| Literature DB >> 35497062 |
Rosie J Crane1,2, Edward P K Parker3, Simon Fleming4, Agnes Gwela2, Wilson Gumbi2, Joyce M Ngoi2,5, Zaydah R de Laurent2, Emily Nyatichi2, Moses Ngari2,6, Juliana Wambua2, Holm H Uhlig7,8,9, James A Berkley1,2,6.
Abstract
Background: Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED) is a chronic intestinal inflammatory disorder of unclear aetiology prevalent amongst children in low-income settings and associated with stunting. We aimed to characterise development of EED and its putative risk factors amongst rural Kenyan infants.Entities:
Keywords: Breastfeeding; Environmental enteric dysfunction; Gut microbiota; Infant feeding; Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth; Stunting
Year: 2022 PMID: 35497062 PMCID: PMC9046123 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101403
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EClinicalMedicine ISSN: 2589-5370
Figure 1Hypothesised causal framework. Blue arrows indicate hypothesised causation in the direction of the arrow. Blue arrows indicate hypothesised potentiation except for antibiotics, which were proposed to inhibit intestinal dysbiosis and SIBO. The red arrow indicates hypothesised effect modification.
Figure 2Putative EED risk factors by age. (A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve for reported continuous exclusive breastfeeding since birth amongst 99 cohort participants recorded prospectively by weekly caretaker recall. Prelacteal feed recipients (n = 18) are considered still exclusively breastfeeding. Vertical dashed line indicates six months of age. (B) Current reported exclusive breastfeeding status by day of age amongst 99 cohort participants. Ordered by age at first introduction of complementary foods (top three participants had not started complementary foods prior to exit from study). Black lines indicate that the participant was reported to have received only breastmilk on that day. Grey lines indicate that complementary foods were given on that day. Total line length differs by participant due to varying duration of follow-up. Vertical dashed line indicates six months of age. (C) Breath hydrogen test Rome criteria results by age. Error bars indicate 95% confidence interval for proportion negative. (D) Incidence rates by age for acute illnesses and antibiotics. Rates are unadjusted and estimated by integer month age category. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Parasitaemia indicates Plasmodium species diagnosed by slide microscopy.
Figure 3Markers of EED by age. (A–C) Concentrations of faecal alpha-1-antitrypsin (A; n = 432), myeloperoxidase (B; n = 434) neopterin (C; n = 434) amongst stool samples obtained from 99 cohort participants. Two outlying alpha-1-antitrypsin values (12.6 mg/g and 45.2 mg/g) are not shown. Red dotted lines denote non-tropical adult threshold normal values (alpha-1-antitrypsin: 0·27 mg/g (Beckmann et al. Microbiology of the Intestine. Hannover: Schluttersche, 1–446); neopterin: 70 nmol/L (Ledjeff et al. Pteridines 12:155–160); myeloperoxidase: 2000 ng/g (Saiki T Kurume Med J. 1998;45(1):69–73). (D) Urinary LM ratio by age. One high outlying value (0.54) omitted. Red dotted lines indicate lower and upper range of proposed normal reference values (0.03–0.12; ref: Denno et al. Clin Infect Dis 2014;59(4):213–19).
Association of putative exposures with linear growth. Multivariable mixed-effects linear regression with participant (groups=97) as a random effect. n = 671. Outcome is difference in LAZ between the month prior to and the month after the index (mid-point) LM test. To adjust for regression towards the mean, LAZ at the beginning of each two-month period was included as a fixed effect (not shown). Diarrhoea, fever and breathing difficulty occurred during the 30 days preceding the index LM test. Exponentiation of the coefficient for log LM ratio in this model yields a predicted 12·8% decrease in difference between LAZ over a two-month period with each 1-unit increase in LM ratio after adjustment for other factors in the model. Mother's height was strongly co-linear with enrolment weight so not included in the model.
| Factor | Category | Distribution | Coefficient | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (months) | 4·9 (0·8–9·0) | -0·09 | -0·13 to -0·06 | <0·001 | ||
| Sex | Female | 312 (46) | – | – | 0·003 | |
| Male | 359 (54) | -0·48 | -0·16 to -0·80 | |||
| Log LM ratio | -3·3 (-6·9 to -0·6) | -0·14 | -0·23 to -0·05 | 0·002 | ||
| Log peak breath hydrogen during next day's breath hydrogen test (ppm) | 1·1 (0·0–4·0) | -0·04 | -0·11 to 0·03 | 0·28 | ||
| Exclusive breastfeeding since birth | Yes | 202 (30) | – | – | 0·83 | |
| No | 469 (70) | 0·02 | -0·16 to 0·19 | |||
| During last 30 days | Diarrhoea | No | 638 (95) | – | – | 0·18 |
| Yes | 33 (5) | 0·18 | -0·08 to 0·43 | |||
| Breathing difficulty | No | 386 (58) | – | – | 0·04 | |
| Yes | 285 (42) | 0·13 | 0·01 to 0·25 | |||
| Fever (slide negative) | No | 512 (76) | – | – | 0·04 | |
| Yes | 159 (24) | -0·16 | -0·30 to -0·01 | |||
| Fever (slide positive) | No | 648 (97) | – | – | 0·45 | |
| Yes | 23 (3) | -0·12 | -0·44 to 0·19 | |||
| Weight at enrolment | 3·1 (2·1 to 4·2) | 1·21 | 0·83 to 1·58 | <0·001 | ||
1 = For categorical variables: n (% of total). For continuous variables: median (range).
Association of putative exposures with selected biomarkers of EED.
Factors associated with EED (log LM ratio and log faecal alpha-1-antitrypsin, myeloperoxidase and neopterin) amongst 99 cohort participants. Multivariable mixed-effects linear regression with participant as a random effect. n = 837 (LM ratio) and 427 (faecal markers). There is evidence for modification by season of the effect of exclusive breastfeeding status on log LM ratio (likelihood ratio test for interaction: p = 0·04; Figure. 4) but not for alpha-1-antitrypsin, myeloperoxidase or neopterin (p = 0·41, p = 0·13 and p = 0·21, respectively).
| Outcome: log LM ratio | Outcome: log faecal… | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha-1-antitrypsin (mg/g) | Myeloperoxidase (ng/g) | Neopterin (nmol/L) | ||||||||||||||
| Factor | Category | Distribution1 | Coeff.2 | 95% CI | Distribution | Coeff.2 | 95% CI | Coeff.2 | 95% CI | Coeff.2 | 95% CI | |||||
| Age (months) | 4·8 (0·1 to 10·0) | 0·05 | 0·02 to 0·07 | <0·001 | 5·3 (2·6 to 7·6) | -0·05 | -0·09 to 0·00 | 0.05 | 0·04 | 0·00 to 0·08 | 0·06 | -0·03 | -0·07 to 0·00 | 0·08 | ||
| Sex | Male | 447 (53) | – | – | 0·19 | 234 (55) | – | – | 0.82 | – | – | 0·52 | – | – | 0·24 | |
| Female | 390 (47) | 0·11 | -0·05 to 0·27 | 193 (45) | -0·02 | -0·21 to 0·17 | 0·07 | -0·14 to 0·27 | 0·10 | -0·06 to 0·26 | ||||||
| Log peak breath hydrogen (ppm minutes)3 | 1·4 (0·0 to 4·1) | -0·01 | -0·06 to 0·05 | 0·85 | 1·4 (0·7 to 2·1) | 0·06 | -0.04 to 0·16 | 0.22 | 0·00 | -0·09 to 0·09 | 0·98 | -0·05 | -0·13 to 0·03 | 0·22 | ||
| Season | Dry | 215 (50) | – | – | 0.50 | – | – | 0·23 | – | – | 0·98 | |||||
| Rainy | 212 (50) | 0·06 | -0·12 to 0·24 | 0·10 | -0·06 to 0·26 | 0·00 | -0·15 to 0·14 | |||||||||
| Exclusive breastfeeding since birth | Yes | 127 (30) | – | – | 0.85 | – | – | <0·001 | – | – | 0·002 | |||||
| No | 300 (70) | 0·03 | -0·26 to 0·32 | 0·50 | 0·24 to 0·78 | 0·37 | 0·13 to 0·60 | |||||||||
| Dry season | Exclusive breastfeeding since birth | 156 (39) | – | – | 0·77 | |||||||||||
| Started complementary foods | 245 (61) | 0·02 | -0·15 to 0·20 | |||||||||||||
| Rainy season | Exclusive breastfeeding since birth | 128 (29) | – | – | 0·01 | |||||||||||
| Started complementary foods | 308 (71) | 0·22 | 0·05 to 0·40 | |||||||||||||
| WASH PCA4 first component score | -0·1 (-2·9 to 3·4) | 0·02 | -0·04 to 0·08 | 0·60 | -0·1 (-1·1 to 0·9) | -0·05 | -0·12 to 0·02 | 0.16 | 0·05 | -0·03 to 0·13 | 0·22 | 0·00 | -0·06 to 0·07 | 0·88 | ||
| Antibiotics5 | No | 626 (75) | – | – | 318 (74) | – | – | 0.83 | – | – | 0·87 | – | – | 0·92 | ||
| Yes | 211 (25) | -0·10 | -0·22 to 0·02 | 109 (26) | -0·03 | -0·26 to 0·21 | 0·02 | -0·20 to 0·23 | -0·01 | -0·20 to 0·18 | ||||||
| Diarrhoea5 | No | 802 (96) | – | – | 409 (96) | – | – | 0.90 | – | – | 0·92 | – | – | 0·58 | ||
| Yes | 35 (4) | 0·12 | -0·10 to 0·35 | 18 (4) | 0·03 | -0·41 to 0·47 | -0·02 | -0·42 to 0·38 | 0·10 | -0·26 to 0·46 | ||||||
| Breathing difficulty5 | No | 505 (60) | – | – | 254 (59) | – | – | 0.09 | – | – | 0·31 | – | – | 0·59 | ||
| Yes | 332 (40) | -0·04 | -0·15 to 0·07 | 173 (41) | 0·18 | -0·03 to 0·39 | 0·10 | -0·09 to 0·29 | 0·05 | -0·12 to 0·21 | ||||||
| Fever | No | 649 (78) | – | – | 330 (77) | – | – | 0.07 | – | – | 0.23 | – | – | 0·70 | ||
| Yes | 188 (22) | 0·00 | -0·12 to 0·13 | 97 (23) | -0·24 | -0·49 to 0·02 | -0·14 | -0·37 to 0·09 | -0·04 | -0·25 to 0·17 | ||||||
| Fever | No | 812 (97) | – | – | 415 (97) | – | – | 0.82 | – | – | 0.09 | – | – | 0·06 | ||
| Yes | 25 (3) | -0·03 | -0·31 to 0·25 | 12 (3) | -0·07 | -0·63 to 0·50 | 0·44 | -0·07 to 0·95 | 0·43 | -0·02 to 0·89 | ||||||
| Iron supplement5 | No | 792 (95) | – | – | 412 (96) | – | – | 0.82 | – | – | 0.68 | – | – | 0·62 | ||
| Yes | 45 (5) | -0·05 | -0·25 to 0·15 | 15 (4) | 0·05 | -0·42 to 0·53 | 0·09 | -0·34 to 0·51 | 0·10 | -0·29 to 0·48 | ||||||
1 = For categorical variables: n (% of total). For continuous variables: median (range).
2 = Coefficient.
3 = For outcome LM ratio, this is the breath hydrogen test that occurred up to three days after the LM test. For faecal marker outcomes, this is the breath hydrogen test that took place up to 13 days after stool sample collection.
4 = Principal Component Analysis: comprised of household water source, location, time to fetch water, water treatment, sanitation type, soap availability and presence of animals inside house.
5 = During 30 days preceding LM test (for outcome LM ratio) or stool sample (for faecal marker outcomes).
Figure 4Model-predicted log LM ratio over calendar time stratified by continuous-since-birth exclusive breastfeeding status. Model covariates: age, sex, peak breath hydrogen, season, WASH status, antibiotics, diarrhoea, breathing difficulty, fever and iron supplementation with random effects adjustment for clustering by participant and interaction between exclusive breastfeeding status and season (Table 2; n = 837; participants=96). Lines denote median splines by exclusive breastfeeding status. Blue circles and red line denote exclusive breastfeeding since birth. Green crosses and orange line denote complementary foods introduced.
Figure 5Maturation of the bacterial gut microbiota. (A) Gut microbial alpha diversity by age for all 322 sequenced faecal samples with read depth >30,000 (93 participants). Local weighted regression (loess) fits and 95% CIs are displayed. (B) Mean genus relative abundance by age. (C) Variables associated with microbiota composition. Using a matrix of abundance-weighted (left panel) or unweighted Bray–Curtis distances (right panel), R values for each variable were derived using PERMANOVA. Sequencing run was included as a permutation constraint to account for sequencing batch effects. Analyses were performed on nested cross-sectional subsets of the cohort comprising one randomly selected sample per infant in three age strata (0–3 months n = 66; 4–6 months n = 72; 7–9 months n = 69). *, FDR p value <0·1.