| Literature DB >> 35497583 |
Xingchen Liu1, Ning Tang1,2, Chi Fang3, Caihua Wan3, Shixiong Zhang1, Xiaoyue Zhang1, Hongming Guan1, Yunfan Zhang1, Xuan Qian4,5, Yang Ji4,5, Weikun Ge1, Xiufeng Han3, Bo Shen1,2.
Abstract
Spin relaxation, affected by interfacial effects, is a critical process for electrical spin injection and transport in semiconductor-based spintronics. In this work, the electrical spin injection into n-GaN via n-GaN/MgO/Co tunnel barrier was realized, and the interface-related spin relaxation was investigated by both electrical Hanle effect measurement and time-resolved Kerr rotation (TRKR) spectrum. It was found that the spin relaxation caused by interfacial random magnetostatic field was nearly equal to the intrinsic contributions at low temperature (less than 80 K) and could be suppressed by smoother n-GaN/Co interface. When the interfacial random magnetostatic field was suppressed, the spin relaxation time extracted from the electrical injection process was still shorter than that in bulk conduction band, which was attributed to Rashba spin-orbit coupling (SOC) induced by the interface band bending in the depletion region. Due to thermal activation, luckily, the spin relaxation induced by the interfacial Rashba SOC was suppressed at temperatures higher than 50 K. These results illustrate that (1) spin relaxation time could be as long as 300 ps for GaN and (2) the influences of interfacial effects could be engineered to further prolong spin relaxation time, both of which shed lights on GaN-based spintronic devices with direct and wide bandgap. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35497583 PMCID: PMC9051297 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra00464b
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1(a) The schematic of the sample structures and setup of three-terminal Hanle effect measurements. (b) The I–V characteristics of the injection circuit of sample A at various temperatures. The inset shows the differential conductance as a function of bias voltages. (c) The I–V characteristics of the injection circuit of sample B at various temperatures. (d) Normalized zero-bias resistance as a function of temperature. The temperature dependence of saturation current is shown in the inset.
Fig. 2(a) The Hanle and inverted Hanle curves in sample A at 2 K. (b) The angle-dependent Hanle and inverted Hanle curves in sample A at 2 K. (c) The extracted FHMW at various angles, and the inset shows the spin relaxation time extracted from the Hanle curves (θ ≥ 45°). (d) The spin relaxation rate 1/τint and 1/τbulk are extracted by linear fitting 1/τs against (1 − cos(θ))2.
Fig. 4(a) The Hanle curve and vanished inverted Hanle curve in sample B at 9 K. (b) The TRKR signals under an external magnetic field at various temperatures. (c) The bias current-dependent τs and bias voltage at 160 K. The corresponding τs extracted from TRKR is also shown. (d) τs extracted by Hanle curves under Iinj = 100 μA and TRKR measurements in sample B at various temperatures.
Fig. 3(a) The bias current-dependent τs and bias voltage in sample A. (b) The temperature-dependent Hanle curves under Iinj = 100 μA. (c) The temperature-dependent τs extracted from Hanle curves and bias voltage under Iinj = 100 μA. (d) The Hanle curve in sample A at 80 K, while the inverted Hanle curve is vanished.