Lester Y Leung1, Yichen Zhou2, Sunyang Fu3, Chengyi Zheng2, Patrick H Luetmer4, David F Kallmes4, Hongfang Liu3, Wansu Chen2, David M Kent5. 1. Department of Neurology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: lleung@tuftsmedicalcenter.org. 2. Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA. 3. Department of AI and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 5. Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of silent brain infarcts (SBIs) and white matter disease (WMD) and associations with stroke risk factors (RFs) in a real-world population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an observational study of patients 50 years or older in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California health system from January 1, 2009, through June 30, 2019, with head computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for nonstroke indications and no history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or dementia. A natural language processing (NLP) algorithm was applied to the electronic health record to identify individuals with reported SBIs or WMD. Multivariable Poisson regression estimated risk ratios of demographic characteristics, RFs, and scan modality on the presence of SBIs or WMD. RESULTS: Among 262,875 individuals, the NLP identified 13,154 (5.0%) with SBIs and 78,330 (29.8%) with WMD. Stroke RFs were highly prevalent. Advanced age was strongly associated with increased risk of SBIs (adjusted relative risks [aRRs], 1.90, 3.23, and 4.72 for those aged in their 60s, 70s, and ≥80s compared with those in their 50s) and increased risk of WMD (aRRs, 1.79, 3.02, and 4.53 for those aged in their 60s, 70s, and ≥80s compared with those in their 50s). Magnetic resonance imaging was associated with a reduced risk of SBIs (aRR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.91) and an increased risk of WMD (aRR, 2.86; 95% CI, 2.83 to 2.90). Stroke RFs had modest associations with increased risk of SBIs or WMD. CONCLUSION: An NLP algorithm can identify a large cohort of patients with incidentally discovered SBIs and WMD. Advanced age is strongly associated with incidentally discovered SBIs and WMD.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of silent brain infarcts (SBIs) and white matter disease (WMD) and associations with stroke risk factors (RFs) in a real-world population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an observational study of patients 50 years or older in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California health system from January 1, 2009, through June 30, 2019, with head computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for nonstroke indications and no history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or dementia. A natural language processing (NLP) algorithm was applied to the electronic health record to identify individuals with reported SBIs or WMD. Multivariable Poisson regression estimated risk ratios of demographic characteristics, RFs, and scan modality on the presence of SBIs or WMD. RESULTS: Among 262,875 individuals, the NLP identified 13,154 (5.0%) with SBIs and 78,330 (29.8%) with WMD. Stroke RFs were highly prevalent. Advanced age was strongly associated with increased risk of SBIs (adjusted relative risks [aRRs], 1.90, 3.23, and 4.72 for those aged in their 60s, 70s, and ≥80s compared with those in their 50s) and increased risk of WMD (aRRs, 1.79, 3.02, and 4.53 for those aged in their 60s, 70s, and ≥80s compared with those in their 50s). Magnetic resonance imaging was associated with a reduced risk of SBIs (aRR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.91) and an increased risk of WMD (aRR, 2.86; 95% CI, 2.83 to 2.90). Stroke RFs had modest associations with increased risk of SBIs or WMD. CONCLUSION: An NLP algorithm can identify a large cohort of patients with incidentally discovered SBIs and WMD. Advanced age is strongly associated with incidentally discovered SBIs and WMD.
Authors: Michael L Alosco; Michael A Sugarman; Lilah M Besser; Yorghos Tripodis; Brett Martin; Joseph N Palmisano; Neil W Kowall; Rhoda Au; Jesse Mez; Charles DeCarli; Thor D Stein; Ann C McKee; Ronald J Killiany; Robert A Stern Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Lester Y Leung; Traci M Bartz; Kenneth Rice; James Floyd; Bruce Psaty; Jose Gutierrez; W T Longstreth; Kenneth J Mukamal Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: W T Longstreth; T A Manolio; A Arnold; G L Burke; N Bryan; C A Jungreis; P L Enright; D O'Leary; L Fried Journal: Stroke Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: F E de Leeuw; J C de Groot; E Achten; M Oudkerk; L M Ramos; R Heijboer; A Hofman; J Jolles; J van Gijn; M M Breteler Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Paul Muntner; Jeff Whittle; Amy I Lynch; Lisandro D Colantonio; Lara M Simpson; Paula T Einhorn; Emily B Levitan; Paul K Whelton; William C Cushman; Gail T Louis; Barry R Davis; Suzanne Oparil Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Lester Y Leung; Sunyang Fu; Patrick H Luetmer; David F Kallmes; Neel Madan; Gene Weinstein; Vance T Lehman; Charlotte H Rydberg; Jason Nelson; Hongfang Liu; David M Kent Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Lester Y Leung; Paul K J Han; Christine Lundquist; Gene Weinstein; David E Thaler; David M Kent Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joanna M Wardlaw; Eric E Smith; Geert J Biessels; Charlotte Cordonnier; Franz Fazekas; Richard Frayne; Richard I Lindley; John T O'Brien; Frederik Barkhof; Oscar R Benavente; Sandra E Black; Carol Brayne; Monique Breteler; Hugues Chabriat; Charles Decarli; Frank-Erik de Leeuw; Fergus Doubal; Marco Duering; Nick C Fox; Steven Greenberg; Vladimir Hachinski; Ingo Kilimann; Vincent Mok; Robert van Oostenbrugge; Leonardo Pantoni; Oliver Speck; Blossom C M Stephan; Stefan Teipel; Anand Viswanathan; David Werring; Christopher Chen; Colin Smith; Mark van Buchem; Bo Norrving; Philip B Gorelick; Martin Dichgans Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 44.182