Literature DB >> 35482126

Patterns of primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in older Medicare patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Jennifer Schenfeld1, TingTing Gong2, David Henry3, Michael Kelsh4, Prasad Gawade4, Yi Peng2, Brian D Bradbury4, Shuling Li2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend primary prophylactic (PP) granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for prevention of febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy with high risk (HR: > 20%), or intermediate risk (IR:10-20%) of FN and ≥ 1 patient risk factor (e.g., age ≥ 65y). The current retrospective cohort study describes patterns of PP-G-CSF in older Medicare patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy with HR/IR of FN.
METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 66y initiating chemotherapy regimens with HR/IR of FN to treat breast, colorectal, lung, or ovarian cancer, or Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma were selected using Medicare 20% sample (2013-2015) and 100% cancer patient (2014-2017) data. PP-G-CSF use was identified in the first cycle. Timing of pegfilgrastim pre-filled syringe (PFS) administration, proportion of patients completing all cycles (adherence) with pegfilgrastim PFS or on-body injector (OBI), and duration of short-acting G-CSF (sG-CSF) was described across all cycles.
RESULTS: Of 64,893 patients receiving HR/IR for FN, 71% received HR and 29% IR regimens. Overall, PP-G-CSF use in the first cycle was 53% (HR: 74%; IR: 44%) and varied across cancers. Adherence with pegfilgrastim was slightly higher among OBI initiators (78%) than PFS (74%). Number of PP-sG-CSF administrations (mean [SD]) per cycle was 5.1 (SD: 2.7) overall, 5.4 (2.6) for HR, and 4.9 (2.7) for IR.
CONCLUSION: Despite cancer treatment guidelines recommending PP-G-CSF use to reduce risk of FN associated with HR and IR (with ≥ 1 patient risk-factor) regimens, PP-G-CSF remains underutilized in older patients, across cancer types and regimens. Opportunities exist for improvement in use of PP-G-CSF.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Febrile neutropenia; Filgrastim; Granulocyte-colony–stimulating factor; Myelosuppressive chemotherapy; Older patients; Pegfilgrastim

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35482126     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06967-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  2 in total

1.  Colony-stimulating factor prescribing patterns in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; Jeannine S McCune; David K Blough; Cara L McDermott; Lauren Clarke; Jennifer L Malin; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Clinical Outcomes of Treatment with Filgrastim Versus a Filgrastim Biosimilar and Febrile Neutropenia-Associated Costs Among Patients with Nonmyeloid Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Lee S Schwartzberg; Lincy S Lal; Sanjeev Balu; Kim Campbell; Lee Brekke; Andrew DeLeon; Caitlin Elliott; Stephanie Korrer
Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm       Date:  2018-04-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.