| Literature DB >> 26344823 |
Lan Li1, Ping Zhang2, Wei-Ming Wang3, Hongtao Lin1, Aidan B Zerdoum4, Sarah J Geiger1, Yangchen Liu1, Nicholas Xiao1, Yi Zou1, Okechukwu Ogbuu1, Qingyang Du1, Xinqiao Jia1,4, Jingjing Li3, Juejun Hu1,5.
Abstract
Integrated photonics provides a miniaturized and potentially implantable platform to manipulate and enhance the interactions between light and biological molecules or tissues in in-vitro and in-vivo settings, and is thus being increasingly adopted in a wide cross-section of biomedical applications ranging from disease diagnosis to optogenetic neuromodulation. However, the mechanical rigidity of substrates traditionally used for photonic integration is fundamentally incompatible with soft biological tissues. Cytotoxicity of materials and chemicals used in photonic device processing imposes another constraint towards these biophotonic applications. Here we present thin film TiO2 as a viable material for biocompatible and flexible integrated photonics. Amorphous TiO2 films were deposited using a low temperature (<250 °C) sol-gel process fully compatible with monolithic integration on plastic substrates. High-index-contrast flexible optical waveguides and resonators were fabricated using the sol-gel TiO2 material, and resonator quality factors up to 20,000 were measured. Following a multi-neutral-axis mechanical design, these devices exhibit remarkable mechanical flexibility, and can sustain repeated folding without compromising their optical performance. Finally, we validated the low cytotoxicity of the sol-gel TiO2 devices through in-vitro cell culture tests. These results demonstrate the potential of sol-gel TiO2 as a promising material platform for novel biophotonic devices.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26344823 PMCID: PMC4561379 DOI: 10.1038/srep13832
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Characterization of sol-gel prepared TiO2 thin films annealed at different temperatures.
(a) thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curve of pre-dried PTA sol; (b) UV-Vis transmission spectra of the films on glass substrates; (c) refractive indices at 1550 nm wavelength and film thickness, both fitted from the UV-Vis spectra using the Swanepoel method; (d) refractive indices n and extinction coefficients k of TiO2 thin film annealed at 250 °C measured using ellipsometry; (e) FTIR spectra; (f) X-ray diffraction spectra; (g) AFM surface profile (1 μm × 1 μm); (h) top-view SEM image of film annealed at 250 °C; inset: film cross-section.
Figure 2Flexible TiO2 photonic device fabrication and optical characterization.
(a) Schematic device fabrication process; (b) optical microscope top-view image of a TiO2 rib racetrack resonator. The inset shows the cross-sectional SEM image of the bus waveguide; (c) cut-back loss measurement: transmitted optical power as a function of waveguide length at 1550 nm wavelength. The channel waveguide width is 4.7 μm and height is 0.2 μm. Inset shows an optical microscope image of a fabricated TiO2 channel waveguide; (d,e) normalized optical transmission spectra of a TiO2 rib racetrack resonator with a loaded Q-factor of (1.07 ± 0.05) × 104.
Figure 3Mechanical simulation.
(a) Strain distribution in the laminated photonic chip structure during bending at R = 1 mm; (b–d) strain ε along the structure’s center axis OO’ calculated using FEM and the analytical multi-neutral-axis model: (b) R = 1 mm, (c) R = 0.85 mm, and (d) R = 0.25 mm. The black dotted lines mark the locations of the neutral axes in the polyimide and SU-8 layers.
Figure 4Mechanical tests of foldable TiO2 waveguides.
(a) optical microscope image of the input fiber coupled to a waveguide; (b) far-field image of TE polarized mode output from a flexible TiO2 waveguide; (c) normalized optical transmission spectra of a flexible waveguide after bending at different radii; (d–f) photos of the fiber butt coupling testing set-up for in-situ measurement of optical transmission characteristics at different bending radii.
Figure 5Analyses of cytocompatibility of the sensor materials.
(a) proliferation of hMSCs in indirect contact with sensor materials; (b–c) confocal images of live/dead stained day 10 hMSCs cultured in direct contact with SU-8 (b); and TiO2 (c). Live cells were stained green and dead cells, if any, were stained red. *significantly different (p < 0.01) from day 0–6. No significant difference was observed between day 6 and 8.