Literature DB >> 35501902

Diagnoses and procedures of inpatients with female genital mutilation/cutting in Swiss University Hospitals: a cross-sectional study.

Mathilde Horowicz1, Sara Cottler-Casanova2,3, Jasmine Abdulcadir4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) can result in short and long-term complications, which can impact physical, psychological and sexual health. Our objective was to obtain descriptive data about the most frequent health conditions and procedures associated with FGM/C in Swiss university hospitals inpatient women and girls with a condition/diagnosis of FGM/C. Our research focused on the gynaecology and obstetrics departments.
METHODS: We conducted an exploratory descriptive study to identify the health outcomes of women and girls with a coded FGM/C diagnose who had been admitted to Swiss university hospitals between 2016 and 2018. Four of the five Swiss university hospitals provided anonymized data on primary and secondary diagnoses coded with the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and interventions coded in their medical files.
RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2018, 207 inpatients had a condition/diagnosis of FGM/C. The majority (96%) were admitted either to gynaecology or obstetrics divisions with few genito-urinary and psychosexual conditions coded.
CONCLUSIONS: FGM/C coding capacities in Swiss university hospitals are low, and some complications of FGM/C are probably not diagnosed. Pregnancy and delivery represent key moments to identify and offer medical care to women and girls who live with FGM/C. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This cross-sectional study (protocol number 2018-01851) was conducted in 2019, and approved by the Swiss ethics committee.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coding; Female genital cutting; Female genital mutilation; Female genital mutilation/cutting; ICD; International classification of diseases; Switzerland

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35501902      PMCID: PMC9063091          DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01411-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health        ISSN: 1742-4755            Impact factor:   3.355


Introduction

Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) comprises all procedures involving partial or total removal of the external female genitalia without medical indication [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines four main types of FGM/C (Table 1) [2]. 200 million women and girls have undergone the practice in 31 countries according to nationally representative household surveys, without counting female migrants with FGM/C who live high-income countries [3, 4]. According to estimates, almost 600,000 individuals living in the European Union are believed to have been exposed to ritual genital cutting (2016) [5], and in Switzerland, approximately 21,706 women and girls are estimated to have been exposed to this practice (2018) [6]. These estimates were obtained by indirect measures: multiplying the number of female migrants from an FGM/C practicing country with the FGM/C prevalence rate from the same country. This method does not account for regional and ethnic variations of the practice within countries, and does not include corrections for any changes in attitudes towards FGM/C, which have been described among migrants [7-11], nor include other female genital modifications such as female genital cosmetic surgeries. The actual prevalence of FGM/C among communities of migrants remains unknown [12, 13]. Recent studies conducted in the United Kingdom (UK) showed significantly fewer cases of FGM/C than expected among minors according to prevalence estimates [14, 15]. Nevertheless, the total number of women and girls who have undergone FGM/C is expected to grow in high-income countries because of increasing migration from countries where FGM/C prevalence remains high [16]. Although several interventions effectively promote the abandonment of FGM/C, many countries are simultaneously facing population growth, with consequent increase in the absolute number of girls exposed to FGM/C [17].
Table 1

Classification of FGM/C types and subtypes according to WHO [2]

Type IPartial or total removal of the clitoral glans (the external and visible part of the clitoris, which is a sensitive part of the female genitals, with the function of providing sexual pleasure to the woman), and/or the prepuce/clitoral hood (the fold of skin surrounding the clitoral glans)
 Type IaRemoval of the prepuce/clitoral hood only
 Type IbRemoval of the clitoral glans with the prepuce/clitoral hood
Type IIPartial or total removal of the clitoral glans and the labia minora, with or without removal of the labia majora
 Type IIaRemoval of the labia minora only
 Type IIbPartial or total removal of the clitoris and the labia minora
 Type IIcPartial or total removal of the clitoris, the labia minora and the labia majora
Type III (Infibulation)Narrowing of the vaginal opening with the creation of a covering seal. The seal is formed by cutting and repositioning the labia minora, or labia majora. The covering of the vaginal opening is done with or without removal of the clitoral prepuce/clitoral hood and glans
 Type IIIaRemoval and apposition of the labia minora
 Type IIIbRemoval and apposition of the labia majora
Type IVAll other harmful procedures to the female genitalia for non-medical purposes, for example, pricking, piercing, incising, scraping and cauterization
Classification of FGM/C types and subtypes according to WHO [2] It has been widely studied that FGM/C, particularly type III, can result in short and long-term complications, which can impact physical, psychological and sexual health [1]. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses show that female individuals with FGM/C are at higher risk of dyspareunia, genito-urinary complications, prolonged labour, episiotomies, and birth complications [18-21]. Frequently cited as a limitation, the lack of high-quality studies makes it difficult to reach consensus surrounding the association between FGM/C and caesarean section, infertility and HIV [18-20]. Depending on the study design, some of the available data about FGM/C complications and their clinical management may be subject to self-report and recall bias [22]. Inappropriate health management due to the lacking training surrounding FGM/C may further bias the existing data. To our knowledge, no study has yet described FGM/C complications and associated procedures using hospital inpatient data coded with the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). We sought to describe the most frequent health conditions and procedures associated with FGM/C in inpatient women and girls identified from ICD diagnoses of FGM/C from five Swiss university hospitals.

Materials and methods

This cross-sectional study (protocol number 2018-01851) was conducted in 2019, and approved by the Swiss ethics committee. We invited all five Swiss university hospitals (Geneva, Lausanne, Bern, Basel and Zürich) to provide anonymized data for all inpatient adult women and girls (< 18 years) with a nationality from any of the 30 FGM/C practicing countries [3] in addition to all inpatients who had a coded condition/diagnosis of FGM/C between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018. We did not include inpatients from the Maldives, where FGM/C has been recently reported [23], because no nationally representative survey was available when the study began. Please note that we talk about a “condition/diagnosis” of FGM/C as the ICD contains specific codes for FGM/C, which are also used to justify reimbursement of healthcare provided in case of need by health insurances. We also use the term condition, to acknowledge the fact that not all women and girls with FGM/C are sick. In Swiss university hospitals, healthcare professionals record the diagnosis responsible for the hospitalization (primary diagnosis); eventual complications that arise during the patient’s hospital stay, as well as any additional diseases treated (secondary diagnoses) in the patients’ electronic medical charts. Professional coders in Switzerland code this information with the German Modification of the tenth edition of the ICD (ICD-10-GM), and interventions are coded with the Swiss Classification of Surgical Interventions (CHOP) [24]. We received the requested data from four university hospitals: Geneva (HUG), Lausanne (CHUV), Bern (Inselspital), and Zürich (USZ). The university hospital of Basel (USB) did not participate due to logistical difficulties in data provision. All data were then merged in a single database using STATA version 15. The data for all inpatient women and girls from the 30 targeted FGM/C countries and all primary and secondary diagnoses of FGM/C coded between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018 was anonymized. The university hospital of Bern did not provide data on the interventions performed. Lausanne and Zürich provided CHOP codes of the interventions performed, and Geneva provided the name of the CHOP interventions. We analyzed all diagnoses and interventions in patients’ records with a coded primary or secondary diagnosis of FGM/C. We provided descriptive statistics with mean, ± standard deviation, and median for continuous variables, numbers by categorical variables. We compared all diagnoses from our sample with the FGM/C ICD “tip-sheet” for FGM/C associated health conditions (full methods available in another manuscript) [25]. We focused our analysis on the gynaecology and obstetrics divisions, where most of the inpatients with an FGM/C code were admitted. The Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, the Swiss Network against Female Circumcision, and Caritas Switzerland funded the study. They had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Results

In four of the five Swiss university hospitals, 207 inpatients received a primary (n = 22, 10.6%) or a secondary (n = 185) diagnosis of FGM/C during the study period (Table 2). Of these 207 women and girls, 199 (96%, 89.4%) were admitted either to gynaecology or obstetrics divisions. The remaining women and girls were admitted to other departments (surgery, internal medicine, emergency, and paediatrics).
Table 2

Description of inpatients with a FGM/C (n = 207) as primary or secondary diagnosis between 2016 and 2018 followed in one of four Swiss university hospitals (Geneva, Lausanne, Bern and Zürich)

Variables2016 (n = 42)2017 (n = 69)2018 (n = 96)
Center, n (%)
 Geneva20 (47.6)24 (34.8)67 (69.8)
 Lausanne13 (31.0)10 (14.5)19 (19.8)
 Bern3 (7.1)23 (33.3)6 (6.3)
 Zürich6 (14.3)12 (17.4)4 (4.2)
Country of origin, n (%)
 Benin0 (0)0 (0)1 (1.0)
 Burkina Faso1 (2.4)2 (2.9)0 (0)
 Cameroon1 (2.4)0 (0)0 (0)
 Côte d’Ivoire1 (2.4)1 (1.5)1 (1.0)
 Egypt0 (0)0 (0)5 (5.2)
 Eritrea12 (28.6)37 (53.6)36 (37.5)
 Ethiopia2 (4.8)3 (4.4)2 (2.1)
 Guinea0 (0)0 (0)6 (6.2)
 Guinea-Bissau0 (0)0 (0)2 (2.1)
 Mali0 (0)0 (0)1 (1.0)
 Mauritania0 (0)0 (0)1 (1.0)
 Nigeria1 (2.4)1 (1.5)3 (3.1)
 Senegal0 (0)0 (0)3 (3.1)
 Somalia14 (33.3)18 (26.1)22 (22.9)
 Sudan and South Sudan1 (2.4)1 (1.5)3 (3.1)
 Unknown or other9 (21.4)6 (8.7)10 (10.4)
Service, n (%)
 Gynaecology13 (31.0)12 (17.4)9 (9.4)
 Gynaecology or obstetricsa1 (2.4)23 (33.3)6 (6.3)
 Obstetrics23 (54.8)33 (47.8)79 (82.3)
 Others5 (11.9)1 (1.5)2 (2.1)
Mean age at first visit (± SD, median)30.7 (± 12.0, 27)27.7 (± 6.1, 27.4)29.8 (± 6.7, 30)
FGM/C type, n (%)
 Type I3 (7.1)13 (18.8)10 (10.4)
 Type II8 (19.1)16 (23.2)33 (34.4)
 Type III21 (50.0)33 (47.8)39 (40.6)
 Type IV0 (0)1 (1.5)2 (2.1)
 Unspecified or other10 (23.8)6 (8.7)12 (12.5)

aData obtained from Bern did not specify whether patients were admitted in gynecology or obstetrics

Description of inpatients with a FGM/C (n = 207) as primary or secondary diagnosis between 2016 and 2018 followed in one of four Swiss university hospitals (Geneva, Lausanne, Bern and Zürich) aData obtained from Bern did not specify whether patients were admitted in gynecology or obstetrics The primary diagnoses of women with a secondary diagnosis of FGM/C (n = 185) spanned 11 chapters of the ICD-10 (Table 3). 156 inpatients had a primary diagnosis related to pregnancy and childbirth. The most frequent diagnoses were perineal laceration during delivery (n = 29, 18.6%), labour and delivery complicated by fetal heart rate anomaly (n = 16, 10.3%), prolonged second stage of labour (n = 13, 8.3%) and premature rupture of membranes (n = 13, 8.3%). Nine patients were admitted for some type of anaemia: anaemia complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium (n = 5), iron deficiency anaemia (n = 3), and post-haemorrhagic anaemia (n = 1). Primary diagnoses of genitourinary diseases included vulvar cysts (n = 4), and infectious diseases such as abscess of vulva (n = 2), chronic salpingitis and oophoritis (n = 1) and pyonephrosis (n = 1).
Table 3

Primary diagnoses of inpatients with a secondary diagnosis of FGM/C (n=185) presented by chapter of the ICD-10

VariablesN
ICD-10 chapter and codesICD-10 diagnoses
Neoplasms3
 C77.4, C90.00Malignant neoplasms2
 D25.9Leiomyoma of uterus, unspecified1
Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs and certain disorders involving the immune mechanism4
 D50.8, D50.9Iron deficiency anemias3
 D62Acute posthemorrhagic anemia1
Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases1
 E55.9Vitamin D deficiency, unspecified1
Diseases of the circulatory system1
 I05.0Rheumatic mitral stenosis1
Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue1
 L02.2Cutaneous abscess, furuncle and carbuncle of trunk1
Diseases of the genitourinary system20
 N13.1Hydronephrosis with ureteral stricture, not elsewhere classified1
 N13.6Pyonephrosis1
 N39.3Stress incontinence1
 N70.1Chronic salpingitis and oophoritis1
 N76.4Abscess of vulva2
 N84.0Polyp of corpus uteri1
 N90.7Vulvar cyst4
Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium156
 O00.1Tubal pregnancy1
 O02.1Missed abortion1
 O09.6“Duration of pregnancy 37 to 41 completed weeks, 253 to 287 completed days”4
 O09.7“Duration of pregnancy More than 41 completed weeks More than 287 completed days”1
 O12.1Gestational proteinuria1
 O14.0, O14.1, O14.9Pre-eclampsia4
 O24.0Pre-existing type 1 diabetes mellitus, in pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium1
 O24.4Gestational diabetes mellitus8
 O30.0Twin pregnancy1
 O32.1Maternal care for breech presentation1
 O33.5Maternal care for disproportion due to unusually large fetus2
 O34.2Maternal care due to uterine scar from previous surgery3
 O34.30Maternal care for cervical incompetence, unspecified trimester1
 O34.7Maternal care for abnormality of vulva and perineum1
 O36.5Maternal care for known or suspected poor fetal growth4
 O36.6Maternal care for excessive fetal growth2
 O41.0Oligohydramnios2
 O41.1Infection of amniotic sac and membranes1
 O42.0, O42.11, O42.12Premature rupture of membranes, onset of labor within 24 hours of rupture13
 O43.21Placenta accreta1
 O44.11Complete placenta previa with hemorrhage, first trimester2
 O48Post-term pregnancy4
 O60.1Preterm labor with preterm delivery2
 O61.0Failed medical induction of labor2
 O62.8Other abnormalities of forces of labor2
 O63.0Prolonged first stage (of labor)4
 O63.1Prolonged second stage (of labor)13
 O64.8Obstructed labor due to other malposition and malpresentation1
 O65.4Obstructed labor due to fetopelvic disproportion, unspecified1
 O66.2Obstructed labor due to unusually large fetus1
 O66.5Attempted application of vacuum extractor and forceps1
 O68.0Labour and delivery complicated by fetal heart rate anomaly16
 O68.2Labour and delivery complicated by fetal heart rate anomaly with meconium in amniotic fluid3
 O70.0First degree perineal laceration during delivery13
 O70.1Second degree perineal laceration during delivery11
 O70.2Third degree perineal laceration during delivery1
 O70.3Fourth degree perineal laceration during delivery2
 O70.9Perineal laceration during delivery, unspecified2
 O71.1Rupture of uterus during labour1
 O72.0, O72.1Third-stage haemorrhage3
 O75.6Delayed delivery after spontaneous or unspecified rupture of membranes1
 O75.7Vaginal delivery following previous caesarean section2
 O80Single spontaneous delivery3
 O98.8Other maternal infectious and parasitic diseases complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium1
 O99.0Anaemia complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium5
 O99.1Other diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs and certain disorders involving the immune mechanism complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium1
 O99.2Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium1
 O99.8Other specified diseases and conditions complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium4
Congenital malformations, deformations and chromosomal abnormalities1
 Q50.5Embryonic cyst of broad ligament1
Symptoms, signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified1
 R74.0Elevation of levels of transaminase and lactic acid dehydrogenase [LDH]1
Injury, poisoning and certain other consequences of external causes1
 S72.3Fracture of shaft of femur1
Factors influencing health status and contact with health services18
 Z37.0Single live birth4
 Z65Problems related to other psychosocial circumstances1
 Z91.70Personal history of female genital mutilation, type unspecified1
 Z91.71Personal history of female genital mutilation, type 11
 Z91.72Personal history of female genital mutilation, type 22
 Z91.73Personal history of female genital mutilation, type 39
Primary diagnoses of inpatients with a secondary diagnosis of FGM/C (n=185) presented by chapter of the ICD-10 The mean number of secondary diagnoses coded among women with a primary or secondary diagnosis of FGM/C was 2.59 (median 2, range 0–15), spanning 16 chapters of the ICD-10 (Table 4). There were 281 secondary diagnoses related to pregnancy and childbirth, including 114 codes describing duration of pregnancy (O09.1-O09.7, O48). Other frequent codes were perineal laceration during delivery (n = 21), prolonged second stage of labour (n = 8), and anaemia complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium (n = 24).
Table 4

Secondary diagnoses of inpatients with a condition/diagnosis of FGM/C presented by chapter of the ICD-10

VariablesN
ICD-10 chapter and codesICD-10 diagnoses
Certain infectious and parasitic diseases27
 A39.0Meningococcal meningitis2
 A60.9Anogenital herpesviral infection, unspecified1
 B18.1Chronic viral hepatitis B without Delta virus1
 B65.0Schistosomiasis due to Schistosoma haematobium [urinary schistosomiasis]1
 B68.1Taenia saginata taeniasis1
 B95.1Streptococcus, group B, as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere17
 B95.91Other specified gram-positive anaerobic, non-spore forming pathogens causing diseases, classified elsewhere1
 B96.2Escherichia coli [E. coli ] as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere2
 B98.0Helicobacter pylori [H. pylori] as the cause of diseases classified in other chapters1
Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs and certain disorders involving the immune mechanism33
 D50.0Iron deficiency anemia secondary to blood loss (chronic)9
 D50.8, D50.9Iron deficiency anemias10
 D52.9Folate deficiency anemia, unspecified1
 D57.1Sickle-cell disease without crisis1
 D62Acute posthemorrhagic anemia3
 D64.8, D64.9Anemia, other or unspecified6
 D68.4, D68.9Coagulation defect2
 D90Immune compromise after radiation, chemotherapy and other immunosuppressive measures1
Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases16
 E03.8, E03.9Hypothyroidism6
 E11.60Type 2 diabetes mellitus with other specified complications1
 E44.0Moderate protein-calorie malnutrition1
 E53.8Deficiency of other specified B group vitamins1
 E55.9Vitamin D deficiency, unspecified2
 E66.00, E66.91Obesity2
 E83.38Other disorders of phosphorus metabolism and phosphatase1
 E87.6Hypokalemia2
Mental, Behavioral and Neurodevelopmental disorders3
 F32.8Other depressive episodes1
 F43.1Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)1
 F53.8Other postpartum mental and behavioral disorders, not elsewhere classified1
Diseases of the nervous system3
 G01Meningitis in bacterial diseases classified elsewhere2
 G57.2Lesion of femoral nerve1
Diseases of the circulatory system5
 I05.0, I07.1Heart valve diseases2
 I10.90Essential hypertension, unspecified: No indication of a hypertensive crisis1
 I48.9Unspecified atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter1
 I95.8Other hypotension1
Diseases of the respiratory system1
 J90Pleural effusion, not elsewhere classified1
Diseases of the digestive system5
 K21.9Gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis1
 K59.0Constipation1
 K64.3Fourth degree hemorrhoids1
 K66.1Hemoperitoneum1
 K66.8Other specified disorders of peritoneum1
Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue2
 L20.8Dermatitis2
Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue1
 M54.2Cervicalgia1
Diseases of the genitourinary system49
 N06.8Isolated proteinuria with other morphologic lesion1
 N13.6Pyonephrosis1
 N18.9Chronic kidney disease, unspecified1
 N39.0Urinary tract infection, site not specified1
 N73.6Female pelvic peritoneal adhesions1
 N80.3Endometriosis of pelvic peritoneum1
 N83.8Other noninflammatory disorders of ovary, fallopian tube and broad ligament1
 N87.0Mild cervical dysplasia1
 N90.7Vulvar cyst1
 N90.8Other specified noninflammatory disorders of vulva and perineum1
 N90.80Female genital mutilation, type unspecified3
 N90.81Female Genital Mutilation, Type 13
 N90.82Female Genital Mutilation, Type 25
 N90.83Female Genital Mutilation, Type 316
 N90.88Other specified non-inflammatory diseases of the vulva and perineum (FGM, Unspecified or other)6
 N92.0Excessive and frequent menstruation with regular cycle2
 N94.1Dyspareunia2
 N94.4Primary dysmenorrhea1
 N97.1Female infertility of tubal origin1
Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium281
 O08.1Delayed or excessive haemorrhage following abortion and ectopic and molar pregnancy1
 O09.1“Duration of pregnancy 5 to 13 completed weeks, 35 to 91 completed days”2
 O09.2“Duration of pregnancy 14 to 19 completed weeks, 92 to 133 completed days”4
 O09.3“Duration of pregnancy 20 to 25 completed weeks, 134 to 175 completed days”2
 O09.4“Duration of pregnancy 26 to 33 completed weeks, 176 to 231 completed days”6
 O09.5“Duration of pregnancy 34 to 36 completed weeks, 232 to 252 completed days”3
 O09.6“Duration of pregnancy 37 to 41 completed weeks, 253 to 287 completed days”72
 O09.7“Duration of pregnancy more than 41 completed weeks, more than 287 completed days”15
 O13Gestational [pregnancy-induced] hypertension without significant proteinuria1
 O14.9Unspecified pre-eclampsia1
 O16Unspecified maternal hypertension2
 O24.1, O24.3Pre-existing diabetes mellitus, in pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium4
 O24.4Gestational diabetes mellitus6
 O32.2Maternal care for transverse and oblique lie2
 O33.4Maternal care for disproportion of mixed maternal and fetal origin3
 O34.2Maternal care due to uterine scar from previous surgery4
 O34.6Maternal care for abnormality of vagina3
 O34.7Maternal care for abnormality of vulva and perineum3
 O36.0Maternal care for rhesus isoimmunization2
 O36.5Maternal care for known or suspected poor fetal growth1
 O36.6Maternal care for excessive fetal growth1
 O41.0Oligohydramnios2
 O42.0, O42.11Premature rupture of membranes, onset of labor within 24 hours of rupture3
 O43.20Placenta accreta2
 O44.11Complete placenta previa with hemorrhage, first trimester1
 O45.9Premature detachment of the placenta, unspecified1
 O48Post-term pregnancy10
 O60.1Preterm labor with preterm delivery1
 O60.3Preterm delivery without spontaneous labour5
 O61.0Failed medical induction of labor2
 O62.1Secondary uterine inertia  3
 O63.0Prolonged first stage (of labor)2
 O63.1Prolonged second stage (of labor)8
 O64.1Obstructed labour due to breech presentation  1
 O64.8Obstructed labor due to other malposition and malpresentation1
 O66.8Other specified obstructed labor2
 O68.0Labour and delivery complicated by fetal heart rate anomaly2
 O69.8Labour and delivery complicated by other cord complications  1
 O70.0First degree perineal laceration during delivery14
 O70.1Second degree perineal laceration during delivery7
 O71.3Obstetric laceration of cervix1
 O71.8Other specified obstetric trauma2
 O72.0, O72.1Third-stage haemorrhage9
 O72.3Postpartum coagulation defects1
 O73.0Retained placenta without haemorrhage1
 O73.1Retained portions of placenta and membranes, without haemorrhage1
 O75.7Vaginal delivery following previous caesarean section3
 O85Puerperal sepsis1
 O86.2Urinary tract infection following delivery1
 O87.2Haemorrhoids in the puerperium1
 O90.2Haematoma of obstetric wound1
 O98.3Other infections with a predominantly sexual mode of transmission complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium1
 O98.4Viral hepatitis complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium1
 O98.8, O98.9Maternal infectious and parasitic diseases complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium2
 O99.0Anaemia complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium24
 O99.2Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium7
 O99.3Mental disorders and diseases of the nervous system complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium2
 O99.6Diseases of the digestive system complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium2
 O99.7Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium2
 O99.8Other specified diseases and conditions complicating pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium12
Symptoms, signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified3
 R30.0Dysuria  1
 R74.8Abnormal levels of other serum enzymes1
 R82.3Abnormal findings on cytological and histological examination of urine1
Definition of HIV infection stages2
 U60.9, U61.9HIV classification2
External causes of morbidity2
 Y57.9Drug or medicament, unspecified1
 Y84.9Medical procedure, unspecified  1
Factors influencing health status and contact with health services290
 Z21Asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection status1
 Z22.3, Z22.8Carrier of other infectious diseases17
 Z25.8, Z27.3, Z27.4Need for immunization against specified viral diseases8
 Z30.4Surveillance of contraceptive drugs1
 Z34Supervision of normal pregnancy3
 Z35.2, Z35.4, Z35.8Supervision of high-risk pregnancy4
 Z37.0Single live birth91
 Z37.2Twins, both liveborn1
 Z59Problems related to housing and economic circumstances1
 Z64.8, Z65Problems related to certain psychosocial circumstances4
 Z86.1Personal history of infectious and parasitic diseases1
 Z86.7Personal history of diseases of the circulatory system2
 Z87.8Personal history of other specified conditions1
 Z91.70Personal history of female genital mutilation, type unspecified17
 Z91.71Personal history of female genital mutilation, type 122
 Z91.72Personal history of female genital mutilation, type 247
 Z91.73Personal history of female genital mutilation, type 363
 Z91.74Personal history of female genital mutilation, type 43
 Z92.1Personal history of long-term (current) use of anticoagulants2
 Z94.0Kidney transplant status1
Secondary diagnoses of inpatients with a condition/diagnosis of FGM/C presented by chapter of the ICD-10 Among diseases of the genitourinary system, coded diagnoses featured vulvar cyst (n = 1), urinary tract infection (n = 1) and mild cervical dysplasia (n = 1). Other secondary diagnoses related to infections were Streptococcus group B (n = 17), possibly describing a carrier-state in pregnant women, and carrier of other specified bacterial or infectious diseases (n = 17), and asymptomatic HIV status (n = 1). Eight women required immunization against viral diseases such as measles, diphtheria, and other viral diseases. Mental disorders and sexual health conditions were rarely coded as either primary or secondary conditions. “Problems related to psychosocial and/or economic circumstances” appeared five times as secondary diagnosis, and once as a primary diagnosis for a minor inpatient that was admitted in paediatrics. Out of the other four minors with a code of FGM/C (n = 5), another was admitted in paediatrics to undergo surgery for mitral valve stenosis, and the remaining two were admitted in gynaecology for surgical treatment of a vulvar cyst. The only minor inpatient with a primary diagnosis of FGM/C underwent defibulation and had secondary codes related to pregnancy. In total, there were 62 primary and secondary diagnoses of anaemia in 36 patients admitted in gynaecology or obstetrics. Among them, six had third-stage haemorrhage, six a first- or second-degree perineal tear, and nine underwent caesarean section 27 of 135 patients admitted in obstetrics (19%), had a primary or secondary diagnosis of anemia complicating pregnancy and childbirth. Several coded diagnoses in our sample might be possible long-term complications of FGM/C found in the FGM/C “tip-sheet” [25] (Table 5). The most frequently coded diagnoses (primary and secondary combined) were: perineal laceration during delivery (n = 50, 37.5% of FGM/C type III), prolonged second stage of labour (n = 21, 28.6% of FGM/C type III), postpartum haemorrhage (n = 12, 41.7% of FGM/C type III), and vulvar cysts (n = 5, 80% of FGM/C type III).
Table 5

Specific codes for long-term complications to FGM/C when FGM/C was coded as primary or secondary diagnosis

VariablesPrimary diagnosis of FGM/C (n = 22)Secondary diagnosis of FGM/C (n = 185)Percentage of FGM/C Type III
ICD-10 chapter and diagnosesICD-10 code
Certain infectious and parasitic diseases
 Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) diseaseB20-2400
Mental, Behavioral and Neurodevelopmental disorders
 Recurrent depressive disorderF32-330150% (n = 1)
 Generalized anxiety disorderF41.100
 Post-traumatic stress disorderF43.101100% (= 1)
 Sexual dysfunction, not due to an organic conditionF5200
Diseases of the genitourinary system
 CystitisN3000
 Urinary tract infection, site not specifiedN39.001100% (n = 1)
 Other inflammation of vagina and vulvaN7600
 Dysplasia of cervix uteriN87010% (n = 0)
 Other specified non-inflammatory disorders of vaginaN89.800
 Vulvar cystN90.74180% (n = 4)
 Non-inflammatory disorder of vulva and perineum, unspecifiedN90.900
 DyspareuniaN94.10250% (n = 1)
 Dysmenorrhea, unspecifiedN94.600
 Other specified conditions associated with female genital organs and menstrual cycleN94.800
Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium
 Prolonged second stage of labourO63.113828.6% (n = 6)
 First degree perineal laceration during deliveryO70.0131429.6% (n = 8)
 Second degree perineal laceration during deliveryO70.111744.4% (n = 8)
 Third degree perineal laceration during deliveryO70.210100% (n = 1)
 Fourth degree perineal laceration during deliveryO70.32050% (n = 1)
 Perineal laceration during delivery, unspecifiedO70.9200% (n = 0)
 Obstetric high vaginal lacerationO71.400
 Other specified obstetric traumaO71.80250% (n = 1)
 Obstetric trauma, unspecifiedO71.900
 Postpartum haemorrhageO72.0, O72.13941.7% (n = 5)
 Low forceps deliveryO81.000
 Other and unspecified forceps deliveryO81.300
 Vacuum extractor deliveryO81.400
 Single delivery by caesarean sectionO8200
 Disruption of perineal obstetric woundO90.100
Certain conditions originating in the perinatal period
 Birth traumaP10-1500
Specific codes for long-term complications to FGM/C when FGM/C was coded as primary or secondary diagnosis Medical or surgical interventions were carried out in 110 (56,5%) patients with FGM/C: 47 interventions in Geneva, 42 in Lausanne and 22 in Zürich (Table 6). The most frequent obstetrical intervention was caesarean section (n = 29, 48.3% of FGM/C type III). 14 patients had an episiotomy (35.7% of FGM/C type III) and 15 required unspecified manual assistance during delivery (20% of FGM/C type III). The most frequent intervention aimed at treating complications of FGM/C was surgery of the clitoris (n = 11, 36.4% of FGM/C type III). In Geneva, four inpatients underwent defibulation.
Table 6

Main intervention reported among patients with FGM/C according to hospital

VariablesGeneva(n = 111)Lausanne(n = 42)Zürich(n = 22)Percentage of FGM/C Type III
Obstetrical interventions
 Cerclage of the cervix100100% (n = 1)
 Pharmaceutical induction of labour010100% (n = 1)
 Manual assistance during delivery:

  With episiotomy and instrumentation

  With episiotomy only

  Unspecified

0

0

0

5

1

13

2

6

2

42.9% (n = 3)

28.5% (n = 2)

20% (n = 3)

 Caesarean section208148.3% (n = 14)
 Perineal tear repair26037.5% (n = 3
 Curettage for retained placenta1100% (n = 0)
Gynaecological interventions
 Ovarian cyst excision100100% (n = 1)
 Myomectomy100100% (n = 1)
 Salpingectomy10150% (n = 1)
Interventions related to FGM/C
 Clitoral surgery83036.4% (n = 4)
 Vulvar cyst excision200100% (n = 2)
 Vulvar abscess incision and drainage1000% (n = 0)
 Defibulation400100% (n = 4)
Interventions possibly related to FGM/C
 Hymenectomy001100% (n = 1)
 Repair of vulva and perineum005100% (n = 5)
 Incision of vulva and perineum00475% (n = 3)
Other interventions
 Femoral fracture repair010
 Hematopoietic stem cell transplant010
 Lymph node biopsy010
 Mitral valvuloplasty100
 Retrograde ureteropyelography100
 Ureteral pigtail placement100
 Transvaginal suspension for urinary incontinence010
 Trunk abscess incision and drainage100
Main intervention reported among patients with FGM/C according to hospital With episiotomy and instrumentation With episiotomy only Unspecified 0 0 0 5 1 13 2 6 2 42.9% (n = 3) 28.5% (n = 2) 20% (n = 3)

Discussion

Main findings

In four Swiss university hospitals, 207 inpatients had a primary (n = 22, 10.6%) or secondary (n = 185, 89.4%) diagnosis of FGM/C coded at admission between 2016 and 2018 [26]. As discussed in our related paper on Swiss university hospitals’ capacities of coding FGM/C, this was much less than expected when compared with the number of inpatients who could have undergone FGM/C based on their nationality and indirect estimates (n = 4947) [26]. Either fewer women than expected have undergone FGM/C, or healthcare professionals did not identify and/or record it, or professional coders failed to code FGM/C, resulting in suboptimal coding. Nearly all patients with a coded condition/diagnosis of FGM/C were admitted to an obstetrics and/or gynaecology division, and most of their primary and secondary diagnoses were related to pregnancy and delivery.

Limitations and strengths

Limitations included the absence of participation from Basel; of interventions’ data from Bern; the exclusion of outpatients, which would inform on the health conditions treated and interventions performed (e.g. defibulation) in ambulatory care; and of non-university hospitals, where most deliveries of women in the cantons of Bern and Zürich occur (Tables 7, 8) [27-34]. Future studies could assess the prevalence of FGM/C and associated health outcomes in all hospitals, and study regional variations, such as in areas near asylum centres. Application of our method is mostly limited by undercoding of FGM/C, which most likely results from insufficient training about FGM/C [26]. Besides gynaecology and obstetrics, health professionals working in paediatrics, travel medicine, infectious diseases, primary care, and migrant health programmes, could benefit from such training.
Table 7

Number of deliveries between 2016 and 2018 according to center [27−33]

201620172018
Geneva (HUG)410141824213
Vaud (CHUV)323032273375
Bern (Inselspital)181018272004
Zürich (USZ)296029712969
Table 8

Living births according to canton and nationality category of the mother [34]

201620172018
TotalSwissaForeignersbTotalSwissForeignersTotalSwissForeigners
Geneva (Geneva)536122533108544123503091535323313022
Vaud (Lausanne)87304401432986864350433610,14558794266
Bern (Bern)10,1137038307510,1417115302610,14571892956
Zürich (Zürich)17,0519602744917,0709490758016,91994027517

aInfants born to women with a Swiss nationality

bInfants born to women without a Swiss nationality

Number of deliveries between 2016 and 2018 according to center [27−33] Living births according to canton and nationality category of the mother [34] aInfants born to women with a Swiss nationality bInfants born to women without a Swiss nationality This study’s main strength was the use of ICD-10 codes to identify health complications of FGM/C, an affordable and objective method, easily reproducible over time, and at national and international level, with good comparability of data. Impact of training, specific care, as well as financial costs resulting from health complications of FGM/C might also be assessed using ICD codes. They could be used in both diaspora and FGM/C high prevalence countries, as an alternative to the FGM/C cost calculator developed by WHO only for high prevalence countries [35].

Interpretation

Women with FGM/C might consult, be admitted or referred more frequently when pregnant, resulting in better FGM/C coding in obstetrics divisions. Furthermore, Swiss basic health insurance covers most pregnancy-related costs, facilitating access to healthcare [36]. Obstetricians and gynaecologists routinely perform genital examinations and are more likely trained to diagnose FGM/C [26]. FGM/C is also more likely to be recorded in obstetrics charts, because it can influence childbirth [1]. For instance, UK’s report on FGM/C prevalence in the National Health System (NHS) showed that 1630 women and girls had a consultation where FGM/C was recorded between October and December 2020, with 74.9% of attendances in midwifery or obstetrical units [37]. Antenatal consultations provide major opportunities to identify and care for individuals with FGM/C who might not seek or receive medical attention otherwise [1, 38]. Meta-analyses including studies from FGM/C practicing countries, and diaspora countries showed that FGM/C was significantly associated with prolonged labour, perineal tears, episiotomy, and non-significantly associated with caesarean section [19, 20]. Obstetric outcomes coded in our study were mainly prolonged second stage of labour (n = 21) and perineal lacerations (n = 50) especially of first- or second-degree (90%). 29 inpatients required a caesarean section, 14 episiotomy, and 15 assistance during delivery. We were not able to calculate the prevalence of complications from FGM/C for several reasons. Our data was fully anonymized, and thus some records could potentially be returning patients, so we cannot know the exact denominator of pregnant women in our sample. Second, the study was cross-sectional, and some pregnant women might have delivered after the end of the study, leaving their birth outcomes unknown. Among 85,990 deliveries in 2017 in Swiss medical institutions, 54.7% of women had a perineal tear mainly of first- or second-degree (94.7%); 32.3% a caesarean section; 11.1% an assisted delivery, and 17% an episiotomy [39]. Considering that at least 135 women were pregnant (135 inpatients admitted in obstetrics, and 30 in gynaecology and/or obstetrics), and subject to the limitations stated above, our data do not suggest high rates of obstetric complications. Studies about obstetric complications of FGM/C sometimes show diverging results. A prospective study conducted in six African countries found a significant association between obstetric complications and FGM/C, especially type III [40], whereas retrospective studies from high-income countries such as Sweden, the UK, and Switzerland showed similar obstetric outcomes among women with and without FGM/C [41-43]. FGM/C has been significantly associated with higher rates of caesarean sections in studies conducted in both practicing and diaspora countries [40, 44, 45], and meta-analyses show a non-significant trend towards higher rates [19, 20]. Future studies could assess if training of health professionals and access to interpreters could improve obstetric outcomes of individuals with FGM/C. Indeed, health professionals unfamiliar with FGM/C might perform caesarean sections for inappropriate reasons, especially in cases of infibulation [46]. Moreover, migrant women in high-income countries often have higher rates of caesarean sections than non-migrants [47]. Communication barriers, economic difficulties, and exposure to violence can result in poor maternal health and/or care quality for some migrants regardless of FGM/C [48-52]. Only five minor inpatients had an FGM/C code. Outpatient clinics may attend more children with FGM/C than hospitals, but paediatricians may also not know when and how to discuss FGM/C with parents and their children, not recognize it if they perform a genital examination, or simply not record it [53-55]. Alternatively, they could be second-generation migrants and beyond, and therefore less exposed to the practice. A UK study showed that among 55 children with FGM/C referred to specialized clinics, 21% suffered from mental health symptoms such as anxiety, sleep and behaviour disorders, and 13% from physical symptoms such as problems with micturition, menstruation and genital pain [14]. Except one post-traumatic stress disorder, psychological symptoms were not coded in our minor population, and rarely among adults. Swiss university hospitals’ health professionals may lack time or training on how to detect and treat such symptoms and other FGM/C complications. Or, they may identify and manage psychological complications, without however identifying or documenting the FGM/C as an associated condition [54-60]. Coding of surgical interventions was incomplete. Perineal tears were more coded (n = 50) than perineal tears repairs (n = 8). Other repairs were either not coded, or coded as secondary interventions, which were not provided. Because no CHOP codes exist for defibulation and clitoral reconstruction, we had to hypothesize that codes such as repair (n = 5), or incision (n = 4) of vulva and perineum had been used to indicate these surgeries. Geneva provided the interventions’ names instead of codes, and reported 8 clitoral surgeries and 4 defibulations among inpatients, and additionally reported 12 clitoral surgeries, 25 defibulations and 8 other surgeries for scar complications of FGM/C in outpatient care. Some Swiss insurance companies have tried to refuse to reimburse these surgeries. Specific CHOP codes would facilitate medical coding and reimbursement. Sensitisation and training of healthcare professionals and professional coders on FGM/C could improve identification, documentation and coding of FGM/C and its complications in Swiss university hospitals; inform and improve the quality of future policies, services and interventions. Future prospective and case–control studies could assess coding of FGM/C and associated health outcomes according to training and specialised care resources.

Conclusion

Most of the 207 women and girls admitted to Swiss university hospitals between 2016 and 2018 with a primary or secondary diagnosis of FGM/C were admitted to obstetrics divisions. Pregnancy and delivery seem to be key moments to care for and counsel a population that might not consult or be identified otherwise. FGM/C coding capacities in Swiss university hospitals are low, and some complications of FGM/C are probably not diagnosed, or diagnosed alone, without FGM/C.
  39 in total

1.  Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment of Female Genital Mutilation or Cutting in Girls.

Authors:  Janine Young; Nawal M Nour; Robert C Macauley; Sandeep K Narang; Crista Johnson-Agbakwu
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Coding female genital mutilation/cutting and its complications using the International Classification of Diseases: a commentary.

Authors:  S Cottler-Casanova; M Horowicz; S Gieszl; C Johnson-Agbakwu; J Abdulcadir
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting-Pediatric Physician Knowledge, Training, and General Practice Approach.

Authors:  Janine Young; Kristine Knuti Rodrigues; Basel Imam; Crista Johnson-Agbakwu
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2020-08

4.  Qualitative study of pregnancy and childbirth experiences in Somalian women resident in Sweden.

Authors:  B Essén; S Johnsdotter; B Hovelius; S Gudmundsson; N O Sjöberg; J Friedman; P O Ostergren
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Effects of female genital mutilation on birth outcomes in Switzerland.

Authors:  S Wuest; L Raio; D Wyssmueller; M D Mueller; W Stadlmayr; D V Surbek; A Kuhn
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Is there an association between female circumcision and perinatal death?

Authors:  Birgitta Essen; Birgit Bodker; N-O Sjoberg; Saemundur Gudmundsson; P-O Ostergren; Jens Langhoff-Roos
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  United States' Obstetrician/Gynecologists' Readiness to Care for Women Affected by Female Genital Cutting.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fay; Carrie M Snead; Kaitlin Huennekens; Catherine A O'Brian; Laura Tom; Melissa A Simon
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Estimating the indirect prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting in Switzerland.

Authors:  S Cottler-Casanova; J Abdulcadir
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Sexual norms and the intention to use healthcare services related to female genital cutting: A qualitative study among Somali and Sudanese women in Norway.

Authors:  Mai Mahgoub Ziyada; Inger-Lise Lien; R Elise B Johansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) coding capacities in Swiss university hospitals using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD).

Authors:  S Cottler-Casanova; M Horowicz; A Gayet-Ageron; J Abdulcadir
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  1 in total

1.  Somalian women with female genital mutilation had increased risk of female sexual dysfunction: a cross-sectional observational study.

Authors:  Abdikarim Hussein Mohamed; Rahma Yusuf Haji Mohamud; Hussein Ali Mohamud; Aşır Eraslan; Metin Gur; Abdikarim Ali Omar; Sertac Cimen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.