Stanislav S Shcherbakov1, Artyom Yu Magometov1, Viktoriia Yu Shcherbakova1, Alexander V Aksenov1, Dmitriy A Domenyuk2, Vladimir A Zelensky2, Michael Rubin1,3. 1. Department of Chemistry, North Caucasus Federal University 1a Pushkin St. Stavropol 355009 Russian Federation alexaks05@rambler.ru. 2. Department of General Practice Dentistry and Child Dentistry, Stavropol State Medical University 310 Mira Street Stavropol 355017 Russian Federation. 3. Department of Chemistry, University of Kansas 1567 Irving Hill Road Lawrence KS 66045-7582 USA mrubin@ku.edu +1-785-864-5071.
4-Arylpyrimidines 1 bearing acetylene substituents at C-5 (Scheme 1) were investigated as promising non-nucleoside-type adenosine kinase,[1,2] tyrosine kinase,[3,4] or lysine-specific demethylase[5] inhibitors. These molecules were also tested as potential anti-proliferative agents[6,7] or non-toxic selective herbicides,[8] or used as a synthetic platform for further derivatization en route to medicinally relevant structures.[9] Conveniently, structures of this type are accessible via Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction involving terminal alkynes and hetaryl halides or sulfonates 2 (Scheme 1).[10,11] Alternatively, a decarboxylative cross-coupling of alkynyl halides with hetarylcarboxylic acids can be employed.[12] Although the synthetic route involving 2 as an electrophilic component in the Sonogashira reaction seems very straightforward, access to these starting materials typically relies on another transition metal-catalyzed cross-coupling step, usually chemoselective Suzuki reaction between arylboronic acid 3 and hetaryl dihalide 4 (Scheme 1).[13-18] Since this conventional approach lacks any atom-economy appeal, we wondered, if an alternative synthetic strategy could be designed, utilizing a formal oxidative functionalization of two C–H bonds in arene 5 and pyrimidine 6 (Scheme 1). In perspective, this would allow for an easier assembly of 2 from more affordable precursors, while generating less chemical waste. Herein we wish to report on our synthetic studies towards this goal.
Scheme 1
Synthetic approaches towards 4-arylpyrimidines.
Results and discussion
In recent years, our group was interested in designing novel acid-mediated multistep cascade transformations targeting material science and medicinal chemistry applications.[19-23] In particular, an unusual annulation reaction was demonstrated, involving perimidines 7 and pyrimidines 8 and leading to the formation of 1,3-diazapyrenes 9 (Scheme 2).[24] It was also shown that unlike most other pyrimidines, 5-bromopyrimidine 10 did not react according to this general scheme, forming mono-alkylation products 11 instead (Scheme 2).[24,25] Apparently, this process is related to a Friedel–Crafts type SEAr alkylation reaction, in which pyrimidine in protonated form serves as an electrophile. We considered that an extension of the latter reaction to other nucleophilic arenes would help us to pursue our stated goal of installing an aryl substituent at C-4 of 5-bromopyrimidine ring.
Scheme 2
Acid-assisted reactions of perimidines with pyrimidines.
To test this idea, we carried out the reaction between phenol (12a) (as an example of electron rich nucleophilic arene) and 5-bromopyrimidine (10) in 70% aqueous sulfuric acid. Regrettably, this reaction led to the formation of a mixture of two sulfonic acids 13a and 14a, but the desired product 15a did not form under these conditions (Scheme 3). Next, we tried to carry out the same transformation in 86% polyphosphoric acid (PPA). We were pleased to find that in this case 15a was formed smoothly, and we managed to isolate it in 60% yield (Scheme 3). The same reaction carried out at room temperature in the presence of methanesulfonic acid afforded 15a in 71% yield (Scheme 4).
Scheme 3
Reactions of phenol 12a with pyrimidine 15 in the presence of acids.
Scheme 4
Alkylation of different electron-rich benzenes with 5-bromopyrimidine.
Inspired by these results, we examined the reactivity of other electron rich arenes. To our delight, anisole (12b), o- and p-cresols (12c and 12d, respectively), and o-methylanisole (12e) reacted smoothly providing the corresponding alkylated products 15b–e in high yields (Scheme 4). Reactions of catechol (12f) and veratrole (12g) also proceeded smoothly, but isolation via extraction was accompanied with notable loss of products 15f and 15g, which proved to be quite water-soluble (Scheme 4). In contrast, reaction and isolation of 1,4-dimethoxybenzene (12h) proceeded uneventfully, leading to formation of 15h in high yield (Scheme 4). Next, we tested the reactivity of halogenated phenol derivatives. Remarkably, both p-fluorophenol (12i) and m-bromoanisole (12j) afforded the corresponding coupling products 15i, j very efficiently (Scheme 4).Reactions of naphthalenes with electrophilically activated 5-bromopyrimidine under the same conditions were also tested. Non-substituted naphthalene (12k) reacted very efficiently, but the regioselectivity was poor, and the 2 : 1 mixture of inseparable 2-naphthyl- (15k) and 1-naphthyl-regioisomeric products was isolated in 83% combined yield (Scheme 5). Alkylation of 2-naphthol (12l) and 2-ethoxynaphthalene (12m) proceeded regioselectively and the corresponding structures 15l and 15m were obtained as sole products isolated in high yields (Scheme 5).
Scheme 5
Alkylation of different electron-rich naphthalenes with 5-bromopyrimidine.
It is believed that this reaction proceeds via SEAr mechanism. Indeed, protonation of one of the nitrogen atoms in pyrimidine 10 in the presence of strong Brønsted acid should afford highly electrophilic pyrimidinium species 16, which could serve as an electrophile in Friedel–Crafts-like reaction involving electron-rich arenes (Scheme 6). To get an additional support to this mechanistic rationale we attempted to carry out this reaction employing electron deficient substrates: nitrobenzene, acetophenone, 2-hydroxyacetophenone, 2-acetonaphthone, 1-benzonaphthone, acetanilide, or 1,8-diaminonaphthalene (the latter upon protonation is converted in poorly nucleophilic ammonium form). Expectedly, the alkylation did not proceed with either of these substrates.
Scheme 6
Mechanism of electrophilic alkylation.
Next, we decided to investigate the possibility to use 5-bromo-3,4-dihydropyrimidin-4-yl arenes 15 in cross-coupling reaction with terminal alkynes. To this end, compound 15a was treated with phenyl acetylene 18 under standard conditions for Sonogashira reaction. Unfortunately, reaction produced a complex mixture of products, among which we only were able to isolate minute amounts of pyrimidine 19a, probably resulted from aerobic oxidation of the 3,4-dihydropyrimidine ring (Scheme 7).
Scheme 7
Attempted Sonogashira coupling of dihydropyrimidine 15a.
Since oxidation of dihydropyrimidine ring seemed to proceed spontaneously, it was decided to perform it first to achieve cleaner Sonogashira coupling at the next step. First, oxidation with DMSO was attempted (Method C), but this method was highly inefficient. Reaction of 19a with DDQ also proceeded inefficiently, affording a mixture of three products, none of which was identified as the desired product 20a. However, we managed to obtain practical yields of aromatized products 20 in reactions with aqueous potassium ferricyanide (Method D, Scheme 8). Structure of compound 20a was unambiguously confirmed by single crystal X-ray diffraction (CCDC #1983237).
Scheme 8
Oxidative aromatization of dihydropyrimidines 15. Yields for Method D and for Method C (in parentheses) are shown.
Finally, acetylene substituent was installed into pyrimidine ring via Sonogashira coupling employing microwave irradiation. This allowed to obtain the target pyrimidylacetylenes 19 in good yields (Scheme 9).
In conclusion, a new synthetic protocol was developed, allowing for a facile assembly of 4-aryl-5-alkynylpyrimidines involving chemo- and regioselective acid catalyzed electrophilic alkylation of arenes with 5-bromopyrimidine, followed by oxidative aromatization of the formed dihydropyrimidine moieties, and subsequent Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction.
Experimental part
General information
1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance-III spectrometer (400 or 100 MHz, respectively) equipped with a BBO probe in CDCl3, DMSO-d6, acetone-d6 using TMS as an internal standard. High-resolution mass spectra were registered with a Bruker Maxis spectrometer (electrospray ionization, in MeCN solution, using HCO2Na–HCO2H for calibration). Melting points were measured with a Stuart smp30 apparatus. All reactions were performed in oven-dried 5 mL round-bottomed flasks equipped with reflux condensers. The reaction progress and purity of isolated compounds were controlled by TLC on Silufol UV-254 plates, with EtOAc as eluent. Polyphosphoric acids (86%) were obtained by dissolving of precise amount of P2O5 in 85% orthophosphoric acid according to the published protocols.[26,27] All reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial vendors and used as received.
Preparation of (5-bromo-3,4-dihydropyrimidin-4-yl)-benzenes (general procedure)
Method A (in methanesulfonic acid)
A 10 mL round-bottomed flask equipped with magnetic stirring bar was charged with the corresponding substituted arene 4 (1.00 mmol), methanesulfonic acid (5 mL), and 5-bromopyridine 158 mg (1.00 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min (1 h for naphthalenes), then poured into cold water (50 mL), and aqueous ammonia was added dropwise to achieve a neutral reaction (pH 7–8). The formed precipitate was filtered, rinsed with small portions of cold water, and dried on air. This material was sufficiently pure for most application and did not require any additional purification.
Method A (in polyphosphoric acid)
A 10 mL round-bottomed flask equipped with magnetic spin-bar was charged with the corresponding substituted arene 4 (1.00 mmol), 86% polyphosphoric acid (5 g), and 5-bromopyridine 158 mg (1.00 mmol). The mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 1 h. The subsequent quench, aqueous work up and isolation was identical to the one described for Method A. The formed precipitate was filtered, rinsed with small portions of cold water, and dried on air. This material was sufficiently pure for most application and did not require any additional purification.
Preparation of (5-bromo-3,4-pyrimidin-4-yl)-benzenes (general procedure)
Method C
A 10 mL round bottomed flask equipped with magnetic stirring bar was charged with DMSO (5 mL), potassium hydroxyde (112 mg, 2.00 mmol), and the corresponding (5-bromo-3,4-dihydropyrimidine-4-yl)benzene (1.00 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 4 h at 60 °C, then poured into cold water (10 mL). Formed precipitate is collected, washed on a filter with small portions of water and dried on air. Thus obtained crude material was purified by column chromatography eluting with a mixture of petroleum ether and ethyl acetate (1 : 1).
Method D
10 mL round bottomed flask equipped with magnetic stirring bar was charged with water (5 mL), potassium ferricyanide (658 mg, 2.00 mmol), and potassium hydroxyde (224 mg, 4.00 mmol). (5-Bromo-3,4-dihydropyrimidine-4-yl)benzene (1.00 mmol) was added to the formed solution, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. Aqueous work up, isolation and purification of the product was performed in the same way as described for Method C.
Preparation of 4-(5-(phenylethynyl)pyrimidin-4-yl)benzenes via Sonogashira coupling (general procedure)
Pyrex microwave vessel was charged with phenylacetylene (102 mg, 1.00 mmol) and the corresponding substituted 4-(5-bromopyrimidin-4-yl)-2-benzene (1.00 mmol) in dry DMF (0.5 mL). Dry nitrogen was passed to the vessel for 50 min, then anhydrous DIPEA (1.5 mL, 1.11 g, 8.6 mmol), dry triphenylphosphine (23 mg, 0.087 mmol) were introduced, followed by bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium chloride (Pd(PPh3)Cl2, 15 mg, 0.021 mmol) and copper(i) iodide (CuI, 3.8 mg, 0.020 mmol). The vessel was sealed and microwaved at 115 °C for 25 min. Then the mixture was cooled down and extracted with ethyl acetate (2 × 50 mL). Combined organic extracts were consecutively washed with aqueous ammonium chloride solution (2 × 25 mL) and water (2 × 25 mL), and dried with sodium sulfate. Pure product was crystallized from concentrated solution obtained after evaporation of most solvent.
Authors: Alexander V Aksenov; Alexander N Smirnov; Nicolai A Aksenov; Inna V Aksenova; Liliya V Frolova; Alexander Kornienko; Igor V Magedov; Michael Rubin Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Jingbo Xiao; Juan J Marugan; Wei Zheng; Steve Titus; Noel Southall; Jonathan J Cherry; Matthew Evans; Elliot J Androphy; Christopher P Austin Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2011-08-19 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Alexander V Aksenov; Alexander N Smirnov; Igor V Magedov; Mary R Reisenauer; Nicolai A Aksenov; Inna V Aksenova; Alexander L Pendleton; Gina Nguyen; Robert K Johnston; Michael Rubin; Annelise De Carvalho; Robert Kiss; Véronique Mathieu; Florence Lefranc; Jaime Correa; David A Cavazos; Andrew J Brenner; Brad A Bryan; Snezna Rogelj; Alexander Kornienko; Liliya V Frolova Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2015-02-20 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Alexis Mollard; Steven L Warner; Lee T Call; Mark L Wade; Jared J Bearss; Anupam Verma; Sunil Sharma; Hariprasad Vankayalapati; David J Bearss Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2011-12-08 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: Mark A Matulenko; Ernest S Paight; Robin R Frey; Arthur Gomtsyan; Stanley DiDomenico; Meiqun Jiang; Chih-Hung Lee; Andrew O Stewart; Haixia Yu; Kathy L Kohlhaas; Karen M Alexander; Steve McGaraughty; Joseph Mikusa; Kennan C Marsh; Steven W Muchmore; Clarissa L Jakob; Elizabeth A Kowaluk; Michael F Jarvis; Shripad S Bhagwat Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2006-12-20 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Anthony D William; Angeline C-H Lee; Stéphanie Blanchard; Anders Poulsen; Ee Ling Teo; Harish Nagaraj; Evelyn Tan; Dizhong Chen; Meredith Williams; Eric T Sun; Kee Chuan Goh; Wai Chung Ong; Siok Kun Goh; Stefan Hart; Ramesh Jayaraman; Mohammed Khalid Pasha; Kantharaj Ethirajulu; Jeanette M Wood; Brian W Dymock Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Leticia M Toledo-Sherman; Michael E Prime; Ladislav Mrzljak; Maria G Beconi; Alan Beresford; Frederick A Brookfield; Christopher J Brown; Isabell Cardaun; Stephen M Courtney; Ulrike Dijkman; Estelle Hamelin-Flegg; Peter D Johnson; Valerie Kempf; Kathy Lyons; Kimberly Matthews; William L Mitchell; Catherine O'Connell; Paula Pena; Kendall Powell; Arash Rassoulpour; Laura Reed; Wolfgang Reindl; Suganathan Selvaratnam; Weslyn Ward Friley; Derek A Weddell; Naomi E Went; Patricia Wheelan; Christin Winkler; Dirk Winkler; John Wityak; Christopher J Yarnold; Dawn Yates; Ignacio Munoz-Sanjuan; Celia Dominguez Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 7.446