| Literature DB >> 35478770 |
Lu Zhou1,2, Khunanan Sukpasjaroen1, Yuming Wu2, Liu Gao2, Thitinan Chankoson1,3, Enli Cai2.
Abstract
Background: The psychological distress of nursing students is ongoing and getting worse during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. Numerous calls for future research on exploring the effects of perceived social support would be an effective way to improve nursing students' mental health. However, the pathway(s) between perceived social support and psychological wellbeing (PWB) remain unknown. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore how self-compassion and professional self-concept mediate the relationship between perceived social support and PWB to explain the theoretical mechanisms of the relationship. Design: This study is the analytical cross-sectional research based on online self-reports and completed validated measures of perceived social support, PWB, self-compassion, and professional self-concept.Entities:
Keywords: nursing students; perceived social support; professional self-concept; psychological wellbeing; self-compassion
Year: 2022 PMID: 35478770 PMCID: PMC9037285 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Descriptive statistics for variables.
| Measures | Mean | SD | Variance | Minimum | Maximum | Skewness | Kurtosis | Female | Male |
| |
| Self-compassion | 3.432 | 0.604 | 0.365 | 1.910 | 5.000 | 0.163 | 0.148 | 0.859 | 3.43 ± 0.61 | 3.50 ± 0.56 | 0.44 |
| Professional self-concept | 6.068 | 1.182 | 1.397 | 1.360 | 8.000 | –0.246 | –0.023 | 0.527 | 6.07 ± 1.16 | 6.09 ± 1.39 | 0.914 |
| Perceived social support | 5.179 | 1.034 | 1.068 | 1.170 | 7.000 | –0.673 | 0.781 | 1.034 | 5.16 ± 1.02 | 5.36 ± 1.12 | 0.254 |
| Psychological wellbeing | 4.391 | 0.852 | 0.725 | 2.390 | 6.000 | –0.135 | –0.767 | 0.802 | 4.37 ± 0.84 | 4.60 ± 0.97 | 0.121 |
Correlations for all variables.
| Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 1. Self-compassion | 1 | |||
| 2. Professional self-concept | 0.494 | 1 | ||
| 3. Perceived social support | 0.407 | 0.495 | 1 | |
| 4. Psychological wellbeing | 0.612 | 0.616 | 0.694 | 1 |
n = 487. **p < 0.01.
Model fit.
| Models | χ2 | χ 2/df | GFI | AGFI | IFI | TLI | CFI | RMSEA | SRMR |
| Ms | 966.533 | 6.620 | 0.826 | 0.774 | 0.897 | 0.879 | 0.897 | 0.108 | 0.073 |
| Mn | 1,892.798 | 12.453 | 0.690 | 0.612 | 0.781 | 0.753 | 0.781 | 0.154 | 0.377 |
| Mt | 966.533 | 6.620 | 0.826 | 0.774 | 0.897 | 0.879 | 0.897 | 0.108 | 0.073 |
Path analysis.
| Unstd. β | SE | t-Value |
| Std. β | |
| PSS→SC | 0.367 | 0.039 | 9.317 |
| 0.552 |
| PSS→NPSC | 0.424 | 0.074 | 5.697 |
| 0.327 |
| SC→NPSC | 0.784 | 0.107 | 7.345 |
| 0.402 |
| PSS→PWB | 0.337 | 0.040 | 8.496 |
| 0.384 |
| NPSC→PWB | 0.259 | 0.025 | 10.191 |
| 0.382 |
| SC→PWB | 0.408 | 0.054 | 7.613 |
| 0.309 |
***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 1Standardized path coefficient of Structural Equation Model. Self-compassion and professional self-concept in sequence mediated the relationship of perceived social support on psychological wellbeing (PWB). SK, self-kindness; SJ, self-judgment; CH, common humanity; I, isolation; M, mindfulness; OI, overidentification; C, care; K, knowledge; SR, staff relations; L, leadership; SO, significant others; FA, family; FR, friends; PR, positive relations with others; AU, autonomy; EM, environmental mastery; PG, personal growth; PL, purpose in life; SA, self-acceptance.
Bollen–Stine χ2 modify model fit.
| GFI | AGFI | NFI | NNFI | IFI | CFI | RMSEA | χ2/df | BIC | ECVI |
| 0.977 | 0.967 | 0.977 | 0.994 | 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.024 | 1.289 | 460.455 | 0.567 |
Hypothesis testing.
| Effects | Point estimation | Product of Coefficient | Bias-corrected 95% CI | Percentile 95% CI | Ind/Total1 | Ind/Total2 | Hypothesis | Findings | |||||
| SE |
| Lower | Upper |
| Lower | Upper |
| ||||||
|
| H1 | Accepted | |||||||||||
| Total1 | 0.671 | 0.064 | 10.484 | 0.571 | 0.778 | 0.001 | 0.573 | 0.783 | 0.000 | – | – | ||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Total2 | 0.334 | 0.038 | 8.789 | 0.279 | 0.404 | 0.000 | 0.273 | 0.397 | 0.000 | – | – | ||
|
| |||||||||||||
| PSSect | 0.337 | 0.056 | 6.018 | 0.248 | 0.433 | 0.000 | 0.253 | 0.440 | 0.000 | ||||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Ind1: PSS→SC→PWB | 0.150 | 0.027 | 5.556 | 0.113 | 0.203 | 0.000 | 0.106 | 0.194 | 0.000 | 22.35% | 44.91% | H2 | Accepted |
| Ind2: PSS→PSC→PWB | 0.110 | 0.028 | 3.929 | 0.066 | 0.158 | 0.000 | 0.066 | 0.158 | 0.000 | 16.39% | 32.93% | H3 | Accepted |
| Ind3: PSS→SC→PSC→PWB | 0.074 | 0.019 | 3.895 | 0.049 | 0.114 | 0.000 | 0.046 | 0.109 | 0.000 | 11.03% | 22.16% | H4 | Accepted |
| Ind1–Ind2 | 0.040 | 0.042 | 0.952 | −0.023 | 0.116 | 0.278 | −0.032 | 0.107 | 0.375 | – | – | ||
| Ind1–Ind3 | 0.075 | 0.029 | 2.586 | 0.032 | 0.126 | 0.011 | 0.025 | 0.120 | 0.020 | – | – | ||
| Ind2–Ind3 | 0.035 | 0.040 | 0.875 | −0.033 | 0.099 | 0.394 | −0.030 | 0.100 | 0.358 | – | – | ||
5,000 bootstrap samples. SE, standard error of mean.
FIGURE 2Model of Directionality 1: self-compassion to professional self-concept. After adding the mediators, there is a significant indirect effect of perceived social support on PWB. The coefficients shown above are unstandardized. *Significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed). **Significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed). ***Significant at the 0.001 level (two-tailed). The total effects (Ind1 + Ind2 + Ind3 + direct effect) = 0.671. The total indirect effects (Ind1 + Ind2 + Ind3) = 0.334.
FIGURE 3Model of Directionality 2: professional self-concept to self-compassion. After adding the mediators, there is a significant indirect effect of perceived social support on PWB. The coefficients shown above are unstandardized. *Significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed). **Significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed). ***Significant at the 0.001 level (two-tailed). The total effects (Ind1 + Ind2 + Ind3 + direct effect) = 0.635. The total indirect effects (Ind1 + Ind2 + Ind3) = 0.224.
Models fit.
| Models | χ2 | χ 2/df | GFI | IFI | TLI | CFI | RMSEA | SRMR |
| Model 0 | 1,372.099 | 4.604 | 0.790 | 0.861 | 0.839 | 0.860 | 0.086 | 0.105 |
| Model 1 | 1,394.417 | 4.523 | 0.785 | 0.857 | 0.843 | 0.856 | 0.085 | 0.114 |
| Model 2 | 1,395.651 | 4.516 | 0.784 | 0.856 | 0.843 | 0.856 | 0.085 | 0.113 |
| Model 3 | 1,401.510 | 4.488 | 0.783 | 0.856 | 0.844 | 0.856 | 0.085 | 0.115 |
| Model 4 | 1,535.975 | 5.128 | 0.709 | 0.819 | 0.816 | 0.819 | 0.092 | 0.115 |
Model 0, unconstrained structural model; Model 1, measurement weights’ invariant; Model 2, measurement weights’ and measurement intercepts’ invariant; Model 3, measurement weights’, measurement intercepts’, and structural covariances’ invariant; Model 4, measurement weights’, measurement intercepts’, structural covariances’, and structural residuals’ invariant.
Model comparisons for multigroup Structural Equation Models.
| Comparison | Δχ2 | Δdf | ΔCFI | ΔNNFI |
|
| Model 0 vs. Model 1 | 22.318 | 15 | −0.005 | –0.005 | 0.100 |
| Model 0 vs. Model 2 | 23.552 | 16 | −0.006 | –0.005 | 0.100 |
| Model 0 vs. Model 3 | 29.411 | 19 | −0.007 | –0.005 | 0.060 |
| Model 0 vs. Model 4 | 163.876 | 38 | −0.081 | 0.022 | 0.000 |
| Model 1 vs. Model 2 | 1.234 | 1 | −0.001 | 0.000 | 0.267 |
| Model 1 vs. Model 3 | 7.093 | 4 | −0.002 | –0.001 | 0.131 |
| Model 1 vs. Model 4 | 141.558 | 23 | −0.076 | 0.029 | 0.000 |
| Model 2 vs. Model 3 | 5.859 | 3 | −0.001 | 0.000 | 0.119 |
| Model 2 vs. Model 4 | 140.324 | 22 | −0.075 | 0.029 | 0.000 |
| Model 3 vs. Model 4 | 134.465 | 19 | −0.074 | 0.030 | 0.000 |
Model 0, unconstrained structural model; Model 1, measurement weights’ invariant; Model 2, measurement weights’ and measurement intercepts’ invariant; Model 3, measurement weights’, measurement intercepts’, and structural covariances’ invariant; Model 4, measurement weights’, measurement intercepts’, structural covariances’, and structural residuals’ invariant.