| Literature DB >> 35480478 |
Shan Han1,2, Yuqing Zhang1,2, Yukun Zheng1,2, Congcong Liu1,2, Yonghui Jiang2, Shigang Zhao1,2, Han Zhao1,2.
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified THADA as one of the susceptibility genes for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the THADA gene showed significant over-transmission in PCOS and strong correlations with testosterone level. However, there was insufficient evidence to verify the effect of THADA in vivo on female reproductive system. In this study, we investigated the impacts of Thada ablation on ovarian function and reproductive outcomes with knockout (KO) mice. The results showed that the Thada deletion was insufficient to affect ovarian folliculogenesis, steroidogenesis, and female fertility. Additionally, we stressed the mice with high-fat-high-sugar diet (HFHS). In this case, the KO mice still merely had a negligible impact on ovarian function. These findings indicated that Thada deficiency was dispensable for female fertility in mice, which enriched our knowledge about in vivo functions of PCOS susceptibility genes.Entities:
Keywords: THADA; follicle development; in vivo; ovarian function; polycystic ovarian syndrome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35480478 PMCID: PMC9037063 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.787733
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 6.055
Figure 1Thada knockout mice have normal fertility. (A) The flowchart of experimental design. (B, C). Generation and dentification of Thada knockout mice. Efficiency of knockdown in ovary was determined by qPCR. (D) The genotype distribution and the male/female ratio of offsprings were obtained by mating Thada +/- (n = 211). (E). KO and WT had similar body weights (n = 15-24). (F) WT and KO female mice had the similar litter size (n = 5).
Figure 2Thada knockout mice did not present ovarian development abnormalities. (A) Anogenital distance (AGD) of 4 week-old mice (n = 4-7). (B) Vaginal opening time was similar between WT and KO mice (n = 4-7). (C) The ovarian weights were no different between WT and KO mice (n=8-10). (D) Estrous cycle profile of WT and KO mice (Proestrus-Estrus P/E), Matestrus M, Diestrus D) (n = 6-9). (E) Hematoxylin-Eosin stained ovaries sections of WT and KO mice, scale bar=200μm. (F) The numers of these follicles at different developmental stages of maturation(n = 3-4).
Figure 3Thada knockout mice have normal ovarian function and ovulation. (A–C) Serum levels of testosterone, progesterone and estradiol of adult female WT and KO mice (n = 9-10). (D) qRT-PCR analysis of hormone related genes in ovary (n = 8-9). (E) Morphology ofMII oocytes, where black arrows indicate polar bodies, scale bar=100μm.(n = 4-6) (F) Number of oocytes retrieved after ovarian stimulation. (G) Polar body extrusion rates in oocytes from WT and KO mice at adult stage (n = 4-6). (H, I). mRNA expression of gonadotrophin receptors in ovary(n = 8).
Figure 4HFHS could not induce reproductive dysfunctions in KO mice. (A) Body weights were measured for WT and KO mice with normal chow diet or HFHS diet (n = 6-10). (B, C) Estrous cycle profile of WT and KO mice with ten weeks HFHS-fed. WT mice with the normal chow diet were selected as control groups (n = 7-8). (D–F). Serum levels of testosterone, progesterone, and estradiol of HFHS-fed mice (n = 7-8). (G) HE stained histological sections of ovaries, scale bar=200μM. ***P < 0.005.