Literature DB >> 27652839

Estimates of first-generation women and girls with female genital mutilation in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland.

Luk Van Baelen1, Livia Ortensi2, Els Leye1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation (FGM) is the practice of partial or total removal of female genitalia for non-medical reasons. The procedure has no known health benefits but can cause serious immediate and long-term obstetric, gynaecological and sexual health problems. Health workers in Europe are often unaware of the consequences of FGM and lack the knowledge to treat women adequately.
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to estimate the number of first-generation girls and women in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland who have undergone FGM. Before migration from FGM-practicing countries began, FGM was an unknown phenomenon in Europe.
METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from the 2011 EU census and extrapolation from age-specific FGM prevalence rates in the immigrants' home countries to these data were used to provide our estimates. Estimates based on census and other demographic data were compared to our results for Belgium.
RESULTS: In 2011 over half a million first-generation women and girls in the EU, Norway and Switzerland had undergone FGM before immigration. One in two was living in the UK or France, one in two was born in East-Africa.
CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, scientific evidence gives a reliable estimate of the number of first-generation women and girls in Europe coming from countries where FGM is practiced. The use of census data proves reliable for policy makers to guide their actions, e.g., regarding training needs for health workers who might be confronted with women who have undergone FGM, or the need for reconstructive surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Europe; Female genital mutilation; female genital cutting; migrant health; prevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27652839     DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2016.1234597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1362-5187            Impact factor:   1.848


  19 in total

1.  Estimating the indirect prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting in Switzerland.

Authors:  S Cottler-Casanova; J Abdulcadir
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Female genital mutilation/cutting in Italy: an enhanced estimation for first generation migrant women based on 2016 survey data.

Authors:  Livia Elisa Ortensi; Patrizia Farina; Els Leye
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  The risk of female genital cutting in Europe: Comparing immigrant attitudes toward uncut girls with attitudes in a practicing country.

Authors:  Sonja Vogt; Charles Efferson; Ernst Fehr
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2017-12

4.  Mapping the lack of public initiative against female genital mutilation in Denmark.

Authors:  Gro Møller Christoffersen; Peter James Bruhn; Rosanna de Neergaard; Susanne Engel; Vibeke Naeser
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 5.  Towards a better estimation of prevalence of female genital mutilation in the European Union: a situation analysis.

Authors:  L De Schrijver; L Van Baelen; N Van Eekert; E Leye
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.223

6.  Seeking culturally safe care: a qualitative systematic review of the healthcare experiences of women and girls who have undergone female genital mutilation/cutting.

Authors:  Catrin Evans; Ritah Tweheyo; Julie McGarry; Jeanette Eldridge; Juliet Albert; Valentine Nkoyo; Gina Marie Awoko Higginbottom
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  The benefits and disappointments following clitoral reconstruction after female genital cutting: A qualitative interview study from Sweden.

Authors:  Malin Jordal; Hannes Sigurjonsson; Gabriele Griffin; Anna Wahlberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) coding capacities in Swiss university hospitals using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD).

Authors:  S Cottler-Casanova; M Horowicz; A Gayet-Ageron; J Abdulcadir
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Health sector involvement in the management of female genital mutilation/cutting in 30 countries.

Authors:  R Elise B Johansen; Mai Mahgoub Ziyada; Bettina Shell-Duncan; Adriana Marcusàn Kaplan; Els Leye
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  What are the experiences of seeking, receiving and providing FGM-related healthcare? Perspectives of health professionals and women/girls who have undergone FGM: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative evidence.

Authors:  Catrin Evans; Ritah Tweheyo; Julie McGarry; Jeanette Eldridge; Carol McCormick; Valentine Nkoyo; Gina Marie Awoko Higginbottom
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.