| Literature DB >> 35492908 |
Luya Li1, Rui Feng2, Xue Feng1, Yuting Chen1, Xin Liu1, Wenjing Sun1, Lantong Zhang1.
Abstract
Eriocitrin is one of the major active constituents of lemon fruit, and it possesses strong antioxidant, lipid-lowering, anticancer and anti-inflammatory activities and has long been used in food, beverages and wine. In this study, for the first time, a rapid, selective, and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method (LC/MS/MS) with protein precipitation was developed and validated for the analysis of eriocitrin in rat plasma. Chromatographic separation was achieved using a mobile phase, comprising 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution and acetonitrile eluted at a flow rate of 0.8 mL min-1. In multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) modes, eriocitrin and internal standard (IS) were quantified using precursor-to-product ion transitions of m/z 595.4 → 287.1 and m/z 252.0 → 155.9, respectively. The intra- and inter-day precision (RSD) were below 6.79% in plasma, while accuracy (RE) was within ±7.67%. The matrix effect, recovery and stability were also demonstrated to be within acceptable limits. This method was successfully employed in the pharmacokinetic study on rats after the oral administration of eriocitrin. The pharmacokinetic parameters show that the maximum plasma concentration (C max) of eriocitrin was 299.833 ± 16.743 μg L-1, while the corresponding time to reach C max(T max) was 0.094 ± 0.019 h, and the half-time (T 1/2) was 1.752 ± 0.323 h. The present results would be valuable for further research and development of eriocitrin. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35492908 PMCID: PMC9050387 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra10925k
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1MS/MS spectra of eriocitrin and IS (sulfamethoxazole) in negative mode.
Fig. 2MRM chromatograms of the blank plasma (A), plasma spiked with eriocitrin and IS (B), and plasma samples after oral administration of eriocitrin (C).
Intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy of eriocitrin in rat plasma
| Concentration (ng mL−1) | Intra-day ( | Inter-day ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured conc., (ng mL−1) | Precision, RSD (%) | Accuracy, RE (%) | Measured conc., (ng mL−1) | Precision, RSD (%) | Accuracy, RE (%) | |
| 6.25 | 6.41 ± 0.36 | 5.64 | 2.56 | 6.50 ± 0.31 | 4.79 | 4.06 |
| 50 | 53.04 ± 3.20 | 6.02 | 6.09 | 53.83 ± 3.65 | 6.79 | 7.67 |
| 600 | 593.01 ± 12.30 | 2.07 | −1.17 | 596.42 ± 11.15 | 1.87 | −0.60 |
Mean matrix effects and extraction recoveries of eriocitrin in rat plasma
| Analyte | Spiked concentration (ng mL−1) | Extraction recovery | Matrix effect | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (%) | RSD (%) | Mean (%) | RSD (%) | ||
| Eriocitrin | 6.25 | 82.13 | 4.17 | 82.23 | 5.61 |
| 50 | 93.14 | 7.63 | 88.65 | 8.41 | |
| 600 | 87.16 | 8.09 | 90.59 | 1.96 | |
Stability data of eriocitrin in rat plasma and stock solutions
| Storage condition | Eriocitrin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nominal conc. (ng mL−1) | Found conc. (ng mL−1) | RE (%) | |
| Short-term stability (room temperature for 24 h) | 6.25 | 6.29 ± 0.315 | 0.69 |
| 50 | 52.25 ± 3.208 | 4.51 | |
| 600 | 594.38 ± 12.715 | −0.94 | |
| Long-term stability (−20 °C for 30 days) | 6.25 | 6.12 ± 0.241 | −2.06 |
| 50 | 49.43 ± 0.291 | −1.13 | |
| 600 | 605.61 ± 4.378 | 0.93 | |
| Three freeze–thaw cycles stability | 6.25 | 6.32 ± 0.265 | 1.17 |
| 50 | 51.60 ± 2.927 | 3.20 | |
| 600 | 589.09 ± 9.952 | −1.82 | |
| Stock solution stability (4 °C for 30 days) | 6.25 | 6.33 ± 0.340 | 1.28 |
| 50 | 53.35 ± 3.134 | 6.71 | |
| 600 | 584.61 ± 5.330 | −2.56 | |
Fig. 3Plasma concentration–time profile after a single oral administration of eriocitrin (50 mg kg−1) to rats. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 6).
Pharmacokinetic parameters of eriocitrin in rat plasma after oral administration (n = 6)
| Pharmacokinetic parameters | Eriocitrin |
|---|---|
|
| 299.833 ± 16.743 |
|
| 0.094 ± 0.019 |
|
| 1.752 ± 0.323 |
| AUC0– | 653.852 ± 143.341 |
| AUC0–∞ (μg h L−1) | 670.847 ± 141.634 |
| CLz/F (L kg−1 h−1) | 77.139 ± 18.52 |
| Vz/F (L h−1) | 198.656 ± 75.89 |