Literature DB >> 35492909

Solvent-free and room temperature microwave-assisted direct C7 allylation of indolines via sequential C-H and C-C activation.

Qiuling Wang1, Linlin Shi1, Shuang Liu1, Changlei Zhi1, Lian-Rong Fu1, Xinju Zhu1, Xin-Qi Hao1, Mao-Ping Song1.   

Abstract

A Ru or Rh-catalyzed efficient and atom-economic C7 allylation of indolines with vinylcyclopropanes was developed via sequential C-H and C-C activation. A wide range of substrates were well tolerated to afford the corresponding allylated indolines in high yields and E/Z selectivities under microwave irradiation. The obtained allylated indolines could further undergo transformations to afford various value-added chemicals. Importantly, this reaction proceeded at room temperature under solvent-free conditions. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 35492909      PMCID: PMC9050424          DOI: 10.1039/d0ra02016h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RSC Adv        ISSN: 2046-2069            Impact factor:   3.361


The development of sustainable methodologies is attractive for access to complex molecular architectures in organic chemistry.[1] In recent years, various non-conventional techniques, such as microwave irradiation, sonochemistry, mechanical grinding and photochemistry, have achieved remarkable success.[2] In particular, microwaves have shown unique advantages with regards to reaction times, energy efficiency, temperature, and reaction media.[3] On the other hand, transition-metal-catalyzed activation of C–H[4] and C–C[5] bonds has been considered as an ideal method for the formation of C–C and C–X bonds. Nevertheless, transition-metal-catalyzed C–H or C–C bond activation under the above non-conventional techniques remains to be explored. It is thus highly imperative to develop a practical strategy in combination of C–H or C–C activation and microwave irradiation.[6] Recently, there have significant advances in C–H activation technology by merging C–H functionalization with challenging C–C cleavage strategies.[7] Since the pioneering work by Bergman and co-workers[8] on the sequential C–H and C–C bond activation, many research groups, including Dong,[9] Ackermann,[10] Li,[11] Cramer,[12] and others[13] have contributed to C–H/C–C activation. In this content, certain small strained rings are often utilized as an effective synthons to undergo ring-opening reactions driven by strain-release energy.[14] Very recently, VCPs (vinylcyclopanes) have been reported as allyl reagents to access various (hetero)aromatic derivatives through sequential C–H and C–C activation (Scheme 1a–d).[15]
Scheme 1

Sequential C–H/C–C activations using VCPs.

As a continuation of our interest in chelation-directed reactions and novel methods for C–H functionalization,[16] we herein report a Ru or Rh-catalyzed C-7 allylation of indolines under microwave irradiation using VCPs as the allylating agents (Scheme 1e). This transformation possesses great synthetic potential from the viewpoint of green and sustainable chemistry. Notable features of our protocol include (1) C–H/C–C activation with VCPs by microwave irradiation, (2) broad substrate scope with good regio- and E/Z selectivities, (3) high atom economy, and (4) high efficiency (2 h) at room temperature under solvent-free conditions. We initiated our investigation by choosing indoline 1a and VCP 2a as model substrates under microwave irradiation conditions (Table 1). To our delight, the allylated product 3aa was isolated in 40% yield in the presence of [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (5 mol%), AgSbF6 (25 mol%), and AdCOOH (30 mol%) at 25 °C for 1 h (Table 1, entry 1). Other ruthenium salts, such as [Cp*RuCl2]2 and RhCl3·3H2O, were also investigated, which showed no catalytic reactivity (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). Subsequently, the effects of various additives, including MesCOOH, AcOH, NaOAc, PivONa·H2O, and DABCO, were screened, which indicates that MesCOOH was the best choice to afford 3aa in 47% yield (Table 1, entry 4). Increasing the loading of MesCOOH from 30 mol% to 50 mol% resulted in an increased yield (57%) of 3aa (Table 1, entry 9). To improve reaction efficiency, the temperature range was evaluated (Table 1, entries 10–12). It was found that product 3aa was obtained in 83% yield at 50 °C (Table 1, entry 11) and a comparable result could still be achieved at 25 °C (Table 1, entry 12). Finally, the reactivity could be further increased when the reaction was performed at 25 °C for 2 h to deliver the desired product 3aa in 87% yield with excellent E/Z selectivity (Table 1, entry 13). To demonstrate the unique reactivity of Ru catalyst in this protocol, [Cp*Rh(CH3CN)3](SbF6)2 was also tested to give a slightly lower yield with decreased E/Z selectivity at higher temperature (Table 1, entry 14).

Optimization of the reaction conditionsa

EntryCatalyst (mol%)Additive (mol%) T (°C)Yield (%)
1[Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2AdCOOH9040
2RuCl3·3H2OAdCOOH90N.R
3[Cp*RuCl2]2AdCOOH90N.R
4[Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2MesCOOH9047
5[Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2AcOH9040
6[Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2NaOAc9020
7[Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2PivONa·H2O9021
8[Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2DABCO90Trace
9b[Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2MesCOOH9057
10b[Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2MesCOOH7068
11b[Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2MesCOOH5083
12b[Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2MesCOOH2565
13b,c[Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2MesCOOH2587 (>20 : 1)e
14c,d[Cp*Rh(CH3CN)3](SbF6)2AdCOOH8078 (10 : 1)e

Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (5 mol%), additive (30 mol%), MW, 1 h, 90 °C.

MesCOOH (50 mol%).

t = 2 h.

[Cp*Rh(CH3CN)3](SbF6)2 (8 mol%).

The E : Z ratio was determined by 1H NMR analysis. MW = microwave irradiation.

Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (5 mol%), additive (30 mol%), MW, 1 h, 90 °C. MesCOOH (50 mol%). t = 2 h. [Cp*Rh(CH3CN)3](SbF6)2 (8 mol%). The E : Z ratio was determined by 1H NMR analysis. MW = microwave irradiation. Under the optimized reaction conditions with the ruthenium catalyst, the substrate scope of indolines 1 was investigated (Table 2). C2-alkyl and aryl substituted indolines were initially examined to give products 3ba–fa in 65–96% yields. Indoline bearing methyl group at the C3 position was also tolerated to afford product 3ga in 91% yield. For C4 and C5 substituted indolines, both electron-donating (Me, OMe, and OBn) and electron-withdrawing (F and Cl) groups were well compatible to provide the corresponding allylated products 3ha–la and 3na–ra in 80–96% yields. The presence of bromo and ester functionalities on substrates led to products 3ma (54%), 3sa (73%), and 3ta (60%) in slightly decreased yields. In addition, disubstituted indolines were also tested to deliver products 3ua and 3va in 82% and 89% yields, respectively. Notably, C6-halogen substituted indolines exhibited high activity to afford products 3wa–ya in 78–95% yield. However, C6-methyl substituted substrate turned to be unsuccessful probably due to steric hindrance effect. Moreover, quinoline and carbazole substrates were also employed to afford the allylated products 3za and 3a′a in 71% and 78% yields. Finally, a series of other directing groups such as acetyl, pyridyl, and others were also tried (see in the ESI†). While 3b′a was obtained in 84% yield, others failed to give the coupling products. Overall, indolines with a variety of functionalities ranging from C2 to C6 positions could react with VCP 2a to afford the allylated products in good yields with high E/Z selectivities under the [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 catalytic system. On the other hand, when [RhCp*(CH3CN)3](SbF6)2 was employed as the catalyst instead of Ru analogue, decreased yields accompanied with lower E/Z selectivities was observed in most cases.

Substrate scope of indolinesa,b

Reaction conditions [Ru]: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (5 mol%), MesCOOH (50 mol%), AgSbF6 (25 mol%), MW, 25 °C, 2 h; [Rh]: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), [Cp*Rh(CH3CN)3](SbF6)2 (8 mol%), AdCOOH (30 mol%), AgSbF6 (20 mol%), MW, 80 °C, 2 h.

The E : Z ratio was determined by 1H NMR analysis. MW = microwave.

Reaction conditions [Ru]: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (5 mol%), MesCOOH (50 mol%), AgSbF6 (25 mol%), MW, 25 °C, 2 h; [Rh]: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), [Cp*Rh(CH3CN)3](SbF6)2 (8 mol%), AdCOOH (30 mol%), AgSbF6 (20 mol%), MW, 80 °C, 2 h. The E : Z ratio was determined by 1H NMR analysis. MW = microwave. Encouraged by the above results, the scope of VCPs 2 was also explored to further examine the generality of the current C–C/C–H activation strategy with the ruthenium catalyst (Table 3). Various ester-substituted VCPs, including CO2Me, BuCO2, iPrCO2, and BnCO2 groups, were successfully coupled with indoline 1a to afford products 3ab–ad in 74–90% yields with up to 20 : 1 E/Z selectivity. For VCPs having CF3CH2CO2 and lactone activating groups, products 3af and 3ag were isolated in decreased yields. When CN and PhSO2 functionalities were introduced into VCP moiety, the corresponding products 3ah–ak were obtained in 56–78% yields with decreased E/Z values. Furthermore, the substituted indolines could also furnish the corresponding products (3fe, 3kc, and 3sc) in 74–90% yields. Finally, Rh catalytic system could give the corresponding products in comparable yields and E/Z ratios.

Substrate scope of VCPsa,b

Reaction conditions [Ru]: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (5 mol%), MesCOOH (50 mol%), AgSbF6 (25 mol%), MW, 25 °C, 2 h; [Rh]: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), [Cp*Rh(CH3CN)3](SbF6)2 (8 mol%), AdCOOH (30 mol%), AgSbF6 (20 mol%), MW, 80 °C, 2 h.

The E : Z ratio was determined by 1H NMR analysis.

40 °C.

[Ru] CH2Cl2 (0.5 mL), 40 °C; [Rh] : MeOH (0.5 mL). MW = microwave.

Reaction conditions [Ru]: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (5 mol%), MesCOOH (50 mol%), AgSbF6 (25 mol%), MW, 25 °C, 2 h; [Rh]: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), [Cp*Rh(CH3CN)3](SbF6)2 (8 mol%), AdCOOH (30 mol%), AgSbF6 (20 mol%), MW, 80 °C, 2 h. The E : Z ratio was determined by 1H NMR analysis. 40 °C. [Ru] CH2Cl2 (0.5 mL), 40 °C; [Rh] : MeOH (0.5 mL). MW = microwave. To evaluate the practical utility of the current methodology, a gram-scale reaction between 1a (6.0 mmol) and 2a (12.0 mmol) was performed under standard conditions, which delivered the allylated product 3aa in 74% yield (Scheme 2). Meanwhile, the derivatizations of 3aa were also conducted to highlight the synthetic importance of allylated indolines. Firstly, 3aa could undergo decarboxylation in the presence of NaOEt in DMSO to afford compound 4 in 86% yield. Under the condition of KOH in EtOH, the hydrolysis product 5 was obtained in 90% yield. Secondly, in the presence of DDQ in toluene, product 3aa could be oxidized to compound 6 in 38% yield. Thirdly, hydrogenation of 3aa under Pd–C/H2 conditions would afford a reduced product 7, which could further undergo oxidation and decarboxylation transformations to give indole derivatives 8 and 9 in 90% and 82% yields, respectively.
Scheme 2

Gram-scale reaction and further derivatization of product 3aa.

To gain insights into the reaction mechanism, a series of control experiments were conducted (Scheme 3). In the H/D exchange experiment, the deuterated [D]-1a was prepared and subjected to the standard conditions. It was found that only negligible amount of deuterium was detected for retrieved 1a. When 2a reacted with [D]-1a for 30 min, a similar result with a distinct D/H exchange was also observed (Scheme 3a). Next, the intermolecular competition experiment between substituted indolines 1o and 1t was conducted. Methoxyl-substituted allylated indoline 3oa was isolated as the major product, indicating that indolines bearing electron-donating groups are more reactive (Scheme 3b). When a radical quencher, such as 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (TEMPO), 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT), or benzoquinone (BQ), was added, the allylation reaction was suppressed with product 3aa obtained in a decreased yield (Scheme 3c). These results could't indicate that a non-radical mediated reaction pathway. Finally, the KIE values observed in parallel reactions suggest that the C–H bond cleavage is not involved in the limiting step (Scheme 3d).
Scheme 3

Control experiments.

On the basis of above discussion and related reports,[17] a plausible catalytic cycle was proposed (Scheme 4). A pyrimidine-directed C–H activation between indoline 1a and an in situ-generated Ru cationic complex I gives a six-membered ruthenacycle II. Coordination of intermediate II with VCP 2a provides intermediate III, which undergoes 1,2-migratory insertion to afford an ruthenium intermediate IV. Then oxygen coordinates to Ru metal center to form intermediate V. After C–C cleavage of VCP 2a, intermediate VI will be generated, followed by protonation to deliver the desired product 3aa and regenerate the active catalyst species I.
Scheme 4

Proposed reaction mechanism.

Conclusions

In summary, we have successfully demonstrated a [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2-catalyzed C7 allylation of indolines with VCPs as the allylating reagents via a sequential C–H/C–C process. This protocol is applicable to broad substrate scope with good functional group compatibility and high E/Z selectivity. The practical applications of allylation transformation are highlighted through gram-scale production and multiple derivatizations. Notably, the use of microwave irradiation under room temperature and solvent-free conditions makes this protocol more valuable and operational convenience, which provides a new insight for the formation of indoline derivatives.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.
  51 in total

1.  Cobalt-Catalyzed N-O and C-C Bond Cleavage in 1,2-Oxazetidines: Solvent-Controlled C-H Aminomethylation and Hydroxymethylation of Heteroarenes.

Authors:  Song Li; Pengfei Shi; Rui-Hua Liu; Xu-Hong Hu; Teck-Peng Loh
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 6.005

2.  Transition metal-catalysed couplings between arenes and strained or reactive rings: combination of C-H activation and ring scission.

Authors:  Fen Wang; Songjie Yu; Xingwei Li
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  Cp*-Free Cobalt-Catalyzed C-H Activation/Annulations by Traceless N, O-Bidentate Directing Group: Access to Isoquinolines.

Authors:  Xiao-Cai Li; Cong Du; He Zhang; Jun-Long Niu; Mao-Ping Song
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 6.005

4.  Metal-Organic Cooperative Catalysis in C-H and C-C Bond Activation.

Authors:  Dong-Su Kim; Woo-Jin Park; Chul-Ho Jun
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Ligand-free Pd-catalyzed and copper-assisted C-H arylation of quinazolin-4-ones with aryl iodides under microwave heating.

Authors:  Sylvain Laclef; Marine Harari; Julien Godeau; Isabelle Schmitz-Afonso; Laurent Bischoff; Christophe Hoarau; Vincent Levacher; Corinne Fruit; Thierry Besson
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 6.005

6.  Ring-Opening Ortho-C-H Allylation of Benzoic Acids with Vinylcyclopropanes: Merging Catalytic C-H and C-C Activation Concepts.

Authors:  Zhiyong Hu; Xiao-Qiang Hu; Guodong Zhang; Lukas J Gooßen
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 6.005

7.  Rhodium-Catalyzed Direct Bis-cyanation of Arylimidazo[1,2-α]pyridine via Double C-H Activation.

Authors:  Xinju Zhu; Xiao-Jing Shen; Zi-Yao Tian; Shuai Lu; Lu-Lu Tian; Wen-Bo Liu; Bing Song; Xin-Qi Hao
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.354

8.  "Cut and Sew" Transformations via Transition-Metal-Catalyzed Carbon-Carbon Bond Activation.

Authors:  Peng-Hao Chen; Brent A Billett; Tatsuhiro Tsukamoto; Guangbin Dong
Journal:  ACS Catal       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 13.084

9.  Mild C-H/C-C Activation by Z-Selective Cobalt Catalysis.

Authors:  Daniel Zell; Qingqing Bu; Milica Feldt; Lutz Ackermann
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 15.336

10.  Manganese-catalyzed allylation via sequential C-H and C-C/C-Het bond activation.

Authors:  Qingquan Lu; Felix J R Klauck; Frank Glorius
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 9.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.