Daniel Sánchez-Resa1, Isabella Daidone2, Ryan Djemili3, Sonia Adrouche3, Stéphanie Durot3, Valérie Heitz3, Laura Zanetti-Polzi4, Barbara Ventura1. 1. Isituto ISOF-CNR, Via P. Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy. 2. Department of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio (Coppito 1), 67010 L'Aquila, Italy. 3. Laboratoire de Synthèse des Assemblages Moléculaires Multifonctionnels, Institut de Chimie de Strasbourg, CNRS/UMR 7177, Université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France. 4. CNR Institute of Nanoscience, Via Campi 213/A, 41125 Modena, Italy.
Abstract
The photophysical characterization of four supramolecular complexes based on covalent cages 2H-S-2H, 2H-L-2H, Zn-S-2H, and Zn-L-2H, consisting in either two free-base porphyrins or one Zn(II) porphyrin and one free-base porphyrin connected by four flexible linkers of different lengths incorporating triazole binding sites, and their Ag(I) complexation are reported. The complexation processes have been followed by means of absorption and emission spectroscopies, and a comprehensive computational study explains the behavior of the free-base porphyrin-containing cages. Absorption and emission features have been interpreted on the bases of conformational changes, metalation processes, and modification of energy transfer efficiencies occurring in the different cases. In all cages, except 2H-L-2H, the coordination of four Ag(I) ions to the lateral triazole groups of the linkers leads to the enlargement of their cavity. Only for 2H-L-2H is a different behavior observed, where the process of silver metalation of the porphyrins' core prevails.
The photophysical characterization of four supramolecular complexes based on covalent cages 2H-S-2H, 2H-L-2H, Zn-S-2H, and Zn-L-2H, consisting in either two free-base porphyrins or one Zn(II) porphyrin and one free-base porphyrin connected by four flexible linkers of different lengths incorporating triazole binding sites, and their Ag(I) complexation are reported. The complexation processes have been followed by means of absorption and emission spectroscopies, and a comprehensive computational study explains the behavior of the free-base porphyrin-containing cages. Absorption and emission features have been interpreted on the bases of conformational changes, metalation processes, and modification of energy transfer efficiencies occurring in the different cases. In all cages, except 2H-L-2H, the coordination of four Ag(I) ions to the lateral triazole groups of the linkers leads to the enlargement of their cavity. Only for 2H-L-2H is a different behavior observed, where the process of silver metalation of the porphyrins' core prevails.
The synthesis of molecular
capsules as functional systems has attracted
great interest in nanochemistry since these systems can work as molecular
recognition systems, nanoreactors, or drug carriers, providing a confined
environment that enhances guest stability, molecular reactivity, and
catalysis.[1−3]Among the different possibilities in the design
of molecular cages,
metalated or free-base porphyrins provide attractive architectures
due to their chemical stability and their mimicry of natural chromophores.[1,4−19]Porphyrin derivatives participate in natural processes for
light
harvesting, electron and energy transfer reactions, and catalysis
or as oxygen transporters. Their stable aromatic core can be functionalized
on meso or β pyrrolic positions, and the inserted metal can
modulate their chemical, electronic, and photophysical properties.
These systems are useful in various fields[20−22] such as artificial
photosynthesis, molecular electronics, molecular machines, catalysis,
therapy, or surface engineering. The porphyrin unit can be considered
as follows: (i) a large structural element that delineates the molecular
cavity, (ii) an active component since its large π-delocalized
core can stabilize π-conjugated guest molecules inside the cavity,
whereas its metalated form can coordinate various ligands within the
cage, and (iii) a redox and photoactive component, participating directly
to the reactivity occurring inside the structure.[1]In previous studies, we have shown that bis-Zn(II)
porphyrin cages
equipped with four flexible linkers incorporating peripheral 1,2,3-triazole
binding sites allow for a control of the distance and orientation
between the two Zn(II) porphyrins. Combined experimental and computational
data showed that in solution, the cages adopt a flattened conformation
based on π–π interactions between the porphyrins,
whereas a large conformational change occurs upon binding of four
Ag(I) ions to the peripheral ligands, leading to open cages with two
cofacial porphyrins separated by about 9 Å.[23−26] Thanks to their tunable cavity
size, these cages were effective as allosteric receptors toward different
kinds of guest molecules.[25,27]The employment
of silver(I) is very attractive due to its versatile
coordination sphere and coordination numbers ranging from 2 to 6.
This second row transition metal is widely used in supramolecular
chemistry because silver–ligand bonds are labile in solution,
allowing for the thermodynamic product to be reached via self-correction,
and it is also easily decoordinated by the use of a compatible anion
such as chloride[28−30] or of light as an external stimulus.[31]Later, we reported on bis-porphyrin cages constituted
by either
two free-base porphyrins or one Zn(II) porphyrin and one free-base
porphyrin, connected by four flexible connectors that incorporate
1,2,3-triazole ligands linked with either an ethylene glycol unit
or a diethylene glycol unit. The latter units confer different lengths
to the connectors, leading to different possible conformations of
the systems. Strong exciton interactions between the porphyrins occur
due to the proximity of these units in the collapsed structure of
the cages. In the monometalated cages, the free-base porphyrins showed
altered fluorescence quantum yield and lifetime due to the presence
of the closely spaced Zn counterpart. On the other hand, in these
cages, the Zn-porphyrin emission is quantitatively quenched via a
fast energy transfer process that sensitizes the free-base emission.[29]In view of further exploring the properties
of the four cages 2H-S-2H, 2H-L-2H, Zn-S-2H, and Zn-L-2H, here, we report on their
complexation processes with
Ag(I). A detailed photophysical study has been performed by means
of steady-state absorption and emission spectroscopies and time-resolved
luminescence techniques, combined with a thorough computational analysis
of the structural features of the free-base cages, namely, 2H-S-2H and 2H-L-2H. This study completes the reported characterization
of Ag(I) complexation of the analogues bis-Zn(II) porphyrin cages.[26]
Materials and Methods
Absorption and Emission
Spectroscopies and Photophysics
Spectroscopy-grade CH2Cl2 and MeOH were obtained
from Merck and used as received. Silver trifluoromethanesulfonate
[Ag(OTf)] was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The latter has been stored
in argon in a sealed vial under dark and dry conditions. Ag(OTf) solutions
were used fresh and kept in the dark during the measurements.Absorption spectra were recorded using PerkinElmer Lambda 650 UV–vis
and PerkinElmer Lambda 950 UV–vis–NIR spectrophotometers.Emission spectra were collected using an Edinburgh FLS920 fluorimeter,
equipped with a Peltier-cooled Hamamatsu R928 PMT (280–850
nm), and corrected for the wavelength-dependent phototube response.Titration
experiments were performed via incremental addition of micro-aliquots
of stock solutions of Ag(OTf) (10–3 to 10–4 M) to a solution of the molecular cage (5–8 × 10–7 M) or model 2H-alkyne (1.2 × 10–6 M). The final added volume was kept below 10% of
the total volume to avoid dilution. The experiments have been conducted
avoiding light exposure of the solutions. All the titrations of the
cages were characterized by an early step, where the addition of silver
(5–10 equiv) caused no changes in both absorption and emission
features, attributed to an initial disaggregation process. Addition
of an excess of silver salt caused degradation of the compounds in
all cases. Titration data have been analyzed using ReactLab Equilibria
software[32] to determine the association
constants.Fluorescence lifetimes in the nanosecond range were
detected by
using an IBH time correlated single photon counting apparatus with
nano-LED excitation at 465 nm. Analysis of the decay profiles against
time was performed using decay analysis software DAS6 provided by
the manufacturer.Fluorescence lifetimes in the picosecond regime
were measured by
means of a Hamamatsu SynchroScan streak-camera apparatus (C10910-05
main unit and M10911-01 SynchroScan unit) equipped with an ORCA-Flash
4.0 V2 charge-coupled device and an Acton spectrograph SP2358. As
the excitation source, a Newport Spectra-Physics Solstice-F-1K-230
V laser system, combined with a TOPAS Prime (TPR-TOPAS-F) optical
parametric amplifier (pulse width: 100 fs and repetition rate: 1 kHz)[9] was used, tuned at 560 nm. To reduce photo-degradation,
the pump energy on the sample was reduced to 26 μJ/pulse. Emission
from the sample, collected at a right angle with a 1 mm slit, was
focused by means of a system of lenses into the spectrograph slit.
Streak images were taken in the analog integration mode (100 exposures,
exposure time: 2 s). The decays were measured over emission spectral
ranges of 20–40 nm. HPD-TA 9.3 software from Hamamatsu was
used for data acquisition and analysis. The overall time resolution
of the system after deconvolution procedure was 1 ps.
Molecular Dynamics
Simulations
Molecular dynamics (MD)
simulations of 2H-S-2H and 2H-L-2H are performed
in CH2Cl2/MeOH (9:1) to mimic the experimental
conditions. The initial structures of 2H-S-2H and 2H-L-2H were obtained from previous MD simulations of two
covalent cages, Zn-S-Zn and Zn-L-Zn, consisting
of two zinc porphyrins connected by the same four flexible spacers
in the same solvent.[26] Each Zn(II) ion
is replaced with two protons to obtain a starting structure for the
two free-base porphyrin cages.MD simulations are performed
using the GROMACS software package using the GROMOS force field. The
GROMOS force field parameters for 2H-S-2H and 2H-L-2H were obtained from the Automated Topology Builder database.[33] These parameters already proved their reliability
in the MD simulations of the similar structures Zn-S-Zn and Zn-L-Zn and their corresponding silver(I)-complexed
cages.[26,27] The 2H-S-2H and 2H-L-2H cages are placed in a dodecahedral box large enough to contain the
molecule and at least 1.0 nm of solvent on all sides with the appropriate
number of CH2Cl2 molecules to reproduce the
density of CH2Cl2 at 300 K and 1 bar (1.33 g
cm–3). A proper number of CH2Cl2 molecules was then substituted with the corresponding number of
MeOH molecules to reproduce the experimental CH2Cl2/MeOH (9:1) proportion. The force field parameters for CH2Cl2 and MeOH are obtained from the GROMACS topology
database.Simulations are carried out in the NVT (i.e., with constant number of molecules, volume,
and temperature)
ensemble at a constant temperature of 300 K using the velocity rescaling
temperature coupling.[34] The LINCS algorithm[35] is used to constrain bond lengths, and a time
step of 2 fs for numerical integration of the equations of motion
is used. The particle mesh Ewald method[36] is used for the calculation of the long-range interactions, and
a cutoff of 1.1 nm is used. After solute optimization and the subsequent
solvent relaxation, each system is gradually heated from 50 to 300
K using short MD simulations. The trajectories are then propagated
for 100 ns for each system. Coordinates are saved at every 1 ps.
Results and Discussion
Characterization of the Ag(I) Complexation
Processes in Solution
The experiments have been carried out
in 5–8 × 10–7 M CH2Cl2/MeOH (9:1) solutions
of the cages by adding, as a Ag(I) ion source, Ag(OTf) salt diluted
in the same solvent mixture.Addition of increasing amounts
of Ag(I) to 2H-S-2H (7.5 × 10–7 M) in the range 0–45 equiv causes absorption changes, as
shown in Figure a.
While the Q-bands region remains almost unaltered, the Soret band
shows important variations. The peak at 415 nm increases in intensity,
whereas the original splitting, due to exciton coupling between the
porphyrin units, disappears (Figure a). The result is a Soret band similar to that reported
for the free-base porphyrin model 2H-alkyne.[29] The absorption data support the hypothesis of
a process of cage opening due to the coordination of the Ag(I) ions
to the lateral triazoles since the larger distance between the units
in the open conformation reduces the extent of the coupling, as also
shown by previous calculations of the absorption spectra of analogous
Zn-porphyrinic cages[26] using a hybrid quantum/classical
approach.[37−39] The emission spectrum of the cage, collected upon
excitation at 409 nm, the isosbestic point for the absorption titration,
is slightly affected by the addition of Ag(I), and only a small increase
in intensity followed by a minor decrease is observed (Figure b). The excited state lifetime
measured at the end of the titration is only slightly reduced with
respect to that of the pristine cage (8.4 vs 9.0
ns).[29] The complexation process proposed
for 2H-S-2H is illustrated in Figure .
Figure 1
Absorption (a) and uncorrected emission spectra
(λexc = 409 nm, isosbestic point) (b) of DCM/MeOH
(9:1) solutions containing 2H-S-2H (7.5 × 10–7 M) and increasing amounts of
Ag(OTf) (0–45 equiv). Inset of (a): amplification of the Q-bands
region (480–680 nm).
Figure 2
Schematic
illustration of the complexation process of 2H-S-2H with
silver(I).
Absorption (a) and uncorrected emission spectra
(λexc = 409 nm, isosbestic point) (b) of DCM/MeOH
(9:1) solutions containing 2H-S-2H (7.5 × 10–7 M) and increasing amounts of
Ag(OTf) (0–45 equiv). Inset of (a): amplification of the Q-bands
region (480–680 nm).Schematic
illustration of the complexation process of 2H-S-2H with
silver(I).The absorption and emission data
have been analyzed using software
ReactLab Equilibria 1.1[32] by considering
a 1:4 (cage/Ag+) binding model and Ag+ as a
non-absorbing and non-emissive species. The fitting converges, and
the spectra generated by the software for the [Ag4(2H-S-2H)]4+ complex match well the experimental
ones obtained at the end of titration (Figure S1). The derived average association constant, expressed in
log(Ka/M–4), is (18.94
± 0.02).Differently, Ag(I) complexation of the analogous
“long”
cage 2H-L-2H (5.6 × 10–7 M) in
the range 0–30 equiv causes different and more drastic changes
in absorption and emission spectra. Concerning the absorption features
(Figure a), the Soret
band at 416 nm almost disappears, while a new band at 445 nm increases
(isosbestic point at 434 nm). In the Q-bands region, the original
bands at 516, 550, 592, and 646 nm change into two new bands at 623
and 654 nm (isosbestic points at 503, 565, 580, and 599 nm). The observed
changes point to a Ag(I) metalation process of the core of the free-base
porphyrins, with the formation of a cage where both porphyrins are
monometalated (Figure ). The features of the species that forms, in particular the two
Q bands at 623 and 654 nm, in fact, can be ascribed to a monometalated
porphyrinic species, via comparison with the spectral features reported
for [Ag(I)(TPP)]− (bands at 457, 616, and 667 nm),
obtained via electrochemical reduction from Ag(II)TPP.[40] The formation of monometalated Ag(I) porphyrins
is a quite unusual process, with respect to the more common bis-metalation
that leads to Ag(I)2-porphyrin species,[43] where the two metal ions are coordinated on the two sides
of the porphyrin plane. The lack of formation of Ag(I)2-porphyrins in 2H-L-2H can be attributed to the closed
conformation of the cage that renders the inner face of the porphyrins
barely accessible to the Ag(I) ions. Interestingly, the observed features
are different also from those reported by us for the bis-metalation
of a monomeric tetrapyridyl-functionalized free-base porphyrin.[41] The presence of triazole groups in the linkers
of 2H-L-2H as weak bases close to the porphyrins, moreover,
can favor the Ag(I) complexation step that involves deprotonation
of the porphyrin core. Theoretical investigations (reported below)
support the hypothesis of a Ag(I) metalation process of the core of
the free-base porphyrins and discuss the reasons for the unusual behavior
of 2H-L-2H upon Ag(I) complexation. The emission titration,
performed upon excitation at the isosbestic point, shows a progressive
decrease of the fluorescence of the cage (Figure b), supporting the formation of metalated
porphyrins, which are known to be weakly emissive with respect to
their free-base counterparts.[42] The luminescence
lifetime at the end of the first step of titration was found to be
8.4 ns, which is thus only slightly decreased with respect to the
value of 9.0 ns measured for the original cage[29] and attributable to the residual fluorescence of the nonmetalated
cages, likely interacting with silver(I) in their lateral groups.
Figure 3
Absorption
(a) and uncorrected emission (b) spectra (λexc =
434 nm, isosbestic point) of DCM/MeOH (9:1) solutions
containing 2H-L-2H (5.6 × 10–7 M) and increasing amounts of Ag(OTf) (0–30
equiv). Inset of (a): amplification of the Q-bands region (490–700
nm).
Figure 4
Schematic illustration of the metalation process
of 2H-L-2H with silver(I).
Absorption
(a) and uncorrected emission (b) spectra (λexc =
434 nm, isosbestic point) of DCM/MeOH (9:1) solutions
containing 2H-L-2H (5.6 × 10–7 M) and increasing amounts of Ag(OTf) (0–30
equiv). Inset of (a): amplification of the Q-bands region (490–700
nm).Schematic illustration of the metalation process
of 2H-L-2H with silver(I).It is worth noting that the further addition of Ag(I), up to 400
equiv, produces additional changes in the absorption spectrum, with
the growth of two bands at 421 and 541 nm, while the fluorescence
continues to decrease (Figure S2). A single
Q band at ca. 540 nm is typical of Ag(II)-porphyrins,[43,44] and this second process can be ascribed to the disproportionation
of the Ag(I)-porphyrins of the cage to Ag(II)-porphyrins, with precipitation
of Ag(0) (Figure ),
a process that often accompanies the complexation of silver with porphyrins
since the latter, as ligands, can stabilize high-oxidation states
of metal ions.[43,44]The absorption and emission
titration data comprehensive of both
equilibria are quite complex to be treated using association fitting
models. The data relative to the first process were analyzed using
a 1:2 (cage/Ag+) model, with moderately good fitting results
(Figure S3). The difficulty of this analysis
is due to the fact that the Ag(I) metalation process is not completed,
because of the disproportionation event that sums, and that lateral
complexation of Ag(I) in the free-base cages, even if in a minor extent,
cannot be excluded. An average association constant of log(Ka/M–2) = (10.48 ± 0.01)
is derived.In order to obtain more insights in the complexation
behavior of
the two bis free-base porphyrin cages, model 2H-alkyne (Chart S1) has been titrated with AgOTf
in the same solvent mixture. The absorption titration shows two distinct
families of curves (Figure S4a,c): up to
9 equiv, the decrease and broadening of the Soret band are observed,
with the appearance of a shoulder at higher energy and a tail at lower
energy, and in the Q-bands region a slight decrease of intensity of
the bands occurs; in the range 9–30 equiv, the Soret band further
reduces and slightly red-shifts, with the appearance of a new band
centered at 465 nm, while in the Q-bands region, a further decrease
of the original bands is observed with the formation of bands at ca. 625 and 653 nm. The changes observed in the first step
point to the formation of assemblies constituted by two porphyrins
held together by the coordination of Ag(I) ions to the appended triazole
units.[28,45] Conversely, the second process can be attributed
to the metalation of the porphyrin cores in the formed assemblies,
similarly to what observed for 2H-L-2H. Moreover, the
addition of an excess of silver leads to a degradation/disproportionation
process (Figure S4e). As regards the emission,
a progressive decrease of intensity is observed in all phases (Figure S4b,d,f), compatible with (i) a quenching
interaction among the Ag(I) ions and the porphyrins upon the formation
of the assemblies in the first step, (ii) formation of non-emissive
Ag(I) porphyrinic species in the second step, and (iii) degradation/disproportionation
processes in excess of silver.The results evidence how the
different behaviors of the two cages 2H-S-2H and 2H-L-2H toward Ag(I), where the lateral
coordination and the core coordination prevail versus the other process, respectively, depend uniquely on the different
lengths of the linkers and conformations of the cages, as discussed
in detail in the Computational Results Section.Addition of increasing amounts of Ag(I) to the monometalated
cage Zn-S-2H (5.5 × 10–7 M) in
the range
0–40 equiv causes changes both in absorption and emission features.
The absorption spectrum evolves with the reduction of the splitting
of the Soret band, resulting in the formation of a single band with
maximum at 418 nm (Figure a), while the Q-bands region remains almost unaltered. The
data point toward a process of cage opening, similarly to what is
occurring in the parent 2H-S-2H cage. The emission behavior
is characterized by an increase in intensity of both the bands of
the free-base unit (652 and 717 nm)[29] and
of the Zn-porphyrin (606 nm, the second band at ca. 660 nm is superimposed with the free-base porphyrin emission)[29] (Figure b). The increase of the Zn-porphyrin emission is more evident
by subtracting the free-base contribution from each spectrum of the
cage, calculated by normalizing the emission spectrum of 2H-S-2H at 712 nm (Figure S5). These data can
be explained considering the effect of the cage opening process on
the emission features of both units. We previously showed that the
emission properties of the free-base component in Zn-S-2H are strongly affected by the presence of the closely spaced Zn-porphyrin
counterpart, with the result of an almost halved quantum yield and
a reduced lifetime (6.7 vs 8.5) with respect to the
model monomer and cage 2H-S-2H, attributed to a change
in the molecular symmetry or to an increased intersystem crossing
rate induced by the close proximity of the Zn center.[29] The recovery of the free-base emission intensity observed
upon the addition of Ag(I) testifies the separation of the two units,
following the complexation of the Ag(I) ions with the lateral triazole
groups (Figure ).
Indeed, the lifetime of the free-base emission measured at 720 nm
for the complex was found to be 7.9 ns, which is closer to the value
of 8.5 ns for the free-base porphyrin unaffected by the Zn counterpart.[29] The parting of the two units toward an open
cage conformation also decreases the efficiency of the energy transfer
occurring from the Zn-porphyrin to the free-base counterpart,[29] with the result of an increase of the emission
intensity of the Zn component in the complexed cage.
Figure 5
Absorption (a) and uncorrected
emission spectra (λexc = 415.5 nm, isosbestic point)
(b) of DCM/MeOH (9:1) solutions containing Zn-S-2H (5.5 × 10–7 M) and increasing amounts of AgOTf (0–40 equiv).
Inset of (a): amplification of the Q-bands region (480–680
nm). Inset of (b): amplification of the 580–630 nm region.
Figure 6
Schematic illustration of the complexation process of Zn-S-2H (n = 1) and Zn-L-2H (n = 2) with silver(I).
Absorption (a) and uncorrected
emission spectra (λexc = 415.5 nm, isosbestic point)
(b) of DCM/MeOH (9:1) solutions containing Zn-S-2H (5.5 × 10–7 M) and increasing amounts of AgOTf (0–40 equiv).
Inset of (a): amplification of the Q-bands region (480–680
nm). Inset of (b): amplification of the 580–630 nm region.Schematic illustration of the complexation process of Zn-S-2H (n = 1) and Zn-L-2H (n = 2) with silver(I).The titration data could be satisfactorily fitted using a 1:4 (cage/Ag+) binding model (Figure S6) that
provided a value of log(Ka/M–4) = (22.09 ± 0.05) for the association constant.Finally,
addition of increasing amounts of Ag(I) to the “long”
monometalated cage Zn-L-2H (6.5 × 10–7 M) in the range 0–25 equiv provokes changes in absorption
and emission spectra, as shown in Figure . In absorption, a reduction of the splitting
of the Soret band is observed with an increase of the band at 417
nm and a reduction of the shoulder at 426 nm (Figure a). In the Q-bands region, no significant
modifications are observed. These spectral features again support
a process of cage opening as in the previous cases (Figure ). Concerning the emission
spectra, a particular behavior is observed (Figure b): the band of Zn-porphyrin at 606 nm displays
a constant increase in intensity, also considering the subtraction
of the free-base contribution (Figure S7), while the bands of the free-base component at 652 and 716 nm show
a slight increase, followed by a decrease. The gain in intensity of
the Zn-porphyrin emission can be explained by the reduction of the
efficiency of the energy transfer process occurring in the cage due
to the increased distance between the two units, as in the parent Zn-S-2H. The dual behavior of the free-base emission is less
straightforward: while the initial increase can be attributed to a
recovery of the emission of the unit, which is reduced in the cage
by the presence of the Zn counterpart (ca. 20% reduction),[29] the following decrease seems to be due to an
interaction of the free-base porphyrin with the linked Ag(I), while
the metalation of the core can be excluded by the absorption features
of the complex. The lifetime of the free-base component in the complex
was found to be slightly decreased compared to that of the same unit
in the bare cage, that is, 7.0 versus 7.6 ns.[29]
Figure 7
Absorption (a) and uncorrected emission spectra (λexc = 421 nm, isosbestic point) (b) of DCM/MeOH (9:1) solutions
containing Zn-L-2H (6.4 × 10–7 M) and increasing
amounts of AgOTf (0–25 equiv). Inset of (a): amplification
of the Q-bands region (480–680 nm). Inset of (b): amplification
of the 580–630 nm region.
Absorption (a) and uncorrected emission spectra (λexc = 421 nm, isosbestic point) (b) of DCM/MeOH (9:1) solutions
containing Zn-L-2H (6.4 × 10–7 M) and increasing
amounts of AgOTf (0–25 equiv). Inset of (a): amplification
of the Q-bands region (480–680 nm). Inset of (b): amplification
of the 580–630 nm region.A value of log(Ka/M–4) = (20.78 ± 0.02) was derived for the formation of the complexed
cage (Figure S8).In order to study
in more detail the modification of the energy
transfer process in the cages Zn-S-2H and Zn-L-2H upon the addition of Ag(I), ultrafast luminescence measurements
on the cages added with Ag(I) were performed. Figure shows the luminescence time profiles of
the two complexed cages in the region 600–620 nm, where only
emission from the Zn-porphyrin is collected. The decays are fitted
with lifetimes of 230 and 160 ps for Zn-S-2H and Zn-L-2H, respectively. These lifetimes are longer than those
measured in the pristine cages, that is, 10 and 7 ps, respectively.[29] By considering a lifetime of 1.7 ns for the
unquenched Zn-porphyrin model Zn-alkyne,[29] the efficiency of the energy transfer is thus reduced from
99.4 to 86.5% in Zn-S-2H and from 99.6 to 90.6% in Zn-L-2H, accounting for the observed increase in the emission
intensity upon titration with Ag(I) and in agreement with the absorption
changes described above, showing increasing distances between the
porphyrins upon titration with Ag(I). The observation that the distance
between the porphyrins is larger in the complexes with Ag(I) than
in the pristine cages was also previously demonstrated by means of
a combined experimental and computational study on the analogous Zn-porphyrinic
cages.[26] Moreover, it is interesting to
note that the lifetime of the Zn-porphyrin component in the “short”
complexed cage is still longer than that of the same unit in the “long”
and more flexible analogue, indicating a closer disposition of the
two units in the latter, as established for the pristine cages and
for the analogous Zn-porphyrinic cages studied previously.[26,29]
Figure 8
Luminescence
decays in the 600–620 nm region for Zn-S-2H (black dots)
and Zn-L-2H (red dots) added with 30 equiv of AgOTf.
The biexponential fittings are reported as lines. The excitation profile
is shown in light gray. Excitation at 560 nm (26 μJ/pulse).
Luminescence
decays in the 600–620 nm region for Zn-S-2H (black dots)
and Zn-L-2H (red dots) added with 30 equiv of AgOTf.
The biexponential fittings are reported as lines. The excitation profile
is shown in light gray. Excitation at 560 nm (26 μJ/pulse).
Computational Results
In order to
better understand
the peculiar spectroscopic behavior of 2H-L-2H, we performed
MD simulations of both 2H-S-2H and 2H-L-2H in the absence of Ag(I) to compare the structural and dynamic features
of the two cages in their uncomplexed state. The experimental results
indeed suggest that the different length of the linkers can determine
different closed conformations and, therefore, different reactivities
of the two cages toward the silver ions.According to the MD
simulations, the closed conformations sampled by the two cages are
indeed rather different. In 2H-L-2H, the distance between
the porphyrin rings is on average lower than that in 2H-S-2H (see Figure ). In 2H-L-2H, the distance between the centers of mass of the two
porphyrin rings is essentially fixed at around 0.5 nm. In 2H-S-2H, instead, the distribution of the distance between the two porphyrins
is bimodal and features a minor low distance peak at 0.5 nm and a
major broad high distance peak centered at ≈0.8 nm.
Figure 9
Normalized
distribution of the distance between the centers of
mass of the two porphyrin rings in the MD simulations of 2H-S-2H (black) and 2H-L-2H (red).
Normalized
distribution of the distance between the centers of
mass of the two porphyrin rings in the MD simulations of 2H-S-2H (black) and 2H-L-2H (red).Also, the relative orientations of the two porphyrin rings are
different in the two cages. In Figure , we report the bidimensional distribution
of θ1 and θ2, defined as the angles
between each porphyrin plane and the vector connecting the two centers
of mass. In 2H-L-2H, the two porphyrin planes are essentially
parallel (θ1 ≈ θ2) and cofacial
(θ1, θ2 > 40°). In 2H-S-2H, although parallel and cofacial configurations are
also sampled,
the two planes more often assume oblique (θ1 ≠
θ2) and slipped (θ1, θ2 < 40°) configurations. The parallel and cofacial
configurations of 2H-S-2H are explored when the two planes
are at low distances (≈0.5 nm, see Figure S9). This suggests that for both 2H-S-2H and 2H-L-2H, at very low distances, parallel and cofacial relative
orientations are favored. However, these configurations are much more
frequent in 2H-L-2H. This can be due to the fact that
the shorter linkers, being more rigid, less easily accommodate very
closed conformations that require a marked bending of the linkers.
Figure 10
Bidimensional
distribution of θ1 and θ2 in the
MD simulations of 2H-S-2H (black) and 2H-L-2H (red). The relative orientation of the two porphyrin
rings is also sketched.
Bidimensional
distribution of θ1 and θ2 in the
MD simulations of 2H-S-2H (black) and 2H-L-2H (red). The relative orientation of the two porphyrin
rings is also sketched.Interestingly, these
different behaviors of the two uncomplexed
cages can also affect their binding activity toward the silver ions.
As shown in Figure , the more slipped conformations sampled by 2H-S-2H determine
an average “outer” orientation of the two NH groups
of the porphyrin rings (i.e., the two hydrogens point
toward the solvent). On the contrary, in 2H-L-2H, an
“inward” orientation of the two NH groups is favored
(i.e., the two hydrogens point toward the cage cavity).
This inward orientation determines the exposure to the solvent of
the reactive lone pair of the nitrogen atoms. Upon the addition of
Ag+ in solution, the nitrogen atoms can thus easily coordinate
the silver ions, in competition with the complexation process involving
the linkers.
Figure 11
(A) Normalized distribution of the angle between the porphyrin
NH groups and the porphyrin planes in the MD simulation of 2H-S-2H (black) and 2H-L-2H (red). The curve is obtained by
averaging the distributions of the angles obtained for each of the
four NH groups of the cage. Representative structures of the two porphyrin
planes with the NH groups in the outward (B, 2H-S-2H)
and inward (C, 2H-L-2H) orientations.
(A) Normalized distribution of the angle between the porphyrin
NH groups and the porphyrin planes in the MD simulation of 2H-S-2H (black) and 2H-L-2H (red). The curve is obtained by
averaging the distributions of the angles obtained for each of the
four NH groups of the cage. Representative structures of the two porphyrin
planes with the NH groups in the outward (B, 2H-S-2H)
and inward (C, 2H-L-2H) orientations.The stable inward orientation in 2H-L-2H is
driven
by a favorable electrostatic interaction between the NH groups of
one plane and the bare nitrogens of the other plane (see Figure B,D, in which representative
structures of the inward and outward conformations are reported for 2H-L-2H and 2H-S-2H, respectively). These tightly
packed structures require all the linkers to be bent: this is possible
in 2H-L-2H but much less probable in 2H-S-2H, as shown in Figure S10 (see also Figure A,C). We also note
that in Zn-L-2H, in which no evidence for the metalation
of the free-base porphyrin is observed, the presence of the Zn center
hinders the interaction between the NH groups of the free-base porphyrin
and the nitrogens of the other porphyrin plane. This observation supports
our explanation that these interactions, determining the “inward”
orientation, play a major role in the metalation process of 2H-L-2H.
Figure 12
In 2H-L-2H, the flexibility of the longer
linkers
allows their bending (A), with the porphyrin planes stacked in a parallel
cofacial configuration, which in turn promotes a favorable interaction
between the NH groups of one plane and the bare nitrogens of the other
plane, as highlighted in (B). In 2H-S-2H, the shorter
linkers are less flexible and assume open configurations (C), forcing
the two porphyrin planes in slipped configurations, in which the NH–N
interactions are not possible (D). The distance between the two carbons
connecting the phenyl and triazole rings in each linker is reported
in angstroms in (A,C).
In 2H-L-2H, the flexibility of the longer
linkers
allows their bending (A), with the porphyrin planes stacked in a parallel
cofacial configuration, which in turn promotes a favorable interaction
between the NH groups of one plane and the bare nitrogens of the other
plane, as highlighted in (B). In 2H-S-2H, the shorter
linkers are less flexible and assume open configurations (C), forcing
the two porphyrin planes in slipped configurations, in which the NH–N
interactions are not possible (D). The distance between the two carbons
connecting the phenyl and triazole rings in each linker is reported
in angstroms in (A,C).
Conclusions
In
this study, we have shown that the coordination of Ag(I) to
the triazole ligands present in cages 2H-S-2H, Zn-S-2H, and Zn-L-2H leads to the opening of
their cavities within the range of 20–40 equiv. The changes
in the absorption spectra point to a separation of the porphyrins
since the reduction of the splitting of the Soret band confirms a
reduction of the coupling between the units. The fluorescence changes
are in agreement with the proposed mechanism. Instead, for cage 2H-L-2H, a porphyrin metalation process, dominating upon the
complexation of the lateral triazoles, is observed. By means of MD
simulations, we ascribe this behavior to a more favorable orientation
of the porphyrinic NH groups, if compared to its analogous 2H-S-2H. In fact, differently from the cage with short linkers, in the cage
with longer linkers, the NH groups point toward the interior of the
cage, leading to the exposure of the reactive lone pair of the nitrogens
to the solvent, possibly enhancing the reactivity toward the binding
of the Ag(I) ions. This favorable orientation is allowed in 2H-L-2H by the higher flexibility of the longer linkers.
Authors: Johannes K Sprafke; Dmitry V Kondratuk; Michael Wykes; Amber L Thompson; Markus Hoffmann; Rokas Drevinskas; Wei-Hsin Chen; Chaw Keong Yong; Joakim Kärnbratt; Joseph E Bullock; Marc Malfois; Michael R Wasielewski; Bo Albinsson; Laura M Herz; Donatas Zigmantas; David Beljonne; Harry L Anderson Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Laura P Hernández-Eguía; Eduardo C Escudero-Adán; Inmaculada C Pintre; Barbara Ventura; Lucia Flamigni; Pablo Ballester Journal: Chemistry Date: 2011-11-17 Impact factor: 5.236