| Literature DB >> 35498472 |
Lu Zheng1,2, Yucai Lin1,3, Donghui Wang1, Jipeng Chen1, Ke Yang1, Binbin Zheng1, Weibin Bai1,3, Rongkun Jian1,3, Yanlian Xu1,3,4.
Abstract
Silver nanoparticle-based coatings have been regarded as promising candidates for marine antifouling. However, current toxic fabrication methods also lead to environment risks. Nanoparticle agglomeration, poor compatibility with polymer, and rapid release of Ag+ result in short-term efficacy. In this study, a facile one-pot synthesis method of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) encapsulated in polymeric urushiol (PUL) was developed. AgNPs were synthesized in situ by natural urushiol, serving as a reductant, dispersant and surfactant. Simultaneously, silver nitrate catalyzed the polymerization of urushiol into PUL. This in situ reduction method made AgNPs uniformly distributed in the polymer matrix. The binding between the AgNPs and the PUL resulted in the stable release of Ag+. Results showed the antibacterial rate of a 0.1% AgNPs coating is 100% in laboratory experiments. This environment-friendly coating showed good microbial inhibition performance with long-term (120 days) marine antifouling efficacy. This study shows the potential of preparing an eco-friendly coating with long-term marine antifouling ability. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35498472 PMCID: PMC9051603 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra02205e
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
The composition of composite coatings
| Sample | Chlorinated rubber (g) | Rosin (g) | Urushiol (g) | Silver nitrate (mL) | Organically modified bentonite (g) | AgNPs content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | 40 | 4.53 | 0 | 0 | 0.50 | 0 |
| b | 40 | 4.53 | 0.14 | 3.96 | 0.50 | 0.05 |
| c | 40 | 4.53 | 0.29 | 7.93 | 0.50 | 0.1 |
| d | 40 | 4.53 | 0.89 | 23.81 | 0.50 | 0.3 |
Fig. 1Schematic in situ fabrication of PUL/AgNPs.
Fig. 2TEM images of PUL/AgNPs (a–d); EDS of AgNPs (e); UV-vis spectra of AgNPs (f); FT-IR spectra of urushiol (U); PUL/AgNPs (g); XRD image of AgNPs (h).
Fig. 3SEM images (a0–c0) and EDS mappings of Ag (a1–c1) of 0.05% AgNPs coating (a), 0.1% AgNPs coating (b), 0.3% AgNPs coating (c).
Fig. 4The XRD pattern of AgNPs in the composite coating.
Fig. 5Cross-section SEM images (i) of the 0% AgNPs coating (a), the 0.05% AgNPs coating (b), the 0.1% AgNPs coating (c) and the 0.3% AgNPs coating (d); Ag+ release kinetics (ii).
Fig. 6SEM images of E. coli (i) and S. aureus (ii) attached to the bare slide (a), the 0% AgNPs coating (b), the 0.05% AgNPs coating (c), the 0.1% AgNPs coating (d), the 0.3% AgNPs coating (e).
The antibacterial rate of AgNPs coatingsa
| Antibacterial rate (%) | a | b | c | d | e |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0 | 0 | 99.43 | 100 | 100 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 99.80 | 100 | 100 |
(a) slide; (b) the 0% AgNPs coating; (c) the 0.05% AgNPs coating; (d) 0.1% AgNPs coating; (e) the 0.3% AgNPs coating.
Fig. 7Cell densities of I. zhanjiangensis (a), P. tricornutum (b), N. closterium (c).
Fig. 8Images of marine fouling tests of composite coating before and after immersion in sea water for 120 days.