| Literature DB >> 35498117 |
Dumitrela Diaconu1, Dorina Amăriucăi-Mantu2, Violeta Mangalagiu1,3, Vasilichia Antoci2, Gheorghita Zbancioc2, Ionel I Mangalagiu2,1.
Abstract
A green, straightforward and efficient study for obtaining hybrid quinoline-imidazole derivatives under ultrasound (US) irradiation as well as under conventional thermal heating (TH) has been presented. The reaction pathway involves only two steps: the N-alkylation of imidazole ring and a Huisgen [3 + 2] dipolar cycloaddition reaction of ylides to dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (DMAD). For both types of reactions, a green workup procedure under US irradiation has been presented. Under US irradiation, the N-alkylation of nitrogen atoms from the imidazole nucleus has outstanding benefits in terms of reaction time, energy consumption and yields, and can thereby be considered an environmentally friendly method. Forty new hybrid quinoline-imidazole compounds have been synthesized: 18 salts, 8 dihydro-benzopyrrolo imidazolo quinoline, 9 benzopyrrolo-imidazolo quinoline and 5 dihydro-pyrroloquinoxaline quinoline cycloadducts. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35498117 PMCID: PMC9044051 DOI: 10.1039/d1ra07484a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Scheme 1Synthesis of hybrid quinoline imidazolium salts 3a-i and 3′a-i.
Obtaining quinoline imidazolium salts 3a-i and 3′a-i using conventional TH and US irradiation
| Compound | 3a | 3b | 3c | 3d | 3e | 3f | 3g | 3h | 3i | |
| R.t. (h) | CV | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 96 | 48 | 48 | 48 |
| US | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.3 | |
| Compound | 3′a | 3′b | 3′c | 3′d | 3′e | 3′f | 3′g | 3′h | 3′i | |
| R.t. (h) | CV | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 96 | 96 | 48 | 48 |
| US | 1.6 | 1.3 | 2 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 1.3 | |
| Compound | 3a | 3b | 3c | 3d | 3e | 3f | 3g | 3h | 3i | |
| Yield, % | CV | 90 | 75 | 56 | 87 | 82 | 63 | 74 | 80 | 88 |
| US | 96 | 80 | 63 | 91 | 85 | 65 | 79 | 84 | 90 | |
| Compound | 3′′a | 3′b | 3′c | 3′d | 3′e | 3′f | 3′g | 3′h | 3′′i | |
| Yield, % | CV | 56 | 84 | 78 | 86 | 81 | 51 | 67 | 75 | 83 |
| US | 78 | 86 | 82 | 90 | 83 | 58 | 70 | 84 | 87 | |
Scheme 3The Huisgen 3 + 2 cycloaddition of ylides 4a-i and 4′a-i with DMAD.
Comparative study of US versus CV (conventional) irradiation, using Et3N, for the cycloaddition reactions of ylides 4a-i with DMAD
| Compound | 5a | 5b | 5c | 5d | 5e | 5f | 5g | 5h | 5i | |
| Yield, % | CV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| US | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | |
| Compound | 6a | 6b | 6c | 6d | 6e | 6f | 6g | 6h | 6i | |
| Yield, % | CV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| US | 6 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | |
| Compound | 7a | 7b | 7c | 7d | 7e | 7f | 7g | 7h | 7i | |
| Yield, % | CV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| US | 17 | 34 | 0 | 12 | 13 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Scheme 2Reaction mechanism for obtaining dihydro-pyrrolo-quinoxaline quinoline compounds 7a-i.
Comparative study of US versus CV (conventional) irradiation, using 1,2-epoxybutane, for the cycloaddition reactions of ylides 4a-i with DMAD
| Compound | 5a | 5b | 5c | 5d | 5e | 5f | 5g | 5h | 5i | |
| Yield, % | CV | 0 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 21 | 13 | 13 | 12 | 18 |
| US | 0 | 24 | 17 | 29 | 25 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 22 | |
| Compound | 6a | 6b | 6c | 6d | 6e | 6f | 6g | 6h | 6i | |
| Yield, % | CV | 32 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 14 | 10 | 8 |
| US | 37 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 13 | 10 | 8 | |
| Compound | 7a | 7b | 7c | 7d | 7e | 7f | 7g | 7h | 7i | |
| Yield, % | CV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| US | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Comparative study US versus CV (conventional) irradiation, using 1,2-epoxybutane and TPCD, for the cycloaddition reactions of ylides 4a-i with DMAD
| Compound | 6a | 6b | 6c | 6d | 6e | 6f | 6g | 6h | 6i | |
| Yield, % | CV | 42 | 25 | 21 | 39 | 35 | 31 | 36 | 30 | 37 |
| US | 45 | 29 | 32 | 41 | 42 | 40 | 44 | 34 | 39 | |