| Literature DB >> 35499823 |
Yunhe Song1, Weijing Cheng1, Fei Li1, Fengbin Lin1, Peiyuan Wang1, Xinbo Gao1, Yuying Peng1, Yuhong Liu1, Hengli Zhang2, Shiyan Chen3, Yazhi Fan4, Ran Zhang5, Wei Wang1, Xiulan Zhang1.
Abstract
Purpose: To identify the ocular factors of microvascular fractal dimension (FD) and blood vessel tortuosity (BVT) of macula measured with optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in a healthy Chinese population.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35499823 PMCID: PMC9078077 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.5.1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol ISSN: 2164-2591 Impact factor: 3.048
Figure 1.Magnification correction by using Littmann's method and the Bennett formula. Scaling factor = 3.382 × 0.013062 × (AL − 1.82). The scaling factor represents the magnification effect, and AL represent the axial length. The scaling factor equals to 1 if AL equals 23.82 mm. An en face image of the SCP at the macula with AL = 24.81 mm is presented, and the scaling factor was calculated as 1.02. The orange square represents the actual image size that corresponds to 6 × 6 mm. The cropped images were involved in the final analysis.
Figure 2.Schematic illustration of the retinal microvascular FD measurement and parameter extraction from a subject who was 43 years old. Images of the macula were obtained by OCTA B-scans. The 6 × 6-mm scans of en face blood flow images of both superficial and deep retina were stratified. Original images with a scan size of 6 × 6 mm were obtained following the removal of projection artifacts. Binarized and skeletonized capillary images were then obtained. The blue dot represents actual OCTA data for this image, and the green line displays the closest fitting fractal log–log line. The x-axis indicates the log base e of the size of the boxes in pixels, and the y-axis represents the log base e of the number of boxes subtending the OCTA pattern. Thus, a linear relationship in the log–log plot is an indication of perfect self-similarity, and the high correlation demonstrates a high degree of self-similarity in OCTA patterns.
Figure 3.Schematic illustration of the retinal microvascular BVT measurement and parameter extraction. Images of the macula were obtained by OCTA B-scans. The 6 × 6-mm scans of en face blood flow images of both superficial and deep retina were stratified. Original images with a scan size of 6 × 6 mm were obtained following the removal of projection artifacts. Binarized and skeletonized capillary images were then generated to extract the distance parameters for BVT calculation. The BVT was calculated as the sum of real distances of the vessel branch divided by the sum of straight distances.
Clinical Characteristics of the Study Population
| Characteristic | |
|---|---|
| Number of subjects (eyes), | 2801 (2801) |
| Female, | 1900 (67.83) |
| Age (yr), mean ± SD | 54.1 ± 14.5 |
| SBP (mm Hg), mean ± SD | 126.13 ± 19.32 |
| DBP (mm Hg), mean ± SD | 69.21 ± 10.63 |
| Height (cm), mean ± SD | 159.59 ± 7.74 |
| Weight (kg), mean ± SD | 59.71 ± 10.8 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2), mean ± SD | 23.39 ± 3.48 |
| BCVA (logMAR), mean ± SD | 0.14 ± 0.21 |
| IOP (mm Hg), mean ± SD | 15.36 ± 2.64 |
| ACD (mm), mean ± SD | 2.78 ± 0.56 |
| Lens thickness (mm), mean ± SD | 4.42 ± 0.47 |
| AL (mm), mean ± SD | 23.77 ± 1.17 |
| Average GCIPL thickness (µm), mean ± SD | 70.58 ± 6.16 |
| Average pRNFL thickness (µm), mean ± SD | 109.47 ± 14.04 |
| Image quality index, mean ± SD | 69.46 ± 9.17 |
Distribution of Retinal Microvasculature Geometric Parameters Values
| Centile | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5th | 10th | 25th | 50th | 75th | 90th | 95th | Mean ± SD | |
| FD in SCP (× 10−3) | 1773.0 | 1778.2 | 1786.0 | 1793.0 | 1797.6 | 1800.5 | 1802.3 | 1790.3 ± 9.1 |
| FD in DCP (×10−3) | 1859.6 | 1862.2 | 1864.6 | 1866.3 | 1867.5 | 1868.3 | 1868.7 | 1864.9 ± 3.2 |
| BVT in SCP (×10−3) | 1005.1 | 1005.3 | 1005.8 | 1006.9 | 1008.5 | 1010.4 | 1011.8 | 1007.5 ± 2.2 |
| BVT in DCP (×10−3) | 1004.3 | 1004.3 | 1004.4 | 1004.5 | 1004.7 | 1004.8 | 1005.0 | 1004.6 ± 0.3 |
Univariate and Multivariate Regression Analyses for Superficial and Deep Fractal Dimensions
| Univariate Regression | Stepwise Multivariate Regression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | Coefficient (95% CI) |
| Coefficient (95% CI) |
|
| Superficial capillary plexus | ||||
| Female sex | −0.776 (−1.600, −0.048) | 0.065 | — | — |
| Mean age (yr) | 0.0 19 (−0.009, 0.047) | 0.199 | — | — |
| BCVA (logMAR) | −11.292 (−23.247, 0.663) | 0.064 | — | — |
| IOP (mm Hg) | 0.305 (0.155, 0.456) |
| 0.204 (0.073, 0.335) |
|
| ACD (mm) | −2.203 (−2.914, −1.493) |
| — | — |
| Lens thickness (mm) | 0.887 (0.027, 1.74) |
| — | — |
| AL (mm) | −1.754 (−2.073, −1.436) |
| −0.875 (−1.197, −0.552) |
|
| GCIPL thickness (µm) | 0.079 (−0.005, 0.163) | 0.067 | — | — |
| pRNFL thickness (µm) | 0.054 (0.018, 0.091) |
| — | — |
| Image quality index | 0.809 (0.750, 0.867) |
| — | — |
| Deep capillary plexus | ||||
| Female sex | 0.252 (−0.038, 0.542) | 0.089 | — | — |
| Mean age (yr) | 0.013 (0.002, 0.023) |
| — | — |
| BCVA (logMAR) | −10.08 (−14.107, −6.063) |
| −6.170 (−10.175, −2.166) |
|
| IOP (mm Hg) | 0.066 (0.009, 0.122) |
| — | — |
| ACD (mm) | −0.621 (−0.872, −0.370) |
| −0.348 (−0.673, −0.023) |
|
| Lens thickness (mm) | 0.208 (−0.093, 0.511) | 0.176 | — | — |
| AL (mm) | −0.260 (−0.375, −0.146) |
| — | — |
| GCIPL thickness (µm) | 0.024 (−0.006, 0.054) | 0.118 | — | — |
| pRNFL thickness (µm) | 0.006 (−0.007, 0.019) | 0.371 | — | — |
| Image quality index | 0.198 (0.175, 0.220) |
| — | — |
The age, sex, and image quality index were adjusted and analyzed in the multivariate model. Bold values indicate statistical significance.
Univariate and Multivariate Regression Analyses for Superficial and Deep Blood Vessel Tortuosity
| Univariate Regression | Stepwise Multivariate Regression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | Coefficient (95% CI) |
| Coefficient (95% CI) |
|
| Superficial capillary plexus | ||||
| Female sex | 0.067 (−0.130, 0.266) | 0.503 | — | — |
| Mean age (yr) | −0.004 (−0.011, 0.002) | 0.219 | — | — |
| BCVA (logMAR) | 0.074 (−2.999, 3.147) | 0.962 | — | — |
| IOP (mm Hg) | −0.064 (−0.101, −0.026) |
| −0.044 (−0.079, −0.009) |
|
| ACD (mm) | 0.351 (0.179, 0.524) |
| — | — |
| Lens thickness (mm) | 0.887 (0.027, 1.74) | 0.053 | — | — |
| AL (mm) | 0.273 (0.195, 0.351) |
| 0.097 (0.014, 0.181) |
|
| GCIPL thickness (µm) | 0.079 (−0.005, 0.002) | 0.067 | — | — |
| pRNFL thickness (µm) | 0.013 (0.018, 0.091) |
| — | — |
| Image quality index | −0.147 (−0.162, −0.132) |
| — | — |
| Deep capillary plexus | ||||
| Female sex | 0.005 (−0.017, 0.028) | 0.641 | — | — |
| Mean age (yr) | 0.001 (0.0005, 0.002) |
| — | — |
| BCVA (logMAR) | 0.499 (0.118, 0.880) |
| — | — |
| IOP (mm Hg) | −0.005 (−0.010, −0.001) |
| −0.004 (−0.009, −0.0005) |
|
| ACD (mm) | −0.005 (−0.025, 0.014) | 0.594 | — | — |
| Lens thickness (mm) | 0.044 (0.021, 0.068) |
| 0.036 (0.003, 0.060) |
|
| AL (mm) | −0.001 (−0.010, 0.007) | 0.808 | — | — |
| GCIPL thickness (µm) | −0.001 (−0.004, 0.0005) | 0.124 | — | — |
| pRNFL thickness (µm) | 0.0001 (−0.0009, 0.001) | 0.812 | — | — |
| Image quality index | −0.010 (−0.012, −0.009) |
| — | — |
The age, sex, and image quality index were adjusted and analyzed in the multivariate model. Bold values indicate statistical significance.