Literature DB >> 17534706

Spike-frequency adaptation generates intensity invariance in a primary auditory interneuron.

Jan Benda1, R Matthias Hennig.   

Abstract

Adaptation of the spike-frequency response to constant stimulation, as observed on various timescales in many neurons, reflects high-pass filter properties of a neuron's transfer function. Adaptation in general, however, is not sufficient to make a neuron's response independent of the mean intensity of a sensory stimulus, since low frequency components of the stimulus are still transmitted, although with reduced gain. We here show, based on an analytically tractable model, that the response of a neuron is intensity invariant, if the fully adapted steady-state spike-frequency response to constant stimuli is independent of stimulus intensity. Electrophysiological recordings from the AN1, a primary auditory interneuron of crickets, show that for intensities above 60 dB SPL (sound pressure level) the AN1 adapted with a time-constant of approximately 40 ms to a steady-state firing rate of approximately 100 Hz. Using identical random amplitude-modulation stimuli we verified that the AN1's spike-frequency response is indeed invariant to the stimulus' mean intensity above 60 dB SPL. The transfer function of the AN1 is a band pass, resulting from a high-pass filter (cutoff frequency at 4 Hz) due to adaptation and a low-pass filter (100 Hz) determined by the steady-state spike frequency. Thus, fast spike-frequency adaptation can generate intensity invariance already at the first level of neural processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17534706     DOI: 10.1007/s10827-007-0044-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  35 in total

1.  Slow Na+ inactivation and variance adaptation in salamander retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Kerry J Kim; Fred Rieke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Primary auditory cortex of cats: feature detection or something else?

Authors:  Israel Nelken; Alon Fishbach; Liora Las; Nachum Ulanovsky; Dina Farkas
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Interaural level difference processing in the lateral superior olive and the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Thomas J Park; Achim Klug; Michael Holinstat; Benedikt Grothe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Spike-frequency adaptation separates transient communication signals from background oscillations.

Authors:  Jan Benda; André Longtin; Len Maler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Effect of the temporal pattern of contralateral inhibition on sound localization cues.

Authors:  Gary Marsat; Gerald S Pollack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  In vivo Ca2+ dynamics in a cricket auditory neuron: an example of chemical computation.

Authors:  E C Sobel; D W Tank
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-02-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A low-dimensional, time-resolved and adapting model neuron.

Authors:  B Cartling
Journal:  Int J Neural Syst       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.866

8.  Selective attention in an insect auditory neuron.

Authors:  G S Pollack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The time course of sensory adaptation in the cockroach tactile spine.

Authors:  A S French; P H Torkkeli
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1994-08-29       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 10.  The role of sensory adaptation in the retina.

Authors:  S B Laughlin
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  26 in total

1.  Temporal resolution for calling song signals by female crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus.

Authors:  E Schneider; R M Hennig
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Sub- and suprathreshold adaptation currents have opposite effects on frequency tuning.

Authors:  Tara Deemyad; Jens Kroeger; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Spike timing precision changes with spike rate adaptation in the owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  Clifford H Keller; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Firing-rate resonances in the peripheral auditory system of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus.

Authors:  Florian Rau; Jan Clemens; Victor Naumov; R Matthias Hennig; Susanne Schreiber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Influence of sound pressure level on the processing of amplitude modulations by auditory neurons of the locust.

Authors:  Gerroth Weschke; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Weakly electric fish display behavioral responses to envelopes naturally occurring during movement: implications for neural processing.

Authors:  Michael G Metzen; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Walking in Fourier's space: algorithms for the computation of periodicities in song patterns by the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus.

Authors:  R Matthias Hennig
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Intensity invariance properties of auditory neurons compared to the statistics of relevant natural signals in grasshoppers.

Authors:  Jan Clemens; Gerroth Weschke; Astrid Vogel; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 9.  Computational themes of peripheral processing in the auditory pathway of insects.

Authors:  K Jannis Hildebrandt; Jan Benda; R Matthias Hennig
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Effects of spike-triggered negative feedback on receptive-field properties.

Authors:  Eugenio Urdapilleta; Inés Samengo
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 1.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.