| Literature DB >> 35497946 |
Imene Cherif1, Rafik Arbouche2, Yasmine Arbouche3, Achour Mennani3, Fodil Arbouche2.
Abstract
Background and Aim: The potential solution is to use agro-industrial by-products as an unconventional source of raw materials for broiler feed. This study aims to determine the effects of substituting prickly pear (FB; Opuntia ficus-indica) husks for corn and FB seed cake for soybean meal on the production performance, slaughter characteristics, and chemical composition of broiler meat. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: broiler feed; prickly pear processing; production cost
Year: 2022 PMID: 35497946 PMCID: PMC9047148 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.551-557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Chemical composition of prickly pear processing by-products in % DM.
| Composition | Seed cake | Dehydrated envelopes |
|---|---|---|
| DM | 94.3 | 94.5 |
| Organic matter | 98.3 | 91.3 |
| Crude protein | 8.8 | 5.6 |
| Crude fiber | 55 | 52.3 |
| Fat | 2.7 | 4 |
| Ash | 1.7 | 8.7 |
| Nitrogen-free extract | 31.7 | 29.4 |
| Gross energy | 4443 | 4166 |
| Metabolizable energy | 1818 | 1710 |
| Lysine | 0.54 | 0.98 |
| Methionine (g/100 g protein) | 0.32 | 0.52 |
| Cystine | 0.31 | 0.62 |
Estimated according to the formula of Carpenter and Clegg[23] with ME (kcal/kg DM)=35.3×P (%)+79.5×F (%)+40.6×NNE (%)+199. ME=Metabolizable energy, CP=Crude protein, F=Fat, NNE=Non-nitrogenous extractive, DM=Dry matter
Formulas (kg/100 kg feed) of starter (1-20 days), grower (21-33 days), and finisher (34-48 days) feed distributed to chickens according to the rate of substitution of corn by prickly pear (FB) husks and soybean meal by FB seed cake.
| Composition | Start | Growth | Finishing | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| Substitution rate (%) | 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 |
| Ingredients | ||||||||||||
| Corn | 61 | 55 | 49 | 43 | 64 | 58 | 51 | 45 | 70 | 63 | 56 | 49 |
| Envelopes from FB | 0 | 06 | 12 | 18 | 0 | 06 | 13 | 19 | 0 | 07 | 14 | 21 |
| Soya cake | 30 | 27 | 24 | 21 | 27 | 24 | 22 | 19 | 21 | 19 | 17 | 15 |
| FB seed cake | 0 | 03 | 06 | 09 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 08 | 0 | 02 | 4 | 06 |
| From milling | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Bi-calcium phosphorus | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| CMV | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| L-Lysine | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| DL-Methionine | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Nutrient content in % DM | ||||||||||||
| Metabolizable energy | 2890 | 2877 | 2847 | 2837 | 2840 | 2822 | 2812 | 2800 | 2990 | 3093 | 3120 | 3192 |
| Crude protein (%) | 21 | 18.2 | 20.3 | 20.4 | 20;3 | 19.1 | 19.1 | 19.1 | 18 | 17 | 17 | 16.5 |
| Fat content (%) | 2.8 | 5.4 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 4.7 |
| Ash (%) | 3 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 4.09 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 3.7 | 4.1 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 4 |
| Crude fiber (%) | 3.0 | 8.7 | 13.7 | 17.7 | 2.9 | 8.6 | 13.6 | 17.5 | 2.8 | 8.4 | 12.8 | 17.3 |
| Lysine (%) | 1.20 | 9.62 | 8.66 | 7.92 | 1.38 | 8.82 | 8.12 | 7.16 | 1.22 | 7.5 | 6.81 | 6.11 |
| Methionine (%) | 0.72 | 2.78 | 2;53 | 2.27 | 0.60 | 2.68 | 2.44 | 2.18 | 0.57 | 2.38 | 2.24 | 2.02 |
CMV=Cytomegalovirus, DM=Diabetes mellitus
Changes in weight growth and ADG (g/d/subject) during the start-up, growth, and finishing phases as a function of substitution rates.
| Phase | 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | SEM | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start-up phase | ||||||
| Initial weight (g) | 37.00 | 37.00 | 37.00 | 37.00 | ||
| Weight on 10 days (g) | 137b | 161a | 114d | 128c | 2.19 | 0.001 |
| ADG 1-10 (g/d/subject) | 11.1b | 13.8a | 8.6d | 10.1c | 0.25 | 0.02 |
| Weight on 20 days (g) | 438b | 489a | 412c | 407c | 9.67 | 0.01 |
| ADG 11-20 (g/d/subject) | 33.4b | 36.4a | 33.1b | 31.0c | 1.13 | 0.001 |
| ADG 1-20 (g/d/subject) | 21.1b | 23.8a | 19.8c | 19.5c | 0.36 | 0.01 |
| Growth phase | ||||||
| Weight on 33 days (g) | 1032b | 1139a | 1020bc | 987c | 2.21 | 0.03 |
| ADG 21-33 (g/d/subject) | 49.5b | 54.2a | 50.6b | 48.3b | 1.48 | 0.01 |
| Finishing phase | ||||||
| Weight on 48 days (g) | 2003c | 2225a | 2061b | 1948d | 41.43 | 0.02 |
| ADG 34-48 (g/d/subject) | 69.5c | 77.5a | 74.3b | 68.7c | 1.18 | 0.02 |
| ADG 1-48 (g/d/subject) | 39.7c | 43.9a | 41.4b | 38.7c | 0.88 | 0.001 |
The indices indicate the period in days over which this parameter was calculated. The presence of different letters on the same line indicates a significant difference between diets (p<0.05). ADG=Average daily gain, SEM=Standard error of the mean
Changes in average daily intake and the feed efficiency as a function of the substitution rate.
| Parameter | 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | SEM | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average daily intake (g/subject) | ||||||
| From 1 to 10 days | 270a | 265b | 263b | 263b | 3.51 | 0.01 |
| From 11 to 20 days | 511a | 513a | 504b | 510a | 6.82 | 0.01 |
| From 21 to 33 days | 1500 | 1490 | 1488 | 1487 | 10.24 | 0.3 |
| From 34 to 48 days | 2844b | 2869a | 2870a | 2846b | 19.56 | 0.01 |
| From 1 to 48 days | 5125b | 5137a | 5125b | 5106c | 53.8 | 0.02 |
| Feed efficiency (g/g) | ||||||
| From 1 to 10 days | 2.7b | 2.1c | 3.4a | 2.9b | 0.253 | 0.001 |
| From 11 to 20 days | 1.7b | 1.6b | 1.7b | 1.9a | 0.566 | 0.01 |
| From 21 to 33 days | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 0.292 | 0.38 |
| From 34 to 48 days | 2.9a | 2.6b | 2.7b | 2.9a | 0.127 | 0.04 |
| From 1 to 48 days | 2.6a | 2.3b | 2.4b | 2.6a | 0.132 | 0.01 |
The presence of different letters on the same line indicates a significant difference between the diets (p<0.05). SEM=Standard error of the mean
Changes in slaughter parameters and meat chemistry as a function of the substitution rate.
| Parameter | 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | SEM | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slaughter parameters | ||||||
| Live weight (g) (Pv) | 2009c | 2221a | 2052b | 1990c | 119.1 | 0.01 |
| Hot carcass weight (g) | 1406c | 1597a | 1487b | 1398c | 41.38 | 0.01 |
| Hot carcass yield % | 69.9b | 72.0a | 72.5a | 70.2b | 0.12 | 0.01 |
| Cold carcass weight (g) | 1265c | 1494a | 1391b | 1222d | 44.1 | 0.01 |
| Cold carcass yield%. | 63b | 67.3a | 67.8a | 61.4c | 1.87 | 0.01 |
| Visceral weight (g) | 239 | 236 | 235 | 240 | 4.1 | 0.88 |
| Head weight (g) | 67 | 66 | 68 | 69 | 7.84 | 0.25 |
| Leg weight (g) | 100 | 98 | 110 | 100 | 11.63 | 0.35 |
| Weight feather (g) | 147 | 146 | 146 | 147 | 11.03 | 0.81 |
| Weight liver (g) (Pf) | 53a | 47b | 45b | 46b | 7.82 | 0.03 |
| Pf/Pv ratio (%) | 2.6a | 2.1b | 2.2b | 2.3b | 0.56 | 0.01 |
| Gizzard weight (g) (Pg) | 58b | 85a | 82a | 80a | 11.06 | 0.02 |
| Pg/Pv ratio (%) | 2.9b | 3.8a | 3.9a | 4.0a | 0. 87 | 0.02 |
| Chemical composition of the meat | ||||||
| pH | 6.34a | 6.31a | 6.36a | 6.23b | 0.034 | 0.01 |
| Crude protein content | 16.36b | 18.39a | 18.50a | 18.77a | 0.61 | 0.004 |
| Fat content | 3.06a | 2.87b | 2.56c | 1.98d | 0.183 | 0.001 |
| Mineral content | 0.88b | 0.98a | 0.96a | 0.94a | 0.148 | 0.02 |
The presence of different letters on the same line indicates a significant difference between the diets (p<0.05). SEM=Standard error of the mean