Joanna Lewek1,2, Maciej Banach3,4,5. 1. Department of Preventive Cardiology and Lipidology, Chair of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University of Lodz, Rzgowska 281/289, 93-228, Lodz, Poland. 2. Department of Cardiology and Adult Congenital Heart Diseases, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute (PMMHRI), Lodz, Poland. 3. Department of Preventive Cardiology and Lipidology, Chair of Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University of Lodz, Rzgowska 281/289, 93-228, Lodz, Poland. maciej.banach@umed.lodz.pl. 4. Department of Cardiology and Adult Congenital Heart Diseases, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute (PMMHRI), Lodz, Poland. maciej.banach@umed.lodz.pl. 5. Cardiovascular Research Centre, Zielona Góra, Poland. maciej.banach@umed.lodz.pl.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite the elevation of lipid values during pregnancy is mostly physiological, evidence suggest that it may be associated with adverse events. This article reviews the characteristics of lipid disorders and the possible management with dyslipidemia in pregnant women. RECENT FINDINGS: Among many available groups of lipid-lowering drugs, only bile acid sequestrants are approved for the treatment of dyslipidemia during pregnancy. Ezetimibe and fenofibrate might be considered if benefits outweigh the potential risk. Statins are still contraindicated due to the results mainly from animal studies and series of human cases. However, recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses showed that their use may not be detrimental, and in some selected cases may be beneficial. Especially, in some groups of pregnant patients with very high cardiovascular risk-those already after an event, or with established cardiovascular disease, with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia; in such cases the final decision should weight the potential risk of discontinuation of therapy. Finally, we need to wait for the data with new drugs, including PCSK9 inhibitors and especially inclisiran, which (still hypothetically) might be a very interesting option as it may be used just before the pregnancy and immediately after with the duration of about 9 months between injections. The decisions on lipid-lowering therapy in pregnant patients should be individualized. Despite design and ethical difficulties with such studies, further investigations on dyslipidemia treatment during pregnancy are highly awaited.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite the elevation of lipid values during pregnancy is mostly physiological, evidence suggest that it may be associated with adverse events. This article reviews the characteristics of lipid disorders and the possible management with dyslipidemia in pregnant women. RECENT FINDINGS: Among many available groups of lipid-lowering drugs, only bile acid sequestrants are approved for the treatment of dyslipidemia during pregnancy. Ezetimibe and fenofibrate might be considered if benefits outweigh the potential risk. Statins are still contraindicated due to the results mainly from animal studies and series of human cases. However, recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses showed that their use may not be detrimental, and in some selected cases may be beneficial. Especially, in some groups of pregnant patients with very high cardiovascular risk-those already after an event, or with established cardiovascular disease, with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia; in such cases the final decision should weight the potential risk of discontinuation of therapy. Finally, we need to wait for the data with new drugs, including PCSK9 inhibitors and especially inclisiran, which (still hypothetically) might be a very interesting option as it may be used just before the pregnancy and immediately after with the duration of about 9 months between injections. The decisions on lipid-lowering therapy in pregnant patients should be individualized. Despite design and ethical difficulties with such studies, further investigations on dyslipidemia treatment during pregnancy are highly awaited.
Authors: Tanja G M Vrijkotte; Náthalie Krukziener; Barbara A Hutten; Karlijn C Vollebregt; Manon van Eijsden; Marcel B Twickler Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Maciej Banach; Paweł Burchardt; Krzysztof Chlebus; Piotr Dobrowolski; Dariusz Dudek; Krzysztof Dyrbuś; Mariusz Gąsior; Piotr Jankowski; Jacek Jóźwiak; Longina Kłosiewicz-Latoszek; Irina Kowalska; Maciej Małecki; Aleksander Prejbisz; Michał Rakowski; Jacek Rysz; Bogdan Solnica; Dariusz Sitkiewicz; Grażyna Sygitowicz; Grażyna Sypniewska; Tomasz Tomasik; Adam Windak; Dorota Zozulińska-Ziółkiewicz; Barbara Cybulska Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2021-11-08 Impact factor: 3.318
Authors: María José Aguilar Cordero; Laura Baena García; Antonio Manuel Sánchez López; Rafael Guisado Barrilao; Enrique Hermoso Rodríguez; Norma Mur Villar; Manuel Capel Tuñón Journal: Nutr Hosp Date: 2015-08-01 Impact factor: 1.057
Authors: Kausik K Ray; Bart Molemans; W Marieke Schoonen; Periklis Giovas; Sarah Bray; Gaia Kiru; Jennifer Murphy; Maciej Banach; Stefano De Servi; Dan Gaita; Ioanna Gouni-Berthold; G Kees Hovingh; Jacek J Jozwiak; J Wouter Jukema; Robert Gabor Kiss; Serge Kownator; Helle K Iversen; Vincent Maher; Luis Masana; Alexander Parkhomenko; André Peeters; Piers Clifford; Katarina Raslova; Peter Siostrzonek; Stefano Romeo; Dimitrios Tousoulis; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Michal Vrablik; Alberico L Catapano; Neil R Poulter Journal: Eur J Prev Cardiol Date: 2021-09-20 Impact factor: 7.804