Ayca Løndalen1,2, Johan Blakkisrud3,4, Mona-Elisabeth Revheim3,5, Jostein Dahle6, Arne Kolstad7, Caroline Stokke3,4. 1. Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. ayca.londalen@getmail.no. 2. Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. ayca.londalen@getmail.no. 3. Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 4. Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 5. Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 6. Nordic Nanovector ASA, Oslo, Norway. 7. Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospital, Oslo, Norway.
Abstract
PURPOSE: [177Lu]Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan, a novel CD37 directed radioimmunotherapy (RIT), has been investigated in a first-in-human phase 1/2a study for relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In this study, new methods were assessed to calculate the mean absorbed dose to the total tumor volume, with the aim of establishing potential dose-response relationships based on 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) parameters and clinical response. Our second aim was to study if higher total tumor burden induces reduction in the 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan accumulation in tumor. PROCEDURES: Fifteen patients with different pre-dosing (non-radioactive lilotomab) regimens were included and the cohort was divided into low and high non-radioactive lilotomab pre-dosing groups for some of the analyses. 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan was administered at dosage levels of 10, 15, or 20 MBq/kg. Mean absorbed doses to the total tumor volume (tTAD) were calculated from posttreatment single-photon emission tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) acquisitions. Total values of metabolic tumor volume (tMTV), total lesion glycolysis (tTLG) and the percent change in these parameters were calculated from FDG PET/CT performed at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months after RIT. Clinical responses were evaluated at 6 months as complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD). RESULTS: Significant decreases in tMTV and tTLG were observed at 3 months for patients receiving tTAD ≥ 200 cGy compared to patients receiving tTAD < 200 cGy (p = .03 for both). All non-responders had tTAD < 200 cGy. Large variations in tTAD were observed in responders. Reduction in 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan uptake in tumor volume was not observed in patients with higher baseline tumor burden (tTMV). CONCLUSION: tTAD of ≥ 200 cGy may prove valuable to ensure clinical response, but further studies are needed to confirm this in a larger patient population. Furthermore, this work indicates that higher baseline tumor burden (up to 585 cm3) did not induce reduction in radioimmunoconjugate accumulation in tumor.
PURPOSE: [177Lu]Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan, a novel CD37 directed radioimmunotherapy (RIT), has been investigated in a first-in-human phase 1/2a study for relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In this study, new methods were assessed to calculate the mean absorbed dose to the total tumor volume, with the aim of establishing potential dose-response relationships based on 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) parameters and clinical response. Our second aim was to study if higher total tumor burden induces reduction in the 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan accumulation in tumor. PROCEDURES: Fifteen patients with different pre-dosing (non-radioactive lilotomab) regimens were included and the cohort was divided into low and high non-radioactive lilotomab pre-dosing groups for some of the analyses. 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan was administered at dosage levels of 10, 15, or 20 MBq/kg. Mean absorbed doses to the total tumor volume (tTAD) were calculated from posttreatment single-photon emission tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) acquisitions. Total values of metabolic tumor volume (tMTV), total lesion glycolysis (tTLG) and the percent change in these parameters were calculated from FDG PET/CT performed at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months after RIT. Clinical responses were evaluated at 6 months as complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD). RESULTS: Significant decreases in tMTV and tTLG were observed at 3 months for patients receiving tTAD ≥ 200 cGy compared to patients receiving tTAD < 200 cGy (p = .03 for both). All non-responders had tTAD < 200 cGy. Large variations in tTAD were observed in responders. Reduction in 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan uptake in tumor volume was not observed in patients with higher baseline tumor burden (tTMV). CONCLUSION: tTAD of ≥ 200 cGy may prove valuable to ensure clinical response, but further studies are needed to confirm this in a larger patient population. Furthermore, this work indicates that higher baseline tumor burden (up to 585 cm3) did not induce reduction in radioimmunoconjugate accumulation in tumor.
Authors: Yuni K Dewaraja; Matthew J Schipper; Jincheng Shen; Lauren B Smith; Jure Murgic; Hatice Savas; Ehab Youssef; Denise Regan; Scott J Wilderman; Peter L Roberson; Mark S Kaminski; Anca M Avram Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-05-19 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: S Marcatili; A Pichard; A Courteau; R Ladjohounlou; I Navarro-Teulon; A Repetto-Llamazares; H Heyerdahl; J Dahle; J P Pouget; M Bardiès Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Bruce D Cheson; Beate Pfistner; Malik E Juweid; Randy D Gascoyne; Lena Specht; Sandra J Horning; Bertrand Coiffier; Richard I Fisher; Anton Hagenbeek; Emanuele Zucca; Steven T Rosen; Sigrid Stroobants; T Andrew Lister; Richard T Hoppe; Martin Dreyling; Kensei Tobinai; Julie M Vose; Joseph M Connors; Massimo Federico; Volker Diehl Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-01-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Yuni K Dewaraja; Matthew J Schipper; Peter L Roberson; Scott J Wilderman; Hanan Amro; Denise D Regan; Kenneth F Koral; Mark S Kaminski; Anca M Avram Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Johan Blakkisrud; Ayca Løndalen; Anne C T Martinsen; Jostein Dahle; Jon E Holtedahl; Tore Bach-Gansmo; Harald Holte; Arne Kolstad; Caroline Stokke Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 10.057