Z F Zhang1, C B Begg. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We conducted this combined analysis of available data from studies with information on this issue to clarify the association between Trichomonas vaginalis infection and cervical neoplasia. METHODS: We performed MEDLINE searches (1966-1993) using the key words and phrases 'trichomonas vaginitis' and 'neoplasms, cervix' for articles published in English, and searched citations of the articles obtained from MEDLINE: A total of 24 articles (two cohort studies and 22 case-control) were included in this data analysis. In the analysis, the studies were evaluated for heterogeneity using Breslow-Day tests for homogeneity of the odds ratios and of rate ratios. If the odds ratios from studies are heterogeneous, it is not appropriate to combine them using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Also, publication bias was evaluated by assessing the association between the observed effect size and the variance of the effect size using a rank correlation test. RESULTS: The combined summary relative risk for the two cohort studies was 1.93 (95% confidence interval: 1.22-2.65) indicating an approximate doubling of the risk of cervical neoplasia in the presence of T. vaginalis infection. The attributable risks among exposed subjects and among the source population were 47.4% and 2.1% respectively. Results of the 22 retrospective studies were much less consistent. However, most of them demonstrated a significant positive association. CONCLUSIONS: This combined analysis suggests that there is an association between T. vaginalis and the risk of cervical neoplasia, but that such infections account for only 2% of cervical neoplasia.
BACKGROUND: We conducted this combined analysis of available data from studies with information on this issue to clarify the association between Trichomonasvaginalis infection and cervical neoplasia. METHODS: We performed MEDLINE searches (1966-1993) using the key words and phrases 'trichomonasvaginitis' and 'neoplasms, cervix' for articles published in English, and searched citations of the articles obtained from MEDLINE: A total of 24 articles (two cohort studies and 22 case-control) were included in this data analysis. In the analysis, the studies were evaluated for heterogeneity using Breslow-Day tests for homogeneity of the odds ratios and of rate ratios. If the odds ratios from studies are heterogeneous, it is not appropriate to combine them using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Also, publication bias was evaluated by assessing the association between the observed effect size and the variance of the effect size using a rank correlation test. RESULTS: The combined summary relative risk for the two cohort studies was 1.93 (95% confidence interval: 1.22-2.65) indicating an approximate doubling of the risk of cervical neoplasia in the presence of T. vaginalis infection. The attributable risks among exposed subjects and among the source population were 47.4% and 2.1% respectively. Results of the 22 retrospective studies were much less consistent. However, most of them demonstrated a significant positive association. CONCLUSIONS: This combined analysis suggests that there is an association between T. vaginalis and the risk of cervical neoplasia, but that such infections account for only 2% of cervical neoplasia.
Entities:
Keywords:
Biology; Cancer; Case Control Studies; Cervical Cancer--etiology; Cohort Analysis; Data Analysis; Diseases; Epidemiologic Methods; Literature Review; Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Studies; Vaginal Abnormalities; Vaginitis
Authors: J B Jesus; M A Vannier-Santos; C Britto; P Godefroy; F C Silva-Filho; A A S Pinheiro; B Rocha-Azevedo; A H C S Lopes; J R Meyer-Fernandes Journal: Parasitol Res Date: 2004-06-15 Impact factor: 2.289
Authors: Beatriz E Perazzi; Claudia I Menghi; Enrique F Coppolillo; Claudia Gatta; Martha Cora Eliseth; Ramón A de Torres; Carlos A Vay; Angela M R Famiglietti Journal: Korean J Parasitol Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 1.341
Authors: Eshan U Patel; Charlotte A Gaydos; Zoe R Packman; Thomas C Quinn; Aaron A R Tobian Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 9.079