| Literature DB >> 35494522 |
Wei He1, Jiayu Lu1, Wei Zheng1, Xingyu Zhang1, Zhaoxiang Yu1, Lin Shen1, Duo Zhang2.
Abstract
Anesthesiology is a subject with strong practicality and application. Undergraduate anesthesiology teaching needs to strike a balance between theoretical knowledge, clinical skill training, and clinical thinking development. Clinical probation and practice are an important part of undergraduate anesthesia teaching. Traditional clinical teaching uses real patients for demonstration and training, but as patients become more self-protective and less cooperative, there are not enough patients for clinical skill training. Simulation is to teach medical scenes in real life under the control of standardized technical guidelines and parameters. Since then, with the rapid development of computer technology, simulation technology and simulation teaching have been greatly developed and are more and more used in clinical teaching, skill evaluation, and scientific research. This study explores the effective methods of clinical teaching in anesthesiology by comparing the effectiveness of traditional teaching methods and simulation teaching methods in undergraduate clinical teaching. It is difficult to combine theory and practice in first aid, which does not allow them to directly receive and deal with emergency medical treatment and resuscitation. In China's current medical environment and patients' high demand for medical services, it is imperative to vigorously carry out simulated medical education. In the eastern part of Inner Mongolia, according to the advantages of teaching hospitals, our hospital took the lead in carrying out the simulation education project, which is still in the exploratory stage and not systematic enough. This study will help us to better carry out simulation teaching and improve the clinical skills of medical students in the future. Methods. The student group and class took the advanced simulator training as the experimental group, applied the advanced integrated simulator and other systems of the Norwegian company, referred to the international guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and cardiovascular first aid in 2005, and practiced in the emergency department during the clinical internship and "emergency clinical simulation training" course. The course includes basic life support, advanced life support, and comprehensive training of CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and endotracheal intubation. Results. The passing rate of simulated first aid practice was 94.4%; 100% of the students think it is necessary to set up the course, 91% of the students think it is practical, 91% of the students think the course content is reasonable and perfect, and 77%-100% of the students think the course has improved their first aid operation ability, comprehensive application of knowledge, and clinical thinking ability. Conclusion. Carrying out the course of "clinical simulated first aid training" through the advanced simulator system can effectively improve the interns' clinical first aid operation ability, teamwork ability, and self-confidence, improve the students' clinical thinking and judgment ability, and improve the service level to patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35494522 PMCID: PMC9050259 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8163546
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 3.822
Comparison of the examination results of the two groups of students.
| Assessment items | Experimental group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical assessment | 85.2±8.2 | 76.9±5.3 | 11.42 | <0.01 |
| Skill assessment | 88.5±6.5 | 67.7±4.5 | 24.13 | <0.01 |
| Comprehensive ability assessment | 87.6±7.2 | 73.1±4.1 | 17.25 | <0.01 |
Participants' feedback on the intelligent medical integrated simulation system course questionnaire.
| Evaluation items | Student feedback | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Improve learning enthusiasm and interest | Helpful 100% (50/50) | General 0% (0/50) | No help 0% (0/50) |
| Influence on clinical thinking | Helpful 90% (45/50) | General 10% (5/50) | No help 0% (0/50) |
| Deepen the understanding and mastery of knowledge | Helpful 96% (48/50) | General 4% (2/50) | No help 0% (0/50) |
| Practical operation ability | Increased by 100% (50/50) | Slightly increased by 0% (0/50) | No increase of 0% (0/50) |
| Teamwork ability | Increased by 80% (40/50) | Slightly increased by 20% | No increase of 0% (0/50) |
| Doctor-patient communication skills | Increased by 30% (15/50) | Slightly increased by 20% (10/50) | No increase of 50% (25/50) |
| Adaptability and judgment | Increased by 92% (46/50) | Slightly increased by 8% (4/50) | No increase of 0% (0/50) |
| Problem solving ability | Increased by 92% (46/50) | Slightly increased by 8% (4/50) | No increase of 0% (0/50) |
| Necessity of offering this course | Necessary 100% (50/50) | Slightly increased by 6% (3/50) | No increase of 0% (0/50) |
| Practicality of the course | Significant effect 100% (50/50) | Unnecessary 0% (0/50) | It does not matter 0% (0/50) |
| Satisfaction with the course | Very satisfied 100% (50/50) | Also 0% (0/50) | Dissatisfied 0% (0/50) |
| Course content | Reasonable improvement 84% (42/50) | Need to add 10% (5/50) | Content to be deleted 6% (3/50) |
Results of questionnaire feedback on student satisfaction with teaching methods in both groups.
| Group |
| Satisfied | Dissatisfied | Indifferent | Satisfaction rate (%) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experience group | 50 | 47 | 1 | 2 | 94 | 14.98 | <0.01 |
| Control group | 52 | 28 | 20 | 4 | 53.8 | - | - |