| Literature DB >> 35482744 |
Hiran Kanti Santra1, Debdulal Banerjee1.
Abstract
Endophytes are silent microbial partners of green plants that ensure hosts' survival in odd conditions. They are known as the factories of multipotent metabolites with diverse bioactivities beneficial to modern pharmaceuticals industry. Endophytic fungi have been screened from a variety of plants and it is the first-time endophytes of club moss is being studied for production of antibacterial and antioxidative compounds. The present study reveals that Lycopodium clavatum L. harbors a potent niche of bioactive endophytic fungi and Colletotrichum alatae LCS1 was the prime producer of antibacterial and antioxidative compounds among them. The minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of ethyl- acetate culture extract ranged from 15.62 to 250 μg/mL against four Gram negative and three Gram positive microorganisms including methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC-33591). Bio-autogram based screening followed by Gas chromatographic analysis confirmed the occurrence of 17 bioactive compounds and α-bisabolol is known to be the prime one. Alfa bisabolol is a unique and versatile bioactive essential oil and facilitates variety of functions. Killing kinetics data along with leakage of macromolecules into extracellular environment supports the cidal activity of the antibacterial principles at MBC values. Isolate C. alatae LCS1 was optimized by one variable at a time system coupled with response surface methodology for broad spectrum antibacterial production. The organism yielded maximum response (22.66±0.894 mm of zone of inhibition against MRSA) in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 50 mL potato dextrose broth supplemented with (g/L) glucose, 7.53; yeast extract concentration, 0.47; NaCl, 0.10 with medium pH 6.46; after 134 hours of incubation at 26°C. Optimized fermentation parameters enhanced antibacterial activity up-to more than 50% than the pre-optimized one (10.33±0.57 mm). Endophytic LCS1 was also efficient in free radical scavenging tested by DPPH, ABTS, H2O2 and FRAP assay with an IC50 values of 23.38±5.32 to 82.873±6.479 μg/mL.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35482744 PMCID: PMC9049576 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267302
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Fig 110 days old culture of Colletotrichum alatae LCS1 (A), Light microscopic image of sterile mycelium (B), Scanning electron micrograph of sterile hyphae (C-D).
Fig 2a- Antibacterial activity of the LCS1 culture extract (31.25 μg/mL) against MRSA in a nutrient agar medium. b- Antibacterial action of the F3 (fraction 3) with highest clear zone of inhibition. c- Clear zone of inhibition of bacterial (MRSA) growth on TLC plate after TTC application.
Antibacterial activity (MIC and MBC- μg/mL) of C. alatae LCS1 EA (ethyl-acetate) culture extract against pathogenic bacteria.
| Pathogenic bacteria | MIC (μg/mL) | MBC (μg/mL) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCS1 | CPFX | STREP | CLINDA | VANCO | LCS1 | CPFX | STREP | CLINDA | VANCO | |
| 15.62 (a, a1) | 7.81 (b) | 15.62 (a) | 3.90 (c) | 0.97 (d) | 31.25 (a, | 15.62 (b) | 31.25 (a) | 7.81 (c) | 1.95 (d) | |
| 15.62 (a, a1) | 7.81 (b) | 15.62 (a) | 3.90 (c) | 0.97 (d) | 31.25 (a, | 15.62 (b) | 31.25 (a) | 7.81 (c) | 1.95 (d) | |
| MRSA (ATCC | 31.25 (a, a1) | 15.62 | 62.5 (c) | 7.81 (d) | 3.90 (e) | 62.5 (a, a2) | 31.25 (b) | 125 (c) | 15.62 (d) | 7.81 (e) |
| 31.25 (a, a1) | 15.62 | 62.5 (c) | 7.81 (d) | 3.90 (e) | 62.5 (a, a2) | 31.25 (b) | 125 (c) | 15.62 (d) | 7.81 (e) | |
| 62.5 (a, a1) | 3.90 (b) | 7.81 (c) | 1.95 (d) | 0.48 (e) | 125 (a, a2) | 7.81 (b) | 15.62 (c) | 3.90 (d) | 0.97 (e) | |
| 62.5 (a, a1) | 3.90 (b) | 7.81 (c) | 1.95 (d) | 0.48 (e) | 125 (a, a2) | 7.81 (b) | 15.62 (c) | 3.90 (d) | 0.97 (e) | |
| 125 (a, a1) | 3.90 (b) | 7.81 (c) | 1.95 (d) | 0.48 (e) | 250 (a, a2) | 7.81 (b) | 15.62 (c) | 3.90 (d) | 0.97 (e) | |
The five different letters (a, b, c, d, e) indicates potential statistical differences between the five testing agents- LCS1 and other four antibiotics regarding their MIC and MBC values respectively. The other two letters a1 and a2 indicates valid statistical difference between the MIC and MBC value of LCS1 extract (row wise).
Fig 3Killing kinetics of pathogenic microorganisms over time when treated with different concentrations of MIC values a–P. aeruginosa b–MRSA c- V. parahaemolyticus d- B. cereus e–B. subtilis f–E. coli. Values on the graphs are the means ± Standard error (SE) of the three replicates.
Fig 4Leakage of intracellular macromolecules in to extracellular environment A–DNA content B- protein content. Values on the graphs are the means ± Standard error (SE) of the three replicates. Tukey’s multiple comparison test was performed. The different letters a, and b in each case (for each bacterial pathogen at control and at treated condition) represents a significant difference between them (At, P<0.05).
Effect of different physical conditions and chemical supplements on biomass and antibacterial activity (ZOI-zone of inhibition) by Colletotrichum alatae LCS1.
Against MRSA (Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus).
| Parameters | Effectors | Percentage added | Biomass (g/L) | Antibacterial activity (ZOI in |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incubation time (in day) | 2 |
| 3.566±0.057(a) | 3.33±0.58(a) |
| 4 |
| 4.466±0.115(b) | 5±0(b) | |
| 6 |
| 5.343±0.045(c) | 9.67±0.58(c) | |
| 8 |
| 4.916±0.020(b) | 6.33±0.58(d) | |
| 10 |
| 4.133±0.057(d) | 6±1(d) | |
| Incubation temperature (°C) | 22 |
| 5.970±0.026(a) | 8±0(a) |
| 24 |
| 6.756±0.049(b) | 9.33±0.58(b) | |
| 26 |
| 7.863±0.030(c) | 12.33±0.58(c) | |
| 28 |
| 4.963±0.046(d) | 9.67±0.58(b) | |
| 30 |
| 3.076±0.015(e) | 7±0(d) | |
| Initial medium pH | 4 |
| 2.286±0.005(a) | 2.33±0.58(a) |
| 5 |
| 3.906±0.010(b) | 3.33±0.58(b) | |
| 6 |
| 6.156±0.049(c) | 6±1(c) | |
| 6.5 |
| 7.896±0.015(d) | 8±0(d) | |
| 7 |
| 7.033±0.049(e) | 5.33±0.58(e) | |
| 7.5 |
| 6.896±0.015(e) | 4.33±0.58(f) | |
| 8 |
| 6.012±0.011(f) | 4±0(f) | |
| Additional carbon source | Starch | 1 | 7.877±0.001(a) | 8.67±0.58(a) |
| Fructose | 1 | 7.167±0.017(b) | 7.67±0.58(b) | |
| Glucose | 1 | 8.063±0.054(c) | 10±1(c) | |
| Maltose | 1 | 7.084±0.018(b) | 8±1(a, b) | |
| Additional nitrogen sources | Tryptone | 0.3 | 8.073±0.004(a) | 9.33±0.58(a) |
| Yeast extract | 0.3 | 8.430±0.010(a) | 12±1(b) | |
| NH4NO3 | 0.3 | 8.066±0.005(a) | 8±0.58(c) | |
| Glucose concentration | Glucose | 2 | 8.423±0.004(a) | 10.33±0.58(a) |
| 4 | 8.743±0.004(a) | 11±0(a) | ||
| 6 | 9.114±0.004(b) | 12.33±0.58(b) | ||
| 8 | 9.742±0.001(b) | 16±0(c) | ||
| 10 | 8.866±0.005(a) | 11.33±0.58(d) | ||
| 12 | 8.805±0.004(a) | 10.33±0.58(a) | ||
| Yeast extract concentration | 0.1 | - | 8.410±0.010(a) | 8.67±0.58(a) |
| 0.3 | - | 9.713±0.011(b) | 11.33±0.58(b) | |
| 0.5 | - | 9.065±0.004(b) | 15.67±0.58(c) | |
| 0.7 | - | 8.113±0.004(a) | 13.67±0.58(d) | |
| 0.9 | - | 7.205±0.004(c) | 12.33±0.58(e) | |
| Different metal ions | NaCl | 0.05 | 10.134±0.056(a) | 12±1(a) |
| KCl | 0.05 | 7.011±0.006(b) | 8.67±0.58(b) | |
| MgCl2 | 0.05 | 5.706±0.009(c) | 9.33±0.58(c) | |
| CaCl2 | 0.05 | 3.011±0.006(d) | 10.33±0.58(d) | |
| NaCl concentration | 0.05 | 7.952±0.063(a) | 11.33±.0.58(a) | |
| 0.1 | 9.069±0.043(b) | 14±0(b) | ||
| 0.2 | 8.006±0.004(a) | 13.67±0.58(c) | ||
| 0.3 | 7.069±0.043(d) | 12±1(a) |
One-way ANOVA (Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test) was performed to check the potential statistical differences in case of the biomass (g/L) and antibacterial activity (ZOI-mm) in different fermentation conditions (incubation time, temperature, conc. of sugar and nitrogen sources etc.). There were valid statistical differences in most of the cases (P<0.05), the different letters a, b, c, d, e, and f indicates significant difference and same letter at two positions indicate no statistical differences.
Role of available oxygen on growth and antibacterial production by Colletotrichum alatae LCS1.
| Medium volume (mL) | Total volume of flask | Head space volume (mL) | Medium depth (cm) | Surface area (cm) | Biomass (g/L) | Yield of bisabolol | Antibacterial activity (ZOI-mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 320 | 295 | 1 | 2.79 | 4.763±0.215(a) | 28.62 μg/mL(a) | 6.33±0.58(a) |
| 50 | 320 | 270 | 1.5 | 2.65 | 6.777±0.091(b) | 42.46 μg/mL(b) | 9.67±0.58(b) |
| 75 | 320 | 245 | 2 | 2.53 | 5.112±0.415(c) | 41.04 μg/mL(b) | 9.33±0.58(b) |
| 100 | 320 | 220 | 2.5 | 2.39 | 5.447±0.819(c) | 20.34 μg/mL(c) | 4.33±0.58(c) |
One-way ANOVA (Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test) was performed to check the potential statistical differences between the data (column wise) of biomass (g/L), yield of bisabolol and antibacterial activity (ZOI- mm) in different medium volume (mL). There were valid statistical differences in most of the cases (P<0.05),the three different letters a, b, c indicates significant difference and same letter at two positions indicate no statistical differences.
Experimental design and results of the Box-Behnken design for the optimization of the antibacterial activity of the fungal isolate Colletotrichum alatae LCS1.
|
|
|
| ||||
| X1: YEC (g/L) | X2: GC (g/L) | X3: M pH | X4: FT (day) | Measured | Predicted | |
| 1 | 0 (0.5) | 0 (8) | 0 (6.5) | 0 (6) | 22.4000 (a1) | 22.4580 (a1) |
| 2 | 1 (0.7) | 0 | 1(7) | 0 | 15.5100 (a2) | 15.5600 (a2) |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | -1 (6) | -1(4) | 17.3900 (a3) | 17.3529 (a3) |
| 4 | 0 | 1 (10) | -1 | 0 | 15.5700 (a4) | 15.6404 (a4) |
| 5 | -1 (0.3) | 0 | 0 | 1 (8) | 14.6800 (a5) | 14.7471 (a5) |
| 6 | 0 | -1 (6) | 1 | 0 | 18.3500 (a6) | 18.3488 (a6) |
| 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 14.2000 (a7) | 14.1783 (a7) |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 15.0400 (a8) | 14.9996 (a8) |
| 9 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 17.5400 (a9) | 17.5083 (a9) |
| 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 14.5500 (a10) | 14.5167 (a10) |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.5200 (a11) | 22.4580 (a11) |
| 12 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 18.5000 (a12) | 18.4646 (a12) |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 14.4500 (a13) | 14.4013 (a13) |
| 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 15.3800 (a14) | 15.4571 (a14) |
| 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13.5700 (a15) | 13.5638 (a15) |
| 16 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 18.7700 (a16) | 18.7621 (a16) |
| 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 15.4400 (a17) | 15.4421 (a17) |
| 18 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 17.6000 (a18) | 17.5563 (a18) |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 17.4000 (a19) | 17.3546 (a19) |
| 20 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 17.8500 (a20) | 17.8167 (a20) |
| 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.5400 (a21) | 22.4580 (a21) |
| 22 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 15.8000 (a22) | 15.8483 (a22) |
| 23 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 16.5500 (a23) | 16.5079 (a23) |
| 24 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 19.8000 (a24) | 19.8383 (a24) |
| 25 | -1 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 18.1000 (a25) | 18.1754 (a25) |
| 26 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13.5500 (a26) | 13.4996 (a26) |
| 27 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 14.8200 (a27) | 14.8700 (a27) |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.4100 (a28) | 22.4580 (a28) |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.4200 (a29) | 22.4580 (a29) |
One-way ANOVA (Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test) was performed to check the potential statistical differences (P<0.05) between the measured and predicted antibacterial action (zone of inhibition). There were no statistical differences between each data set (row wise) and similar letters (a1-a29) in each row indicates the data are same and lacks statistical differences.
ANOVA for response surface quadratic regression model of antibacterial productions by endophytic Colletotrichum alatae LCS1.
| Source | DF | Adj SS | Adj MS | F-Value | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 14 | 231.289 | 15.6709 | 3979.93 | 0.000 |
| Linear | 4 | 59.097 | 17.0034 | 3178.69 | 0.000 |
| YEC (X1) | 1 | 13.95 | 13.6054 | 2767.99 | 0.000 |
| GC (X2) | 1 | 31.012 | 29.0765 | 5457.79 | 0.000 |
| M pH (X3) | 1 | 0.391 | 0.2670 | 58.88 | 0.000 |
| FT (X4) | 1 | 27.398 | 23.1205 | 4443.60 | 0.000 |
| Square | 4 | 174.876 | 43.3433 | 8198.94 | 0.000 |
| 2) | 1 | 69.768 | 65.7646 | 14762.66 | 0.000 |
| 2) | 1 | 53.147 | 51.5307 | 10997.42 | 0.000 |
| 2) | 1 | 49.876 | 43.4540 | 9547.89 | 0.000 |
| 2) | 1 | 98.768 | 95.457 | 19987.78 | 0.000 |
| 2-Way Interaction | 6 | 9.690 | 1.2986 | 276.57 | 0.000 |
| YEC*GC (X1X2) | 1 | 1.208 | 1.1092 | 241.99 | 0.000 |
| YEC*M Ph (X1X3) | 1 | 0.001 | 0.0001 | 0.02 | 0.887 |
| YEC*FT (X1X4) | 1 | 0.707 | 0.7005 | 198.72 | 0.000 |
| GC*M Ph (X2X3) | 1 | 0.019 | 0.0123 | 3.89 | 0.119 |
| GC*FT (X2X4) | 1 | 6.387 | 6.3793 | 1139.88 | 0.000 |
| M pH*FT (X3X4) | 1 | 0.091 | 0.0989 | 20.00 | 0.001 |
| Error | 14 | 0.067 | 0.0069 | ||
| Lack-of-Fit | 10 | 0.096 | 0.0041 | 1.10 | 0.505 |
| Pure Error | 4 | 0.017 | 0.0057 | ||
| Total | 28 | ||||
| R-sq | 99.96% | ||||
| R-sq(adj) | 99.95% | ||||
| R-sq(pred) | 99.89% |
Fig 5The contour plot and 3D-plot with 2D-projection showing the most important interactions of factors in RSM optimization of antibacterial activity by Colletotrichum alatae LCS1 (A1 &A2) between yeast extract conc.
(YEC) vs. glucose conc. (GC) at fermentation time (FT) 7 days and medium pH (M-pH) 6.5 (B1 & B2) between YEC vs. M-pH at FT 7 days and GC 8 (C1 & C2) between YEC vs. FT at GC 8 and M-pH 6.5 (D1 & D2) between GC and M-pH at FT 7 days and YEC of 0.47 (E1 & E2) between GC vs. FT at YEC 0.47 and M-pH 6.5 (F1 & F2) between M-pH vs. FT at GC 8 and YEC 0.47.
Fig 6a HPLC chromatogram of antibacterial fraction of LCS1 extract obtained using a C18 reverse phase column and gradient elution was used with the mobile phase composed of (A) acetonitrile–water–phosphoric acid (19:80:1) and (B) acetonitrile with a flow-rate of 0.8 mL/min. Fig 6B HPLC chromatogram of standard bisabolol chemical Fig 6C Full scan chromatographic profile obtained from the bioactive fraction (antibacterial) of endophytic fungi Colletotrichum alatae LCS1.
List of bioactive compounds produced by Colletotrichum alatae LCS1and their respective bioactivities.
| Sl. | Name of the compound | RT | Area | Ch. formula | MW | Biological activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4-Amino-1-pentanol (amino | 2.26 | 17.64 | C5H13NO | 103 | ------ |
| 2 | 3-methyl 1-butanol (Isopentyl | 3.44 | 9.15 | C5H12O | 88 | Antimicrobial activity against |
| 3 | Butyric acid, 2-methyl-, ethyl ester | 5.26 | 5.22 | C7H14O2 | 130 | Broad spectrum Antibacterial activity |
| 4 | 2-(2-Aminopropyl) phenol | 6.16 | 3.92 | C9H13NO | 151 | Antibacterial |
| 5 | Pthalic acid | 7.72 | 2.61 | C8H604 | 166.14 | Broad spectrum antibacterial activity against 10 pathogenic microorganisms |
| 6 | d-Alaninol (amino alcohols) | 8.12 | 1.30 | C3H9NO | 75 | ------ |
| 7 | 7-isopropyl-1-methyl phenanthrene | 8.40 | 1.30 | C18H18 | 234 | Broad spectrum antibacterial activity |
| 8 | p-Hydroxyphenylacetic acid | 8.99 | 1.30 | C8H8O3 | 152.15 | Broad spectrum antibacterial activity |
| 9 | Cathinone or Norephedrone | 10.23 | 5.22 | C9H11NO | 149 | ---- |
| 10 | à-Bisabolol (sesquiterpene) | 10.81 | 30.71 | C15H26O | 222 | Antibacterial activity against halitosis |
| 11 | Longipinine (sesquiterpene) | 12.01 | 1.30 | C15H24 | 204.35 | ---- |
| 12 | 2-amino-1-(4-methyl phenyl) propane | 12.74 | 5.22 | C10H15N | 149 | ----- |
| 13 | Cedrene (sesquiterpene) | 14.15 | 5.22 | C15H24 | 204 | Broad spectrum antimicrobial activity |
| 14 | Naphthalene | 17.33 | 8.49 | C10H8 | 128 | Antimicrobial and insecticidal property [ |
| 15 | Pterin-6-carboxylic acid | 19.00 | 1.30 | C7H5N5O3 | 207 | Antimicrobial and antioxidant |
| 16 | Dimethylamine | 20.95 | 1.30 | C2H7N | 45 | Broad spectrum antimicrobial activity |
| 17 | Oxalic acid | 22.10 | 1.30 | C2H2O4 | 90 | Broad spectrum antibacterial activity |
Antioxidant activity of Colletotrichum alatae LCS1 methanolic culture extract isolated from Lycopodium clavatum.
| Antioxidant assays |
| Standard | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Scavenging ability of hydrogen peroxide | 52.75 ± 5.47a | 12.03 ± 2.21b |
| Scavenging ability of DPPH radicals | 56.37 ± 6.06a | 12.80 ± 1.73b | |
|
| |||
|
| Scavenging ability of ABTS radicals | 23.38 ± 5.32a | 6.02 ± 2.62b |
|
| |||
| Ferric reducing antioxidant power | 82.87 ± 6.47a | 26.26 ± 4.96b |
One-way ANOVA (Tukey’s Multiple Comparison test) was performed to check the potential statistical differences and the standard (ascorbic acid) showed statistically valid differences (P<0.05, the two different letters a and b in each case indicates significance differences) from the Colletotrichum alatae LCS1 extract.
Fig 7Antioxidant activity of endophytic culture extract (ethyl acetate fraction) of Colletotrichum alatae LCS1 and ascorbic acid as standard.
a–Ferric reducing antioxidant power assay. b- Hydrogen peroxide radical scavenging ability. c- DPPH radical scavenging activity. d–ABTS radical scavenging assay Values on the graphs are the means ± Standard error (SE) of the three replicates.