Literature DB >> 27956674

Patient reported outcome of adult perioperative anaesthesia in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional observational study.

E M K Walker1, M Bell2, T M Cook3, M P W Grocott4, S R Moonesinghe5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the patient perspective on healthcare is central to the evaluation of quality. This study measured selected patient-reported outcomes after anaesthesia in order to identify targets for research and quality improvement.
METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study in UK National Health Service hospitals, recruited adults undergoing non-obstetric surgery requiring anaesthesia care over a 48 h period. Within 24 h of surgery, patients completed the Bauer questionnaire (measuring postoperative discomfort and satisfaction with anaesthesia care), and a modified Brice questionnaire to elicit symptoms suggestive of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia (AAGA). Patient, procedural and pharmacological data were recorded to enable exploration of risk factors for these poor outcomes.
RESULTS: 257 hospitals in 171 NHS Trusts participated (97% of eligible organisations). Baseline characteristics were collected on 16,222 patients; 15,040 (93%) completed postoperative questionnaires. Anxiety was most frequently cited as the worst aspect of the perioperative experience. Thirty-five per cent of patients reported severe discomfort in at least one domain: thirst (18.5%; 95% CI 17.8-19.1), surgical pain (11.0%; 10.5-11.5) and drowsiness (10.1%; 9.6-10.5) were most common. Despite this, only 5% reported dissatisfaction with any aspect of anaesthesia-related care. Regional anaesthesia was associated with a reduced burden of side-effects. The incidence of reported AAGA was one in 800 general anaesthetics (0.12%)
CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety and discomfort after surgery are common; despite this, satisfaction with anaesthesia care in the UK is high. The inconsistent relationship between patient-reported outcome, patient experience and patient satisfaction supports using all three of these domains to provide a comprehensive assessment of the quality of anaesthesia care.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anaesthesia; awareness; health care; outcome; patient satisfaction; quality indicators

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27956674     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aew381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  24 in total

1.  Fitter, Better, Sooner: helping your patients in general practice recover more quickly from surgery.

Authors:  Hilary Swales; Anne-Marie Bougeard; Ramani Moonesinghe
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Trans-auricular vagus nerve stimulation to reduce perioperative pain and morbidity: protocol for a single-blind analyser-masked randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Amour B U Patel; Phillip P W M Bibawy; Zehra Majeed; Weng Liang Gan; Gareth L Ackland
Journal:  BJA Open       Date:  2022-06

3.  Preoperative anxiety and its association with patients' desire for support - an observational study in adults.

Authors:  Stefan Salzmann; Stephen Rienmüller; Stefan Kampmann; Frank Euteneuer; Dirk Rüsch
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Investigating the causes of patient anxiety at induction of anaesthesia: A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Andrew B Lumb; Gary J Latchford; Hilary L Bekker; Anna R Hetmanski; Caroline R Thomas; Claire E Schofield
Journal:  J Perioper Pract       Date:  2020-07-08

5.  Melatonin for preoperative and postoperative anxiety in adults.

Authors:  Bennedikte K Madsen; Dennis Zetner; Ann Merete Møller; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-08

6.  A randomised controlled pilot trial of two interventions to manage dry mouth in pre-operative elective surgical patients.

Authors:  Leesa Morton; Amanda Tsan Yue Siu; Samuel Fowler; Chen Zhou; Christopher Nixon; Doug Campbell
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2020-06-24

7.  Propofol vs. inhalational agents to maintain general anaesthesia in ambulatory and in-patient surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Schraag; Lorenzo Pradelli; Abdul Jabbar Omar Alsaleh; Marco Bellone; Gianni Ghetti; Tje Lin Chung; Martin Westphal; Sebastian Rehberg
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Effect of magnesium sulfate on anesthesia depth, awareness incidence, and postoperative pain scores in obstetric patients. A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Başak Altıparmak; Nalan Çelebi; Özgür Canbay; Melike K Toker; Banu Kılıçarslan; Ülkü Aypar
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 9.  A Systematic Review of Postoperative Pain Outcome Measurements Utilised in Regional Anesthesia Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  E Pushpanathan; T Setty; B Carvalho; P Sultan
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2018-07-29

10.  SNAP-2 EPICCS: the second Sprint National Anaesthesia Project-EPIdemiology of Critical Care after Surgery: protocol for an international observational cohort study.

Authors:  S Ramani Moonesinghe; Danny J N Wong; Laura Farmer; Richard Shawyer; Paul S Myles; Steve K Harris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.