Krishna Kishor Dey1, Shovanlal Gayen2, Manasi Ghosh1. 1. Department of Physics, Dr Harisingh Gour Central University Sagar MP-470003 India manasi.ghosh@gmail.com. 2. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dr Harisingh Gour Central University Sagar MP-470003 India.
Introduction of topical glucocorticoids has led marked improvement in the outcomes of several skin diseases. For many years, they have played major roles in the treatment of different dermatoses sensitive to corticosteroids. Skin diseases like atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, psoriasis vulgaris, seborrheic dermatitis, etc., can be treated.[1-6] They are also used for the treatment of different eczematous skin disorders from different age groups of the human population, including children.[7,8] Topical corticosteroids are classified based on various potency values from class 1, most potent to least potent, class 7 based on their different skin permeation abilities, activity at the target and rate of removal from the site of application. The selection of a specific class of topical corticosteroid is influenced by its sensitivity to the disease and its penetration power to reach the site of the disease. The high potency or super high potency corticosteroids are mainly used for the treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis (CPP) and lichenified eczematous plaques.[9,10] The mid potency (class 4 to 5) topical corticosteroids are applied for the treatment of various common dermatological disorders. Clocortolone pivalate is one of the widely used mid-potency (class 4) topical corticosteroid used in the treatment of different skin diseases. The use of corticosteroids in skin diseases is determined by their distinctive biological properties like anti-inflammatory, anti-miotic, immunosuppressive action and their ability to inhibit the production of connective tissue molecules.[11-24] Although topical corticosteroids lack antipruritic activity, they can function by reducing the inflammation of skin disorders and thus, they decrease indirectly the itching of different skin disorders.In general, the basic structure of topical corticosteroid molecules consists of 21-carbon atoms and an additional 2-carbon side chain at C5. There are three 6-carbon rings and one 5-carbon ring in its core structure. The basic structure of corticosteroid is frequently modified to enhance the glucocorticoid receptor binding affinity, lipophilicity and ability of cutaneous penetration.[8] Clocortolone pivalate is a nice example where different structural modifications have improved its properties.[13,14] Clocortolone pivalate is 4-chloro-13α-fluoro-11β, 21-dihydroxy-16α methylpregna-1,4-diene-3, 20-dione 21-pivalate. In the molecule, esterification was introduced at C20 position with a pivalate group to increase lipophilicity and decrease metabolic breakdown. Methylation at the C8 position is done to decrease various allergic reactions of corticosteroids.[10] Moreover, halogenation by fluorine and chlorine at C13 and C4 position respectively, increases the efficacy and safety profile of this mid potency topical corticosteroid.[15] Due to its unique structure having high efficacy and low side effects it is widely used as a 0.1% cream for the treatment of many skin diseases. Several clinical trials have been performed on clocortolone pivalate 0.1% cream to prove its efficacy and safety and it is eminently suitable for human use with a relative lack of adverse effects.[13-16] One of these trials includes 559 adult and paediatric volunteers, who have undergone active treatment of clocortolone pivalate cream. Overall no systemic adverse effects were reported from the study. Hence, it can be concluded that clocortolone pivalate is highly bio-available for local activity in the skin after its topical application.[17-24]Chemical shift anisotropy (CSA) is a sensitive probe of detecting the local electronic environment, three-dimensional structural details surrounding the nucleus, and the degree of motion of the molecule. The broadening of spectral line-width due to the presence of various anisotropic interactions makes it complicated to determine the values of CSA parameters from static solid state NMR spectra. In magic angle spinning (MAS) experiment all the information encoded in anisotropic interactions are lost. However, the principal values of CSA tensor can be reconstructed by - two-dimensional MAS/CSA NMR experiment;[26] SUPER (separation of undistorted powder patterns by effortless recouplin) MAS NMR;[27] ROCSA (recoupling of chemical shift anisotropy) pulse sequence at MAS frequencies 11 to 20 kHz;[28] RNCSA (γ-encoded RN-symmetry based chemical shift anisotropy) schemes for the system associated with weak homonuclear dipole–dipole interactions;[29] 2DMAF (two-dimensional magic angle flipping) experiment;[30-32] 2DMAT (two-dimensional magic angle turning) experiment;[33] 2DPASS (two-dimensional phase adjusted spinning side-band) MAS (magic angle spinning) SSNMR experiment.[34-36] The CSA parameters of glass compounds,[36] biopolymers,[37-40] antifungal drug itraconazole[41] were extracted by applying 2DPASS MAS NMR experiments. The purpose of the current work is to elucidate the structural details and spin dynamics of clocortolone pivalate by extracting principal values of CSA parameters by two-dimensional phase-adjusted spinning side-band (2DPASS) magic-angle-spinning (MAS) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiment, to determine the site-specific spin–lattice relaxation time by Torchia CP method,[25] and to calculate of molecular correlation time at chemically distinct carbon sites by assuming that the chemical shift anisotropy interaction and heteronuclear dipole–dipole coupling play predominate role in spin–lattice relaxation mechanism. This type of spectroscopic studies is necessary for confounding structure–dynamic relationships of steroids, which has enormous applications in pharmaceutical industry.
Experiment section
NMR-measurements
An active ingredient of clocortolone pivalate from Sigma Aldrich was used for solid state NMR experiments. All solid state NMR experiments were carried out on a JEOL ECX 500 NMR Spectrometer associated with a 3.2 mm JEOL double resonance MAS probe, operating at a resonance frequencies of 500 MHz for 1H and 125.721 MHz for 13C. The magic angle spinning (MAS) speed was 10 kHz for 13C CP-MAS and Torchia CP experiments. The cross-polarization (CP) condition was maintained at contact time 2 ms, and SPINAL-64 1H decoupling. 13C-spin lattice relaxation experiment was performed by following Torchia CP method.[25]
CSA measurements
2DPASS MAS SSNMR experiment generates a isotropic spectrum in direct-dimension and an anisotropic spectrum in indirect dimension. It can correlate the isotropic dimension with anisotropic dimension.[36-41,50-52] As the parameters of second rank CSA tensor corresponding to two distinct chemical environments are different, hence, with the help of this experiment, one can also identify two overlapping signals.[52] Herzfeld and Berger[42] had shown that the sideband intensities of spinning CSA sideband pattern of different nuclei are related with the CSA parameters and they had introduced a graphical method for evaluating the CSA eigenvalues.In 1995, Antzutkin et al.[35] had established the pulse scheme of 2DPASS MAS NMR experiment using sequence of five π pulses. The total time duration of all the PASS sequences containing five π pulses is independent of the sideband phase shift. The time evolution of five π pulses is varied during the 2D PASS experiment according to the PASS equations. The 2DPASS experiments were carried out at two different values of MAS frequencies 600 Hz and 2000 Hz.
Results and discussion
Spin–lattice relaxation measurements
Fig. 1(a) shows the structure of clocortolone pivalate is associated with three 6-carbon rings and one 5-carbon ring. Fig. 1(b) represents 13C-CP-MAS-NMR spectrum of clocortolone pivalate. Fig. 2 shows 13C spin–lattice relaxation decay curves of clocortolone pivalate at (a) C1, (b) C9, (c) C13, and (d) C27 carbon nuclei positions. Table 1 shows the spin–lattice relaxation time of numerous carbon nuclei is varying substantially. For C5 it is 184 s and for C12, C17, C16, C26 carbon nuclei it values reduces to 1 s. At the position of C20, where the esterification was incorporated with the molecule by introducing a pivalate group for increasing lipophilicity and decreasing metabolic breakdown, the spin–lattice relaxation time is 175 s. At C8 position, where methylation is introduced to decrease various allergic reactions of corticosteroids, the value of spin–lattice relaxation is 138 s. At the positions of C4 and C13 halogenations was done by chlorine and fluorine atoms to increase the efficacy and safety profile of the drug. The spin–lattice relaxation time of C4 and C13 are respectively 94 s and 171 s. Spin–lattice relaxation time is considerable high for those carbon nuclei reside at the carbon rings (there are three 6-carbon rings and one 5-carbon ring in the molecule) and it is comparatively lower for carbon nuclei attached at the side of the molecule like C12, C17, C16, C26 (as shown in Fig. 1(a)). The dipole–dipole interaction of those carbon nuclei resides at the side of the molecule is highly influenced by the internal motion and rotational motion of molecule about its symmetry axis. That's why the degree of motion is higher for those carbon nuclei.
Fig. 1
(a) Molecular structure of clocortolone pivalate. (b) 13C CP MAS NMR spectrum of clocortolone pivalate.
Fig. 2
13C spin–lattice relaxation decay curve of (a) C1, (b) C9, (c) C13, (d) C27. (e) shows the spin–lattice relaxation time is different at chemically distinct carbon sites of clocortolone pivalate.
Spin–lattice relaxation time of clocortolone pivalate at chemically different carbon sites
13C-Spin–lattice relaxation time (T1) of clocortolone pivalate
Carbon nuclei
Spin lattice relaxation time (T1) (s)
Carbon nuclei
Spin lattice relaxation time (T1) (s)
C1
104 ± 5
C2
75 ± 5
C3
112 ± 5
C4
94 ± 5
C5
184 ± 10
C6
115 ± 5
C7
122 ± 5
C8
138 ± 5
C9
130 ± 5
C10
118 ± 5
C11
4 ± 1
C12
1 ± 0.5
C13
171 ± 10
C14
106 ± 5
C15
81 ± 5
C16
1 ± 0.5
C17
1 ± 0.5
C18
82 ± 5
C19
70 ± 5
C20
175 ± 10
C21
76 ± 5
C22
46 ± 2
C23
14 ± 2
C24
46 ± 2
C25
21 ± 2
C26
1 ± 0.5
C27
78 ± 5
Chemical shift anisotropy
Chemical-shift anisotropy interaction has a great role in nuclear spin relaxation mechanism. Hence, the accurate determination of CSA tensor can provide a plenty of information about molecular structure, molecular conformation and spin dynamics. In principal axis system (PAS) off-diagonal components of CSA tensor are cancel out and three diagonal terms survive. The expression of those diagonal components of chemical shift anisotropy tensor (δ11, δ22 and δ33) are given by[43,44]where L = Lî + Lĵ + Lk̂ is the angular momentum. The first part of the above three equations regarding principal components of CSA tensor is generated by electrons resides in the spherically symmetric ‘s’ orbital. The second term arise when the electrons are in ‘p’ or ‘d’ orbital. The isotropic component of chemical shift represents the average values of the principal components of CSA tensor along three orthogonal directions. Basically, it is the position of the centre of gravity of the spinning CSA sideband pattern.[42,45,46] The breadth of the CSA tensor is getting affected due to the change of the centre of gravity of the spinning CSA pattern. Small changes in centre of gravity of CSA pattern is generally associated with larger change in chemical shift anisotropy.[47] According to Haeberlen convention[54] the asymmetry parameter is . The deviation of the spinning CSA side band pattern from its axially symmetric shape is measured by the asymmetry parameter. The sign of the asymmetry parameter indicates the direction of largest separation with respect to the centre of gravity of CSA pattern. ‘Skew’ says the amount of orientation of the asymmetry pattern. The width of the sideband pattern is called ‘span’ (Ω = δ11 − δ33).The spinning CSA sideband pattern becomes axially symmetric, when δ22 is equal to δ11 or δ33. Table 2 says that the asymmetry parameter is zero for C11, C17, C26, it is very small (≤0.3) for C2, C5, C10, C22, C23, C24, and very large (≥0.9) for C3, C4, C6, C18, C19, C21. When it is zero, the CSA pattern is called axially symmetric. On the contrary, the CSA pattern is highly asymmetric, when the asymmetry parameter is very large.
The CSA parameters at structurally and chemically distinct carbon sites of clocortolone pivalate
Carbon from different chemical environment with isotropic chemical shift (δiso) (ppm)
δ11
δ22
δ33
Span (ppm)
Skew
Anisotropy
Asymmetry
67.5(C1)
87.9
72
42.6
45.3
0.3
−37.3
0.6
52.3(C2)
82.7
41.8
32.3
50.4
−0.6
45.6
0.3
42.9(C3)
54.5
43.3
30.9
23.5
0.05
−17.9
0.9
88(C4)
113
87.1
64
49
−0.06
37.5
0.9
75.7(C5)
106.7
65.3
55.2
51.5
−0.6
46.4
0.3
34.7(C6)
46.6
34.5
22.9
23.7
−0.03
17.9
1
49(C7)
71.6
46.7
28.8
42.8
−0.2
33.9
0.8
36.1(C8)
46.3
38.1
24.1
22.2
0.3
−18.1
0.7
86.8(C9)
124.1
75.6
60.8
63.4
−0.5
55.9
0.4
70.1(C10)
109.7
55.2
45.5
64.2
−0.7
59.4
0.2
39.95(C11)
54.1
32.9
22.8
21.3
−1.0
21.2
0
17.7(C12)
29.8
15.1
8.2
21.6
−0.4
18.2
0.6
87.7(C13)
117.3
84
61.9
55.5
−0.2
44.4
0.7
165.7(C14)
287.9
149.1
59.9
228.1
−0.2
183.4
0.7
201.1(C15)
309.7
171.5
122.2
187.5
−0.5
162.9
0.5
20.6(C16)
36.4
16.8
8.7
27.7
−0.4
23.6
0.5
28.2(C17)
33.2
33.2
18.3
14.9
1
−14.9
0
156.6(C18)
269.8
150.6
49.3
220.5
−0.08
169.9
0.9
122(C19)
203.2
117.8
45
158.2
−0.08
121.8
0.9
84.8(C20)
118.7
78.3
57.3
61.4
−0.3
50.9
0.6
128.7(C21)
209.5
133.9
42.8
166.8
0.1
−129
0.9
187.9(C22)
300.1
151.2
112.6
187.5
−0.6
168.2
0.3
178.6(C23)
240.4
211
84.3
156.1
0.6
−141.4
0.3
46.4(C24)
59.2
53.2
26.8
32.5
0.6
−29.4
0.3
32.3(C25)
49.3
38.1
9.6
39.8
0.4
−34.1
0.5
23.5(C26)
42.5
14.1
14.1
28.4
−1
28.4
0
33.2(C27)
51.1
36.7
11.9
39.2
0.3
−32
0.7
Fig. 3 shows 13C 2DPASS CP MAS NMR spectrum of clocortolone pivalate. The direct-dimension and indirect-dimension of two-dimensional spectrum respectively represents the isotropic spectrum and anisotropic spectrum. The spinning CSA sideband patterns of (a) C14, (b) C22, (c) C26, (d) C13, (e) C6, (f) C4, (g) C20, (h) C18, (i) C9 carbon nuclei are also shown in Fig. 3. The different values of CSA parameters at numerous carbon sites of clocortolone pivalate indicate that the distribution of electron density surrounding the carbon nuclei, and the molecular conformation and orientation are dissimilar at different portion of the molecule. Fig. 4(b) and Table 2 show anisotropy parameter (defined as according to Haeberlen convention[54]) is significantly high for C14, C15, C18, C19, C21, C22, and C23 nuclei, connected with neighbouring atoms by double bond. For carbonyl group carbon like C15, C22, C23 does not possess any axis of symmetry. The polarization is induced on the non spherical distribution of charges surrounding the carbon nuclei due to the electrostatic interaction. The strength of the induced magnetic field is getting influenced by the action of the polarization. Consequently, the induced magnetic field is varied along different directions. This is equally considered as reason behind the large value of anisotropy of carbonyl group carbon.[55] Another reason is magnetic anisotropy, which arise due to three miscellaneous values of magnetic susceptibilities along three directions in principal axes system (PAS). Consequently, there originate an anisotropic susceptibility parallel to the magnetic field and perpendicular to the magnetic field .[55] The McConnell equation of magnetic anisotropy for carbonyl group is[56]where θ1 is the angle between the radius vector and x-axis. θ2 is the angle between the radius vector and z-axis. Effective magnetic field experienced by the nucleus varies along three orthogonal directions because of these anisotropic magnetic susceptibilities.
Fig. 3
13C 2DPASS CP MAS NMR spectrum of clocortolone pivalate. The horizontal axis shows isotropic spectrum, and the vertical axis shows anisotropic spectrum. The spinning CSA sideband patterns of (a) C14, (b) C22, (c) C26, (d) C13, (e) C6, (f) C4, (g) C20, (h) C18, (i) C9 are shown in this figure.
Fig. 4
(a) Bar-diagram of anisotropy parameter at chemically different carbon sites of clocortolone pivalate. (b) Bar-diagram of molecular correlation time at chemically different carbon sites. Molecular correlation time is high for those nuclei for which the value of chemical shift anisotropy parameter (Δδ) is high and vice versa.
The existence of the non-bonded electron surrounding the nucleus is responsible for the manifestation of magnetic shielding and deshielding effect.[57] When the non-bonded electron revolves around the nucleus in a clockwise direction, a paramagnetic current is generated, and a magnetic field is induced along the direction of the external magnetic field. Naturally, the strength of the local magnetic field is increased. This effect is called magnetic deshielding effect. On the other hand, when a bonded electron revolves around the nucleus along the counter clockwise direction, a magnetic field is generated along the opposite direction of the external magnetic field. As a consequence, the value of the local magnetic field is decreased – magnetic shielding effect. These effects manifest themselves as a large value of chemical shift anisotropy for those carbon nuclei surrounded by nonspherical distribution of electronic charge density.
Determination of correlation times associated with molecular motions
The molecular motions associated with molecular rotation, translational self-diffusion, and internal motion in non-rigid molecular can be probed by nuclear spin relaxation. Several nuclear interactions like chemical shift anisotropy interaction, magnetic dipole–dipole interaction, the spin rotation interaction, the electric quadrupole interaction, and the scalar coupling of the first and second kind simultaneously contribute to the relaxation mechanism of a spin system. However, for 13C nuclei, the relaxation mechanism is predominated by the chemical shift anisotropy interaction, and the hetero-nuclear dipole–dipole coupling. The magnitude of CSA tensor fluctuates with time because of the modulations caused by molecular rotations. The chemical shift anisotropy has a great influence in relaxation mechanism for nuclei exhibiting large chemical-shift ranges. The expression of spin–lattice relaxation time due to CSA interaction is[46,48,49,53]The correlation time τc = 3τ2 and B is the applied external field. Where S2 = (Δδ)2(1 + η2/3) and , .The contribution of dipole–dipole interaction on spin–lattice relaxation is[48,53]By keeping first term only of the above expressionwhere X represent 1H, 35Cl, and 19F. The bond distance rCX is represented in Table 4. Larmor precession frequency ω = 2πf = 2 × 3.14 × 125.758 MHz = 789.76024 MHz; B = 11.74 T, γC = 10.7084 MHz T−1, γH = 42.577 MHz T−1, γN = 3.077 MHz T−1. ℏ = 1.054 × 10−34 J s.
Bond-distances of clocortolone pivalate
Bond-distance of clocortolone pivalate
Bond
Distance (Å)
Bond
Distance (Å)
C1–H1
1.088
C15–H15
1.092
C1–C2
1.337
C15–H16
1.096
C1–C10
1.524
C15–H17
1.095
C2–H2
1.084
C16–H18
1.100
C2–C3
1.475
C16–C17
1.527
C3–O1
1.227
C17–H19
1.095
C3–C4
1.478
C17–H20
1.096
C4–H3
1.085
C17–C18
1.551
C4–C5
1.343
C18–C20
1.555
C5–C6
1.510
C18–H21
1.097
C5–C10
1.539
C18–C19
1.526
C6–H4
1.095
C19–H22
1.095
C6–F
1.366
C19–H23
1.095
C6–C7
1.525
C19–H24
1.095
C7–H5
1.097
C20–C21
1.495
C7–H6
1.097
C20–H25
1.099
C7–C8
1.539
C21–C22
1.514
C8–C9
1.582
C21–O3
1.230
C8–C16
1.537
C22–H26
1.095
C8–H7
1.095
C22–C27
1.092
C9–Cl
1.865
C22–O4
1.412
C9–C10
1.598
O4–C23
1.375
C9–C12
1.572
C23–O5
1.225
C10–C11
1.505
C23–C24
1.532
C11–H8
1.093
C24–C25
1.535
C11–H9
1.099
C24–C26
1.535
C11–H10
1.095
C24–C27
1.535
C12–C13
1.505
C25–H28
1.096
C12–O2
1.424
C25–H29
1.096
C12–H11
1.097
C25–H30
1.096
O2–H12
0.972
C26–H31
1.096
C13–H13
1.096
C26–H32
1.096
C13–H14
1.097
C26–H33
1.096
C13–C14
1.541
C27–H34
1.096
C14–C15
1.551
C27–H35
1.096
C14–C16
1.543
C27–H36
1.096
C14–C20
1.550
The spin–lattice relaxation for 13C can be written asAt the presence of high magnetic field, chemical shift anisotropy (CSA) interaction dominate over hetero-nuclei dipole–dipole coupling for non-protonated carbon nuclei.[48,49] Molecular correlation time is calculated by eqn (8).Table 3 and Fig. 4(b) show molecular correlation time, which implies the time required for the rotation of the molecule through one radian, of clocortolone pivalate at chemically different carbon sites. The order of magnitude varies from 10−4 to 10−8 s. Molecular correlation time is of the order of 10−4 s for those carbon nuclei attached with neighbouring carbon or oxygen atoms by double bonds like C14, C15, C18, C19, C21, C22, and C23(as shown in Fig. 1(a)). It implies the molecular correlation time is substantially high for those carbon nuclei associated with high values of chemical shift anisotropy parameter (Δδ). On the contrary, molecular correlation time is of the order of 10−8 s for C12, C16, C17 carbon nuclei reside at the side portion of the molecule and the magnitude of chemical shift anisotropy parameter (Δδ) is low for those carbon nuclei. Fig. 4 shows the bar diagram of chemical shift anisotropy parameter (Δδ) and molecular correlation time at crystallographically and chemically different carbon nuclei sites.
Molecular correlation time at chemically different carbon sites of clocortolone pivalate
Carbon nuclei
Molecular correlation time (s)
Carbon nuclei
Molecular correlation time (s)
C1
2.6 × 10−5
C2
2.6 × 10−5
C3
7.4 × 10−6
C4
2.7 × 10−5
C5
6.6 × 10−5
C6
7.7 × 10−6
C7
2.7 × 10−5
C8
8.3 × 10−6
C9
6.9 × 10−5
C10
6.8 × 10−5
C11
2.9 × 10−7
C12
5.9 × 10−8
C13
6.4 × 10−5
C14
6.7 × 10−4
C15
3.7 × 10−4
C16
9.7 × 10−8
C17
3.5 × 10−8
C18
4.8 × 10−4
C19
2.1 × 10−4
C20
8.2 × 10−5
C21
2.5 × 10−4
C22
2.2 × 10−4
C23
4.6 × 10−5
C24
6.6 × 10−6
C25
4.2 × 10−6
C26
1.3 × 10−7
C27
1.5 × 10−5
The crystal structure of the molecule was first drawn by using Chem Draw software.[24,58] The structure was optimized by density functional theory method with the help of GAUSSIAN 09W software.[59] B3LYP-631G (d, p) basis set was used for the optimization process. The bond distances, shown in Table 4, were extracted from the final optimized structure of clocortolone pivalate.The considerable variation of the spin–lattice relaxation time (Table 1), CSA parameters (Table 2) and molecular correlation time (Table 3) at numerous carbon nuclei sites of clocortolone pivalate, suggests that the nuclear spin dynamics hugely varied due to the presence of the different structural groups surrounding the carbon nuclei. How the dynamics of carbon nuclei spin of clocortolone pivalate is getting affected due to the presence of various chemical group surrounding the nuclei can be picturized vividly by this type of extensive studies. The drug, clocortolone pivalate has different substitution pattern for example methylation at C8, chlorine at C4 and fluorine at C13 and pivalate at C20 etc. These unique substitution patterns make it different from other steroids to be more potent, safe, efficacious and metabolically stable. Thus, dynamics at every chemically different carbon nuclei is important in this aspect.
Conclusion
The correlation between the structure and dynamics of clocortolone pivalate (extensively used for cutaneous disease states, such as psoriasis vulgaris, nummular eczema, contact dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, seborrheic dermatitis, and stasis dermatitis) are monitored by measuring CSA parameters, spin–lattice relaxation time, and molecular correlation time at twenty-seven crystallographically and chemically different carbon nuclei sites. The CSA parameters are substantially varied at chemically different carbon sites, indicate that the molecular orientation and electron distribution are different in numerous regions of this molecule. The asymmetry parameter is zero for C11, C17, C26, indicates that the spinning CSA sideband pattern for those nuclei are axially symmetric. And it is very small (≤0.3) for C2, C5, C10, C22, C23, C24, resonance line, suggests the spinning CSA side-band pattern for those resonance lines is nearly axially symmetric. On other hand, the spinning CSA sideband pattern is highly asymmetric for C3, C4, C6, C18, C19, C21 carbon resonance line. Anisotropy parameter is substantially high for double bonded C14, C15, C18, C19, C21, C22, and C23 nuclei. Spin–lattice relaxation time and molecular correlation time at chemically different carbon site of this molecule differ widely. Spin–lattice relaxation rate is slow for carbon nuclei reside at the carbon ring. On the contrary, it is very fast for C12, C17, C16, C26 carbon nuclei reside at the side portion of the molecule. Molecular correlation time is of the order of 10−4 s for those carbon nuclei attached with neighbouring carbon or oxygen atoms by double bonds like C14, C15, C18, C19, C21, C22, and C23. It implies that the molecular correlation time is very high for those carbon nuclei associated with high values of chemical shift anisotropy. On the contrary, molecular correlation time is of the order of 10−8 s for C12, C16, and C17 carbon nuclei present at the side portion of the molecule. The various portion of the molecule exhibit different degree of motions. The relationship between the structure and dynamics of the molecule is pictured by these types of investigation. This type of inclusive investigation will deliver a potential impact on the way of inventing advanced medicine in pharmaceutical industry.
Authors: Alan Menter; Neil J Korman; Craig A Elmets; Steven R Feldman; Joel M Gelfand; Kenneth B Gordon; Alice Gottlieb; John Y M Koo; Mark Lebwohl; Henry W Lim; Abby S Van Voorhees; Karl R Beutner; Reva Bhushan Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2009-02-13 Impact factor: 11.527