| Literature DB >> 35480593 |
Bo Li1, Qiuhong Liu1, Tong Wang2, He He1, You Peng3, Tao Feng4.
Abstract
Outdoor physical activities can promote public health and they are largely influenced by the built environment in different urban settings. Understanding the association between outdoor physical activities and the built environment is important for promoting a high quality of life. Existing studies typically focus on one type of outdoor activity using interview-based small samples and are often lack of systematic understanding of the activities' intensity and frequency. In this study, we intend to gain deeper insight into how the built environment influences physical activities using the data extracted from individual's wearables and other open data sources for integrated analysis. Multi-linear regression with logarithm transformation is applied to perform the analysis using the data from Changsha, China. We found that built environment impacts on outdoor physical activities in Changsha are not always consistent with similar studies' results in other cities. The most effective measures to promote outdoor physical activities are the provision of good arterial and secondary road networks, community parks, among others in Changsha. The results shed light on future urban planning practices in terms of promoting public health.Entities:
Keywords: GPS tracking; intensity and frequency; public health; smart wearables; trajectory analysis; urban planning
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35480593 PMCID: PMC9037378 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.861456
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Names and abbreviations of independent variables.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Land-use mix | LM |
| Residential land density | RLD |
| Building density | BD |
| Arterial road density | ARD |
| Secondary road density | SRD |
| Branch road density | BRD |
| Bus stop density | BSD |
| University campuses density | UCD |
| Comprehensive parks density | CPD |
| Community parks density | PD |
| Square density | SD |
| Market density | MD |
| Living service points density | LSD |
| Normalized difference vegetation index | NDVI |
Name and abbreviation of the dependent variable.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Walking activity frequency | WAF |
| Running activity frequency | RAF |
| Walking activity intensity | WAI |
| Running activity intensity | RAI |
Figure 1Distribution of slow motion physical activity trajectories (pink for running, green for walking).
Figure 2Trajectory density distribution of walking (left) and running (right) activity.
Figure 3Sample points in the case study area.
The goodness-to-fit of all the estimates of multiple linear regression with logarithmic transformation (MLR-LT).
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.620 | 0.422 | 0.632 | 0.535 |
|
| 0.612 | 0.409 | 0.625 | 0.525 |
The results of MLR-LT regarding WAF and RAF.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| LM | 0.064 | 0.007 | 0.032 | 0.299 |
| RLD | 0.220 | 0.000 | 0.148 | 0.001 |
| BD | 0.049 | 0.300 | 0.052 | 0.397 |
| PD | 0.163 | 0.000 | 0.229 | 0.000 |
| UCD | 0.140 | 0.000 | 0.264 | 0.000 |
| ARD | 0.209 | 0.000 | 0.132 | 0.003 |
| SRD | 0.101 | 0.004 | 0.234 | 0.000 |
| BRD | 0.116 | 0.016 | 0.049 | 0.429 |
| LSD | −0.059 | 0.338 | −0.160 | 0.045 |
| CPD | 0.083 | 0.009 | 0.028 | 0.486 |
| BSD | 0.127 | 0.022 | 0.061 | 0.385 |
| MD | 0.042 | 0.338 | 0.102 | 0.071 |
| SD | 0.103 | 0.009 | 0.120 | 0.020 |
| NDVI | 0.085 | 0.001 | 0.013 | 0.691 |
The results of MLR-LT regarding WAI and RAI.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| LM | 0.051 | 0.028 | 0.021 | 0.453 |
| RLD | 0.217 | 0.000 | 0.151 | 0.000 |
| BD | 0.021 | 0.644 | 0.070 | 0.204 |
| PD | 0.165 | 0.000 | 0.196 | 0.000 |
| UCD | 0.153 | 0.000 | 0.292 | 0.000 |
| ARD | 0.248 | 0.000 | 0.195 | 0.000 |
| SRD | 0.115 | 0.001 | 0.319 | 0.000 |
| BRD | 0.115 | 0.016 | −0.023 | 0.674 |
| LSD | −0.089 | 0.140 | −0.162 | 0.024 |
| CPD | 0.130 | 0.000 | 0.131 | 0.000 |
| BSD | 0.106 | 0.052 | 0.026 | 0.682 |
| MD | 0.048 | 0.258 | 0.019 | 0.708 |
| SD | 0.103 | 0.008 | 0.185 | 0.000 |
| NDVI | 0.144 | 0.000 | 0.127 | 0.000 |
The variance inflation factor of MLR-LT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LM | 1.042 | 1.030 | 1.042 | 1.030 |
| RLD | 2.075 | 1.954 | 2.075 | 1.954 |
| BD | 4.190 | 4.102 | 4.190 | 4.102 |
| PD | 1.075 | 1.098 | 1.075 | 1.098 |
| UCD | 1.084 | 1.088 | 1.084 | 1.088 |
| ARD | 2.209 | 2.045 | 2.209 | 2.045 |
| SRD | 2.244 | 2.018 | 2.244 | 2.018 |
| BRD | 4.354 | 4.194 | 4.354 | 4.194 |
| LSD | 7.135 | 6.887 | 7.135 | 6.887 |
| CPD | 1.884 | 1.726 | 1.884 | 1.726 |
| BSD | 5.767 | 5.348 | 5.767 | 5.348 |
| MD | 3.542 | 3.467 | 3.542 | 3.467 |
| SD | 2.950 | 2.890 | 2.950 | 2.890 |
| NDVI | 1.194 | 1.214 | 1.194 | 1.214 |