| Literature DB >> 35488259 |
Mario Kasović1,2, Ana Oreški3, Tomaš Vespalec2, Kateřina Jenčíková2, Lovro Štefan4,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence has shown that higher levels of physical fitness (PF) in youth have beneficial effects on adult health-related outcomes. However, the tracking of separate PF components during adolescence has been less studied. Since PF often starts to rapidly decline during adolescence, it is necessary to provide information regarding critical time-point for interventions. This study aimed to analyze the extent of tracking the components of PF through PF tests.Entities:
Keywords: Generalized estimating equations; Performance; Secondary school; Stability; Youth
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35488259 PMCID: PMC9052589 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03305-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.567
Descriptive statistics of the study participants at baseline and follow-up (N = 240)
| Study variables | Baseline | Follow-up | ∆ (%) | ES | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||||
| 165.8 (7.3) | 167.6 (7.5) | 1.1 | 0.24 | < 0.001 | |
| 60.2 (14.0) | 62.3 (14.8) | 3.5 | 0.15 | < 0.001 | |
| 27.0 (10.5) | 29.8 (10.1) | 10.4 | 0.27 | < 0.001 | |
| 178.5 (28.3) | 170.9 (28.1) | -4.3 | -0.27 | < 0.001 | |
| 55.4 (11.0) | 51.2 (10.1) | -7.6 | -0.40 | < 0.001 | |
| 69.4 (8.9) | 64.5 (9.6) | -7.1 | -0.53 | < 0.001 | |
| 48.7 (8.0) | 44.9 (7.9) | -7.8 | -0.48 | < 0.001 | |
| 4.49 (0.78) | 4.99 (0.78) | 11.1 | 0.64 | < 0.001 | |
| 1.47 (0.31) | 1.64 (0.38) | 11.6 | 0.49 | < 0.001 |
Higher score denotes poorer performance, that is, more time is needed to complete the task in min
p < 0.05
Tracking coefficients for each physical fitness component between the 2 time-points (N = 240)
| Study variables | Tracking coefficient | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fat mass (%) | 0.88 | 0.84 to 0.92 | < 0.001 |
| Standing broad jump (cm) | 0.98 | 0.97 to 0.99 | < 0.001 |
| Sit-ups (reps in 60 s) | 0.51 | 0.41 to 0.61 | < 0.001 |
| Sit-and-reach test (cm) | 0.89 | 0.86 to 0.92 | < 0.001 |
| Squats (reps in 60 s) | 0.65 | 0.55 to 0.74 | < 0.001 |
| The 800 m run test (min) | 0.75 | 0.67 to 0.84 | < 0.001 |
| The 400 m run test (min) | 0.86 | 0.80 to 0.90 | < 0.001 |
p < 0.05
Girls’ maintenance of physical fitness tertile classification from baseline to follow-up (N = 240)
| Baseline | Follow-up | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | Medium | Low | |||
| High | 88.5% | 11.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Medium | 5.2% | 87.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Low | 0.0% | 23.8% | 76.2% | ||
| Kappa statistics ( | 0.75 (< 0.001) | ||||
| Agreement | 83.9% | ||||
| High | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Medium | 0.0% | 92.9% | 7.1% | ||
| Low | 0.0% | 22.2% | 77.8% | ||
| Kappa statistics ( | 0.86 (< 0.001) | ||||
| Agreement | 90.2% | ||||
| High | 61.9% | 28.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Medium | 19.0% | 64.3% | 16.7% | ||
| Low | 17.6% | 17.6% | 64.7% | ||
| Kappa statistics ( | 0.43 (< 0.001) | ||||
| Agreement | 63.6% | ||||
| High | 90.5% | 9.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Medium | 2.6% | 87.2% | 10.3% | ||
| Low | 0.0% | 20.0% | 80.0% | ||
| Kappa statistics ( | 0.78 (< 0.001) | ||||
| Agreement | 85.9% | ||||
| High | 61.5% | 38.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Medium | 10.8% | 70.3% | 18.9% | ||
| Low | 11.8% | 11.8% | 76.5% | ||
| Kappa statistics ( | 0.51 (< 0.001) | ||||
| Agreement | 69.4% | ||||
| High | 57.9% | 36.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Medium | 19.5% | 63.4% | 17.1% | ||
| Low | 0.0% | 20.0% | 80.0% | ||
| Kappa statistics ( | 0.47 (< 0.001) | ||||
| Agreement | 67.1% | ||||
| High | 77.8% | 22.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Medium | 12.5% | 80.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Low | 0.0% | 18.2% | 81.8% | ||
| Kappa statistics ( | 0.68 (< 0.001) | ||||
| Agreement | 79.9% | ||||
p < 0.05