide students with the main purpose of meeting their needs. |
| Life-long learning | Shallow learning only pays attention to the immediate task and lacks reflection on learning and evaluation of results. On the contrary, deep learning requires timely summarization and criticism of mistakes in learning and continuous improvement to proficiency. |
| Comprehension capability | Shallow learning is passive learning. However, deep learning focuses on understanding and treating problems and problems with a skeptical attitude, which can increase one's objective evaluation and achieve the purpose of deep thinking. |
| Integration capability | Deep learning emphasizes integrating new knowledge and old knowledge, which requires a broader acquisition of knowledge and establishing its knowledge base. |
| Conversion capability | Students need to strengthen self-consciousness, improve the ability of self-understanding, self-examination, self-evaluation, self-control, and transformation, and reflect and summarize the knowledge results established. |
| Application ability | Superficial learning methods only focus on ending the immediate problems with mechanical methods. Deep learning cultivates students' ability to use their own knowledge comprehensively. |
| Problem-solving ability | Superficial learning can only solve written problems with scattered knowledge. In contrast, deep learning emphasizes applying the knowledge learned in real life to solve complex problems in practical situations. |
| High-latitude thinking | Current superficial learning methods still emphasize low-level goals, such as memorizing written knowledge and understanding surface meaning. Deep learning focuses on combining and applying knowledge with real life and creating things of higher value, focusing on knowledge application and high-latitude ideas of improving learning effectiveness. |
Gaps between superficial learning and deep learning.
| Feature | Superficial learning | Deep learning |
|---|---|---|
| Learning purpose | To complete the basic tasks assigned by the teacher | Focusing on advanced development of basic knowledge |
| Learning motivation | Passive learning at the request of family and teachers | Spontaneous learning triggered by students' interests |
| Concentration | Students are passive and have a low concentration. | Students are in an active learning state |
| Learn content | Boring written knowledge | Knowledge combining questions with real-world situations |
| Teaching methods | The current common teaching strategy of one teacher and many students | Students are the main body; teachers are the assistants, which focuses on ability development |
| Final results | Student achievement is uneven, and the gap is too large | Students can use concepts flexibly to solve practical difficulties |
Figure 3Relationship between superficial learning and deep learning.
Figure 4Employment training goals for college graduates.
Figure 5Employment training system based on school scenarios combined with deep learning.
Questionnaire content.
| Basic information | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | A. Male | B. female | ||||
|
| ||||||
| Grade | A. Freshman | B. Sophomore | C. Junior | D. Senior | ||
|
| ||||||
| Major | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Class ranking | A. Top 5% | B. 5%–30% | C. 30%–60% | D. 60%–90% | E. The last 10% | |
|
| ||||||
| Question number | Question content | Strongly disagree | Not agree | Neutral | Slightly agreeable | Quite agree |
|
| ||||||
| Learning motivation | ||||||
| 1 | I study hard just to get a job. | A | B | C | D | E |
| 2 | I think it makes sense to adopt deep learning. | A | B | C | D | E |
| Concentration | ||||||
| 3 | I will do a preview before class. | A | B | C | D | E |
| 4 | My purpose is clear when I study. | A | B | C | D | E |
| 5 | I will actively answer the teacher's questions. | A | B | C | D | E |
| Teaching process | ||||||
| 6 | I can use the teacher's method. | A | B | C | D | E |
| 7 | I can seek answers through the internet. | A | B | C | D | E |
| 8 | I will ask my teachers and classmates for questions. | A | B | C | D | E |
| Final results | ||||||
| 9 | I think this way of learning is significantly beneficial to my employment. | A | B | C | D | E |
| 10 | I am able to apply the new knowledge in the classroom flexibly in my life. | A | B | C | D | E |
| 11 | I can get the satisfaction of serious study. | A | B | C | D | E |
Questionnaire evaluation results.
| Judge | Evaluation criteria | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Very perfect (%) | Relatively perfect (%) | Imperfect (%) | |
| Teacher A | 69 | 21 | 10 |
| Teacher B | 34 | 60 | 6 |
| Professor A | 50 | 46 | 4 |
| Professor B | 85 | 3 | 12 |
Figure 6Evaluation results of male and female students on the employment guidance model. (a) The data result of male students. (b) The data result of female students.
Figure 7The measure of effectiveness of the judge strategy and learning things.
Figure 8Multidimensional influence degree analysis.
Figure 9Multidimensional standard error analysis.