| Literature DB >> 35480650 |
Ayman H Kamel1,2, Abd El-Galil E Amr3,4, Abdulrahman A Almehizia3, Elsayed A Elsayed5,6, Gaber O Moustafa7.
Abstract
A simple, cost-effective, portable and disposable paper-based analytical device is designed and fabricated for copper(ii) determination. All solid-state ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) for copper and a Ag/AgCl reference electrode were constructed and optimized on the paper substrate. The copper electrodes were built using carbon nano-tube ink as a conductive substrate and an ion-to electron transducer. A suitable polymeric membrane is drop-cast on the surface of the conductive carbon ink window. The copper-sensing membrane is based on newly synthesized macrocyclic pyrido-pentapeptide derivatives as novel ionophores for copper detection. Under the optimized conditions, the presented all-solid-state paper-based Cu2+-ISEs showed a Nernstian response toward Cu2+ ions in 30 mM MES buffer, pH 7.0 over the linear range of 5.0 × 10-7-1.0 × 10-3 M with a limit of detection of 8.0 × 10-8 M. The copper-based sensors exhibited rapid detection of Cu2+ ions with a short response time (<10 s). The selectivity pattern of these new ionophores towards Cu2+ ions over many common mono-, di- and trivalent cations was evaluated using the modified separate solution method (MSSM). The presented paper-based analytical device exhibited good intra-day and inter day precision. The presented tool was successfully applied for trace Cu2+ detection in real samples of serum and whole blood collected from different children with autism spectrum disorder. The data obtained by the proposed potentiometric method were compared with those obtained by the inductively-coupled plasma (ICP) as a reference method. The presented copper paper-based analytical-device can be considered as an attractive tool for point-of-care copper determination because of its affordability, vast availability, and self-pumping ability, particularly when combined with potentiometric detection. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35480650 PMCID: PMC9037668 DOI: 10.1039/d1ra04712d
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Synthetic pathway of copper ionophores.
Fig. 2A simple presentation for the constructed miniaturized paper-based potentiometric cell.
Fig. 3The potentiometric response and time-trace for Cu2+-paper based sensors.
Fig. 4The potentiometric response and time-trace for GC/Cu2+-based sensors.
Performance potentiometric characteristics of Cu2+-sensors
| Parameter | Sensor I | Sensor II | Sensor III | Sensor IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 28.6 ± 0.5 | 25.6 ± 0.8 | 29.1 ± 0.6 | 25.6 ± 0.2 |
|
| 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 |
|
| 5.0 × 10−7–1.0 × 10−3 | 4.0 × 10−7–1.0 × 10−3 | 1.0 × 10−7–1.0 × 10−3 | 1.0 × 10−7–1.0 × 10−3 |
|
| 8.0 × 10−8 | 6.5 × 10−8 | 3.4 × 10−8 | 3.3 × 10−8 |
|
| 4.0–7.5 | 4.0–7.5 | 4.0–7.5 | 4.0–7.5 |
|
| <5 | <5 | <5 | <5 |
|
| 98.2 | 98.7 | 98.8 | 97.9 |
|
| 99.2 | 99.3 | 98.7 | 98.6 |
|
| 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.1 |
|
| 0.8 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
|
| 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.2 |
Fig. 5Selectivity pattern for the paper-based electrochemical device based on (A) sensor I and (B) sensor II.
Fig. 6Selectivity coefficient pattern for copper-paper selective electrodes based on ionophores I and II.
Copper determination in spiked artificial serum samples using copper paper-based potentiometric devices
| Sample no. | Added, μg mL−1 | Sensor I | Sensor II | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Found | Recovery, % | Found | Recovery, % | ||
| 1 | 0.5 | 0.46 ± 0.04 | 92.0 | 0.51 ± 0.03 | 102.0 |
| 2 | 2.0 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 105.0 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 105.0 |
| 3 | 5.0 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 94.0 | 4.8 ± 0.2 | 96.0 |
| 4 | 10.0 | 9.7 ± 0.2 | 97.0 | 9.4 ± 0.5 | 94.0 |
Average of 5 measurements.
Copper determination in real serum samples collected from autistic children
| Sample no. | Copper content | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Potentiometry | ICP-OES | ||
| Sensor I | Sensor II | ||
|
| |||
| 1 | 19.4 ± 12 | 17.2 ± 9.0 | 16.2 ± 0.8 |
| 2 | 57.3 ± 5.0 | 52.2 ± 3.0 | 55.6 ± 0.2 |
| 3 | 44.5 ± 0.7 | 39.2 ± 6.0 | 42.2 ± 0.1 |
|
| |||
| 4 | 55.2 ± 0.9 | 51.9 ± 4.0 | 54.4 ± 0.3 |
| 5 | 63.2 ± 2.0 | 61.5 ± 6.0 | 67.2 ± 0.5 |
| 6 | 48.1 ± 4.0 | 51.2 ± 3.0 | 45.3 ± 0.1 |
Average of 3 measurements.
Copper determination in blood samples collected from autistic children
| Sample no. | Copper content | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Potentiometry | ICP-OES | ||
| Sensor I | Sensor II | ||
|
| |||
| 1 | 39.2 ± 0.9 | 36.1 ± 4.0 | 35.1 ± 0.2 |
| 2 | 37.3 ± 0.8 | 32.5 ± 2.1 | 35.6 ± 0.1 |
| 3 | 40.2 ± 1.7 | 37.2 ± 6.3 | 42.2 ± 0.3 |
|
| |||
| 4 | 35.3 ± 1.9 | 31.2 ± 4.4 | 34.2 ± 0.1 |
| 5 | 33.4 ± 3.3 | 31.6 ± 1.4 | 37.5 ± 0.3 |
| 6 | 43.3 ± 3.6 | 41.4 ± 2.1 | 40.4 ± 0.2 |
Average of 3 measurements.
Comparison of previously reported all-solid-state copper potentiometric electrodes with the presented paper-based electrochemical analytical device
| Ionophore | Type of electrode | Solid contact transducer | Slope, mV per decade | Detection limit, M | Linear range, M | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (4-Phenyl-11-decanoyl-1,7-dithia-11-aza-cyclotetradecane-4-sulfide) | Pt micro-electrode | PPy [3,3′-Co (1,2-C2 B9 H11)2] | 29.5 ± 1 | 5.6 × 10−7 | 1 × 10−6–1 × 10−2 |
|
| Copper ionophore (IV) | GC | Graphene/7,7,8,8-tetracyano-quinodimethane | 30.5 ± 0.05 | 8 × 10−10 | 1 × 10−9–1 × 10−2 |
|
| Copper ionophore (II) | Graphite powder/resin | Three-dimensional graphene sponge | 28.9 ± 0.7 | 2.5 × 10−9 | 1 × 10−8–7.9 × 10−4 |
|
| Phytic acid/Ag composite | Gold substrate | Ag nanoparticles | 31.1 ± 1.8 | 2.7 × 10−6 | 1 × 10−5–1 × 10−3 |
|
| 2-Mercapto-benzoxazole | Screen-printed | PEDOT/PSS | 28 | 3 × 10−7 | 1 × 10−6–1 × 10−2 |
|
| 5-Sulfosalicylic acid | Pencil graphite | Polypyrrol | 29.6 ± 0.3 | 5.4 × 10−6 | 1 × 10−5–1 × 10−1 |
|
| Copper ionophore (ETH 1062) | Gold wire | PEDOT/PSS | 28.1 ± 1.8 | 4 × 10−8 | 2.5 × 10−7–2.5 × 10−4 |
|
| 2-(1′-(4′-(1′′-Hydroxy-2′′-naphthyl)methyleneamino)butyl iminomethyl)-1-naphthol | Graphite powder/resin | MWCNTs | 29.7 ± 0.2 | 5.5 × 10−9 | 1 × 10−8–1 × 10−3 |
|
| Diphenylisocyanate bis (acetylacetone)ethylenediimine | Graphite powder/resin | MWCNTs | 29.4 ± 0.4 | 2.4 × 10−9 | 1 × 10−8–1 × 10−3 |
|
|
| Graphite powder/resin | — | 37.5 | 4.4 × 10−6 | 1 × 10−4–1 × 10−2 |
|
| Macrocyclic pyrido pentapeptide derivative 1 (ionophore I) | Paper based modified with CNTs | Carbon nanotubes ink (CNTs) | 28.6 ± 0.5 | 8 × 10−8 | 5.7 × 10−7–1 × 10−3 | This work |
| Macrocyclic pyrido pentapeptide derivative 2 (ionophore II) | 25.6 ± 0.8 | 6.5 × 10−8 | 4 × 10−7–1 × 10−3 |