| Literature DB >> 30532492 |
Abdelhamid Baa1,2, Fodil Arbouche3, Rafik Arbouche3, Etienne Montaigne4, Yasmine Arbouche5, Halima Saâdia Arbouche3.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of incorporating three local oasis by-products [cull dates (CDs), date pedicels (DPs) treated with urea, and juice from rumen content] into the food ration of Ouled Djellal lambs on fattening performance and carcass characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: cull dates; date pedicels; extract of rumen content; sheep fattening
Year: 2018 PMID: 30532492 PMCID: PMC6247884 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.1397-1403
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Chemical composition of CDs.
| Mineral substances (% of DM) | 2.9 |
| Total nitrogenous matter (% of DM) | 4.2 |
| Crude fiber (% of DM) | 9.4 |
| Fat (% of DM) | 8.2 |
| Total sugars (% of DM) | 63.87 |
| Gross energy (kcal/kg of DM) | 4.235 |
| Meat feed unit | 1.12 |
CDs=cull dates DM=Dry matter
Chemical composition of DPs[9].
| Designation | DM % | % of DM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OM | TNM | CF | MM | ||
| Pedicels from 1 year treated under black plastic film | 86.28 | 94.88 | 13.62 | 32.18 | 5.12 |
DPs=Date pedicels. DM=Dry matter, OM=Organic matter, TNM=Total nitrogenous matter, CF=Crude fiber, MM=Ash
Content of the ovine RCE in terms of nitrogenous matter (% of DM) and amino acids (% of TNM).
| RCE (%) | TNM | Amino acid content | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cystine | Methionine | Threonine | Lysine | Glutamic acid | Aspartic acid | Arginine | Leucine | Isoleucine | ||
| 8.32 | 0.89 | 1.10 | 2.14 | 2.56 | 10.21 | 6.24 | 2.85 | 4.36 | 1.81 | |
RCE=Rumen content extract, DM=Dry matter, TNM=Total nitrogenous matter
Composition and nutrient content of the basic ration.
| Ingredients (g) | Control | Group 50 | Group 80 | Group 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barley straw | 700 | 350 | 140 | 0 |
| Treated pedicels | 350 | 560 | 700 | |
| Oat hay | 700 | 700 | 700 | 700 |
| Nutrient content as % | ||||
| Dry matter | 94.75 | 92.75 | 91.55 | 90.75 |
| Fat | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Crude protein | 3.95 | 6.75 | 8.43 | 9.55 |
| Crude fiber | 43.9 | 41.425 | 39.94 | 38.95 |
| Mineral substances | 5.45 | 5.45 | 5.45 | 5.45 |
| MFU | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.26 |
MFU=Meat feed unit
Feed formulae of the additional rations (in % 100 of feed).
| Ingredients | Control group | Experimental groups |
|---|---|---|
| Corn | 60 | 0 |
| Cull dates | 0 | 60 |
| Soya meal | 20 | 20 |
| Wheat bran | 9 | 9 |
| Carob | 9 | 9 |
| Salt | 1 | 1 |
| CMV | 1 | 1 |
| Rumen fluid (ml/kg) | 0 | 250 |
| Nutrient content as % | ||
| Dry matter | 85.31 | 87.71 |
| Fat | 2.59 | 2.61 |
| Crude protein | 16.23 | 16.25 |
| Crude fiber | 7.53 | 7.90 |
| Mineral substances | 6.83 | 6.34 |
| MFU | 1.14 | 1.15 |
Calculated according to the equations proposed by Sauvant et al. [15], CMV=Complement mineral vitamin, MFU=Meat feed unit
Fattening performances of Ouled Djellal lambs.
| Parameters | L0 | L50 | L80 | L100 | SEM | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial LW (kg) | 32.3 | 31.7 | 32.1 | 32.4 | 0.43 | 0.95 |
| Final LW (kg) | 39.6a | 40.1ab | 40.5ab | 43.1b | 0.55 | 0.01 |
| ADG (g) | 130.35a | 149.10a | 150a | 191.07b | 5.47 | 0.001 |
| ADI (g/animal/day) | 900.9a | 917.8a | 922.3a | 963.4b | 12.56 | 0.001 |
| FCR (g DM/g) | 7.34b | 6.49b | 6.27ab | 5.08a | 0.25 | 0.01 |
In each line, the numbers followed by the same exponents do not differ significantly at p<0.05, SEM=Standard error of the mean, LW=Live weight, ADG=Average daily gain, ADI=Average daily intake, FCR=Feed conversion ratio, DM=Dry matter
Figure-1Change in live weight according to the substitution rates.
Effects of incorporating DPs and cull dates on the characteristics of Ouled Djellal lamb carcasses.
| Parameters | 0 | 50 | 80 | 100 | SEM | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hot carcass weight (kg) | 20.13 | 20.26 | 20.46 | 22.93 | 0.57 | 0.28 |
| Cold carcass weight (kg) | 19.5 | 19.53 | 19.9 | 22.43 | 0.57 | 0.22 |
| Carcass yield (%) | 44.66a | 45.35a | 47.31ab | 48.77b | 0.63 | 0.01 |
| Thickness of back fat (cm) | 3.93b | 3.46a | 3.56ab | 3.23a | 0.09 | 0.02 |
| Thickness of leg (cm) | 30.66 | 27.13 | 30.23 | 30.9 | 0.9 | 0.47 |
| Width of pelvis (G) (cm) | 22.63 | 20.96 | 21.26 | 23.0 | 0.57 | 0.58 |
| Width of chest (LAC) (cm) | 19.16 | 19.83 | 19.30 | 20.56 | 0.62 | 0.89 |
| Width of shoulders (M) (cm) | 15.86 | 16.33 | 15.66 | 17.93 | 0.43 | 0.25 |
| Length of carcass (K) (cm) | 66.33 | 67.50 | 67.66a | 68.00 | 0.95 | 0.95 |
| Depth of chest (TH) (cm) | 30.2 | 26.4 | 29.86 | 30.3 | 0.95 | 0.45 |
| Length of leg (F) (cm) | 33.96 | 37.00 | 35.00 | 36.83 | 0.69 | 0.37 |
| Leg index (width/length) | 0.66b | 0.56a | 0.60ab | 0.62ab | 0.015 | 0.03 |
| Carcass index 1 (width/length) | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.008 | 0.91 |
| Muscle index (thickness/length of leg) | 0.90b | 0.73a | 0.86ab | 0.84ab | 0.026 | 0.01 |
| Carcass index 2 (weight/length of carcass) | 0.295 | 0.289 | 0.293 | 0.330 | 0.008 | 0.30 |
| Conformation index (g/cm) | 1.19b | 1.02a | 1.15ab | 1.17b | 0.026 | 0.02 |
DPs=Date pedicels, In each line, the numbers followed by the same exponents do not differ significantly at P<0.05, SEM=Standard error of the mean
Economic cost.
| Raw materials | Price DZD/kg | % substitution | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100 | ||||
| Qt (g) | Price | Qt (g) | Price | ||
| Control concentrate | 45 | 900.89 | 40.54 | ||
| Experimental concentrate | 42.63 | 963.39 | 41.07 | ||
| Control basic R | 20 | 500 | 10 | ||
| Experimental basic R | 4.168 | 500 | 2.08 | ||
| Price (DZD/d) ovine ration | 50.54 | 43.15 | |||
| ADG (g) | 130.35 | 191.07 | |||
| Price the consumer is willing to pay to have the same yield[ | 74.08[ | ||||
| Profit margin (DZD/day/animal)[ | 30.93[ | ||||
N.B.=The food prices used are the local market prices,
Calculated by the rule of three: The farmer pays DZD 50.54 to have 130.35 g of grow, so for an grow of 191.07 g, he must pay DZD 74.08,
It is the difference between the price of the farmer’s ration and the experimental ration (100%) for an grow of 191.07 g (DZD 43.15 vs. 74.08), ADG=Average daily gain
Cost of producing 1 kg of live weight.
| Costs | Control group | 100% group | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feed costs (DZD/day) | 50.54 | 43.15 | −7.39 |
| Production costs | 107.53 | 91.8 | −15.72 |
| ADG (g) | 130,35 | 191.07 | −60.72 |
| Production costs (DZD/kg) | 824,93 | 480.07 | −344.47 |
| Sale price of 1 kg lamb LW | 650.00 | 650.00 | - |
| Profit margin (DZD/kg LW) | −174.93 | 169.52 | - |
Calculated by the rule of three; feed costs=47% of total production cost [1],
Sale price of 1 kg lamb LW in the experimental farm during the period of Aïd El Kebîr, ADG=Average daily gain, LW=Live weight