Literature DB >> 35495387

Bacterial infection and antibiotic resistance pattern in open fracture cases in Indonesia.

Ahmad Taufik1,2,3, Adnanto Wiweko3, Didit Yudhanto2,3,4, E Hagni Wardoyo3,5, Philip Habib3,6, Mohammad Rizki3,7, Rohadi Muhammad Rosyidi8.   

Abstract

Background: The annual incidence of open fracture in Dr Soetomo Hospital, East Java were 400 cases with chronic infection complications exist in 14% (57 cases). A previous study in this hospital shows the resistance rate of Pseudomonas towards cefazolin and amikacin was 100% and 15%, respectively. The objective of this study was to identify bacterial infection type and antibiotic resistance pattern in infection caused by the open fracture.
Methods: This was an analytic cross-sectional study. Samples were collected from three debridement surgery sites in Mataram Hospital, Mataram University Hospital, and Islamic Mataram Hospital from September 2019 until October 2020. Specimens from wound infection were cultured, and an antibiotic sensitivity test was performed.
Results: Approximately 213 samples were analyzed in this study, comprising open fracture grade 3A (45%) and 3B (39%). The majority of fractures were lower extremity fractures (62%). Bacterial infection were found in 35% cases (80 isolates) in which 62,5% (50 isolates) were gram-positive bacteria and 37,5% (30 isolates) were gram-negative bacteria. Infection in open fracture was equivalent to grading. The predominant bacterial infection was caused by gram-positive bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus negative coagulase. Gram-positive bacteria were sensitive towards Cepoferazone, Sulbactam and Ofloxacin, whereas gram-negative bacteria remains sensitive against Doxicyclin and Amicasin.
Conclusion: Infection in open fracture was equivalent with the grade, and gram-positive were predominantly sensitive with cefoperazone sulbactam.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic; Infection; Osteomyelitis; Resistance pattern; Sensitivity test

Year:  2022        PMID: 35495387      PMCID: PMC9052163          DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)        ISSN: 2049-0801


Introduction

Open fractures due to trauma are still a significant problem in orthopaedics. Handling open fractures requires a longer treatment time and high costs, especially if a chronic infection [1]. At the hospital, dr. Soetomo Surabaya found cases of open fractures more than 400 cases each year, with the incidence of chronic disease is 57 cases [1,2]. The incidence of infection in open fractures is still high even though the treatment methods have been so advanced. Many studies show that grade 3 open fractures have the highest incidence of infection [3]. Patzakis reported an infection incidence of 0%–2% for type I, 2%–5% for type II, 5%–10% for type IIIA, 10%–50% for type IIIB and 25%–50% for type IIIC [4]. At Dr Soetomo Hospital between January 2009–December 2010, it was found that 50.4% were grade 3 open fractures [1]. Many studies from various countries have reported resistance to cefazolin and amikacin as standard antibiotic regimens for prophylactic therapy in open fractures. Johnson reported the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Texas during the 1980s [5]. Arcilla et al. reported Staphylococcus epidermidis resistant to Ampicillin, Penicillin, Cefazolin and Chloramphenicol in post-implantation osteomyelitis patients [25,26]. MH. Perlin and SA Lerner also wrote Amikacin resistance in E. Coli. In the last decade, there have been many reports of multi-drug resistance (methicillin, vancomycin, third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones) in Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli [6,7]. In Herlambang's research at the Emergency Room (IRD), dr. Soetomo Hospital Surabaya found that the pattern of bacteria before debridement was carried out, gram-positive bacteria dominated the picture of germs. These bacteria were mainly Staphylococcus aureus 49.23% and Pseudomonas aeruginosa 20%, whereas, after debridement, the most common gram-negative bacteria were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (43.75%) and Staphylococcus aureus 18.75%. It was also found that resistance to cefazolin was 19.4% in Staphylococcus aureus and 100% in Pseudomonas. Resistance to amikacin was 10% in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 5% in Staphylococcus aureus [8]. Before debridement, most bacteria were gram-positive, while gram-negative bacteria were dominant [21,22]. Other studies have also shown that gram-negative bacteria cause most infections in open fractures. In culture, it was found that the bacteria causing the condition did not reflect the bacteria that caused the contamination in open fractures when the patient came [28,29]. It was found that 92% of the causes of infection were nosocomial infections [7]. Based on this, the use of antibiotics cefazolin and amikacin in subsequent treatment in the room for up to 5 days needs to be re-examined. This is because the evaluation two days after debridement found resistance to standard antibiotics [8]. Researchers suspect that resistance to antibiotics is even higher after the patient is treated in the room. This study aims to determine the pattern of bacteria and their resistance to antibiotics in patients with open fractures undergoing orthopaedic surgery.

Method

This study is a cross-sectional analytic study in which data was collected only once. This study took samples from surgical debridement of infected patients with open fractures [23,27]. Then culture and sensitivity test (sensitivity) to antibiotics was carried out. This study selected all patients with musculoskeletal infections due to open fractures treated at the Mataram City Hospital, Mataram University Hospital and Siti Hajar Islamic Hospital Mataram from September 2019 to October 2020. Bacterial colonies were grown by planting infected specimens on blood agar and Mac Conkey culture media [30,31]. The pattern of antibiotic resistance was checked by administering an antibiotic plate on the bacterial culture medium. You will see a colony-free area on the culture if the antibiotic is effective against the bacteria.

Result and discussion

Characteristics of research data

In 1 year (September 2019–October 2020), 213 musculoskeletal culture specimens were obtained from patients at the University Hospital of Mataram, Mataram City Hospital and Siti Hajar Islamic Hospital Mataram. These cultures were obtained from surgical debridement in a patient with a musculoskeletal infection in an open fracture (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristic of patients with musculoskeletal infection.

NoPatient CharacteristicsAmountPercentage (%)
Gender
1Male13764.3
Female7635.7
Total213100
Age
2<10 years31
10–20 years4421
21–40 years11554
41–50 years4320
>50 years84
Total213100
Causes of Infection
3Work accident209
Traffic accident14769
Accident at home4622
Total213100
Open Fracture Grade
4Grade 184
Grade 22411
Grade 3A9645
Grade 3B8239
Grade 3C31
Total213100
Fracture Location
5Upper extremity7435
Lower Extremities13362
Pelvis and Spine63
Total213100

Source: Data proceed.

Characteristic of patients with musculoskeletal infection. Source: Data proceed. Of the 213 cases of musculoskeletal infection that were swab and cultured, 137 (64.3%) were men, and 115 patients (54%) were aged between 21 and 40 years. Most cases were traffic accidents (59%). The most were open fracture grades 3A (45%) and 3B (39%) in all total cases. The most common fracture sites were in the lower extremities (62%).

Characteristics of the results of bacterial culture examination

In the span of 1 year (September 2019–October 2020), there were 213 cultures of pus specimens/wound bed swabs in cases of musculoskeletal infection. Of the 213 illustrations, 133 (65%) of them had no bacterial growth, and 80 isolates (35%) grew with the predominance of gram-positive bacteria, 50 isolates (62.5%) and gram-negative bacteria 30 isolates (37.5%). Seen in Table 2:
Table 2

Bacteria that cause musculoskeletal infections.

Organismn%
Staphylococcus aureus2632.5
Staphylococcus coagulase-negative1822.5
Staphylococcus epidermidis67.5
Escherichia coli1417.5
Klebsiella aerogenes22.5
Enterobacter cloacae45
Pseudomonas aeroginosa45
Pseudomonas species33.75
Klebsiella sp22.5
Klebsiella pneumoniae11.25
80100
Bacteria that cause musculoskeletal infections.

Overview of antibiotic sensitivity

The sensitivity of the group of gram-positive cocci to antibiotics (n = 50)

The bacteria included in this group in this study were Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus coagulase-negative, Staphylococcus epidermidis. Here is the sensitivity to antibiotics (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Bar diagram of the sensitivity of Gram-Positive Cocci to several antibiotics.

Bar diagram of the sensitivity of Gram-Positive Cocci to several antibiotics. From the picture above, it can be seen that the sensitivity of gram-positive cocci to antibiotics with a sensitivity of 50% or more, from the highest to the lowest, were cefoperazone sulbactam (100%), ofloxacin (61%), fosfomycin (60%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (59%). %), gentamicin (58%), linezolid (57%), cefoperazone, cefotaxime and doxycycline with similar results 53% and tetracycline (50%).

Sensitivity of gram-negative bacteria group to antibiotics (n = 30)

From Fig. 2 above, it can be seen that the sensitivity of gram-negative bacilli to antibiotics in musculoskeletal infections with a sensitivity of 50% or more, from the highest to the lowest are doxycycline. (100%), cephalothin (68%), amikacin (62%), piperacillin/tazobactam. (57%), cefoperazone-sulbactam (56%), cefoxitin (53%), and levofloxacin (50%).
Fig. 2

Bar diagram of the sensitivity of gram-negative rods to several antibiotics.

Bar diagram of the sensitivity of gram-negative rods to several antibiotics.

Discussion

In this study, the highest incidence of infection was found in grade IIIA (45%) and IIIB (39%). The results follow the study results by Ref. [18], who also got the most infections in grade III (80%) with grade IIIA as much as 46.67%. Research in Brazil also got almost the same results; as many as 72% of infections occurred in grade III; in grade II, there were 24% infections, and grade I only 4% [19]. These results are consistent with the results of previous studies that the incidence of disease in open fractures will increase according to the increasing severity of the open fracture degree [9,10]. In this study, 50 isolates (62.5%) of gram-positive cocci and 30 isolates of gram-negative bacilli (37.5%) were found. The dominant gram-positive bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus (32.5%) and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (22.5%). The gram negative bacteria are Pseudomonas aeroginosa, E Colli and Klebsiella sp [24]. These results are consistent with Jember, East Java, where 66.67% consisted of gram-positive bacteria, and 33.33% were gram-negative bacteria. The dominant bacteria is coagulase-negative staphylococcus [11,12]. These results are somewhat different from the research results by Ref. [11], where the results of the culture are mostly gram-negative bacteria. The dominant bacteria are Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, and Escherichia coli. Ninety per cent of the cultures were gram-negative bacteria, indicating that nosocomial infections occurred because the types of bacteria found were different from the patient's culture results when he first came to the hospital. The study results in India also got the same results where most of the cultures showed gram-negative bacteria [13,14]. Antibiotics that were found to be sensitive to these gram-positive bacteria were Cepoferazone sulbactam, ofloxacin and fosfomycin. For gram-negative bacteria, Sensitive antibiotics are doxycycline, cephalothin and amikacin. A study by Ref. [13] found all gram-positive bacteria showed low resistance (<60%) to antibiotics except ampicillin and penicillin (60–80%). Almost all gram-positive bacteria showed multiple drug resistance (52.7%). All Clostridium spp. were sensitive to tetracycline, doxycycline and kanamycin and had low resistance (<60%) to chloramphenicol, clindamycin and penicillin [14]. All gram-negative showed low resistance (<60%) to antibiotics except ampicillin and amoxicillin (60–80%). Fifty-one per cent of gram-negative bacteria were identified as multiple drug-resistant (MDR) [17] [180. Various studies have shown that gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria always cause infection in open fractures. Based on this, the antibiotics given must be able to eliminate these two types of bacteria. Aminoglycosides are effective antibiotics to treat both types of bacteria. Other studies have shown that Ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and gentamicin are effective antibiotics to treat these gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria [19,20]. The administration of cephalosporins or quinolones should be combined with aminoglycosides in all cases of open fractures to increase their effectiveness [21,22].

Conclusion

In this study, it was found that infection in open fractures is directly proportional to the severity of the fracture grade that occurs. Most of the bacteria that cause infection are gram-positive bacteria, with the dominant bacteria being staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Antibiotics sensitive to positive bacteria are cefoperazone sulbactam and ofloxacin, while doxycycline and amikacin are for gram-negative bacteria.

Ethical approval

All procedure for research has been approved by the ethics committee of Mataram University Hospital.

Sources of funding

No funding or sponsorship.

Author contribution

ATF, ADW, DDY, EHW, PHB, MOR and RHA wrote the manuscript and participated in the study design. ATF, ADW, DDY, EHW, PHB, MOR and RHA drafted and revised the manuscript. ATF, and EHW performed treatment and surgery of Open Fracture with debridement surgery sites infection. ATF, ADW, DDY, EHW, PHB, MOR and RHA performed bioinformatics analyses and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Registration of research studies

1. Name of the registry: http://www.researchregistry.com. Registration Date: January 14, 2022 12:35. 2. Unique Identifying number or registration ID: researchregistry7546. 3. Hyperlink to your specific registration (must be publicly accessible and will be checked): https://www.researchregistry.com/register-now#home/registrationdetails/61e16e1543fed1001e261f84/

Guarantor

Rohadi Muhammad Rosyidi.

Consent

This manuscript data from medical record patients diagnosed Open Fracture with debridement surgery sites Infection in Mataram Hospital, Mataram University Hospital, and Islamic Mataram Hospital from September 2019 until October 2020.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
  17 in total

1.  Epidemiology of bacterial infection during management of open leg fractures.

Authors:  H Carsenti-Etesse; F Doyon; N Desplaces; O Gagey; C Tancrède; C Pradier; B Dunais; P Dellamonica
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  INCIDENCE OF OSTEOMYELITIS IN COMPOUND FRACTURES.

Authors:  C X COPELAND; W F ENNEKING
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1965-02       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Wound management in open fractures.

Authors:  C H EPPS; J P ADAMS
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1961-11       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 4.  Trends in the management of open fractures. A critical analysis.

Authors:  Kanu Okike; Timothy Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Analysis of 511 open fractures.

Authors:  R B Gustilo; L Simpson; R Nixon; A Ruiz; W Indeck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1969 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Fluorescent Antibiotics: New Research Tools to Fight Antibiotic Resistance.

Authors:  M Rhia L Stone; Mark S Butler; Wanida Phetsang; Matthew A Cooper; Mark A T Blaskovich
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 19.536

7.  Antibiotic Resistance Increases with Local Temperature.

Authors:  Derek R MacFadden; Sarah F McGough; David Fisman; Mauricio Santillana; John S Brownstein
Journal:  Nat Clim Chang       Date:  2018-05-21

8.  Bacterial persistence promotes the evolution of antibiotic resistance by increasing survival and mutation rates.

Authors:  Etthel Martha Windels; Joran Elie Michiels; Maarten Fauvart; Tom Wenseleers; Bram Van den Bergh; Jan Michiels
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 9.  A Review on Antibiotic Resistance: Alarm Bells are Ringing.

Authors:  Sojib Bin Zaman; Muhammed Awlad Hussain; Rachel Nye; Varshil Mehta; Kazi Taib Mamun; Naznin Hossain
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-06-28

10.  Infection rate in adult patients with open fractures treated at the emergency hospital and at the ULBRA university hospital in Canoas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Authors:  Marcelo Teodoro Ezequiel Guerra; Fernando Machado Gregio; Adriane Bernardi; Cyntia Cordeiro de Castro
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.