As non-renewable metal mineral resources, rare earth (RE) elements have many fascinating properties, which enable them to be widely used in agriculture,[1] optics[2] and electromagnetics[3] as well as weaponry. Due to early large-scale mining and low utilization efficiency, the reserve of REs has declined sharply. At the same time, spent REs are produced because they are frequently used and then discharged into the environment. This has a great impact on the environment on the one hand; and on the other hand it is also a waste of resources. As one of the REs, lanthanum (La) is abundant in nature. Because of its good physical and chemical properties, La has been widely utilized in many high-tech fields.[4] However, due to its toxicity, La can cause peripheral blood lymphocytes in humans once it has been discharged into the environment.[5] Therefore, the efficient recovery of La is of great significance to sustainable development as well as to environment protection/remediation.In order to solve these problems, many methods have been exploited to remove trivalent La ion (La(iii)) from wastewater, such as co-precipitation,[6] ion exchange,[7] membrane separation,[8] adsorption[9-11] as well as liquid–liquid and solid phase extraction.[12] Among them, the adsorption method has been intensively studied because of economical and effective merits. Due to this advantage, adsorption has been widely used for water treatment. With that, different adsorbents have been examined such as metal-polyphenolic nanocages,[13] organic frameworks,[14,15] MXene nanocomposites.[16-18] Of them, carbon nanotube,[19] ammonium citrate-modified biochar[4] and active carbon modified with pentaethylhexylamine[9] were applied for the removal and recovery of La(iii). Although these materials showed good separation efficiency, low-cost adsorbent with high removal capacity for La(iii) is still demanded.In seeking selective adsorbent for designated elements, ion-imprinted polymers have been received a lot of attention.[20] Generally, the ion-imprinting technique covers materials of functional polymer and the target template ions, which are cross-linked by covalent or non-covalent interaction. Being eluted template ions, the ion-imprinted polymer adsorbent can be obtained, which has the memory towards the template ion. With this memory effect, the ion-imprinted polymer adsorbent can remove template ion from environment.[21-23]As an environmental-friendly polymer, carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) is a cheap and renewable biomass, which has good biocompatibility and degradability. CMC molecules contain a large number of hydroxyl and carboxyl groups, which can form complexes with metal ions through electrostatic attraction and chelation, thereby effectively removing metal ions in sewage.[24-26] Thus, CMC has large adsorption capacity toward certain materials, which makes it a good candidate for the ion-imprinting polymer.[27] Some studies showed that cellulose can form magnetic adsorption materials once being combined with magnetic components. And the prepared composite had fast removal rate and easy separation property for dyes.[28]In this work, ion-imprinted Fe3O4/carboxymethyl cellulose (Fe3O4/CMC) was prepared and La(iii) was used as the template ion. The adsorption performance of Fe3O4/CMC for La(iii) was studied. It is shown that our ion-imprinted material bears good adsorption property by means of the ion-printed technique. Meanwhile, the adsorption mechanism was hypothesised. Due to its good adsorption performance and easy separation property, environment-friendly ion-imprinted Fe3O4/CMC shows good application prospect for removal and recovery La(iii) from the wastewater.
Results and discussion
Micro morphology of Fe3O4/CMC
The structure of the ion-imprinted Fe3O4/CMC was characterized by XRD, and results are shown in Fig. 1. From Fig. 1a, we can see that Fe3O4 has characteristic diffraction peaks of magnetite Fe3O4 standard card (JCPDS: 77-1545). The peaks at 30.1°, 35.6°, 43.3°, 53.8°, 57.1°, 62.8° and 74.5° correspond to the (200), (311), (400), (422), (511), (440) and (533) crystal planes of the inverse spinel structure of Fe3O4. It can be seen that there is no other peaks in the XRD pattern, indicating the pure phase of Fe3O4. To the pattern of Fe3O4/CMC, all diffraction peaks of Fe3O4 can be found in XRD plot, which indicated that Fe3O4 exits in the composite. Meanwhile, there is a broad peak around 20°, which is characteristic peak of CMC. The XRD result gave the evidence that both CMC and Fe3O4 coexist in composite and there is no other impurities.
Fig. 1
XRD patterns (a) and FTIR spectra (b) of Fe3O4/CMC and CMC.
Fig. 1b shows the FTIR spectra of the original CMC and Fe3O4/CMC. According to the IR spectrum of CMC, peak at 3365.6 cm−1 can be attributed to the stretching vibration absorption peak of –OH; peak at 2886.8 cm−1 is stretching vibration absorption peak of –CH2; adsorption band of CO in CMC located at 1716.9 cm−1; adsorption bands at 1228.6 and 1012.3 cm−1 can be attributed to the stretching vibration absorption of –C–O–C–. Compared with the original CMC, spectrum of Fe3O4/CMC shows difference. It can be found that the –OH stretching vibration peak absorption is significantly reduced, and the absorption of the stretching vibration peak of –C–O–C– is significantly increased. This is probably because the acetal reaction between the –OH groups in CMC and the CO in glutaraldehyde, which make the CO functional groups disappear and enhance the adsorption of –C–O–C– functional groups. Moreover, adsorption peak at 564.5 cm−1 was found, which can be attributed to the characteristic stretching vibration of the Fe–O in Fe3O4. This result indicated that the cross-linked CMC successfully encapsulated the Fe3O4 particles.Fig. 2 shows the morphology of both Fe3O4 and Fe3O4/CMC, which were observed by SEM. It can be seen from Fig. 2a that Fe3O4 are well dispersed nanoparticles. After combined with CMC (Fig. 2b), large particles of Fe3O4/CMC are formed with rough surface and Fe3O4 nanoparticles are also found in CMC. To further prove it, the EDS was applied to Fe3O4/CMC and the mapping pictures were shown in Fig. 2c. From the picture, we can see that carbon, oxygen and Fe are distributed evenly in the composites, which also gave the evidence that the composite of Fe3O4/CMC was prepared.
Fig. 2
SEM images of Fe3O4 (a), Fe3O4/CMC (b) and EDS mapping pictures of Fe3O4/CMC (c).
The TGA analyses of both CMC and Fe3O4/CMC were carried out. As shown in Fig. 3, one can see that CMC itself has one-step degradation in the range of 250–430 °C, where the weight loss is 84%. The fastest degradation rate is found at 350 °C. To the composite, it degrades at the same temperature, but the fast degradation rate occurs at about 300 °C, which is higher than that of CMC. This result indicate that Fe3O4 is good for heat conduction. The composite reaches the balance with the weight loss of 19.4% at 550 °C. According to the TG data, the contents of Fe3O4 and CMC in the composite are 64.6 and 35.4%, respectively.
Fig. 3
The TGA and DTA of CMC and Fe3O4/CMC.
Since the specific surface area has great impact on the adsorption capacity, BET analysis has been performed on Fe3O4, CMC and Fe3O4/CMC. The results of BET analysis are presented in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4
Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms of (a) CMC, (b) Fe3O4, and (c) Fe3O4/CMC.
From Fig. 4 and Table 1, one can note that the surface area of Fe3O4 is the highest due to its small particle size. The SBET of CMC is 5.7 m2 g−1. After coating Fe3O4, the SBET of Fe3O4/CMC increases to 9.2 m2 g−1. This results indicate that Fe3O4/CMC has not only magnetic property, which would help to recover the adsorbent, but also high specific surface area, which can improve its adsorption property.
Specific surface areas and pore diameters of samplesa
Sample
SBET/(m2 g−1)
D/nm
Fe3O4
38.3
6.3
CMC
5.7
7.7
Fe3O4/CMC
9.2
5.1
S
BET is the specific surface area, Vp is the total pore volume, and D is the average pore diameter.
S
BET is the specific surface area, Vp is the total pore volume, and D is the average pore diameter.
Adsorption properties of Fe3O4/CMC
The adsorption property of Fe3O4/CMC was evaluated by templated ion of La(iii). Fig. 5a shows the adsorption capacities of Fe3O4/CMC at different initial pH. It can be seen that the initial pH values have great influence on adsorption capacity. The adsorption capacity gradually increases as the initial pH value increases, and it reaches to 58.5 mg g−1 when the initial pH value is 5, further increase the pH to 6.0, the adsorption capacity increases a little. The results indicated that our composites are suitable in weak acid and neutral conditions. This is probably because H+ in the solution at low pH is competitive with La(iii) and resulted in low adsorption capacity.[29]
Fig. 5
The pH effect on the adsorption capacities (a) and the La(iii) concentration after oscillation at high pH with and without using Fe3O4/CMC (b), and adsorption kinetic curve of Fe3O4/CMC (c).
The adsorption property at high pH value has some difference. One can see that the removal capacities increase dramatically at pH 7–9. We deduce that the increase of the removal capacities is partially caused by the formation of La(OH)3 precipitate.To fully investigate the pH effect on the adsorption property, the controlled experiments at pH 7, 8 and 9 were also carried out without using Fe3O4/CMC. The precipitate would be found once the La(iii) solution was adjusted to high pH values of 7–9. After 20 min reaction, the concentration of La(iii) in solution was sampled and tested. The results are shown in Fig. 5b. It is found that the concentrations of La(iii) are 168.2, and 158.7 mg L−1 at pH 7 and 8, respectively, which decrease compared with the original concentration of 201.7 mg L−1. When further raising the pH to 9, a lot of precipitates are formed immediately. And the residual contents of La(iii) is 14.08 mg L−1. These indicate that almost all the La(iii) ions precipitate from the solution at the high pH even without using adsorbent of Fe3O4/CMC.Fig. 5c is the kinetic curve of Fe3O4/CMC. From the Fig. 5c, we can see that the adsorption capacity increases rapidly within 30 minutes; then it reaches equilibrium in 120 min with Qe of 60.0 mg g−1. In order to further study the adsorption mechanism, both the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models (eqn (1) and (2)) were used to fit the adsorption process.Where Qe and Qt are the adsorption capacities (mg g−1) at equilibrium and the adsorption time t, respectively; k1 (min−1) and k2 (g mg−1 min−1) are the pseudo-first/second-order adsorption rate constants; t is the duration of adsorption (min).According to the data in Table 2, R2 of the pseudo-second-order kinetic model is much higher than that of the pseudo-first-order kinetic model, which indicated that pseudo-second-order kinetic model fits the adsorption process better. Meanwhile, the Qe,cal calculated by pseudo-second-order kinetic model is 61.7 mg g−1, that is very close to experimental value. These results show that the adsorption process is mainly controlled by chemical reactions.[30]
Kinetic parameters fitted by pseudo-first/second order modelsa
Pseudo-first-order
Pseudo-second-order
k1 (min−1)
R2
Qe,cal (mg g−1)
k2 (g mg−1 min−1)
R2
Qe,cal (mg g−1)
1.056 × 10−2
0.6741
23.9
1.63 × 10−3
0.9983
61.7
k
1/k2 is first/second order rate constants, R2 is the coefficient of determination, and Qe,cal is the calculated capacity at equilibrium.
k
1/k2 is first/second order rate constants, R2 is the coefficient of determination, and Qe,cal is the calculated capacity at equilibrium.The adsorption isotherm of Fe3O4/CMC is shown in Fig. 6a. It can be seen that the adsorption capacities gradually increase with the increase of the initial concentration of La(iii). The adsorption capacity (Qmax) reaches the largest of 61.5 mg g−1 when the initial concentration of La(iii)is 200 mg L−1. Continue to increase the concertation of La(iii), the adsorption capacity changes little. Both Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm adsorption models[10] were applied to fit the adsorption experimental data according to the eqn (3) and (4).Where Ce is the concentration of La(iii) at the time of adsorption equilibrium (mg L−1); qe is the equilibrium adsorption capacity (mg g−1); qm,cal is the calculated maximum adsorption capacity (mg g−1); and KL/KF is the Langmuir (L mg−1)/Freundlich adsorption equilibrium constant (mg g−1).
Fig. 6
The adsorption isotherm of Fe3O4/CMC (a), the fitting curves by Langmuir model (b) and Freundlich model (c).
The fitting plots and data are shown in Fig. 6b, c and Table 3. It can be seen that the linear coefficient of determination (R2) of the Langmuir is 0.9805, which indicating the monolayer adsorption of Fe3O4/CMC and La(iii). The maximum adsorption capacity (qm,cal) calculated by Langmuir fitting model is 65.3 mg g−1, which is close to experimental one.[31]
The fitted constants of adsorption isotherm by Langmuir and Freundlich modelsa
Langmuir isotherm constants
Freundlich isotherm constants
qm,cal (mg g−1)
KL (L mg−1)
R2
KF (mg g−1)
n
R2
65.3
4.184 × 10−2
0.9805
16.794
4.243
0.9403
q
m,cal is calculated maximum adsorption capacity. KL is Langmuir coefficient of distribution, and KF and n are Freundlich coefficient of distribution.
q
m,cal is calculated maximum adsorption capacity. KL is Langmuir coefficient of distribution, and KF and n are Freundlich coefficient of distribution.Meanwhile, the R2 obtained by fitting Freundlich model is 0.9403, indicating that the chemical adsorption undergoes: Fe3O4/CMC and La(iii) would form chemical bondings during the adsorption.To fully understand the adsorption mechanism, the zeta potential analyses at different pH values of Fe3O4/CMC were carried out. From Fig. 7a, one can see that the zeta potential of Fe3O4/CMC decreases as the pH in solution increases. It would reach the isoelectric point at about pH 2.5. At pH 5, the zeta potential gets to −24.5 mV. Further increasing the pH to 10, the zeta potential changes slightly. The reason for this is that there are plenty of hydrogen ions in low pH and, which can be adsorbed on the surface of the CMC and make it positively charged.
Fig. 7
The zeta potentials of (a) Fe3O4/CMC at vs. pH and (b) various samples at pH 5.
Zeta potentials of CMC, Fe3O4, Fe3O4/CMC and Fe3O4/CMC-La at pH 5 were also determined (Fig. 7b). Zeta potentials of CMC and Fe3O4 are −37.9 and 14.7 mV, respectively. To the composite, its zeta potential turns −24.5 mV. This indicates that some negative charges on the surface of CMC can be neutralized by the positive charges on the Fe3O4. However, the total charges on the composite surface are still retained negative, which would benefit to adsorb positive La(iii) ion. After up-taken La(iii), the zeta potential of Fe3O4/CMC-La becomes 0.43 mV. This evidences that La(iii) can be adsorbed on the surface of Fe3O4/CMC via the electrostatic force.The XPS analysis was also applied to characterize the elemental environments of Fe3O4/CMC before and after adsorption. From the XPS spectra in Fig. 8, the binding energies of Fe and C show subtle difference. To XPS spectra of Fe 2p before and after adsorption (Fig. 8a), there are two peaks around 725.5 and 712.2 eV, which belong to the binding energies of Fe 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 in Fe3O4, respectively. The relatively weak peaks were caused by the coating layer of CMC, which blocks the signals. This also gives the evidence that Fe3O4 is coated by CMC. In C 1s spectra in Fig. 8b, there are three peaks can be obtained after fitting, which are located at 285.1, 286.7 and 288.4 eV. These peaks are attributed to binding energies of C–C, C–O and CO, respectively. The binding energies of O 1s before and after adsorption are in Fig. 8c. It can be seen that three peaks are fitted to the sample of Fe3O4/CMC. The peak at 534.4 eV is the binding energy of CO, the peak at 533.1 eV is the binding energy of C–O, and the binding energy of 530.7 eV is the lattice oxygen of Fe3O4. More importantly, another peak at 531.2 eV can be obtained for the sample after adsorption, which is assigned to the binding energy of La–O. For the sample after up-taken of La(iii), four peaks are found in La 3d spectra (Fig. 8d). Ones located at 852.8 and 836.0 eV are La 3d3/2 and 3d5/2, respectively; and peaks at 856.0 and 839.2 eV are the satellite ones of La 3d. The separation energy between La 3d3/2 and 3d5/2is about 16.8 eV, indicating the existence of La(iii). Both the XPS Spectra of O 1s and La 3d evidence that La(iii) has been adsorbed on Fe3O4/CMC.
Fig. 8
XPS spectra of Fe 2P (a), C 1s (b), O 1s (c) and La 3d (d) before and after adsorption.
The adsorption selectivity and reuse property
In application, some other metal ions would coexist in the solution and interfere the adsorption of La(iii). Thus, the competitive adsorption experiments were carried out to study the adsorption selectivity of Fe3O4/CMC. Ni(ii), Cu(ii) and Cd(ii) were selected as interfering ions. In dual system, both La(iii) and the competing metal ion are 200 mg L−1. Table 4 shows the calculated selective adsorption parameters in the dual-ion coexistence solution. It can be seen that the distribution coefficient (Kd) to La(iii) is higher than that of Ni(ii)/Cu(ii)/Cd(ii) in the system, which means that Fe3O4/CMC has better adsorption performance than the competing ions when co-exiting in solution. Meanwhile, the selectivity coefficient k is larger than 1, indicating the good adsorption of selectivity for La(iii).
The selective adsorption parameters of Fe3O4/CMC in the dual-ion coexistence solutiona
Template ion (T)/Competing ion (C)
T
C
k
Qe (mg g−1)
Ce (mg L−1)
Kd
Qe (mg g−1)
Ce (mg L−1)
Kd
La(iii)/Ni(ii)
46.9
154.3
0.30
4.5
188.6
0.02
12.75
La(iii)/Cu(ii)
32.8
171.8
0.19
16.4
190.1
0.09
2.22
La(iii)/Cd(ii)
44.6
162.7
0.27
2.2
199.7
0.01
25.46
Q
e is the equilibrium adsorption capacity; Ce is equilibrium concentration of competitive adsorption; Kd is the partition coefficient; and k is the selectivity coefficient.
Q
e is the equilibrium adsorption capacity; Ce is equilibrium concentration of competitive adsorption; Kd is the partition coefficient; and k is the selectivity coefficient.The adsorption selectivity was also carried out in a multi-ion coexisting solution of La(iii), Cu(ii), Cd(ii) and Ni(ii). Table 5 shows the calculated selective adsorption parameters. It can be seen that the distribution coefficient Kd of Fe3O4/CMC to La(iii) is still greater than that of competing metal ions in the multi-ion coexisting solution. However, compared with the binary ion system, the Kd is reduced to some degree. This is probably because there are three competing ions in solution, and the total concentration of these competing metal ions is about 600 mg L−1. The high concentration of competing ions make them take more sites on Fe3O4/CMC, which results in relative low up-taken amount for La(iii). However, the k is still larger than 1, which shows Fe3O4/CMC still has a good selective adsorption performance for La(iii) under the interference of multi-ions.
The selective adsorption parameters of Fe3O4/CMC in the multi-ion coexistence solutiona
Template ion (T) or competing ion (M)
Fe3O4/CMC
Qe/(mg g−1)
Ce/(mg L−1)
Kd
k
La(iii)
22.5
181.4
1.24 × 10−1
—
Ni(ii)
5.8
192.4
3.02 × 10−2
4.1
Cu(ii)
5.9
200.4
2.94 × 10−2
4.2
Cd(ii)
0.8
190.7
3.94 × 10−3
31.4
Q
e is the equilibrium adsorption capacity is in mg g−1; Ce is equilibrium concentration of competitive adsorption is in mg L−1; Kd is the partition coefficient; and k is the selectivity coefficient.
Q
e is the equilibrium adsorption capacity is in mg g−1; Ce is equilibrium concentration of competitive adsorption is in mg L−1; Kd is the partition coefficient; and k is the selectivity coefficient.To study the reusability of Fe3O4/CMC, cycling experiments were carried out and 5 cycles are tested. At the end of each cycle, the Fe3O4/CMC-La(iii) was recovered by magnet and elute before next cycle. It can be seen from Table 6 that the adsorption capacity of the Fe3O4/CMC are between 57.8–61.5 mg g−1 (Table 6). Desorption capacities depend on the condition of elution. When elute was made by water-nitric acid (100 : 1, v/v) and elution time is 90 min, desorption capacities remain between 45.1 and 46.8 mg g−1. The recovery efficiency is about 70% after being re-used for 5 times as shown in Fig. 9. The relatively short time and low acid solution are not favoured by the recovery of La(iii).
Fig. 9
The recovery efficiency when eluted with A: water–nitric acid (100 : 1, v/v) for 90 min, and B: water–nitric acid (80 : 1, v/v) for 120 min.
Q is adsorption capacity; and qt is desorption capacity. A: water–nitric acid (100 : 1, v/v) for 90 min; B: be eluted with water–nitric acid (80 : 1, v/v) for 120 min.Since the recovery efficiency is low, desorption experiment has been carried out with the elute of water–nitric acid (80 : 1, v/v) for 120 min. The results are shown in Table 6 and Fig. 9. The recovery of La(iii) can achieve almost 98% when more time and relatively strong acid eluent are used. It shows that Fe3O4/CMC has good durability when applied in the removal and recovery of La(iii).
Conclusions
In this work, the ion-imprinted Fe3O4/CMC magnetic composite material was prepared with the template ion of La(iii). The results of XRD, SEM and FTIR show that nano Fe3O4 particles distribute in CMC evenly, which enables Fe3O4/CMC to have good magnetic property. Adsorption performance of La(iii) was fully studied and results showed that Fe3O4/CMC has good adsorption property for La(iii). Its adsorption capacity of Qmax reaches 61.5 mg L−1. Interfering experiments by Cu(ii), Ni(ii) and Cd(ii) ions were also carried out, which reveals that competing ions have little effect on the adsorption of La(iii). This indicates that ion-imprinted Fe3O4/CMC bears good selectivity for La(iii). Five cycling experiments prove that Fe3O4/CMC has good reuse property. Facile preparation method, good selectivity and regeneration property enable Fe3O4/CMC to show good prospect in application of removal or recovery of La(iii).
Materials and methods
Materials
Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC, chemically pure) and glutaraldehyde (50%, chemically pure) were purchased from Tianjin Fuchen Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd; lanthanum nitrate hexahydrate (La(NO3)3·6H2O; 99.99%) and ethylene glycol were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co. Ltd and Tianjin Fuyu Fine Chemical Co. Ltd, respectively; other chemicals were purchased from Tianjin Xinbote Chemical Co. Ltd. All chemicals used in this study were analytical reagents.
Preparation of Fe3O4
Fe3O4 was prepared according to previous ref. 32. 5.0 g FeCl3·6H2O, 2.0 g sodium citrate and 10.0 g anhydrous sodium acetate were mixed with 150 mL ethylene glycol and stirred for 5 h at room temperature. Then the mixture was transferred into 3 reaction kettles evenly and heated at 200 °C for 10 hours by hydrothermal method. The Fe3O4 nanoparticles were obtained after filtrated and washed in absolute ethanol and distilled water, and dried at 45 °C in a vacuum dryer.
Preparation of ion-imprinted Fe3O4/CMC
CMC gel was prepared by stirring mixture of 1.0 g of CMC with 50 mL distilled water for 24 h. Fe3O4 nanoparticles suspension was prepared by adding 0.1 g Fe3O4 nanoparticles into 10 mL distilled water and then oscillated for 25 min. Then the Fe3O4 nanoparticles suspension was added into CMC gel dropwise and continued stirring for 30 minutes to obtained mixture A. 0.1 g La(NO3)3·6H2O and 2 mL glutaraldehyde were mixed with 20 mL distilled water to make mixture B. Mixed the mixture A and B to get mixture C. After 1 h stirring, mixture C was transferred into three Petri dishes and heated at 80 °C for 4 h first and then 140 °C for 2 h. After cooling, the product was grounded and washed with absolute ethanol, dilute nitric acid and distilled water. Final product was obtained after drying at 50 °C.
Adsorption experiments
La(iii) solution with an initial concentration of 200 mg L−1 was made by dissolving 0.3055 g La(NO3)3·6H2O in 200 mL distilled water. Dilute HNO3 or NH3·HO was used to adjust the pH of La(iii).In a typical adsorption experiment, 50/100 mg Fe3O4/CMC was put into 100/200 mL La(iii) solution and oscillated (the oscillation rate of 200 rpm) at 25 °C. During the certain time, solution was sampled and concentration of La(iii) was tested by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (PerkinElmer, USA, model Elan9000).The adsorption capacity was calculated according to eqn (5).Where C0 (mg L−1) is the initial concentration of La(iii); Ct (mg L−1) is the concentration of La(iii) at time t; V (L) is the volume; and m (g) is the mass of sorbent.A multi-ion coexistence solution of La(iii), Cd(ii), Cu(ii) and Ni(ii) were prepared by the initial concentration of each ion was 200 mg L−1. 50 mg Fe3O4/CMC was put into 50 mL of mixed solution and oscillated for 6 h. The partition coefficient (Kd) and selectivity coefficient (k) of Fe3O4/CMC were calculated according to the eqn (6) and (7).[33]Where C0 (mg L−1) is the initial concentration of various ions; Ce (mg L−1) is the equilibrium concentration of various ions; Qe (mg g−1) is the equilibrium adsorption capacity; Kd(T) and Kd(M) are the partition coefficient of template ion and the competing ion respectively; V (L) is the volume; and m (g) is the dry mass of sorbent.
Desorption experiment
To test the reuse property of Fe3O4/CMC, the desorption experiment was carried out. After adsorption, the Fe3O4/CMC-La(iii) was dispersed in 100 mL nitric acid solution and oscillates at 25 °C for certain time. Then the regenerate Fe3O4/CMC was separate with magnet and desorption capacity was calculated according to eqn (8). Separated Fe3O4/CMC was washed with deionized water until it was neutral for next run.Where qt (mg g−1) is the desorption capacity; ct (mg L−1) is the concentration of La(iii) after desorption; v (L) is the volume of nitric acid; m (g) is the mass of Fe3O4/CMC after adsorption.
Characterization
The Fe3O4/CMC was scanned and analysed with a Fourier infrared spectrometer (PerkinElmer Instruments Co., Ltd., USA) to obtain the FTIR spectra; the morphology of composite was observed with scanning electron microscope (Model TM3030, Hitachi High-Tech Co., Ltd.); an X-ray diffractometer (XRD-6100, Shimadzu Corporation) was used to explore the crystal structure of the sample.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
A
Cycles
1
2
3
4
5
Q (mg g−1)
61.5
60.9
59.5
61.3
59.4
qt (mg g−1)
45.1
46.3
45.3
46.4
46.8
Q is adsorption capacity; and qt is desorption capacity. A: water–nitric acid (100 : 1, v/v) for 90 min; B: be eluted with water–nitric acid (80 : 1, v/v) for 120 min.
Authors: Haq N Bhatti; Yusra Safa; Sobhy M Yakout; Omar H Shair; Munawar Iqbal; Arif Nazir Journal: Int J Biol Macromol Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 6.953
Authors: S Saracoglu; M Soylak; D S Kacar Peker; L Elci; W N L dos Santos; V A Lemos; S L C Ferreira Journal: Anal Chim Acta Date: 2006-05-27 Impact factor: 6.558