| Literature DB >> 35493805 |
Jinbei Yu1, Shuai Yan2, Pengpeng Niu1, Junfang Teng1.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics and prognostic features of Chinese patients with relatively late-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (RLO-NMOSD>40 years of age at disease onset), compared with patients with relatively early onset NMOSD (REO-NMOSD, ≤ 40 years of age at disease onset).Entities:
Keywords: annualized relapse rate; disability; disease course; enlarged perivascular space; expanded disability status scale scores; neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; relatively-late onset
Year: 2022 PMID: 35493805 PMCID: PMC9046694 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.859276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) according to age group (<40 or ≥40 years).
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| Female: male (ratio) | 29:3 (9.7:1) | 36:3 (12:1) | 1.000 |
| Age at onset, years, IQR | 25 (21.3–31.8) | 50 (45.0–56.0) | NA |
| Disease duration (months) IQR | 56.5 (43.2–81.0) | 63 (46–75) | 0.977 |
| Optic neuritis | 14 (43.7%) | 12 (30.8%) | 0.259 |
| Transverse myelitis only | 8 (25.0%) | 19 (48.7%) | 0.041 |
| Area postrema syndrome | 6 (18.8%) | 1 (2.6%) | 0.041 |
| Other | 4 (12.5%) | 7 (17.9%) | 0.763 |
| Time to first relapse, months | 7.0 (3.0–16.8) | 10.5 (5.0–16.8) | 0.339 |
| Annualized relapse rate | 1.0 (0–1.0) | 1.0 (0–1.0) | 0.772 |
|
| |||
| At initial | 3.0 (2.6–5.8) | 5.0 (3.0–7.0) | 0.010 |
| Third month follow-up | 2.5 (2.0–3.5) | 4.0 (3.0–5.5) | 0.001 |
| First year follow-up | 2.5 (2.0–3.5) | 3.0 (2.5–4.5) | 0.003 |
| Third year follow-up | 3.0 (1.5–4.0) | 3.5 (2.9–5.1) | 0.017 |
| Latest follow-up | 2.5 (1.1–4.9) | 4.0 (3.0–6.9) | 0.002 |
|
| |||
| At initial | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | 0.466 |
| Nadir | 3.0 (2.5–3.5) | 3.0 (2.0–4.0) | 0.716 |
| Final follow-up | 2.0 (1.0–3.0) | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | 0.038 |
| Time to EDSS score 6, weeks (IQR) | 146 (5.5–273) | 74.0 (2.0–196.0) | 0.116 |
| Coexisting autoimmune disorders | 14 (43.8%) | 12 (30.8%) | 0.259 |
|
| 28 (87.5%) | 34 (87.2%) | 1.000 |
| Time from onset to IST | 8 (4–28.5) | 9.5 (1–22.2) | 0.644 |
| Azathioprine | 14 | 24 | 0.135 |
| Mycophenolate mofetil | 11 | 8 | 0.189 |
| Other (MTX/RTX) | 3 | 2 | 0.652 |
| Without IST | 4 | 5 | 1.000 |
| AQP4-IgG positive | 25 (78.1%) | 26 (66.7%) | 0.302 |
| 0.329 | |||
| High degree-CS EPVS | 16 (50.0%) | 24 (61.5%) | |
| Low degree-CS EPVS | 16 (50.0%) | 17 (38.5%) | |
| 0.086 | |||
| High degree-BG EPVS | 7 (21.9%) | 16 (41.0%) | |
| Low degree-BG EPVS | 25 (78.1%) | 23 (59.0%) |
MTX, methotrexate; RTX, rituximab; CS, centrum semiovale; BG, basal ganglia.
Figure 1Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores at different time periods between patients with relatively early-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (REO-NMOSD) and relatively late-onset neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (RLO-NMOSD) patients. (*p <0.05,**p <0.01).
Figure 2Representative examples of centrum semiovale-enlarged perivascular spaces (CS-EPVS) (A) and basal ganglia (BG)-EPVS (B). Arrowheads point to individual EPVS. EPVS, enlarged perivascular spaces; BG, basal ganglia; CS, centrum semiovale.
Figure 3Weeks from onset to reach the EDSS scores of 6.0 and 4.0, stratified by the age of disease onset: (A) Patients with RLO-NMOSD reached EDSS scores of 6.0 sooner than patients with REO-NMOSD (p = 0.034); (B) Time to EDSS score of 4.0 between the two groups (p = 0.052).
Figure 4Correlation between onset age and EDSS at the final follow-up time point.
The comparison of demographic and clinical features between patients with REO-NMOSD and RLO-NMOSD with AQP4-IgG.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| Female: male (ratio) | 24:1 (24:1) | 12:1 (24:2) | 1.000 |
| Age at onset, years, mean (SD) | 26.9 (6.6) | 51.9 (8.5) | NA |
| Disease duration (months) IQR | 67.0 (44.5–82.5) | 62.5 (44.8–76.3) | 0.644 |
| Optic neuritis | 10 (40.0%) | 10 (38.5%) | 0.910 |
| Transverse myelitis only | 8 (32.0%) | 10 (38.5%) | 0.447 |
| Area postrema syndrome | 4 (16.0%) | 1 (3.8%) | 0.191 |
| Other | 3 (12.0%) | 5 (19.2%) | 0.703 |
| Time to first relapse, months | 9.0 (3.0–21.0) | 9.0 (5.0–20.5) | 0.634 |
| Annualized relapse rate | 1.0 (0.0–1.0) | 1.0 (0.0–1.0) | 0.843 |
|
| |||
| At initial | 3.0 (2.8–6.3) | 4.8 (3.5–7.0) | 0.039 |
| Third month follow-up | 2.5 (2.0–4.0) | 4.0 (3.0–5.5) | 0.004 |
| First year follow-up | 2.5 (1.8–3.5) | 3.0 (2.5–4.0) | 0.032 |
| Third year follow-up | 3.0 (1.5–4.0) | 3.0 (2.9–5.6) | 0.046 |
| Latest follow-up | 2.5 (1.5–4.5) | 3.8 (3.0–6.6) | 0.010 |
| EDSS score≥6 | 4 (16.0%) | 9 (34.6%) | 0.127 |
| EDSS score≥4 | 7 (28.0%) | 15 (57.7%) | 0.032 |
| Coexisting autoimmune disorders | 13 (52.0%) | 10 (38.5%) | 0.331 |
|
| 22 (88.0%) | 23 (88.5%) | 1.000 |
| Time from onset to IST | 9.5 (2.5–25.5) | 9.0 (1.0–28.0) | 0.663 |
| Azathioprine | 12 (48.0%) | 15 (57.7%) | 0.488 |
| Mycophenolate mofetil | 9 (36.0%) | 7 (26.9%) | 0.485 |
| Other (MTX/RTX) | 1 (4.0%) | 1 (3.8%) | 0.745 |
| Without IST | 3 (12.0%) | 3 (11.4%) | 1.000 |
| 0.867 | |||
| High degree-CS EPVS | 15 (60.0%) | 15 (57.7%) | - |
| Low degree-CS EPVS (score ≤ 1) | 10 (40.0%) | 11 (42.3%) | - |
| 0.406 | |||
| High degree-BG EPVS | 6 (24.0%) | 9 (34.6%) | - |
| Low degree-BG EPVS | 19 (76.0%) | 17 (65.4%) | - |
MTX, methotrexate; RTX, rituximab; CS, centrum semiovate; BG, basal ganglia.
Figure 5Expanded disability status scale scores at different points between patients with REO- and RLO-NMOSD with AQP4-Ab positive (*p <0.05,**p <0.01).