Literature DB >> 29687743

Clinical Outcomes of Treatment with Filgrastim Versus a Filgrastim Biosimilar and Febrile Neutropenia-Associated Costs Among Patients with Nonmyeloid Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy.

Lee S Schwartzberg1, Lincy S Lal2, Sanjeev Balu3, Kim Campbell3, Lee Brekke2, Andrew DeLeon3, Caitlin Elliott2, Stephanie Korrer2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors such as filgrastim are used to decrease the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) among patients with nonmyeloid cancers undergoing chemotherapy treatment. Although the biosimilar filgrastim-sndz has been approved in the United States since 2015, limited real-world comparisons of filgrastim-sndz versus reference filgrastim (filgrastim-ref) have been conducted.
OBJECTIVE: To compare FN incidence and assess overall FN-related health care resource utilization and medical costs among U.S. patients with non-myeloid cancer who received filgrastim-sndz or filgrastim-ref during their first chemotherapy cycle.
METHODS: This was a retrospective claims analysis of patients with non-myeloid cancer who were enrolled in commercial or Medicare Advantage insurance plans from March 2015 through June 2016 and received filgrastim-sndz or filgrastim-ref during their first observed chemotherapy cycle. Patients with evidence of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or pregnancy and those with missing demographic information were excluded. FN was defined on the basis of diagnosis codes for neutropenia and fever (N/F); neutropenia and infection (N/I); and neutropenia, infection, and fever (N/I/F). Cohorts were adjusted for differences in baseline patient characteristics using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method, and equivalence testing was used to compare the proportion of patients who developed FN between weighted cohorts. On the basis of the range of neutropenic fever incidence found in the PIONEER clinical trial, FN incidence was considered equivalent if 90% CIs for between-cohort differences were within ± 6%. Mean FN-related health care resource utilization and total FN-related medical costs were calculated for the overall study population.
RESULTS: A total of 3,542 patients were included in the study (172 filgrastim-sndz; 3,370 filgrastim-ref; mean ages 62.1 years and 64.7 years, respectively). After IPTW, there were 162 patients in the filgrastim-sndz cohort and 3,297 in the filgrastim-ref cohort (mean age 64.5 years for both). FN incidence in the weighted filgrastim-sndz versus filgrastim-ref cohorts, respectively, was 1.4% versus 0.9% for N/F, 2.3% versus 1.7% for N/I, and 0.0% versus 0.3% for N/I/F; FN incidence was statistically equivalent between treatment cohorts. Among patients in either treatment cohort who developed FN, the proportion with FN-related inpatient stays during the first chemotherapy cycle ranged from 35.0% for N/I to 70.0% for N/I/F. Mean (SD) FN-related total medical costs across all patients who developed FN were $11,977 ($18,383) for N/F, $8,040 ($14,809) for N/I, and $21,733 ($30,003) for N/I/F, in 2015 U.S. dollars. For all 3 definitions of FN, the largest proportions (73.5%-93.4%) of medical costs were inpatient related.
CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study of patients with nonmyeloid cancers undergoing chemotherapy, the incidence of FN was statistically equivalent between individuals treated with filgrastim-sndz versus filgrastim-ref during their first chemotherapy cycle. FN-related health care resource utilization and medical costs among patients who developed FN were substantial. DISCLOSURES: This work was funded by Sandoz, which participated in the study design, data interpretation, writing and revision of the manuscript, and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Balu and Campbell are employees of Sandoz, which is the manufacturer of the filgrastim biosimilars Zarzio and Zarxio. DeLeon was an employee of Sandoz at the time this study was conducted. Lal, Brekke, Elliott, and Korrer are employees of Optum, which was contracted by Sandoz to conduct this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29687743     DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.17447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm


  10 in total

1.  Patterns of primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in older Medicare patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jennifer Schenfeld; TingTing Gong; David Henry; Michael Kelsh; Prasad Gawade; Yi Peng; Brian D Bradbury; Shuling Li
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Patterns of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Authors:  Prasad L Gawade; Shuling Li; David Henry; Nancy Smith; Rajesh Belani; Michael A Kelsh; Brian D Bradbury
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Home administration of filgrastim (Nivestim™) in primary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  Burkhard Otremba; Carsten Hielscher; Volker Petersen; Christian Petrik
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Incidence of febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy among patients with nonmyeloid cancer receiving filgrastim vs a filgrastim biosimilar.

Authors:  Lee S Schwartzberg; Lincy S Lal; Sanjeev Balu; Kim Campbell; Lee Brekke; Caitlin Elliott; Stephanie Korrer
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-09-03

5.  Economic Analysis on Adoption of Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors in Patients With Nonmyeloid Cancer at Risk of Febrile Neutropenia Within the Oncology Care Model Framework.

Authors:  Weijia Wang; Edward Li; Kim Campbell; Ali McBride; Steve D'Amato
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-05-07

6.  A retrospective review of the real-world experience of the Pegfilgrastim biosimilar (Lapelga®) to the reference biologic (Neulasta®).

Authors:  Gina Wong; Liying Zhang; Habeeb Majeed; Yasmeen Razvi; Carlo DeAngelis; Emily Lam; Erin McKenzie; Katie Wang; Mark Pasetka
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 1.809

7.  The Impact of Baseline Risk Factors on the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy with Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis: A Real-World Data Analysis.

Authors:  Edward Li; Bridgette Kanz Schroader; David Campbell; Kim Campbell; Weijia Wang
Journal:  J Health Econ Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-06-22

8.  Trends in Use of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Following Introduction of Biosimilars Among Adults With Cancer and Commercial or Medicare Insurance From 2014 to 2019.

Authors:  Ching-Yu Wang; Coy D Heldermon; Scott M Vouri; Haesuk Park; Sarah E Wheeler; Brian Hemendra Ramnaraign; Nam Hoang Dang; Joshua D Brown
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01

Review 9.  Biosimilar Pegfilgrastim: Improving Access and Optimising Practice to Supportive Care that Enables Cure.

Authors:  Paul Cornes; Pere Gascon; Arnold G Vulto; Matti Aapro
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.807

10.  The Real-World Experience of the Biosimilar (Grastofil®) to the Reference Biologic (Neupogen®) in Breast Cancer and Lymphoma: A Canadian Single-Centre Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Gina Wong; Katie Wang; Mark Pasetka; Liying Zhang; Julia Lou; Habeeb Majeed; Jerome Flores; Emily Lam; Carlo DeAngelis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.