Literature DB >> 35498625

Quantifying stream periphyton assemblage responses to nutrient amendments with a molecular approach.

James D Hagy Iii1,2, Katelyn A Houghton1,3, David L Beddick1,4, Joseph B James1,5, Stephanie D Friedman1,6, Richard Devereux1,7.   

Abstract

Nutrient (nitrogen [N] and phosphorus [P]) pollution is a pervasive water quality issue in the USA for small streams and rivers. The effect of nutrients on the biotic condition of streams is often evaluated with biological indicators such as macroinvertebrate assemblages or periphyton assemblages, particularly diatoms. Molecular approaches facilitate the use of periphyton assemblages as bioindicators because periphyton is diverse and its composition as a whole, rather than just diatoms, soft-bodied algae, or any single group, may convey additional information about responses to nutrients. To further develop the concept that a taxonomically-broad evaluation of periphyton assemblages could be useful for developing stream bioindicators, we examined microbial assemblage composition with both 16S and 18S rRNA genes, enabling us to evaluate composition in 3 domains. We measured otherwise unknown nutrient responses of different periphyton groups in situ with experiments that used glass fiber filters to allow diffusion of amended nutrients into a stream. We deployed these experimental setups in 2 streams that differ in the extent of agricultural land-use in their catchments in the southeastern USA. Experiments consisted of controls, N amendments, P amendments, and both N and P amendments. Periphyton assemblages that grew on the filters differed significantly by stream, date or season, and nutrient treatment. Assemblage differences across treatments were more consistent among Bacteria and Archaea than among eukaryotes. Effects of nutrient amendments were more pronounced in the stream with less agricultural land use and, therefore, lower nutrient loading than in the stream with more agricultural land use and higher nutrient loading. Combined N and P amendments decreased species richness and evenness for Bacteria and Archaea by ∼36 and ∼9%, respectively, compared with controls. Indicator species analysis revealed that specific clades varied in their response to treatments. Indicators based on the responses of these indicator clades were related to nutrient treatments across sites and seasons. Analyses that included all the taxa in a domain did not resolve differences in responses to N vs P. Instead, better resolution was achieved with an analysis focused on diatoms, which responded more strongly to P than N. Overall, our results showed that in situ nutrient-diffusing substrate experiments are a useful approach for describing assemblage responses to nutrients in streams. This type of molecular approach may be useful to environmental agencies and stakeholders responsible for assessing and managing stream water quality and biotic condition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA; indicator species analysis; indicators; microbial assemblage; nutrient-diffusing substrates; streams

Year:  2020        PMID: 35498625      PMCID: PMC9044509          DOI: 10.1086/708935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Freshw Sci        ISSN: 2161-9549            Impact factor:   2.353


  31 in total

1.  A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences.

Authors:  Z Zhang; S Schwartz; L Wagner; W Miller
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2000 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Continental-scale effects of nutrient pollution on stream ecosystem functioning.

Authors:  Guy Woodward; Mark O Gessner; Paul S Giller; Vladislav Gulis; Sally Hladyz; Antoine Lecerf; Björn Malmqvist; Brendan G McKie; Scott D Tiegs; Helen Cariss; Mike Dobson; Arturo Elosegi; Verónica Ferreira; Manuel A S Graça; Tadeusz Fleituch; Jean O Lacoursière; Marius Nistorescu; Jesús Pozo; Geta Risnoveanu; Markus Schindler; Angheluta Vadineanu; Lena B-M Vought; Eric Chauvet
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Nutrient enrichment in water more than in leaves affects aquatic microbial litter processing.

Authors:  Cristiane Biasi; Manuel A S Graça; Sandro Santos; Verónica Ferreira
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  A hidden pitfall in the preparation of agar media undermines microorganism cultivability.

Authors:  Tomohiro Tanaka; Kosei Kawasaki; Serina Daimon; Wataru Kitagawa; Kyosuke Yamamoto; Hideyuki Tamaki; Michiko Tanaka; Cindy H Nakatsu; Yoichi Kamagata
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Consistent responses of soil microbial communities to elevated nutrient inputs in grasslands across the globe.

Authors:  Jonathan W Leff; Stuart E Jones; Suzanne M Prober; Albert Barberán; Elizabeth T Borer; Jennifer L Firn; W Stanley Harpole; Sarah E Hobbie; Kirsten S Hofmockel; Johannes M H Knops; Rebecca L McCulley; Kimberly La Pierre; Anita C Risch; Eric W Seabloom; Martin Schütz; Christopher Steenbock; Carly J Stevens; Noah Fierer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Is DNA barcoding actually cheaper and faster than traditional morphological methods: results from a survey of freshwater bioassessment efforts in the United States?

Authors:  Eric D Stein; Maria C Martinez; Sara Stiles; Peter E Miller; Evgeny V Zakharov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Temporal variations in the abundance and composition of biofilm communities colonizing drinking water distribution pipes.

Authors:  John J Kelly; Nicole Minalt; Alessandro Culotti; Marsha Pryor; Aaron Packman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A low proportion of rare bacterial taxa responds to abiotic changes compared with dominant taxa.

Authors:  Viola Kurm; Stefan Geisen; Wilhelmina H Gera Hol
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.491

9.  The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools.

Authors:  Christian Quast; Elmar Pruesse; Pelin Yilmaz; Jan Gerken; Timmy Schweer; Pablo Yarza; Jörg Peplies; Frank Oliver Glöckner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  Fungal Biodiversity and Their Role in Soil Health.

Authors:  Magdalena Frąc; Silja E Hannula; Marta Bełka; Małgorzata Jędryczka
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.