Literature DB >> 35479186

Designing a universal tool for developing content of debriefing: The how and what questions.

Gunaseelan Rajendran1, Sasikumar Mahalingam1, Nithya Balaraman1, Aswin Kumaran1, Ezhilkugan Ganessane1.   

Abstract

Objectives: Clear and specific content for debriefing promotes learning and reflection for the learner. Currently, there is no universal tool for developing the content for debriefing.
Methods: We developed a tool for debriefing that can be applied for developing content for debriefing, which can be used for instructor-led and within-team debriefing. These tools include two sets of eight questions, namely, the how and the what questions.
Results: We used these tools in our monthly simulation activities and got a favorable response from the residents who used them. Conclusions: The how question deals with human factors, and the what questions deal with educational factors.
© 2022 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  content for debriefing; debriefing; the how questions; the what questions; universal tool

Year:  2022        PMID: 35479186      PMCID: PMC9024152          DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AEM Educ Train        ISSN: 2472-5390


  8 in total

1.  The Importance of Debriefing in Simulation-Based Learning: Comparison Between Debriefing and No Debriefing.

Authors:  Eon Na Ryoo; Eun-Ho Ha
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Within-team debriefing versus instructor-led debriefing for simulation-based education: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sylvain Boet; M Dylan Bould; Bharat Sharma; Scott Revees; Viren N Naik; Emmanuel Triby; Teodor Grantcharov
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing.

Authors:  Walter Eppich; Adam Cheng
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.929

4.  The relationship between facilitators' questions and the level of reflection in postsimulation debriefing.

Authors:  Sissel Eikeland Husebø; Peter Dieckmann; Hans Rystedt; Eldar Søreide; Febe Friberg
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.929

5.  Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare: development and psychometric properties.

Authors:  Marisa Brett-Fleegler; Jenny Rudolph; Walter Eppich; Michael Monuteaux; Eric Fleegler; Adam Cheng; Robert Simon
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.929

6.  Designing a universal tool for developing content of debriefing: The how and what questions.

Authors:  Gunaseelan Rajendran; Sasikumar Mahalingam; Nithya Balaraman; Aswin Kumaran; Ezhilkugan Ganessane
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2022-04-01

Review 7.  Difficult debriefing situations: A toolbox for simulation educators.

Authors:  V J Grant; T Robinson; H Catena; W Eppich; A Cheng
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.277

8.  Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD) in simulation-based medical education: Translation and validation of the German version.

Authors:  Sandra Abegglen; Andrea Krieg; Helen Eigenmann; Robert Greif
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Designing a universal tool for developing content of debriefing: The how and what questions.

Authors:  Gunaseelan Rajendran; Sasikumar Mahalingam; Nithya Balaraman; Aswin Kumaran; Ezhilkugan Ganessane
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2022-04-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.