| Literature DB >> 35501687 |
Song Zhao1, Dan Liu2, Minzhuang Liu3, Xiaoyuan Luo4, Yi Yuan4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transcranial magneto-acoustical stimulation (TMAS) is a noninvasive technique that has advantages in spatial resolution and penetration depth. It changes the firing properties of neurons through the current generated by focused ultrasound and a static magnetic field. Spike-frequency adaptation is an important dynamic characteristic of neural information processing.Entities:
Keywords: Ermentrout model; Spike-frequency adaptation; TMAS
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35501687 PMCID: PMC9063290 DOI: 10.1186/s12868-022-00709-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurosci ISSN: 1471-2202 Impact factor: 3.288
Fig. 1a Schematic of the TMAS principle; b Circuit diagram of the Ermentrout model under an electric current ()
Fixed parameters for the electric current generated by TMAS
| 0.5 Siemens/m | 10–95% | ||
| 0.5–8 T | 1–100 Hz | ||
| 200–700 kHz | 1120 kg/m3 | ||
| 0.2–4 W/cm2 | 1540 m/s |
Fixed parameters for the Ermentrout model
| 1.0 | + 50 mV | ||
| 100 mS/cm | − 80 mV | ||
| 80 mS/cm | − 67 mV | ||
| 0.1 mS/cm | + 120 mV | ||
| 1 mS/cm | 0 mS/cm | ||
| 16 mS/cm | 100 ms |
Fig. 2The membrane potential curves and spike-frequency curves under different magnetic flux densities
Spike frequencies and settling time with different magnetic flux densities
| Magnetic flux density (T) | Onset spike frequency (Hz) | Steady-state spike freauency (Hz) | Settling time (ms) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 155.9 | 35.3 | 65 |
| 1.0 | 248.0 | 65.7 | 103 |
| 2.0 | 353.4 | 122.8 | 123 |
| 3.0 | 418.1 | 175.2 | 201 |
Fig. 3The membrane potential curves and spike-frequency curves with different ultrasonic intensities
Spike frequencies and settling time with different ultrasound intensities
| Ultrasound intensity (W/cm2) | Onset spike frequency (Hz) | Steady-state spike freauency (Hz) | Settling time (ms) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 219.3 | 54.7 | 127 |
| 1.0 | 269.1 | 74.9 | 148 |
| 2.0 | 321.8 | 102.4 | 198 |
| 3.0 | 353.4 | 122.8 | 218 |
Fig. 4The membrane potential curves and spike-frequency curves under different ultrasound fundamental frequencies
Fig. 5The membrane potential curves and spike-frequency curves with different modulation frequencies
Spike frequencies and settling time with different modulation frequencies
| Modulation frequency (Hz) | Firing pattern | Onset spike freauency (Hz) | Steady-state spike freauency (Hz) | Settling time (ms) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | Bursting | 353.4 | 32.6 | |
| 50 | Bursting | 353.4 | 66.7 | |
| 80 | Spiking | 353.4 | 80.0 | 66 |
| 100 | Spiking | 353.4 | 100 | 31 |
Fig. 6The membrane potential curves and spike-frequency curves under different duty cycles
Spike frequencies and settling time with different duty cycles
| Duty cycle (%) | Firing pattern | Onset spike freauency (Hz) | Minimal spike freauency (Hz) | Settling time (ms) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bursting | 353.4 | 241.7 | ||
| Bursting | 353.4 | 185.6 | ||
| Bursting | 353.4 | 139.0 | ||
| Bursting | 353.4 | 132.2 | 179 |
Fig. 7The adapted onset spike-frequency curves with different initial stimulus inputs