Light trapping effects are known to boost the photocatalytic degradation of organic molecules in 3D photonic structures of anatase titania (a-TiO2) with an inverse opal configuration. In the present work, we show that photocatalytic activity can also be enhanced in a-TiO2 thin films if they are incorporated within a nanoporous 1D optical resonant microcavity. We have designed and manufactured multilayer systems that, presenting a high open porosity to enable a straightforward diffusion of photodegradable molecules, provide light confinement effects at wavelengths around the absorption edge of photoactive a-TiO2. In brief, we have observed that a nanoporous 1D Bragg microcavity prepared by electron beam evaporation at oblique angles comprising a central defect layer of nanoporous a-TiO2 boosts the photocatalytic degradation of nitrobenzene and methyl orange dye solutions. The multilayer structure of the microcavity was designed to ensure the appearance of optical resonances at the a-TiO2 layer location and wavelengths around the absorption onset of this semiconductor. In this porous 1D Bragg microcavity, the diffusion constraints of molecules through the capping layers covering the a-TiO2 are effectively compensated by an increase in the photocatalytic activity due to the light confinement phenomena. We also report that the absorption coefficient of methyl orange dye solution infiltrated within the pore structure of the microcavity is exalted at the wavelengths of the corresponding optical resonances. This effect gives rise to a small but non-negligible visible light photodegradation of dye molecules. The possibilities of tailoring the design of 1D photonic systems to boost the photocatalytic activity of a-TiO2 are discussed.
Light trapping effects are known to boost the photocatalytic degradation of organic molecules in 3D photonic structures of anatase titania (a-TiO2) with an inverse opal configuration. In the present work, we show that photocatalytic activity can also be enhanced in a-TiO2 thin films if they are incorporated within a nanoporous 1D optical resonant microcavity. We have designed and manufactured multilayer systems that, presenting a high open porosity to enable a straightforward diffusion of photodegradable molecules, provide light confinement effects at wavelengths around the absorption edge of photoactive a-TiO2. In brief, we have observed that a nanoporous 1D Bragg microcavity prepared by electron beam evaporation at oblique angles comprising a central defect layer of nanoporous a-TiO2 boosts the photocatalytic degradation of nitrobenzene and methyl orange dye solutions. The multilayer structure of the microcavity was designed to ensure the appearance of optical resonances at the a-TiO2 layer location and wavelengths around the absorption onset of this semiconductor. In this porous 1D Bragg microcavity, the diffusion constraints of molecules through the capping layers covering the a-TiO2 are effectively compensated by an increase in the photocatalytic activity due to the light confinement phenomena. We also report that the absorption coefficient of methyl orange dye solution infiltrated within the pore structure of the microcavity is exalted at the wavelengths of the corresponding optical resonances. This effect gives rise to a small but non-negligible visible light photodegradation of dye molecules. The possibilities of tailoring the design of 1D photonic systems to boost the photocatalytic activity of a-TiO2 are discussed.
The
UV photocatalytic activity of anatase TiO2 (a-TiO2) has been a recurrent research topic during the last decades
due to its effectiveness for pollution removal from gas or liquid
sources.[1] Anatase is the most popular photoactive
phase of TiO2 mainly because it can be obtained by annealing
treatments at relatively mild temperatures and is very stable under
photoactivation conditions.[2] In this context,
much effort has been dedicated to increasing the reaction yields through
careful manufacturing and control of the structural and microstructural
characteristics of the active rutile and anatase phases of this semiconductor
oxide.[3,4] Among the strategies considered, we can
refer to the doping with transition-metal cations,[5] the preparation of defective titania,[6] or the implementation of tandem catalyst concepts.[2] Recently, a different successful approach in
this regard has been the application of light confinement effects
to increase the photocatalytic performance of the system.[7] For this purpose, a-TiO2 has been
fabricated either in the form of three-dimensional photonic crystals
(3D-PCs), usually depicting an inverse opal structure,[8,9] or as agglomerated particles or nanoparticles of a-TiO2 in contact with 3D-PCs made of titania or other materials (e.g.,
SiO2,[10] SnO2,[11] or TiO2[12]). A common feature in these 3D-PCs is the slow group velocity of
light for certain wavelengths and spatial locations. For photons energies
around the absorption edge of the semiconductor, or higher values,
this effect enhances its absorption and, therefore, the photoactivity
of the system.[13] Tuning the spectral response
in these systems is possible by adjusting the dimensions of the basic
building blocks of the photonic structures.[14] In the case of inverse opals, these building blocks correspond to
the size of the empty spheres arranged according to a 3D ordered distribution.[15] The combination of the light confinement effects
appearing in these inverse opals with plasmonics,[16] other semiconductors active in the visible,[17,18] doping of the a-TiO2 to shift its absorption edge toward
the visible region,[12] or the promotion
of its sensitization with dyes[19] has opened
new perspectives in the quest for advanced concepts in PC-assisted
light-activated titania photocatalysis.[20]Photonic crystals can be made one-dimensional (1D-PCs), one
example
of which corresponds to the so-called Bragg mirrors (BM) formed by
the alternant stacking of layers of two dielectric materials with
refractive index contrast.[21] The transmittance
of this type of multilayer depicts a photonic band gap whose spectral
position and width depend on the characteristics (thickness and refractive
index) of the stacked layers. A modification of this photonic structure
through the incorporation of a central layer with different thickness
and/or refractive index gives rise to a so-called Bragg microcavity,
characterized by the appearance of optical resonances within the photonic
gap.[22] 1D-PCs have been prepared by wet[21,23] or vacuum/plasma routes. The latter methods offer advantages in
terms of scalability to large areas and compatibility with sensitive
substrates.[24−26]Light confinement effects in 1D-PCs have been
successfully used
to improve the efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells.[27,28] They have also claimed to be responsible for the enhancement of
the absorption coefficient of dye solutions infiltrated within the
pore structure of 1D Bragg microcavities (i.e., to induce a so-called
“giant” absorption).[29] However,
to our knowledge, except for some attempts to stack TiO2 and graphene oxide layers,[30,31] 1D-PC structures have
not been utilized to enhance the photocatalytic activity of a-TiO2. The present work demonstrates that light trapping in nanoporous
1D Bragg microcavities effectively enhances the photoactivity of this
semiconductor. To prove this concept, we have designed and prepared
a series of highly porous a-TiO2-based layered systems
and correlate their photoactivity with the existence of light confinement
effects for wavelengths around the onset of absorption of a-TiO2 (i.e., ∼380 nm). These nanostructured multilayered
systems have been manufactured by electron beam evaporation in an
oblique angle configuration (OAD),[32,33] a procedure
known to render columnar thin films with empty volume ratios up to
50%. We and other laboratories have applied this procedure to the
fabrication of single photocatalytic layers of TiO2 and
other materials[34−36] or the fabrication of dye-sensitized solar cells.[37,38]Herein, we have investigated the photodegradation rates of
nitrobenzene
and methyl orange dye solutions in contact with various layered systems
where a photoactive nanoporous a-TiO2 layer is in the form
of a bare film (sample pA). It is sandwiched between two SiO2 nanoporous layers (S/pA/S) or between two nanoporous BMs, with a
(LH)3L layered structure, forming a BM/pA/BM microcavity
stack. The L and H layers correspond to low- and high-refractive-index
materials made of photocatalytic inactive SiO2 and Ta2O5. The thickness of the nanoporous anatase titania
layer was the same in all these structures. The purpose of the S/pA/S
sample is to limit reactants and products in/out-diffusion up to the
a-TiO2 layer in a similar manner to the BMs. Meanwhile,
the BM/pA/BM stack depicts a 1D Bragg microcavity photonic configuration[26,29] and has been designed in such a way that two of their optical resonances
appear (i) in the UV region at the onset of a-TiO2 absorption
and (ii) in the visible region around the maximum absorption of the
methyl orange dye, always after liquid infiltration (either water
or dye solutions) of the porous layered structures. Through the comparison
of the photocatalytic activity of these systems, we have found that
the dye degradation is enhanced in the BM/pA/BM stack, which is specifically
designed to provide light trapping at the central nanoporous titania
layer for photon energies around the absorption edge of this semiconductor.A related feature in this porous microcavity infiltrated with methyl
orange molecules has been the observation of an enhancement of the
absorption coefficient of the dye at the wavelengths of the optical
resonances, as expected for a “giant absorption effect”
reported by us in a previous work.[29] The
detection of certain photocatalytic dye degradation activated with
visible light in this microcavity suggests the contribution of a photodegradation
mechanism involving a direct electron transition from an excited state
of the dye molecule to the conduction band of TiO2, followed
by its subsequent degradation by reaction with the medium.
Materials and Methods
Sample Preparation
Titania-based
layered nanocolumnar structures were prepared by electron beam evaporation
in an oblique angle deposition (OAD) geometry at a zenithal angle
of 75° and a distance between target and substrates of 50 cm.
Either fused silica plates or polished silicon wafers were used as
substrates. TiO (i.e., titanium monoxide), SiO2, and Ta2O5 pellets (Kurt J. Lesker Company) were used as
target materials for evaporation to produce TiO2, SiO2, and Ta2O5 thin films, respectively.
A small oxygen leak of 3.0 × 10–4 mbar was
dosed during the evaporation to ensure that the deposited layers grew
in their fully oxidized stoichiometric forms. During deposition, the
substrates were azimuthally rotated at a rate of 30 turns per minute.
It is known that this rotation during OAD gives rise to a microstructure
formed by vertical nanocolumns.[32,39]Figure shows a schematic representation of the
deposition setup and the typical nanocolumn structure formation induced
with this procedure. More detailed information about the preparation
and properties of single layers of these materials can be found in
refs (36−38, 40−44). All samples were annealed at 400 °C in air for 3 h to induce
the crystallization of the titania layers into the photocatalytically
active anatase phase (a-TiO2) of this oxide.
Figure 1
Schematic representation
of the OAD setup and the typical nanocolumn
structure formation induced by azimuthal sample rotation with this
procedure.
Schematic representation
of the OAD setup and the typical nanocolumn
structure formation induced by azimuthal sample rotation with this
procedure.Three different layered samples
were fabricated with a similar
amount (i.e., thickness) of photoactive a-TiO2: a bare
porous a-TiO2 film (sample pA); a porous a-TiO2 film sandwiched between porous SiO2 layers, i.e., with
a SiO2/a-TiO2/SiO2 trilayer structure
(sample S/pA/S); and a porous 1D Bragg microcavity consisting of a-TiO2 film sandwiched between BMs (sample BM/pA/BM). The BMs had
an (LH)3L multilayer structure, where L/H corresponds to
low-/high-refractive-index materials (i.e., SiO2 and Ta2O5, respectively). Nanocolumnar thin films of these
materials are photocatalytically inactive and absorb light at wavelengths
shorter than 300 nm, i.e., they are transparent below 380 nm, the
absorption onset of TiO2.
Structural,
Microstructural, and Optical Characterization
X-ray diffraction
(XRD) measurements were carried out in a Siemens
D5000 diffractometer system, employing monochromatic Cu Kα radiation,
0.02° step angle, and 60 s measuring time per step. Microstructural
characterization in a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was carried
out for thin films deposited on a silicon wafer that was diced for
cross-section analysis. SEM images were taken with a Hitachi S4800
field emission electron microscope operated at 2.0 kV. UV–vis
transmission spectra were recorded in a PerkinElmer spectrometer (UV/vis/NIR
spectrometer Lambda 750S) for samples deposited on fused silica substrates.
Spectra were recorded for pristine samples (i.e., with their pores
empty) or for either water or aqueous dye solutions infiltrated samples
(i.e., with their pores filled with these liquids).
Design of 1D Photonic Structure
The
BM/pA/BM 1D Bragg microcavity was designed in such a way that when
immersed in the aqueous dye solutions, it depicts optical resonances
at the onset of the absorption edge of a-TiO2, (i.e., at
about 380 nm) and around the maximum of the absorption band of methyl
orange molecule (ca. 440–480 nm), one of the dyes considered
in the photodegradation studies reported in this work. The overall
thickness of the capping layers atop and beneath the a-TiO2 thin film (i.e., SiO2 layers in S/pA/S or the BM stack
in BM/pA/BM microcavity) was about the same (400–500 nm) to
induce similar diffusion restrictions to the infiltration of the reactant
and product molecules, these latter resulting from the dye photodegradation
process at the a-TiO2 middle layer. This ensures that any
significant difference in photocatalytic activity between S/pA/S and
BM/pA/BM samples responds exclusively to their different photonic
performance (i.e., to the trapping effect of light with certain wavelengths
within the microcavity) and not to diffusion constraints.The
transmittance of the samples was modeled using the transfer matrix
method with the WVASE software (J. A. Woollan Co.). The parameters
obtained from the fitting procedure (thicknesses and refractive indices
of all of the layers within the considered multilayer stack) were
used to evaluate the spatial distribution of the electric field amplitude
vs wavelength, corresponding to the standing waves developed at the
photonic multilayers. For this purpose, FilmStar Optical Thin Film
software was used.[45]
Evaluation of Photocatalytic Activity
The photocatalytic
activity of the nanoporous a-TiO2-based
samples described above was evaluated following the evolution vs time
of the absorbance of nitrobenzene NB (1.0 × 10–4 M) and methyl orange MO (1.7 × 10–5 M) aqueous
dye solutions under UV irradiation. Once prepared, these solutions
were stable under ambient illumination even after a prolonged contact
with the layered samples. The experimental setup schematized in the
Supporting information (SI), Figure S1,
was used for these experiments. A fused silica cuvette (2 × 1
× 4 cm3) was filled with 4 cc of dye solution. The
photoactive samples (2 × 2 cm2) deposited on a polished
silicon wafer substrate were immersed in the dye solution filling
the cuvette. A small flow of oxygen was continuously bubbled through
the dye solution to ensure that the photodegradation kinetics was
not limited by any shortage of this reactant. A Teflon cap with a
small hole prevented the removal of liquid by the oxygen bubbles during
the photodegradation experiment. Tests were carried out irradiating
with a Xe lamp (LASING ASB-Xe-175) located at 15 cm from the cuvette,
with an irradiance of 1.8 W cm–2 at the position
of the samples for the complete UV–vis spectrum (ca. 0.3 W
cm–2 corresponded to photons with a wavelength shorter
than 380 nm). The kinetics of the photodegradation process was monitored
following the time evolution of the maximum of the absorption bands
of NB and MO dyes at, respectively, 268 and 466 nm. The absorbance
spectra were recorded with two optical fibers provided with collimators
lenses and located face to face at the two lateral windows of the
cuvette; one of the fibers was used to illuminate and the other to
collect the transmitted light, transversally to the irradiation with
the Xe lamp used to activate the photodegradation of the dye solutions.
An Ocean Optics “MAYA 2000 Pro” UV–vis spectrometer
was used to collect absorbance spectra every 5 min for 2 h. It is
assumed that the dye concentration in the solution is proportional
to its absorbance. For some experiments, a PMMA plate was placed between
the Xe lamp and the cuvette to act as a visible filter enabling the
irradiation with just the photons of the visible spectrum emitted
by the Xe lamp.The selection of NB and MO dyes for the photodegradation
experiments was motivated by their different molecular size (∼0.5
vs ∼1.2 nm, respectively) and the position of their absorption
bands, in the far-UV region for the former and in the visible region
for the latter. In principle, the bigger size of the MO molecule will
impose more constraints for its diffusion through the pores of the
capping multilayers. Another difference between these two molecules
is that the NB solution is stable upon irradiation with the Xe lamp,
while the MO solution underwent a little but progressive degradation
upon UV irradiation, even in the absence of the photocatalyst. To
account for this dye degradation induced by direct UV light exposure,
the degradation kinetics data are reported normalized, i.e., in the
form of C/C0 for the
NB solution (with C0 the concentration
of NB at irradiation time t = 0) or C/Cr(t) for the MO solution
(with Cr(t) the concentration
of the MO at irradiation time t upon exposure of
the dye solution to the Xe lamp without photocatalytic agent). Two
selected examples of the evolution of the absorption bands of NB and
MO during photodegradation experiments under Xe lamp irradiation in
the presence of the pA photocatalyst are shown in Supporting Information Figure S2. The intensities at the maxima of the
corresponding absorption bands at 268 and 466 nm are used to characterize
the photodegradation kinetics of the different nanoporous a-TiO2 samples, as explained in the previous paragraph.
Results and Discussion
Microstructure and Optical
Characterization
Prior to any dye degradation study, samples
were annealed in air
at 400 °C for 3 h to induce the crystallization of the photoactive
anatase phase of the titania layer.[1] XRD
spectra of these samples showing the formation of anatase titania
can be seen in Supporting Information Figure S3. It is noteworthy that this annealing treatment did not affect the
microstructural integrity of the multilayer stacks, which remained
intact after the heating treatments.The microstructure of the
samples is depicted in Figure . It shows the cross-section and normal-view SEM backscattered
electron micrographs of pA, S/pA/S, and BM/pA/BM samples. Colored
schemes illustrate the distribution of the different material layers
in the stacks. The SEM micrographs show that the three samples present
the vertical nanocolumnar microstructure typical of OAD films and
multilayers prepared under substrate azimuthal rotation.[31,39] The brightness intensity of the individual layers observable in
the cross-section micrographs in this figure agrees with their atomic
composition. A characteristic of this microstructure is that the constituent
nanocolumns, visible in the cross-section micrographs with a width
of approximately 60–90 nm, are well separated by large void
spaces forming a continuous nanoporous structure that communicates
the sample surface with the interface with the substrate. Previous
investigations with this type of samples have revealed that they have
a void fraction of 40–60%, depending on experimental parameters
of the deposition process.[32,42]
Figure 2
(Top) Cross-section and
(bottom) front-view micrographs of, from
left to right, a bare porous a-TiO2 layer (pA), a porous
a-TiO2 layer sandwiched between two porous silica layers
(S/pA/S), and a porous a-TiO2 layer sandwiched between
two porous Bragg mirrors (BM/pA/BM). The colored schemes describe
the material layer distribution. The brightness intensity of the individual
layers in the cross-section micrographs agrees with their atomic composition.
(Top) Cross-section and
(bottom) front-view micrographs of, from
left to right, a bare porous a-TiO2 layer (pA), a porous
a-TiO2 layer sandwiched between two porous silica layers
(S/pA/S), and a porous a-TiO2 layer sandwiched between
two porous Bragg mirrors (BM/pA/BM). The colored schemes describe
the material layer distribution. The brightness intensity of the individual
layers in the cross-section micrographs agrees with their atomic composition.Another characteristic feature is that pores arrange
along open
channels of a rather large size (larger than 10 nm) and that quite
small nanopores with a size less than or equal to 2 nm are present
within the nanocolumns.[42,43] We assume that this
microstructure enables a straightforward diffusion of dissolved molecules
or vapors, as proved in previous studies dealing with the photonic
analysis of fluids and volatile organic compounds.[26,46,47]It is also apparent in Figure that the thickness of the
a-TiO2 photoactive
layer in the three samples is about the same (∼400 nm) and
the thickness of the external SiO2 or SiO2/Ta2O5 capping stack in S/pA/S or BM/pA/BM sample ranges
between 500 and 600 nm.Figure a shows
that the bare anatase layer (pA sample) depicts the typical transmittance
of a titania thin film characterized by an absorption onset around
380 nm. Noteworthy, it is noteworthy the difference between the interference
patterns of the spectra recorded for the pA sample either pristine
or immersed in water. This pattern accounts for the refractive index
(RI) contrast between the film material and the liquid medium surrounding
the film/multilayers or infiltrated within their pores in each case,
either air (RI = 1.00) or water (RI = 1.33). An evaluation of the
RI of the bare a-TiO2 sample in each case using a conventional
fitting analysis of the interference fringe and assuming a Cauchy-like
wavelength dispersion[48] rendered values
of 1.83 and 1.93 at 450 nm for the “empty” and “water-filled”
a-TiO2 layers, respectively. A rough estimate of porosity
based on a Bruggeman effective medium approximation[49,50] yields that approximately 40% of the volume of the a-TiO2 film is infiltrated with liquid.
Figure 3
UV–vis transmission spectra recorded
at normal incidence
for anatase titania-based samples in their pristine state (dashed
blue lines) or immersed in water (solid red lines): (a) pA, (b) S/pA/S,
and (c) BM/pA/BM. The vertical broad green line indicates the onset
of titania absorption. The stars denote the optical resonances in
the water-infiltrated 1D Bragg microcavity. The schemes describe the
pristine and water-infiltrated states of the three samples.
UV–vis transmission spectra recorded
at normal incidence
for anatase titania-based samples in their pristine state (dashed
blue lines) or immersed in water (solid red lines): (a) pA, (b) S/pA/S,
and (c) BM/pA/BM. The vertical broad green line indicates the onset
of titania absorption. The stars denote the optical resonances in
the water-infiltrated 1D Bragg microcavity. The schemes describe the
pristine and water-infiltrated states of the three samples.At this point, it is worth mentioning that it is
possible to enhance
the void fraction of the layers by modifying the deposition conditions,
especially using more glancing deposition geometries or lower deposition
pressures.[26,32] However, these possibilities
have not been tested in this work because of the need to properly
define the interfaces between layers, a feature that may be altered
when excessively increasing the film porosity.The transmittance
spectra of sample S/pA/S (Figure b) are similar to those of sample pA, although
the interference profile is weaker due to the optical interferences
induced in the trilayer stack (the RIs of the pristine and water-infiltrated
SiO2 layers prepared by OAD are around 1.26 and 1.38, respectively[43]).According to the spectrum in Figure c, drastic changes
occur in the transmittance of sample
BM/pA/BM in comparison with those of pA and S/pA/S samples. The spectra
correspond to the typical transmittance of a resonant microcavity
with resonances within the gap of the BMs integrated in the microcavity.
In addition, it is remarkable that filling the pore structure of sample
BM/pA/BM with water induces a redshift of the spectral features. Of
particular relevance is the fact that two optical resonances of this
microcavity appear at around 385 and 440 nm after water flooding,
a result that is deemed crucial to account for the enhancement of
photocatalytic activity of this sample. As it is discussed below,
this increase is attributed to light trapping phenomena within these
1D-PCs. The effect of water infiltration was simulated using the Bruggeman
effective medium approximation. As a result of the fitting procedure,
it was found that the pore volume of the microcavity was about 40%
of total volume and that this porosity was completely filled with
water through the infiltration process. Besides, according to the
simulation analysis, the peaks at 385 and 440 nm appear to correspond
to the 5th and 6th resonant modes of the microcavity, respectively
(for further details of the fitting procedure and optical constant
of the different layers in the microcavity, see Supporting Information S4, Tables S1 and S2). For illustration, a simulation
of the transmittance spectra of this sample is reported in Figure , together with the
spectra simulated for a BM structure (LH)6, which is the
base of the resonant microcavity design. Note that the optical resonances
of the microcavity lay within the gap of the Bragg mirror. It was
also realized that the spectral shape in the near-UV region around
the absorption edge of TiO2 can be accounted for by the
convolution of an interference spectrum typical of a 1D Bragg microcavity
and the corresponding absorption onset of anatase.
Figure 4
Experimental (red dashed
lines) and simulated (solid black lines)
transmittance spectra of sample BM/pA/BM deposited on a fused silica
plate, in its pristine (i.e., pores empty) (a) or water-infiltrated
(b) states. The solid blue lines are simulations of the (LH)6 Bragg mirror (BM) multilayer structure sandwiching the nanoporous
a-TiO2 active layer in the microcavity. The stars indicate
the optical resonances of the microcavity. The schemes describe the
empty and filled states of the sample in each case (in parenthesis
effective refractive indices of the corresponding layers).
Experimental (red dashed
lines) and simulated (solid black lines)
transmittance spectra of sample BM/pA/BM deposited on a fused silica
plate, in its pristine (i.e., pores empty) (a) or water-infiltrated
(b) states. The solid blue lines are simulations of the (LH)6 Bragg mirror (BM) multilayer structure sandwiching the nanoporous
a-TiO2 active layer in the microcavity. The stars indicate
the optical resonances of the microcavity. The schemes describe the
empty and filled states of the sample in each case (in parenthesis
effective refractive indices of the corresponding layers).
Light Confinement Effects in Resonant 1D Microcavities
The multilayer structure of the BM/pA/BM Bragg microcavity was
designed in such a way that, when immersed in water, one of its optical
resonances matches the absorption onset of the a-TiO2 active
layer. We have hypothesized that such an optical design produces an
enhancement of the electric field amplitude of the standing waves
set up in the microcavity for wavelengths around the resonant feature
and that this enhancement appears located at the center of the microcavity,
i.e., at the a-TiO2 layer. Similar local enhancements of
light electric field amplitude for given wavelengths are known to
stem from interference processes occurring in a large variety of photonic
structures including 1D Bragg microcavities.[29,51−53]This hypothesis is supported by calculations
carried out to map the spatial distribution of the electric field
amplitude of the standing waves within the microcavity (see the Materials and Methods Section for details). Figure shows, in the form
of color maps, the electric field amplitude squared distribution as
a function of the wavelength (x-axis) and local position
within the layered structure (y-axis).[45] The electrical field maps illustrate the developed
standing waves for S/pA/S and BM/pA/BM water-infiltrated samples under
normal illumination.
Figure 5
Multilayer stack schemes and electric field amplitude
squared maps
of the standing waves set up at BM/pA/BM (a) and S/pA/S (b) water-infiltrated
samples under normal illumination. Horizontal dashed lines indicate
the limits of the active a-TiO2 layer within the photonic
structures. RI in-depth profiles are also indicated.
Multilayer stack schemes and electric field amplitude
squared maps
of the standing waves set up at BM/pA/BM (a) and S/pA/S (b) water-infiltrated
samples under normal illumination. Horizontal dashed lines indicate
the limits of the active a-TiO2 layer within the photonic
structures. RI in-depth profiles are also indicated.For the S/pA/S structure, there is a small enhancement of
the electric
field amplitude at the SiO2 upper layer for all wavelengths,
while no particular enhancement effect is induced at the central a-TiO2 layer. This contrasts with the calculated electric field
intensity distribution in sample BM/pA/BM, where, as evidenced by
the development of six maxima in the color map (red spots), the electric
field amplitude at wavelengths around 380 nm is strongly enhanced
at the a-TiO2 central layer position. A significant though
lesser enhancement is also found at around 440 nm (yellow spots).
The number of maxima in this diagram depends on the number of complete
half-waves that occupy the central cavity, since the condition to
be fulfilled is that the wavelength of the resonance is a half-integer
of the optical path of the cavity. In our case, it is remarkable that
the special design of the BM/pA/BM photonic structure makes that this
resonant condition holds for wavelengths around 385 and 440 nm for
this sample immersed in water.Note that light trapping is not
related to the crystallographic
phase of the stacked layers but to the spatial distribution of their
refractive index. Thus, similar results are expected if the rutile
titania active phase is considered as the central layer of the microcavity.
However, one has to take into account that to get rutile samples,
the multilayer system should be annealed at high temperatures,[3,4] and this would most probably decrease the porosity of the films.
Enhanced Photocatalytic Degradation in 1D
Resonant Microcavities
Photocatalytic degradation tests of
NB and MO dye solutions were carried out as reported in the Materials and Methods Section. Upon recording the
absorbance spectra of dye solutions as a function of irradiation time
with the Xe lamp, a progressive decrease in the intensity of the characteristic
absorption bands at, respectively, 268 and 466 nm, was detected (cf., Figure S2 in the SI). From the intensity of these
bands and its equivalence in terms of relative dye molar concentrations,
it is possible to follow the kinetics of NB and MO photodegradation
processes. Results are shown in Figure where values of the relative dye concentrations vs
UV irradiation time are plotted in a semilogarithmic scale.
Figure 6
Photodegradation
kinetics of the NB (a) and MO (b) dye solutions
as a function of irradiation time of the layered systems containing
the nanoporous a-TiO2 films that are investigated in this
work. The straight lines correspond to linear regression fits to a
pseudo-first-order kinetic model. (c) Schematic showing the typical
light excitation and subsequent interface reactions of photogenerated
electrons and holes at the columnar a-TiO2 nanostructures.[56]
Photodegradation
kinetics of the NB (a) and MO (b) dye solutions
as a function of irradiation time of the layered systems containing
the nanoporous a-TiO2 films that are investigated in this
work. The straight lines correspond to linear regression fits to a
pseudo-first-order kinetic model. (c) Schematic showing the typical
light excitation and subsequent interface reactions of photogenerated
electrons and holes at the columnar a-TiO2 nanostructures.[56]The series of curves
in this figure clearly shows that the two
dyes become progressively degraded by the photocatalytic action of
anatase. However, despite that the nanoporous a-TiO2 active
layer thickness is similar in the three samples, the kinetics of the
process strongly differ depending on the analyzed system. A first
look at the curves in Figure a,b reveals that the photodegradation rate is much slower
for sample S/pA/S, where the a-TiO2 layer is sandwiched
between photocatalytically inactive porous capping films of SiO2. In general, these photodegradation processes may involve
various controlling steps, including diffusion of reactants, photocatalytic
oxidation, and so on. An approximation to make a semiquantitative
comparison of photoactivities is to consider that the overall process
can be described by a pseudo-first-order kinetics. The use of pseudo-first-order
kinetic constants for a semiquantitative estimate of the diffusion
restrictions has been proposed in similar tests with other porous
TiO2 systems.[54,55] Pseudo-first-order
kinetic constants characterizing the rate of the photocatalytic degradation
of NB and MO dyes can be calculated from the slope of these semilogarithmic
plots according to the classical equation for first-order kinetic
reactions: ln[C/C0] =
−kNBt for NB or
ln[C/Cr(t)] = −kMOt for
MO. Calculated values of pseudo-first-order kinetic constants corresponding
to each sample and dye solution are summarized in Table .
Table 1
Pseudo-First-Order
Kinetic Constants
Determined for the Photocatalytic Degradation Reactions of Nitrobenzene
and Methyl Orange Dye Solutions
kinetic constants (min–1)
dye solution
pA
S/pA/S
BM/pA/BM
nitrobenzene (NB)
0.0250
0.0057
0.0200
methyl orange (MO)
0.0212
0.0014
0.0170
The smaller kinetic constant values for MO and samples
S/pA/S and
BM/pA/BM in Table , in comparison with those of NB, point to higher diffusion constraints
for MO than for NB dye, in agreement with its larger molecular size.
Besides, the much smaller value of the photodegradation rates determined
for sample S/pA/S with respect to that of the pA sample supports that
in the sandwiched samples, the molecular diffusion of the dye, occurring
through an approximately 600 nm thick porous layer, drastically reduces
the activity of the central a-TiO2 layer. Remarkably, in
sample BM/pA/BM, the pseudo-first-order kinetic constant approaches
the values found for the bare pA film, even though diffusion restrictions
similar to those in S/pA/S sample should also exist in this case.
Therefore, we must conclude that additional factors must intervene
in sample BM/pA/BM to compensate the loss of photocatalytic efficiency
due to diffusion constraints. In other words, the measured degradation
kinetics suggests an enhancement in the photocatalytic activity of
the a-TiO2 active layer in sample BM/pA/BM. We assume that
this enhancement is due to light trapping phenomena at the a-TiO2 layer for wavelengths around those of the optical resonances
of this 1D Bragg microcavity (cf., Figures and 4). In particular,
we claim that the enhancement of the electric field intensity at the
a-TiO2 layer in this 1D resonant microcavity is responsible
for the observed boost in photocatalytic activity of this system with
respect to sample S/pA/S.The scheme in Figure c represents the classical mechanism proposed
to account for the
photodegradation of dye or organic molecules by UV-illuminated a-TiO2.[56] Basically, it involves several
steps: (i) an electron transfer from the valence to the conduction
band of a-TiO2 upon absorption of a suitable UV photon;
(ii) the migration of the valence band hole to the surface, where
it is captured by an OH– group to render reactive
OH* radicals; (iii) the electron diffusion through the conduction
band toward the surface and its reaction with oxygen to yield O2– or similar species; and (iv) the subsequent
reaction of the reactive species with the organic molecules initiating
their degradation process. What we claim is that step (i) is more
effective in sample BM/pA/BM due to the light trapping (i.e., local
electric field enhancement) at the a-TiO2 layer predicted
by the calculations in Figure .
Dye Giant Absorption at Resonant Microcavities
The electric field amplitude map in Figure b reveals the spatial distribution of two
optical resonances at around 385 and 445 nm, both within the spread
of the absorption band of MO and localized at the active a-TiO2 layer. In a previous publication where Rhodamine 101 was
infiltrated within a similar porous 1D Bragg microcavity, we demonstrated
that the absorption coefficient of the infiltrated dye strongly increases
due to the enhancement of the local electric field of the standing
waves set up at the central layer of the microcavity. Herein, we have
verified whether a similar “giant” absorption mechanism
may affect the absorption coefficient of the infiltrated MO molecules.
For this purpose, we first evaluate the refractive index and absorption
coefficient of the MO dye solution used in the photodegradation experiment.
In the Supporting Information, we report
the experimental transmittance spectrum for a 1 cm path cuvette filled
with a 1.7 × 10–5 M MO dye solution, together
with its fitting analysis and the retrieved optical parameters characterizing
this aqueous dye solution (i.e., refractive index and absorption coefficient
wavelength dispersion curves). According to the analysis in Supporting
Information Figure S5, the absorption coefficient
of the 1.7 × 10–5 M aqueous MO solution is
∼0.4 and ∼0.6 cm–1 at about 380 and
450 nm, respectively. Thus, the corresponding molar absorption coefficients
(αMmax) at these wavelengths are 2.3 × 104 and 3.5 × 104 cm–1 M–1, respectively.In addition, we measured the
transmittance of a liquid film of either water or concentrated MO
dye solution (1.7 × 10–3 M) trapped by capillarity
forces between a BK7 glass plate and: (i) another BK7 glass plate,
(ii) sample pA, (iii) sample S/pA/S, and (iv) sample BM/pA/BM. In
all cases, the layered structures were deposited on fused silica plates.
It is noteworthy that in this experiment, a strict control on the
thickness of the liquid layer trapped between the two plates is not
possible and that therefore the absolute intensity of the absorption
curves is not relevant for the analysis. Figure a shows that the shape of the interference
fringes of the transmittance spectra obtained in each case is only
slightly modified when changing water for the MO 1.7 × 10–3 M aqueous solution, indicating that both liquids
have very similar refractive indices (in fact, their RI differ by
less than 0.001 RIU).
Figure 7
(a) Transmittance spectra of a film of water (blue lines)
or a
MO dye solution (red lines) trapped by capillary forces between a
BK7 glass plate and (i) another BK7 plate, (ii) sample pA, (iii) sample
S/pA/S, and (iv) sample BM/pA/BM; these samples deposited on fused
silica plates. The dashed lines are the corresponding difference spectra.
(b) Absorbance of the trapped liquid in the four studied cases. The
scheme shows the configuration of plates adopted for the experiments.
(a) Transmittance spectra of a film of water (blue lines)
or a
MO dye solution (red lines) trapped by capillary forces between a
BK7 glass plate and (i) another BK7 plate, (ii) sample pA, (iii) sample
S/pA/S, and (iv) sample BM/pA/BM; these samples deposited on fused
silica plates. The dashed lines are the corresponding difference spectra.
(b) Absorbance of the trapped liquid in the four studied cases. The
scheme shows the configuration of plates adopted for the experiments.Nevertheless, a certain modification in the transmittance
curves
observed between 350 and 550 nm can be associated with the absorption
of the MO dye. In fact, the ratio in Figure b between the curves recorded with water
and the dye solution (i.e, equivalent to the absorbance of the trapped
dye solution in each case) for the studied cases (i)–(iii)
renders spectral curves with a similar wavelength dependence to the
absorption of MO dye solutions measured in a cuvette (cf. Figure S5). Thus, for these cases, a rough estimation
of the thickness of the dye solution layer tdye can be obtained with the expressionwhere Amax and
αMmax are the absorbance and molar absorption coefficient
at the wavelength of maximum absorption of the dye solution (i.e.,
∼450 nm), and nM its molar concentration.
According to the previous simple expression, the liquid thickness tdye trapped by capillary forces between the
plates in cases (i), (ii), and (iii) varies between 2 and 4 μm.
This 100% variability stands for the already mentioned lack of control
in this experiment over the thickness of the liquid layer trapped
between the glass plate and the fused silica-supported multilayers.However, remarkably, the absorbance in Figure b corresponding to the concentrated MO dye
solution sandwiched between a glass plate and BM/pA/BM porous microcavity
deposited on fused silica shows that, superimposed to the absorption
of the free dye solution, there appear a series of discrete peaks
that match the optical resonances of the Bragg microcavity. Considering
the molar absorption coefficients for the dye solution determined
above (i.e., αMmax equal to 2.3 × 104 and 3.5 × 104 cm–1 M–1 at 380 and 450 nm, respectively), a rough estimation of the absorbance
of a given MO dye solution with an equivalent thickness tvoid (i.e., reproducing the volume of the void fraction
available in the porous pA film (i.e., tvoid = ∼200 nm)) can be evaluated according to the following expressionAccording to this equation, the expected absorbances of a 200 nm
thick layer of 1.7 × 10–3 M MO dye solution
evaluated at the optical resonances of the microcavity, i.e., at 380
and 450 nm, are 0.008 and 0.012, respectively. In other words, in
the absence of light trapping phenomena, the MO dye absorption of
the solution infiltrated within the microcavity would have a negligible
intensity and hardly any specific feature would be detected superimposed
onto the absorption of the solution layer trapped between the glass
and the BM/PA/BM sample. We assume that, according to previous studies,
the significantly higher experimental absorbances (about 1 order of
magnitude higher) depicted in Figure b at these wavelengths must be due to a “giant
absorption” effect. Following previous works,[57,58] this enhancement of absorption coefficient is proportional to the
local electric field amplitude squared times the local effective refractive
index in the Bragg microcavity. Thus, the spectrum in Figure b shows that, at the wavelengths
of the optical resonances, the absorption coefficient intensity of
the dye fraction infiltrated in the nanoporous a-TiO2 central
layer in the Bragg microcavity is about 10 times stronger than in
the free solution. An enhancement of the same order of magnitude has
been reported for the absorption of Rhodamine 101 ethanol solutions
infiltrated in similar porous 1D Bragg microcavities.[28]
Visible-Light-Induced Photodegradation
at
Resonant 1D Microcavities
In general, visible light is inefficient
to induce any photocatalytic reaction in a-TiO2 because
it cannot generate electron–hole pairs at the surface of this
semiconductor and, therefore, cannot trigger any degradation process.[1,3] Nevertheless, under certain circumstances, it has been claimed that
dye degradation may occur with visible light if an electron transfer
occurs from an excited state of the dye to the conduction band of
the a-TiO2.[19] This process is
similar to that occurring in dye-sensitized photovoltaic cells, although
in that case, the electron transfer from the dye to the conduction
band and the resulting formation of an ionized molecule is reversed
by the reaction of the latter with iodine ions present in the medium.[59,60] A band scheme of this visible-light-induced dye photodegradation
process is shown in Figure a. In practice, under standard experimental conditions with
powder or simple thin-film samples, this mechanism is quantitatively
negligible, but it has been claimed to occur in 3D photonic crystal
structures where light confinement effects may produce an exaltation
of the absorption coefficient of the dye.[19]
Figure 8
(a)
Visible-light-induced photodegradation mechanism: (i) photoexcitation
with visible light inducing a transition from the ground to an excited
state of the dye molecule; (ii) electron transfer from the dye excited
state to the a-TiO2 conduction band; (iii) ensuing photodegradation
through direct reaction of the dye excited state with water and/or
dye molecules with O2– species produced
by the reaction of the transferred electron with oxygen in the medium.
(b) Transmittance of pA and BM/pA/BM samples compared with the Xe
lamp emittance and the transmittance of the long-pass filter utilized
for these experiments. (c) Visible-light-induced MO dye photodegradation
kinetics upon irradiation through a long-pass filter with a cutoff
wavelength of ∼385 nm (note that the y-scale
is different than in the plots in Figure ).
(a)
Visible-light-induced photodegradation mechanism: (i) photoexcitation
with visible light inducing a transition from the ground to an excited
state of the dye molecule; (ii) electron transfer from the dye excited
state to the a-TiO2 conduction band; (iii) ensuing photodegradation
through direct reaction of the dye excited state with water and/or
dye molecules with O2– species produced
by the reaction of the transferred electron with oxygen in the medium.
(b) Transmittance of pA and BM/pA/BM samples compared with the Xe
lamp emittance and the transmittance of the long-pass filter utilized
for these experiments. (c) Visible-light-induced MO dye photodegradation
kinetics upon irradiation through a long-pass filter with a cutoff
wavelength of ∼385 nm (note that the y-scale
is different than in the plots in Figure ).Herein, we have investigated whether visible light might induce
the photodegradation of MO dye upon irradiation of a-TiO2 thin film samples to induce the photosensitization of the semiconductor
by visible light excitation of the dye molecules. For this experiment,
we used the same Xe lamp as in the previous photodegradation experiments,
but placed a long-pass optical filter (cutoff wavelength ∼385
nm), consisting of a PMMA plate, between the lamp and the cuvette,
where the degradation experiments are carried out. For a better assessment,
in Figure b, we compare
the transmittance of this filter with the spectrum of the light emitted
by the Xe lamp together with the transmittance of pA and BM/pA/BM
samples deposited on fused silica plates. According to these spectra,
the insertion of this long-pass filter removes most UV photons for
wavelengths shorter than 385 nm, thus making unlikely any photodegradation
process based on the classical photoexcitation mechanism of titania
consisting of the generation of electron–hole pairs at, respectively,
its conduction and valence bands and their reaction with the dye molecules
(cf. Figure c).[1,3] The absence of any photodegradation was, in fact, found for NB dye
solutions with its absorption maximum at 290 nm in all investigated
samples (data not shown). Unlike NB dye, MO dye presents its maximum
absorption at 466 nm with a band extending from 350 to 550 nm (see
Supporting Information Figure S2), which,
according to the analysis summarized in Figure , overlaps the optical resonance features
of the BM/pA/BM microcavity, particularly that around 440 eV.According to Figure c, within the experimental error, no measurable visible-light-induced
photodegradation of MO dye was observed with pA and S/pA/S samples.
However, a certain photodegradation was measured with sample BM/pA/BM.
After data evaluation, a pseudo-first-order kinetic constant of 0.0025
min–1 was obtained for these experimental conditions.
We propose that this little but not negligible degradation occurs
through a process of the kind depicted in Figure a, involving the following steps:[19] (i) the visible light excitation of the MO molecule
to a MO* state through a HOMO–LUMO transition; (ii) the electron
transfer from the excited state of the molecule MO* to the conduction
band of the TiO2 semiconductor and the formation of an
ionized MO+ molecule (i.e., the dye photosensitization
of the a-TiO2); (iii) the reaction of the conduction band
electron with oxygen and the formation of very reactive O2– or similar species; and (iv) the reaction of
MO+ with water or O2 and/or O2– and derived species of oxygen.Therefore, we
attribute the photodegradation of the MO dye upon
visible light irradiation of the BM/pA/BM microcavity reported in Figure c to the enhancement
of the light absorption process by the dye molecules in the solution
infiltrated in the central a-TiO2 nanoporous layer of the
microcavity, as illustrated by the analysis in Figure . In the other samples, although electron
transfer processes as those proposed in Figure a might also take place, their incidence
would be very small and, in practice, undetectable under the operating
conditions of our experiment.
Conclusions
We have proved that the photoactivity of a nanoporous a-TiO2 thin film is boosted when it is incorporated within a porous
1D optical microcavity. The enhancement of photocatalytic activity
is due to light confinement effects for photons with wavelengths around
the absorption onset of a-TiO2. Locally, this enhancement
takes place at the central layer of the optical microresonator where
the titania layer is located. We claim that this enhancement effectively
compensates the deterioration in photoactivity observed when the a-TiO2 film is sandwiched between inactive porous layers imposing
reactants/products diffusion constraints to reach the photocatalytically
active layer.Another evidence gained from the analysis of the
activity upon
visible light exposure of the 1D optical microcavity infiltrated with
dye solutions is that an enhancement in the absorption coefficient
of the dye promotes an additional degradation process. This involves
both a “giant absorption” mechanism of the dye molecules
infiltrated in the porous a-TiO2 layer and their ionization
through an electron transfer to the conduction band of the semiconductor.The reported experimental evidence and simulation analysis of the
optical microcavity incorporating a nanoporous active titania layer
suggest that the engineering of the photonic response of porous 1D
layered systems allows to enhance their photocatalytic activity both
with UV and visible light, in this latter case promoting an additional
activation mechanism of dye molecules.Finally, it is noteworthy
that light trapping phenomena of the
same nature as those described in the present work may be designed
for other 1D photonic structures (e.g., making that light trapping
occurs at the outer layers of the photonic structure and/or other
layer stack distribution). We believe that through proper engineering
of the photonic response, it would be possible to combine the enhancement
of photoactivity reported in this work with the incorporation of additional
functionalities (e.g., structural color, sensing capacity as response
to their infiltration with liquids of different refractive indices
and other). This constitutes another asset to be considered for the
future manufacturing of this type of nanoporous multifunctional photonic
structures.
Authors: Lola González-García; Julián Parra-Barranco; Juan R Sánchez-Valencia; Angel Barranco; Ana Borrás; Agustín R González-Elipe; Mari-Cruz García-Gutiérrez; Jaime J Hernández; Daniel R Rueda; Tiberio A Ezquerra Journal: Nanotechnology Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 3.874
Authors: Armin T Exner; Ida Pavlichenko; Bettina V Lotsch; Giuseppe Scarpa; Paolo Lugli Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2013-01-23 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Mikko Kokkonen; Parisa Talebi; Jin Zhou; Somayyeh Asgari; Sohail Ahmed Soomro; Farid Elsehrawy; Janne Halme; Shahzada Ahmad; Anders Hagfeldt; Syed Ghufran Hashmi Journal: J Mater Chem A Mater Date: 2021-03-10