| Literature DB >> 35491677 |
Karen Cortés-Sarabia1, Luz Del Carmen Alarcón-Romero2, Eugenia Flores-Alfaro3, Berenice Illades-Aguiar4, Amalia Vences-Velázquez2, Miguel Ángel Mendoza-Catalán4, Napoleón Navarro-Tito1, Jesús Valdés5, Ma Elena Moreno-Godínez6, Carlos Ortuño-Pineda7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The repressor element 1-silencing transcription factor (REST) is a regulator of gene expression, and the Ras association domain family member 1 A (RASSF1A) is an important tumor suppressor gene involved in cancer development. Although extensive characterization of the roles of REST and RASSF1A in cancer development have been reported in cellular models, the link between them and their possible role in the development of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix have not been explored. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of REST and RASSF1A in cervical cytological and histological samples from patients diagnosed with SIL or SCC and in CC-derived cell lines.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical cancer; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; RASSF1A; REST; Squamous intraepithelial lesion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35491677 PMCID: PMC9068566 DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2020.08.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed J ISSN: 2319-4170 Impact factor: 7.892
Fig. 1Search for RE-1 in the RASSF1A. A) Characteristics of RE-1 sites in the RASSF1. Position of RE-1 sites in the gene, aligned sequences, and scores are shown. B) Schematic representation of RASSF1 (drawn to scale) and RE1 sequences. Start site of transcription (gray arrow), exons (black boxes), introns (thin lines). The promoter region of RASSF1 is magnified to show the presence of CpG islands (white lines).
Comparison of REST and RASSF1A expression levels in cervical samples from patients with squamous intraepithelial lesions and squamous cell carcinoma.
| Group, | REST | RASSF1A | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immunocytochemistry | Expression level, r.u.d. | β (95% CI) | Expression level, r.u.d. | β (95% CI) | ||||
| N-SIL, 72 (26.6) | 443 ± 10.2 | Ref | Ref. | 276 ± 4.9 | Ref | Ref. | ||
| LSIL, 160 (59.0) | 474 ± 6.9 | 0.005 | 4.4 (−23.5, 32.3) | 0.759 | 236 ± 4.8 | <0.001 | −18.8 (−37, −1.1) | 0.038 |
| HSIL, 21 (7.8) | 141 ± 5.6 | <0.001 | −334 (−376, −292) | <0.001 | 132 ± 6.0 | <0.001 | −126 (−151, −101) | <0.001 |
| SCC, 18 (6.6) | 44 ± 8.3 | <0.001 | −423 (−467, −379) | <0.001 | 37 ± 5.4 | <0.001 | −217 (−243, −191) | <0.001 |
Data are geometric mean ± standard error.
Dunn's test.
Generalized linear model [family(gaussian) link(identity)] adjusted for HPV type by oncogenic risk (negative, low-risk, high-risk, and multiple infection); β = regression coefficient and 95% CI = confidence interval. Abbreviations: r.u.d.: Relative units of densitometry; N-SIL: Non-squamous intraepithelial lesion; LSIL: Low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; HSIL: High grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; SCC: Squamous cell carcinoma.
Fig. 2REST and RASSF1A expression using immunocytochemistry. Representative images (40× amplification) of Papanicolaou (Pap) smear test and immunostaining, using antibodies against REST and RASSF1A. Pap staining was performed for morphological observation of each lesion. Abbreviations used: LSIL: Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (binucleation, perinuclear halo, and karyomegaly); HSIL: High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and SCC: Squamous cell carcinoma (for both lesions: karyomegaly, hyperchromatic nuclei, and granular chromatin).
REST expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC).
| REST histoscore | Histological diagnosis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN 1, | CIN 2/3, | SCC, | ||
| Negative or low (0–200) | 8 (34.8) | 15 (71.4) | 23 (79.3) | <0.001 |
| Intermediate (201–300) | 6 (26.1) | 6 (28.6) | 6 (20.7) | |
| High (301–400) | 9 (39.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Total | 23 | 21 | 29 | |
Chi-square (X2) test.
Fig. 3REST expression using immunohistochemistry. Representative histological samples of REST immunostaining (40× amplification) in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1 and 2/3 and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). p16INK4a expression was used as a positive control, whereas hematoxylin–eosin (and not antibody) staining was used as a negative control for immunostaining.
Fig. 4REST and RASSF1A expression in cervical cancer cell lines. (A) Immunostaining of REST and RASSF1A in HaCat, C33A, SiHa and HeLa cells. p16INK4a expression was used as a positive control, whereas only biotin/streptavidin (but not antibody) was used as a negative control for immunostaining. (B) Densitometry analyses were performed using the ImageJ software.