Literature DB >> 35497696

Patient satisfaction, outcomes and experience measures in patients receiving general anaesthesia: A prospective questionnaire based observational study.

Sri Harsha Chalasani1, C L Gurudatt2, Madhan Ramesh1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35497696      PMCID: PMC9053884          DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_945_21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Anaesth        ISSN: 0019-5049


× No keyword cloud information.

INTRODUCTION

Patient satisfaction encompasses a multidimensional approach to determining how well the patient’s expectations about the service provided by medical care have been met and is an indicator to assess the safety and quality of medical care.[12] Anaesthesia-specific measures include the three aforementioned domains of quality: effectiveness, which assesses procedure-related discomfort; patient-centredness, which assesses patient satisfaction regarding the care delivered; and safety, which estimates the incidence of events that can lead to long-term harm, such as accidental awareness during general anaesthesia[3]

METHODS

This prospective questionnaire based observational study was conducted over a period of six months at the Department of Anaesthesiology in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Southern India with the approval of the Institutional Human Ethics Committee. Patients over the age of 18 years receiving general anaesthesia and of either gender were included; obstetric, and terminally ill cases were excluded from the study. All necessary and relevant data were collected from the patient case notes, patient records, anaesthesia records, patient and healthcare professional interviews. All the eligible 297 patients were followed up post-surgery at the 0th, 24th, and 48th hour of interviewing and completion of the Bauer and modified Brice questionnaire[4] that was used to evaluate patient satisfaction. This questionnaire was further divided into two parts: The first part consisted of questions on anaesthesia-related discomfort, and the second part examined patient dissatisfaction. This study was conducted with the primary objective of assessing patient satisfaction, experience, and outcome measures after receiving general anaesthesia. All the study data are represented as numbers with percentage (%).

RESULTS

A total of 297 eligible patients were enroled in the study, out of which 246 patients (168 men (68.30%) and 78 women (31.70%)) completed both the questionnaires and the response rate of the study was found to be 82.82% [Table 1]. The most frequent discomfort reported was pain at the site of surgery (37.26% (31.57% moderate and 5.69% severe)), followed by 23.30% patients complaining of thirst (21.95% moderate and 1.35% severe). Pain at the site of anaesthetic injection was reported by 20.86% patients. The responses to the anaesthesia-related discomfort questionnaire varied [Table 2]. Majority of the study population were “very satisfied” with the overall care provided. The responses to the patient-satisfaction questionnaire were also varied [Table 3].
Table 1

Characteristics of the study population

CharacteristicsNo. of Patients (%) (n=246)
Gender
 Male168 (68.30)
 Female78 (31.70)
Age [35.15±23.15 years] (Mean±SD)
 18-3060 (24.39)
 31-4046 (18.69)
 41-5054 (21.95)
 51-6041 (16.66)
 61-7039 (15.85)
 71-805 (2.03)
 81-901 (0.40)
Body Mass Index [BMI (kg/m2)]
 Below 18.526 (10.57)
 18.5-24.9142 (57.72)
 25-29.365 (26.43)
 30 and above13 (5.28)
Medical/Surgical Specialities
 General Surgery102 (41.47)
 Ear Nose Throat (ENT)40 (16.26)
 Neurology28 (11.39)
 Gastroenterology23 (9.35)
 Urology23 (9.35)
 Orthopaedics12 (4.88)
 Plastic Surgery10 (4.06)
 Dental4 (1.62)
 Obstetrics and Gynaecology3 (1.21)
 General Medicine1 (0.41)
Type of Surgery
 Major107 (43.50)
 Minor72 (29.26)
 Moderate67 (27.24)
Mode of Surgery
 Elective218 (88.62)
 Emergency28 (11.38)
ASA Physical Status
 I75 (30.49)
 II128 (52.03)
 III34 (13.83)
 IV8 (3.25)
 V1 (0.40)

ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; No,n: Number; SD: Standard deviation

Table 2

Responses to the anaesthesia-related discomfort questionnaire

Anaesthesia-related discomfort0th Hour (%)24th Hour (%)48th Hour (%)Mean±SD
Drowsiness
 None87.4090.6594.31223.33±8.50
 Yes, Moderate12.609.355.6922.66±8.50
 Yes, Severe0.000.000.000
Pain at Site of Surgery
 None58.9458.5470.73154.33±17.04
 Yes, Moderate35.7734.5524.3977.66±15.37
 Yes, Severe5.286.914.8814±2.65
Thirst
 None69.1174.8086.18188.66±21.39
 Yes, Moderate28.8623.9813.0154±19.97
 Yes, Severe2.031.220.813.33±1.53
Hoarseness
 None88.6291.8794.72225.66±7.51
 Yes, Moderate10.988.135.2820±7.00
 Yes, Severe0.410.000.000.33±0.58
Sore throat
 None86.5989.8494.31222±9.54
 Yes, Moderate12.609.354.8822±9.54
 Yes, Severe0.810.810.812
Nausea or Vomiting
 None98.7897.1597.97241±2.00
 Yes, Moderate1.222.852.035±2.00
 Yes, Severe0.000.000.000
Feeling Cold
 None89.8495.5397.56232±9.85
 Yes, Moderate9.764.071.6312.66±10.26
 Yes, Severe0.410.410.811.33±0.58
Confusion or Disorientation
 None99.1999.5999.59244.66±0.58
 Yes, Moderate0.810.410.411.33±0.58
 Yes, Severe0.000.000.000
Pain at the Site of Anaesthetic Injection
 None78.0576.4282.93194.66±8.33
 Yes, Moderate20.3321.1414.6346±8.72
 Yes, Severe1.632.442.445.33±1.15
Shivering
 None95.5396.7597.97238±3.00
 Yes, Moderate4.072.851.226.66±3.51
 Yes, Severe0.410.410.811.33±0.58

SD: Standard deviation

Table 3

Responses to the patient satisfaction questionnaire

Domain0th Hour (%)24th Hour (%)48th Hour (%)Mean±SD
Perioperative Information
 Very Satisfied91.0691.0690.65223.6±0.58
 Satisfied7.327.327.7218.33±0.58
 Dissatisfied1.631.631.634±0.00
 Very Dissatisfied0.000.000.000
 Not Applicable0.000.000.000
Waking Up
 Very Satisfied86.1886.5987.80213.66±2.08
 Satisfied10.5710.1611.3826.33±1.53
 Dissatisfied3.253.250.816±3.46
 Very Dissatisfied0.000.000.000
 Not Applicable0.000.000.000
Pain Therapy
 Very Satisfied86.1886.5986.59212.66±0.58
 Satisfied9.358.549.7622.66±1.53
 Dissatisfied4.074.473.259.66±1.53
 Very Dissatisfied0.410.410.411±0.00
 Not Applicable0.000.000.000
PONV Therapy
 Very Satisfied0.810.810.812±0.00
 Satisfied1.630.811.633.33±1.15
 Dissatisfied0.411.220.411.66±1.15
 Very Dissatisfied0.000.000.000
 Not Applicable97.1597.1597.15239±0.00
Overall Care
 Very Satisfied90.2491.0691.06223.33±1.15
 Satisfied9.768.948.9422.66±1.15
 Dissatisfied0.000.000.000
 Very Dissatisfied0.000.000.000
 Not Applicable0.000.000.000

PONV: Postoperative nausea and vomiting; SD: Standard deviation

Characteristics of the study population ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; No,n: Number; SD: Standard deviation Responses to the anaesthesia-related discomfort questionnaire SD: Standard deviation Responses to the patient satisfaction questionnaire PONV: Postoperative nausea and vomiting; SD: Standard deviation In response to the question, “Did you dream during the procedure?” and “Were your dreams disturbing to you?” (48th hour), 232 patients (94%) did not have dreams and only 14 of the patients (6%) reported having experienced dreams; 13 (5%) of these reported that the dreams were disturbing. In response to the question, “What is the last thing you remember before going to sleep?” (48th hour) 161 patients (65.44%) responded to having “seen the operation room” as their last memory before going to sleep, followed by 28 (11.38%) “hearing voices”, and 21 (8.53%) reporting “nothing significant” that they could recall. In response to the question, “What is the first thing you remember after waking up?” (48th hour), 102 patients (41.46%) responded to “being in the recovery room” as their first thing to remember after waking up, followed by 91 (36.99%) “hearing voices”, 23 (9.34%) “seeing the operation room”, and 25 (10.16%) responding “nothing significant” that they could recall. In response to the question “Would you recommend this anaesthesia service to friends and family?” (48th hour), 245 patients (99.59%) gave a positive response.

DISCUSSION

Patient satisfaction is the balance between prior expectations and later perceptions of the healthcare service received by the patients.[5] An ideal measure of patient satisfaction could therefore provide unique feedback on the quality of practice for medical specialities such as anaesthesia.[6] The current study results revealed that pain at the site of surgery (37.26%) was the most commonly reported discomfort followed by thirst (23.30%), and pain at the site of anaesthetic injection (20.86%). These results were in concordance with the results of the study conducted by Baur M et al. that showed drowsiness (80%), pain at the site of surgery (56.5%), and thirst (more than 50%) to be the most commonly reported discomforts in the patients.[6] Nevertheless, Teukens et al. reported 27.3% pain during injection of propofol, followed by 29.8% sore throat as the most common discomfort.[7] Propofol is the general anaesthetic agent used among the study population of all these studies. Pain at the site of injection is the common adverse effect reported with it; nonetheless, propofol is an alkylphenol, which is expected to cause pain, since all phenols irritate the skin and mucous membrane.[8] 9.21% and 9.75% of the population in the current study reported drowsiness and sore throat respectively. Similar findings were reported by Walker EM et al.,[3] with 64.2% drowsiness and 29.92% sore throat reported amongst their study population. In the current study, 2.03% of the patients reported nausea and vomiting as a discomfort following surgery which was less when compared with the results reported in the study conducted by P S Myles et al.,[9] where the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was found to be 9.7%. Lapere C et al.[1] reported nausea and vomiting among 10.02% and 2.7% of the patients respectively. The reason for this could be the difference in the anaesthetic agent used. Propofol is the anaesthetic agent used in the current study which has high antiemetic properties along with being an effective anaesthetic agent. The current study population experienced pain (27, 10.97%), anxiety (6, 2.43%), and anxiety and pain (3, 1.21%) as the worst thing about their operation. Walker EM et al.[3] study findings showed a higher incidence of patients experiencing pain (16.7%) and anxiety (33.3%), However, reports by Mavridou P et al. showed higher incidence of anxiety (81%).[10] In the current study, the reason for higher number of patients reporting anxiety may have been the fear of death, postoperative pain, needles and drains, nausea, etc. There are many common adverse events reported with general anaesthesia such as transient confusion or memory loss, dizziness, urinary retention, nausea, vomiting, chills, sore throat. Elderly patients and lengthy surgical procedures can be associated with a higher risk of developing complications such as persistent confusion, memory loss, pneumonia, thromboembolism, and cerebrovascular accidents. In a study conducted to assess satisfaction amongst the patients receiving regional or general anaesthesia, it was found that the patients who received regional anaesthesia reported more satisfaction when compared to the patients who received general anaesthesia. Also, the patients who received regional anaesthesia reported lesser postoperative nausea and vomiting, greater analgesia, and shorter hospital stay, when compared to the patients who received general anaesthesia.[11] Nonetheless, the current study included only general anaesthesia patients. Similar studies on patient satisfaction with different types of anaesthesia techniques including peripheral nerve blocks and total intravenous anaesthesia need to be conducted. This will help to provide inputs and ideas to improve the perioperative quality of care which is an important part of patient management.[12] Nevertheless,the limited number of general anaesthesia cases and the short study period affected the sample size of our study.

CONCLUSION

The epitome of patient care vests in their well-being and satisfaction. However, drug-related problems, especially adverse drug events could compromise both, thus housing limited quality of care for the patients. Employing questionnaire-based patient reported outcomes measures would allow the hospitals to identify the predictors of patient satisfaction and their safety-related issues. Clinical pharmacists could assist the healthcare professionals in the early detection and management of drug-related problems and improve overall patient care.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  11 in total

1.  Measuring patient satisfaction with anaesthesia: perioperative questionnaire versus standardised face-to-face interview.

Authors:  M Bauer; H Böhrer; G Aichele; A Bach; E Martin
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.105

2.  Patient satisfaction after anaesthesia and surgery: results of a prospective survey of 10,811 patients.

Authors:  P S Myles; D L Williams; M Hendrata; H Anderson; A M Weeks
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  What do outpatients value most in their anesthesia care?

Authors:  D Fung; M Cohen
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Patient satisfaction with regional anaesthesia and general anaesthesia in upper limb surgeries: An open label, cross-sectional, prospective, observational clinical comparative study.

Authors:  Priyanka Suresh; Akash Mukherjee
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2021-03-13

5.  Patient's anxiety and fear of anesthesia: effect of gender, age, education, and previous experience of anesthesia. A survey of 400 patients.

Authors:  Paraskevi Mavridou; Varvara Dimitriou; Adamantia Manataki; Elena Arnaoutoglou; Georgios Papadopoulos
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Patient reported outcome of adult perioperative anaesthesia in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional observational study.

Authors:  E M K Walker; M Bell; T M Cook; M P W Grocott; S R Moonesinghe
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-06-12       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Measuring satisfaction and anesthesia related outcomes in a surgical day care centre: A three-year single-centre observational study.

Authors:  An Teunkens; Kris Vanhaecht; Kristien Vermeulen; Steffen Fieuws; Marc Van de Velde; Steffen Rex; Luk Bruyneel
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 9.452

8.  Design and methodology of SNAP-1: a Sprint National Anaesthesia Project to measure patient reported outcome after anaesthesia.

Authors:  Suneetha Ramani Moonesinghe; Eleanor Mary Kate Walker; Madeline Bell
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2015-04-17

Review 9.  Pain on propofol injection: Causes and remedies.

Authors:  Kalindi Anil Desousa
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.