Yin Cheong Wong1, Shuai Qian, Zhong Zuo. 1. School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Room 801C, Lo Kwee-Seong Integrated Biomedical Sciences Building, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the pharmacokinetic differences between the common nasal delivery models. METHODS: In three different rat models [long-term anesthetized (with nasal surgery), short-term anesthetized (without nasal surgery) and conscious models], tacrine and loxapine were administered via nasal, intravenous and oral routes, and the plasma pharmacokinetics were compared among different models. RESULTS: Systemic exposures of both drugs and their metabolites were consistently higher in long-term anesthetized model after all routes of administration in comparison to that of conscious model. Nasal bioavailabilities in long-term anesthetized model (tacrine 83%, loxapine 97%) were much higher than that in conscious model (tacrine 10%, loxapine 46%). Further studies on tacrine and its metabolites demonstrated no significant difference in t1/2 between short-term anesthetized and conscious models after all routes of administration; however, long-term anesthetized model showed significantly longer t1/2. Regarding the pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, Tmax, AUC, bioavailability) of tacrine and its metabolites, short-term anesthetized model resembled closer to conscious model than long-term anesthetized model. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma clearances of tacrine, loxapine, and their metabolites were much slower in the long-term anesthetized model of nasal delivery probably due to suppressed hepatic and renal clearances, while the short-term anesthetized model imposed less impact on tacrine pharmacokinetics and metabolism.
PURPOSE: To investigate the pharmacokinetic differences between the common nasal delivery models. METHODS: In three different rat models [long-term anesthetized (with nasal surgery), short-term anesthetized (without nasal surgery) and conscious models], tacrine and loxapine were administered via nasal, intravenous and oral routes, and the plasma pharmacokinetics were compared among different models. RESULTS: Systemic exposures of both drugs and their metabolites were consistently higher in long-term anesthetized model after all routes of administration in comparison to that of conscious model. Nasal bioavailabilities in long-term anesthetized model (tacrine 83%, loxapine 97%) were much higher than that in conscious model (tacrine 10%, loxapine 46%). Further studies on tacrine and its metabolites demonstrated no significant difference in t1/2 between short-term anesthetized and conscious models after all routes of administration; however, long-term anesthetized model showed significantly longer t1/2. Regarding the pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, Tmax, AUC, bioavailability) of tacrine and its metabolites, short-term anesthetized model resembled closer to conscious model than long-term anesthetized model. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma clearances of tacrine, loxapine, and their metabolites were much slower in the long-term anesthetized model of nasal delivery probably due to suppressed hepatic and renal clearances, while the short-term anesthetized model imposed less impact on tacrine pharmacokinetics and metabolism.
Authors: Jiang Ping Luo; Sarvesh C Vashishtha; Edward M Hawes; Gordon McKay; Kamal K Midha; Jim Fang Journal: Biopharm Drug Dispos Date: 2011-08-09 Impact factor: 1.627
Authors: Sandra Buitrago; Thomas E Martin; Joanne Tetens-Woodring; Alan Belicha-Villanueva; Gregory E Wilding Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 1.232