Yeong Hoon Kim1, Hye-Jin Ahn2, Dongjae Kim3, Ho-Woo Nam2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea. 2. Department of Parasitology, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea. 3. Department of Biomedicine Health Science, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.
Abstract
This study was done to provide an overview of the latest trichomoniasis status in Korea by finding disease clusters and analyzing temporal trends during 2012-2020. Data were obtained from the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA) of Korea. SaTScan and Joinpoint programs were used for statistical analyses. Gyeonggi-do had the highest average population and highest number of cases. The high incidence of T. vaginalis infections were observed among women aged 40-49 and 30-39 years (33,830/year and 33,179/year, respectively). Similarly, the 40-49 and 30-39 age group in men showed the highest average cases (1,319/year and 1,282/year, respectively). Jeollabuk-do was the most likely cluster, followed by Busan/Gyeongsangnam-do/Ulsan/Daegu and Jeju-do and Gwangju. Urban and rural differences were prominent. Trichomoniasis has decreased significantly in most clusters, except for Incheon. Trichomoniasis was decreasing in women recently after peaking around 2014. Men showed different trends according to age. Trichomoniasis was increasing in the 10-39 age groups, but decreasing in the 40-59 age groups. This study might provide an analytic basis for future health measures, policy-makers, and health authorities in developing effective system for prevention of trichomoniasis.
This study was done to provide an overview of the latest trichomoniasis status in Korea by finding disease clusters and analyzing temporal trends during 2012-2020. Data were obtained from the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA) of Korea. SaTScan and Joinpoint programs were used for statistical analyses. Gyeonggi-do had the highest average population and highest number of cases. The high incidence of T. vaginalis infections were observed among women aged 40-49 and 30-39 years (33,830/year and 33,179/year, respectively). Similarly, the 40-49 and 30-39 age group in men showed the highest average cases (1,319/year and 1,282/year, respectively). Jeollabuk-do was the most likely cluster, followed by Busan/Gyeongsangnam-do/Ulsan/Daegu and Jeju-do and Gwangju. Urban and rural differences were prominent. Trichomoniasis has decreased significantly in most clusters, except for Incheon. Trichomoniasis was decreasing in women recently after peaking around 2014. Men showed different trends according to age. Trichomoniasis was increasing in the 10-39 age groups, but decreasing in the 40-59 age groups. This study might provide an analytic basis for future health measures, policy-makers, and health authorities in developing effective system for prevention of trichomoniasis.
Trichomoniasis is one of the most common sexually transmitted infection (STI) globally. The responsible pathogen, Trichomonas vaginalis, is a flagellate protozoan that infects the human vagina, prostate gland, and urethra [1]. The majority of women and men with trichomoniasis are asymptomatic [2,3], but it may cause vaginitis and cervicitis in women, and serious complications including infertility, preterm birth, and pelvic inflammatory disease [4,5]. Although the incidence is lower in men, it may cause nongonococcal urethritis, prostatitis, epididymitis, and infertility [6,7]. Cervical neoplasia [8] and prostate cancer are known to be associated with trichomoniasis [9]. It is also a high-risk factor for HIV and other STIs, and thus may pose a significant public health problem [10]. According to the WHO, 170 million people are believed to be infected annually, and it is more prevalent than Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and syphilis combined. Domestically, 10.4% of women complaining of vaginal symptoms and signs have been reported to be infected in Korea [11].Korea has a complete full health-coverage of its population, and the clinical data from the Healthcare Bigdata Hub provided by the Health Insurance Review&Assessment Service (HIRA) of Korea has been used in this study, thereby representing the whole Korean population. Our study shows the results of a 9 year-survey.We discuss the spatial infection clusters and infection trend present during this temporal window. SaTScan and Joinpoint programs were used to locate and statistically test these clusters and determine the most recent trend of trichomoniasis in Korea.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ethics statement
This study was performed under the regulation of the IRB Committee of The Catholic University of Korea (MIRB-2020 1127-002). This research adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Data Source and Definition
The nationwide trichomoniasis cases for 9 years (2012–2020) from the 17 administrative districts in Korea and age-period cohorts (5-year interval) according to sex were obtained from the HIRA of Korea. (https://opendata.hira.or.kr/home.do. [cited 2020 October]) The HIRA collects all relevant information from the records of all the patients at almost all hospitals and clinics in Korea, and the accuracy and reliability of its data have been systemically validated [12].The population data of 17 administrative divisions 2012–2020 were obtained from the Korean Statistical Information Service (https://kosis.kr/index/index.do [cited 2021 October]). The geographical locations of the cases were set to the latitude and longitude of administrative center as the search point since the case data were compiled by administrative district unit. The population and number of cases were summed up as accumulated counts and numbers for the full period to evaluate overall trichomoniasis. Case numbers were adjusted for the particular district’s population (cases/1,000,000) to facilitate comparison between the different districts (Table 1).
Table 1
Trichomoniasis cases and adjusted infection rate for 2012–2020 according to administrative districts
Average population
Cases
Total
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Average
Seoul (SE)
9,935,068
260,892
31,920
39,794
39,697
28,798
28,665
25,362
25,716
22,619
18,321
28,988
Busan (BU)
3,479,524
101,688
10,153
11,995
13,380
14,744
15,865
11,411
11,132
7,139
5,869
11,299
Incheon (IN)
2,922,033
60,760
5,638
6,364
6,246
6,963
7,170
7,928
7,933
8,145
4,373
6,751
Daegu (DG)
2,474,029
80,356
9,022
9,079
10,898
11,191
9,804
9,702
7,716
6,511
6,433
8,928
Gwangju (GW)
1,465,451
37,281
4,126
5,447
6,561
5,694
4,704
2,962
2,812
2,768
2,207
4,142
Daejeon (DJ)
1,505,918
22,801
2,047
3,172
3,444
3,295
3,703
2,783
2,016
1,591
750
2,533
Ulsan (UL)
1,157,860
31,765
3,209
2,946
3,341
4,070
4,707
3,791
3,464
3,549
2,688
3,529
Gyeonggi-do (GY)
12,726,986
270,493
24,131
33,382
35,730
35,062
32,439
32,086
29,050
26,477
22,136
30,055
Gangwon-do (GA)
1,544,798
18,998
2,461
2,553
2,494
2,022
2,234
2,001
2,287
1,868
1,078
2,111
Chungcheongbuk-do (CB)
1,587,489
30,868
3,809
3,966
4,149
4,143
4,874
3,212
2,528
2,440
1,747
3,430
Chungcheongnam-do (CN)
2,088,983
35,073
3,223
5,004
5,240
3,387
3,943
3,636
3,907
3,293
3,440
3,897
Jeollabuk-do (JB)
1,851,870
70,039
6,963
8,283
9,285
9,256
8,637
7,411
7,096
7,523
5,585
7,782
Jeollanam-do (JN)
1,892,796
19,681
2,764
2,695
2,316
1,761
2,634
2,198
1,828
1,999
1,486
2,187
Gyeongsangbuk-do (GB)
2,686,178
37,186
3,893
4,726
6,524
5,452
4,874
4,750
3,043
2,250
1,674
4,132
Gyeongsangnam-do (GN)
3,355,458
73,496
7,654
8,636
9,168
9,473
11,371
8,868
8,423
5,615
4,288
8,166
Jeju-do (JE)
635,639
26,737
2,948
3,466
3,262
2,998
2,921
2,736
2,916
2,881
2,609
2,971
Sejong (SJ)
237,329
391
14
25
13
18
69
42
69
63
78
43
Total
51,547,410
1,178,505
123,735
151,227
161,384
148,012
148,252
130,624
121,716
106,584
84,671
130,689
Adjusted cases[a]
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Average
Seoul (SE)
3,131
3,923
3,929
2,873
2,887
2,573
2,633
2,325
1,895
2,908
Busan (BU)
2,869
3,400
3,802
4,196
4,535
3,288
3,235
2,091
1,730
3,238
Incheon (IN)
3,172
3,153
3,755
3,825
3,331
3,290
2,611
2,202
2,186
3,058
Daegu (DG)
2,250
2,544
2,505
2,799
2,886
3,203
3,222
3,341
1,808
2,729
Gwangju (GW)
2,808
3,698
4,445
3,868
3,202
2,024
1,927
1,900
1,522
2,822
Daejeon (DJ)
1,343
2,069
2,248
2,170
2,445
1,853
1,353
1,079
512
1,675
Ulsan (UL)
2,797
2,547
2,864
3,468
4,015
3,254
2,998
3,091
2,366
3,045
Gyeonggi-do (GY)
1,995
2,728
2,891
2,800
2,551
2,492
2,221
2,000
1,649
2,370
Gangwon-do (GA)
1,599
1,655
1,615
1,305
1,441
1,291
1,482
1,212
699
1,367
Chungcheongbuk-do (CB)
2,433
2,522
2,628
2,616
3,062
2,015
1,581
1,525
1,091
2,164
Chungcheongnam-do (CN)
1,589
2,444
2,541
1,630
1,881
1,718
1,837
1,551
1,622
1,868
Jeollabuk-do (JB)
3,717
4,422
4,961
4,950
4,632
3,996
3,863
4,136
3,096
4,197
Jeollanam-do (JN)
1,447
1,413
1,215
922
1,383
1,159
971
1,070
803
1,154
Gyeongsangbuk-do (GB)
1,443
1,751
2,416
2,017
1,805
1,765
1,137
844
634
1,535
Gyeongsangnam-do (GN)
2,306
2,590
2,737
2,815
3,370
2,623
2,496
1,670
1,284
2,432
Jeju-do (JE)
5,050
5,837
5,371
4,801
4,553
4,164
4,371
4,294
3,867
4,701
Sejong (SJ)
124
205
83
85
284
150
220
185
219
173
Total
2,429
2,957
3,144
2,872
2,868
2,523
2,349
2,056
1,634
2,537
Adjusted infection rate (cases/1,000,000).
The cases were stratified into age groups, under 0–9, 10–19, 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, and 80 years and over, according to sex (Table 2). The total study period was evaluated initially, and it was further divided into tertiles (2012–2014, 2015–2017, 2018–2020) to evaluate the trend more specifically.
Table 2
Trichomoniasis and adjusted infection rate for 2012–2020 according to sex and age
Age group
Cases
Average
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Female
0–9
94
104
108
71
102
83
102
69
45
86
10–19
2,923
3,407
3,611
3,063
3,135
2,900
2,722
2,250
1,806
2,869
20–29
25,893
32,105
33,717
29,219
30,250
26,821
25,890
21,939
17,861
27,077
30–39
32,159
39,862
43,634
39,300
38,680
32,364
29,251
24,647
18,712
33,179
40–49
34,625
40,986
43,639
40,146
38,377
33,067
29,426
25,218
18,987
33,830
50–59
18,847
24,284
25,761
24,898
24,551
22,390
21,341
19,282
15,550
21,878
60–69
3,768
5,038
5,753
5,975
6,705
6,562
6,508
6,314
5,557
5,798
70–79
1,000
1,480
1,744
1,762
1,845
1,702
1,737
1,649
1,485
1,600
≥80
143
248
288
287
333
307
340
354
323
291
Male
0–9
4
5
3
7
2
5
2
0
1
3
10–19
40
29
33
52
58
47
42
46
64
46
20–29
540
476
426
553
730
807
932
1,113
1,093
741
30–39
1,159
1,106
1,081
1,052
1,472
1,448
1,371
1,527
1,325
1,282
40–49
1,665
1,476
1,278
1,178
1,396
1,342
1,248
1,236
1,049
1,319
50–59
1,258
1,182
982
932
1,033
1,006
990
1,049
815
1,027
60–69
252
246
183
248
290
314
321
359
345
284
70–79
51
46
34
55
58
69
62
64
65
56
≥80
7
6
7
6
6
11
7
8
19
9
Age group
Adjusted cases[a]
Average
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Female
0–9
42
46
48
32
46
38
49
34
23
40
10–19
956
1,150
1,263
1,119
1,192
1,139
1,102
941
780
1,072
20–29
8,175
10,233
10,699
9,214
9,458
8,322
8,010
6,798
5,525
8,493
30–39
8,029
10,157
11,404
10,476
10,505
9,001
8,248
7,165
5,617
8,956
40–49
8,004
9,359
9,950
9,222
8,850
7,715
7,053
6,118
4,654
7,881
50–59
4,862
6,095
6,317
6,031
5,895
5,320
4,990
4,483
3,631
5,292
60–69
1,678
2,179
2,375
2,288
2,426
2,264
2,139
1,958
1,613
2,102
70–79
580
835
966
973
1,007
897
892
829
730
857
≥80
182
296
319
295
320
277
288
280
242
278
Male
0–9
2
2
1
3
1
2
1
0
0
1
10–19
12
9
11
17
20
17
16
18
26
16
20–29
156
138
122
157
205
225
259
311
306
209
30–39
278
270
271
268
382
384
368
421
374
335
40–49
369
325
281
261
313
304
289
290
249
298
50–59
321
292
237
222
242
235
228
240
187
245
60–69
121
114
80
101
111
114
110
116
105
108
70–79
41
35
25
40
41
47
40
40
39
39
≥80
22
17
18
14
13
21
12
13
28
17
Adjusted infection rate (cases/1,000,000).
Spatiotemporal analyses of clusters and trend
SaTScan (v10.0) [13] was used to detect clusters and evaluate their significance through simulation. The discrete Poisson model was used since the case data were linked to their background population at risk. Spatial scan analysis detects clusters with maximum likelihood ratio by creating a circular window on a map and scanning the study area by varying the window size.The window size determines a percentage of the population at risk within its boundaries [14]. Spatial scan statistic works best for detecting spatial clusters, and may be effective in the study of small numbered cases, such as novel or infrequent outbreaks [15,16]. It is important to find an appropriate set value of cluster size because a large value could hide the effect of small core clusters, while a small value could overlook the regional pattern of clusters [17]. Various studies have been performed to address this issue, and SaTScan has been progressively updated to address these results and implemented them on the new versions [18,19]. Therefore, we selected 50% window size for statistical analyses as per the users’ guide in the present study.General trend of the disease according to administrative districts was determined through spatial variation in temporal trend analysis, by scanning for clusters with either increasing or decreasing rates.Statistical significance of the clusters was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulations with an inference of 9,999 [20] and expressed as P-value. A significance level of alpha <0.05 was used as a standard. QGIS software (v3.16) was used to visualize cluster patterns on a map. The clusters and trends are shown in order of log likelihood ratio. The study analyzed data from 2012 to 2020.
Trend analysis
Disease trend according to sex and age was determined using Joinpoint Regression Program (v4.9.0.0)(https://surveillance.cancer.gov/joinpoint/) [21,22], The present study used crude rates computed by the Joinpoint software, whereby the number of new cases occurring in a specified population per year is expressed as the number of cases per 100,000 population at risk.A maximum number of 1 joinpoint was used, making it possible to see whether the incidence is better explained by a single trend or by the existence of multiple trend segments during the study period. Briefly, joinpoint regression identifies best-fitting break-points (years) in which there was a significant change in the incidence rate (crude rates) [23]. The results were summarized as annual percentage changes (APC) with the best model fit for each trend segment. Statistical significance was calculated with an inference of 9,999 and expressed as P-value. A significance level of alpha <0.05 was used as a standard.The results were also output in graphs by the software, where crude rates and years are displayed. In some cases, the years are displayed twice, because the crude rates are calculated by mid-year, and multiple trends reflect this aspect. The final selected models from statistically significant age groups according to sex were output into a single graph to view multiple models simultaneously.
RESULTS
General characteristics
A total of 1,178,505 trichomoniasis cases was reported, with an average of 130,689 cases/year during the study period of 2012 to 2020. Gyeonggi-do had the highest average population (12,726,986) and highest average number of cases (30,055). After adjusting for the population (cases/1,000,000), Busan had the highest average crude rate of 3,238. It also had the highest crude rate in 2016 at 4,535. Major cities tended to have a higher crude rate (Table 1).The 40–49 and 30–39 age groups in women showed the highest average cases of trichomoniasis (33,830 and 33,179/year, respectively). Similarly, 40–49 and 30–39 age groups in men showed the highest average cases (1,319 and 1,282/year, respectively). After adjusting for the population (cases/1,000,000), women and men in the 30–39 age group had the highest crude rate (8,956 and 335, respectively). Women tended to have a higher crude rate, but it peaked around 2014, and continued to decrease steadily. On the other hand, the 30–39 age group in men showed a peak around 2017 but remained high, or in the case of 40–49 age group, a stationary crude rate was observed (Table 2).
Purely spatial analysis of clusters
Jeollabuk-do was the most likely cluster (MLC) with relative risk (RR) and log likelihood ratio (LLR) of 1.70 and 7895.184 for the total study period. The joint cluster of Busan/Gyeongsangnam-do/Ulsan/Daegu was next (RR=1.27, LLR=5,771. 405), followed by Jeju-do (RR=1.86, LLR=4,159.725), Seoul (RR=1.19, LLR=2,998.914) and Gwangju (RR=1.12, LLR= 221.612). Urban and rural differences were prominent. Most major metropolitan areas except for Daejon and Sejong were clusters at some point during the study period. In contrast, only Jeollabuk-do and Gyeongsangnam-do were significant clusters among the provinces (Table 3; Fig. 1).
Table 3
Regional clusters for T. vaginalis infection from 2012 to 2020
District
Cases
Expected
Relative risk
Log likelihood ratio[a]
P-value
2012–2014
Seoul
111,411
86,718
1.38
4113.443
<0.001
Jeollabuk-do
24,531
16,008
1.56
2034.825
<0.001
Jeju-do
9,676
5,093
1.92
1651.701
<0.001
Daegu
28,999
21,371
1.38
1293.497
<0.001
Busan
35,528
30,162
1.19
486.738
<0.001
Gwangju
16,134
12,588
1.29
472.969
<0.001
2015–2017
Busan, Gyeongsangnam-do, Ulsan, Daegu
114,997
87,094
1.44
5231.682
<0.001
Busan
42,020
28,928
1.50
2812.724
<0.001
Jeollabuk-do
25,304
15,422
1.68
2766.880
<0.001
Daegu
30,697
20,555
1.53
2296.591
<0.001
Jeju-do
8,655
5,306
1.64
898.886
<0.001
Ulsan
12,568
9,686
1.31
401.646
<0.001
Gyeongsangnam-do
29,712
27,925
1.07
59.983
<0.001
Gwangju
13,360
12,160
1.10
59.131
<0.001
2018–2020
Jeollabuk-do
20,204
11,009
1.89
3213.317
<0.001
Jeju-do
8,406
4,055
2.10
1808.039
<0.001
Daegu
20,660
14,754
1.43
1108.866
<0.001
Incheon, Seoul
87,107
76,650
1.19
917.320
<0.001
Seoul
66,656
58,804
1.17
624.663
<0.001
Incheon
20,451
17,846
1.16
193.043
<0.001
Total period
Jeollabuk-do
70,039
42,337
1.70
7895.184
<0.001
Busan, Gyeongsangnam-do, Ulsan, Daegu
287,305
239,295
1.27
5771.405
<0.001
Jeju-do
26,737
14,533
1.86
4159.725
<0.001
Seoul
260,892
227,134
1.19
2998.914
<0.001
Gwangju
37,281
33,504
1.12
211.612
<0.001
Clusters are shown in decreasing order of log likelihood ratio.
Fig. 1
Regional clusters for T. vaginalis infection from 2012 to 2020. Light to dark blue gradient represents increasing order of log likelihood ratio. Lattice patterns represent a joint cluster. Area codes represent administrative districts of the Korean government. SE, Seoul; BU, Busan; IN, Incheon; DG, Daegu; GW, Gwangju; DJ, Daejeon; UL, Ulsan; GY, Gyeonggi-do; GA, Gangwon-do; CB, Chungcheongbuk-do; CN, Chungcheongnam-do; JB, Jeollabuk-do; JN, Jeollanam-do; GB, Gyeongsangbuk-do; GN, Gyeongsangnam-do; JE, Jeju-do; SJ, Sejong.
Major cities (Seoul, Daegu, Busan, Gwangju), Jeju-do and Jeollabuk-do were significant clusters at the first tertile of 2012–2014. During the second tertile of 2015–2017, Gyeongsangnam-do and Ulsan became significant clusters, while Seoul became not significant. On the third tertile, Incheon became a significant joint cluster together with Seoul. Gyeongsangnam-do, Busan and Ulsan were not further significant. Seen altogether, the southern regions seem to be significant clusters.
Spatial variation in temporal trends analysis
Temporal trends analysis for the whole study period showed that trichomoniasis rate was decreasing in most clusters. Incheon was the only cluster with increasing rate (0.72%, LLR=740.745). Chungcheongbuk-do/Sejong/Daejeon joint cluster (−8.83%, LLR=305.845) showed the greatest decrease. Gangwon-do/Gwangju/Seoul joint cluster (−7.34%, LLR=852.650), Ulsan (−0.0024%, LLR=289.338), Gyeonggi-do (−3.73%, LLR=216.829) and Jeollabuk-do (−2.52%, LLR=168.491) all showed significant decreases (Table 4; Fig. 2).
Table 4
Spatiotemporal trends analysis of trichomoniasis according to administrative districts (2012–2020)
Districts
Cases
Expected
Trend inside cluster[a]
Trend outside cluster[a]
Relative risk
Log likelihood ratio[b]
P-value
Gangwon-do, Gwangju, Seoul
317,171
295,956
−7.34
−4.18
1.10
852.650
<0.001
Incheon
60,760
66,805
0.72
−5.36
0.90
740.745
<0.001
Chungcheongbuk-do, Sejong, Daejeon
54,060
76,151
−8.83
−4.86
0.70
305.845
<0.001
Ulsan
31,765
26,471
0.00[c]
−5.19
1.21
289.338
<0.001
Gyeonggi-do
270,493
290,982
−3.73
−5.42
0.91
216.829
<0.001
Jeollabuk-do
70,039
42,337
−2.52
−5.19
1.70
168.491
<0.001
Trend inside/outside cluster denotes % increase/decrease over the period of 2012–2020.
Clusters are shown in decreasing order of log likelihood ratio.
Real value: −0.0024.
Fig. 2
Spatiotemporal trend analysis of trichomoniasis according to districts. Green and red indicate decreasing and increasing rate of infection within the cluster, respectively. Light to dark green gradient represents increasing order of log likelihood ratio. Lattice patterns and dashed lines represent joint clusters in decreasing order of log likelihood ratio. Area codes represent administrative districts of the Korean government. SE, Seoul; BU, Busan; IN, Incheon; DG, Daegu; GW, Gwangju; DJ, Daejeon; UL, Ulsan; GY, Gyeonggi-do; GA, Gangwon-do; CB, Chungcheongbuk-do; CN, Chungcheongnam-do; JB, Jeollabuk-do; JN, Jeollanam-do; GB, Gyeongsangbuk-do; GN, Gyeongsangnam-do; JE, Jeju-do; SJ, Sejong.
Trends of trichomoniasis in age groups according to sex
Changes in crude rate of women and men are shown in Fig. 3. In women, the 20–59 age groups showed sharp increasing rates until 2014 (trend 1) but were not significant. From 2014 on, they showed significant decrease (trend 2). The 60–69 age group showed a more gradual rise and decrease, which was significant at trend 2. The 70–79 age group showed an even more gradual change, but it was significant throughout the whole period. Overall, trichomoniasis seems to be decreasing in women currently after peaking around 2014 (Fig. 3A). Although the crude rate is far smaller than that of women, men showed different trends according to age. The 10–39 age groups showed significant increasing rates throughout the study period. In contrast, the 40–59 age groups showed significant decrease during the same period (Fig. 3B).
Fig. 3
Trend analysis of trichomoniasis according to sex. (A) In women, the 20–59 age groups show sharp increasing rates until 2014 (trend 1), but are not significant. From 2014 on, they show significant decrease (trend 2). Annual Percentage Changes (APC) for the 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, and 50–59 age groups are −9.3, −10.1, −10.6, and −8.2, respectively. The 60–69 age group shows a more gradual rise and decrease (significant trend 2) with APC −9.6. The 70–79 age group shows an even more gradual change, but is significant throughout the whole period, with APC 31.0 and −4.6 in trend 1 and 2, respectively. (B) In men, the 10–39 age groups show significant increasing rates throughout the study period. APC for the 10–19, 20–29, and 30–39 age groups are 10.1, 12.4, and 5.9, respectively. In contrast, the 40–59 age groups show significant decrease during the same period. APC for 40–49 and 50–59 age groups are −3.0 and −4.6, respectively. Only significant trends are shown. Crude rates (adjusted cases per 100,000 population at risk) are calculated by mid-year in Joinpoint, so the program outputs 2014 (B) and 2018 (A) twice on the X axis to reflect multiple trends. aIndicates that the APC is significant at the alpha=0.05 level.
A joinpoint was observed in all female age groups of 10–19 and older, although the increasing first trend was not significant except for the 70–79 age group (31%, P=0.026). The first trend was seen mostly during 2012–2014. Trichomonas infection decreased significantly during the second trend, which was mostly 2014–2020, in most age groups (all P<0.05), except for the 10–19 and ≥80 age groups (P=0.053 and 0.050, respectively). On the other hand, no joinpoint was observed in the male age groups. The 10–19, 20–29, and 30–39 age groups showed a significant increase while the 40–49 and 50–59 age groups showed significant decrease. Although not significant, increasing rates were observed in the 60–69 and older age groups (Table 5).
Table 5
Trichomoniasis trends according to sex and age
Age group
Trend 1
Trend 2
Period
APC[a]
95% CI
P-value
Period
APC[a]
95% CI
P-value
Female
0–9
2012–2020
−3.6
−9.7~2.8
0.22
10–19
2012–2014
15.5
−17.1~60.8
0.29
2014–2020
−6.0
−11.8~0.1
0.05
20–29
2012–2014
13.8
−13.9~50.4
0.27
2014–2020
−9.3
−13.9~−4.5
0.01
30–39
2012–2014
21.5
−5.2~55.7
0.10
2014–2020
−10.1
−14.2~−5.7
0.00
40–49
2012–2014
13.9
−9.5~43.5
0.19
2014–2020
−10.6
−14.5~−6.5
0.00
50–59
2012–2014
15.6
−6.6~43.0
0.13
2014–2020
−8.2
−11.5~−4.7
0.00
60–69
2012–2016
7.6
−3.3~19.7
0.13
2016–2020
−9.6
−17.7~−0.6
0.04
70–79
2012–2014
31.0
5.6~62.7
0.03
2014–2020
−4.6
−7.5~−1.6
0.01
≥80
2012–2014
27.2
−8.8~77.4
0.12
2014–2020
−4.2
−8.2~0.0
0.05
Male
0–9
2012–2020
−9.9
−26.4~10.4
0.26
10–19
2012–2020
10.1
3.3~17.3
0.01
20–29
2012–2020
12.4
8.2~16.7
0.00
30–39
2012–2020
5.9
2.5~9.5
0.00
40–49
2012–2020
−3.0
−5.7~−0.2
0.04
50–59
2012–2020
−4.6
−7.4~−1.8
0.01
60–69
2012–2020
0.2
−3.2~3.7
0.90
70–79
2012–2020
1.5
−3.0~6.3
0.46
≥80
2012–2020
3.4
−6.2~14.0
0.45
APC: annual percentage change.
DISCUSSION
The present study provides an overview of the latest Trichomonas infection status in Korea by determining trichomoniasis clusters and evaluating temporal trends according to districts and age or sex during 2012–2020.The incidence and prevalence of trichomoniasis are known to be varied depending on the population, time, and region, but they are higher in women and older age groups compared to men or younger age groups [24]. Joo et al. [25] have reported that trichomoniasis emerged as the most common non-viral sexually transmitted diseases (STD) among the total population during 2009–2014. Some overlap occurs, but in the current study, we strived to further analyze more recent data statistically.Gyeonggi-do had the highest average number of cases, not surprising as this province also has the highest average population. Busan had the highest average crude rate after adjusting for the population. Busan is one of the major metropolitan cities in Korea, and major cities tended to have a higher crude rate compared to the provinces.The 40–49 and 30–39 age groups in women showed the highest average cases of trichomoniasis, and this was also observed in the same age groups of men. After adjusting for the population, both women and men in the 30–39 age group had the highest crude rate. These findings were consistent with that reported by Joo et al. [25]. Women tended to have a higher crude rate, but it peaked around 2014 and decreased steadily. On the other hand, the 30–39 age group in men showed a peak around 2017 but remained high, or in the case of 40–49 age group, a stationary crude rate was observed.Most major metropolitan areas were clusters at some point during the study period. This might have been caused by urban and rural differences, as a high population density or ready access to health resources in major cities seems to be the most probable cause.Jeollabuk-do and Gyeongsangnam-do were clusters among the provinces. To our surprise, Jeollabuk-do was the most likely cluster for the whole study period, and this was a finding also noted by Joo et al. [25]. They have reported this finding for 2009–2014, so trichomoniasis is still prevalent for over a decade. The cause is still unclear. Although Gyeongsangnam-do is a province, it is near or borders the major cities of Busan, Ulsan, and Daegu. This might have caused in it becoming a joint cluster. The southern regions seem to be significant clusters. Jeju-do is a province but being a semi-tropical island in the southern region, it is a favorite travelling destination. A large influx of outsiders may have caused in it being a cluster.Trichomoniasis was decreasing in most clusters, except for Incheon. Incheon is a major metropolitan city and has several characteristics that might have had an influence in the outcome. Besides having a large population and industry itself, it also has a major seaport and airport that serves as a major transition point for adjacent Seoul and Gyeonggi-do, the largest city and province, respectively, in terms of population. A large number of people living in Incheon commutes to the surrounding areas. It also has many islands, which means limited health resources spread thinly over a vast area.Chungcheongbuk-do/Sejong/Daejeon joint cluster showed the greatest decrease. Although Daejon is a major city, its nearby Chungcheongbuk-do has a low population compared to the other provinces. Sejong is a fairly new city that was only inaugurated in 2012. It is also a specialized city with mainly public and administrative organizations, so besides its size, its population composition tends to be different from other cities. These factors may have contributed to the significant decrease in trichomoniasis. A low population density might also have had an influence in Gwangwon-do. It was also decreasing in most metropolitan cities. Increased awareness of the disease and introduction of more sensitive diagnostic tests might have had an influence, as initially the incidence had risen around 2014, and then decreased steadily [25].Trichomoniasis cases increased in most female age groups during 2012–2014 but were not significant except for the elderly (70–79 age group). Kim et al. [26] have reported a similar finding in a previous study. However, after around 2014, trichomoniasis decreased significantly in nearly all age groups. The Special Law on Sex Trade was enacted in September 2004. Prostitution has always been illegal in Korea, but up to then the authorities had turned a blind eye to it. Since then, prohibition was strictly implemented, and it might also have had an influence.Trichomoniasis in the male age groups revealed a different trend. The 40–49 and 50–59 age groups showed significant decrease, but in comparison to the same age group in women, the decrease was progressively linear. The decrease might be explained like in women above. On the other hand, a marked age demarcation was noted around the age of 40. It showed a significantly progressive increasing trend in the age groups below 40. According to a 2012 study by the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family, runaway youths, that included at-risk youths and same age group students, have been exposed to various sex-related problems. At-risk youths, compared to their counterpart students, experienced 3 times more prostitution (11.0% vs. 3.3%). Sexual relationship was even higher, at-risk youths experiencing 6 times more than the comparable students (36.3% vs. 5.6%) [http://www.mogef.go.kr/mp/pcd/mp_pcd_s001d.do;jsessionid=fqV5nBCWAC9phOl6rwJ-kN5h.mogef20?mid=plc502&bbtSn=691646]. Unfortunately, rapid changes in society might aggravate this kind of problem further, and it might also have an impact on future trends of the infection.In conclusion, our study was able to recognize the current status and trend of trichomoniasis in Korea, augmenting the study by Joo et al. [25]. This study might provide an analytic basis for future health measures and help policy-makers and health authorities in developing effective system for prevention of trichomoniasis.
Authors: Arlene C Seña; William C Miller; Marcia M Hobbs; Jane R Schwebke; Peter A Leone; Heidi Swygard; Julius Atashili; Myron S Cohen Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2006-11-27 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Siobhan Sutcliffe; John F Alderete; Cathee Till; Phyllis J Goodman; Ann W Hsing; Jonathan M Zenilman; Angelo M De Marzo; Elizabeth A Platz Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Anamaria Molnar; Mihaela Iancu; Rodica Radu; Cristina Maria Borzan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Olivia T Van Gerwen; Andres F Camino; Jyoti Sharma; Patricia J Kissinger; Christina A Muzny Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 20.999