| Literature DB >> 35479761 |
Lei Shi1,2, Jie Zhou1, Chenyi Jiang2, Wanbing Dai1, Weifeng Yu1, Qiang Xia3, Diansan Su1.
Abstract
Background: Nowadays, pediatric liver transplantation (PLT) has become an effective strategy for treating various acute or chronic end-stage liver diseases and inherited metabolic diseases. Many experts have already concluded the current challenges and future directions of PLT. However, no detailed analysis of the publication landscape has substantiated these proposed opinions.Entities:
Keywords: bibliometric analysis; hotspots; pediatric liver transplantation; research front; web of science
Year: 2022 PMID: 35479761 PMCID: PMC9035746 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.805216
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.569
Figure 1Quantitative growth process of the studies from different countries and regions concerning pediatric liver transplantation (PLT) in 24 years.
Figure 2The collaboration status of pediatric liver transplantation (PLT). (A) Network of institutions created by VOSviewer. The resolution in the action panel was set at 0.8. The weight in the options panel was set as “documents.” Node size means the occurrence times of the institutions. (B) Network of countries/regions created by VOSviewer. The resolution in the action panel is set at 0.8. The weight in the options panel is set as “documents.” Node size means the occurrence times of the regions. (C) Dual-map overlay of the literature about PLT. Each dot on the left or right side represents a journal. The dots on the left side compose the citing journal map, and the dots on the right side compose the cited journal map. Labels are extracted from journal titles and show the disciplines involved in the series. The lines are citation links, beginning from the left and pointing to the journals on the right. The size of the oval means how many people are in terms of authors and how many papers are published in those areas.
Figure 3Hotspots in pediatric liver transplantation (PLT). (A) Top 15 keywords with the strongest citation bursts. (B) Word cloud of terms of PLT. The sizes of the words are proportional to their occurrence times. (C,D) Term co-occurrence network created by VOSviewer. (C) is the network visualization, and (D) is the overlay visualization. The resolution in the action panel is set at 0.85. The weight in the options panel is set as “total link strength.” Circle size means the occurrence times of the terms. In (C), circles are colored according to their clusters. In (D), circles are colored differently according to their average occurrence time.
Figure 4Research fronts in pediatric liver transplantation (PLT). (A) A landscape view of the co-citation network, generated by top 50 per slice between 1997 and 2020. The network has modularity of 0.77, implying that the specialties are clearly defined. The average silhouette score is 0.88, suggesting that the homogeneity of the network is high. The nodes in the network are cited articles, and the links are the co-citation relationship between cited articles. Node sizes are proportional to the cited times of the articles. The areas of varied colors indicate the time when co-citation links in those areas appeared for the first time. (B) Top 20 references with the strongest citation bursts.
Clinical trials categorized by their research theme.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Immunosuppression-related virus infection | 5 |
| 2 | Risk factors | 5 |
| 3 | Observation of the long-term outcome | 4 |
| 4 | Improving adherence | 4 |
| 5 | Improving perioperative management | 4 |
| 6 | Improving intraoperative management | 3 |
| 7 | Liver cell transplantation | 1 |
| 8 | New imaging method | 1 |
| 9 | Metabolic liver diseases | 1 |
| 10 | Implementation of PLT | 1 |
| 11 | Preventing specific complication | 1 |
PLT, pediatric liver transplantation.
Four articles with the strongest citation bursts around 1997.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Long-term results of pediatric liver transplantation: an analysis of 569 transplants ( | 21.03 | 1998 |
| 2 | Pediatric liver transplantation with cadaveric or living related donors: comparative results in 90 elective recipients of primary grafts ( | 17.47 | 1999 |
| 3 | Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease in pediatric liver transplantation. Interplay between primary Epstein-Barr virus infection and immunosuppression ( | 14.16 | 1996 |
| 4 | Pediatric liver transplantation: from the full-size liver graft to reduced, split, and living related liver transplantation ( | 12.36 | 1998 |
Six articles with the strongest citation bursts around 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 5 | Health status of children alive 10 years after pediatric liver transplantation performed in the us and canada: report of the studies of pediatric liver transplantation experience ( | 17.99 | 2012 | 147 / 236 / 145 / 0 / 0 |
| 6 | Outcomes of 5-year survivors of pediatric liver transplantation: report on 461 children from a North American multicenter registry ( | 14.83 | 2008 | 167 / 962 / 146 / 0 / 0 |
| 7 | Long-term outcomes of pediatric living donor liver transplantation in japan: an analysis of more than 2,200 cases listed in the registry of the japanese liver transplantation society ( | 13.01 | 2013 | 92/ 123/ 67/ 0/ 1 |
| 8 | A multivariate analysis of pre-, peri-, and post-transplant factors affecting outcome after pediatric liver transplantation ( | 11.76 | 2011 | 81 / 32 / 55 / 0 / 0 |
| 9 | Graft fibrosis after pediatric liver transplantation: 10 years of follow-up ( | 10.99 | 2009 | 123 / 17 / 38 / 0 / 0 |
| 10 | Complete immunosuppression withdrawal and subsequent allograft function among pediatric recipients of parental living donor liver transplants ( | 10.63 | 2012 | 233 / 709 / 112 / 0/ 21 |
“Citations” is a category that contains both traditional citation indexes and citations that help indicate societal impact.
“Usage” is a way to signal if anyone is reading the articles or otherwise using the research.
“Captures” indicates that someone wants to come back to the work.
“Mentions” is the measurement of activities such as news articles or blog posts about research.
“Social media” includes the tweets, Facebook likes, etc. that reference the research.