| Literature DB >> 35477515 |
Elena K Enax-Krumova1,2, Iris Dahlhaus3, Jonas Görlach4, Kristl G Claeys5,6, Federica Montagnese7, Llka Schneider8,9, Dietrich Sturm1,2, Tanja Fangerau10, Hannah Schlierbach4, Angela Roth4, Julia V Wanschitz11, Wolfgang N Löscher11, Anne-Katrin Güttsches1,2, Stefan Vielhaber12, Rebecca Hasseli13, Lea Zunk4, Heidrun H Krämer14, Andreas Hahn15, Benedikt Schoser7, Angela Rosenbohm10, Anne Schänzer16.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pain occurs in the majority of patients with late onset Pompe disease (LOPD) and is associated with a reduced quality of life. The aim of this study was to analyse the pain characteristics and its relation to a small nerve fiber involvement in LOPD patients.Entities:
Keywords: Intraepidermal nerve fiber density; Late onset Pompe disease; Pain; Skin biopsy; Small nerve fiber
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35477515 PMCID: PMC9044713 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-022-02327-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.303
Summary of data in patients with LOPD (n = 35) included in the study
| Female [number (%)] | 19 (54%) |
| Male [number (%)] | 16 (46%) |
| Skin biopsy | 50.3 (18–74) |
| Symptoms | 34.9 (3–72) |
| Diagnosis | 42.3 (4–74) |
| Start ERT | 43.8 (4–74) |
| Duration onset symptoms-time of biopsy | 15.3 (1–44) |
| Duration onset ERT—time of biopsy | 6.5 (0–14) |
| c.-32-13T > G [n (%)] | 30 (88%) |
| c.45T > G [n (%)] | 3 (9%) |
| Others | 1 (3%) |
| 89% (73–99) | |
| 8 (23%) | |
| Diabetes mellitus type 2 | 3 |
| Frequent alcohol intake | 2 |
| Cobalamin or/and ferritin deficiency | 3 |
| Reduced [number (%)] | 20 (57%) |
| 24 (69%) | |
Current pain intensity (NRS 0–10) [mean ± SD (range)] Average pain intensity (NRS 0–10) [mean ± SD (range)] Maximal pain intensity (NRS 0–10) [mean ± SD (range)] | 2.8 ± 2.6 (0–9) 4.1 ± 1.1 (1–7) 6.2 ± 2.2 (2–10) |
Pain attacks without pain between them [number (%)] Persistent pain with slight fluctuations [number (%)] Persistent pain with pain attacks [number (%)] Pain attacks with pain between them [number (%)] | 13 (54%) 8 (33%) 2 (8%) 1 (4%) |
Neuropathic pain likely [number (%)] Neuropathic pain component unclear [number (%)] Neuropathic pain unlikely [number (%)] | 1 (3%) 7 (20%) 16 (46%) |
| Relevant anxiety and/or depressive symptoms [number (%)] | 12 (34%) |
| Relevant depression symptoms [number (%)] | 8 (23%) |
| Relevant anxiety symptoms [number (%)] | 11 (31%) |
ERT, enzyme replacement therapy; GAA, acid alpha glucosidase; PNP, polyneuropathy; IENFD, intraepidermal nerve fiber density; NRS, numeric rating scale; HADS, hospitality anxiety and depression scale
Fig. 1Pain distribution in patients with LOPD: twenty-four (69%) of the patients reported pain including axial and joint pain in most of the cases. Only on patient (P19) reported neuropathic pain in the distal legs (large black rectangular frame). Reduction of IENFD was detected in 57% of the patients (small red rectangular frames)
Fig. 2Correlation between the pain intensity and the A degree of anxiety symptoms (HADS-A score) and the B degree of depressive symptoms (HADS-D score). C Distribution of the HADS-A and HADS-D scores in patients with vs. without pain (x = mean)
Fig. 3Scatter plot showing intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) values in A female patients (black dots) and healthy controls (grey dots) and B male patients (black dots) and healthy controls (grey dots). Solid line depict 50th and dotted line 5th percentiles of normative values from Lauria et al. Values below the 5th percentile (grey area) are considered as reduced
Fig. 4Bar chart showing time periods (duration of symptoms to onset of ERT therapy, onset of ERT therapy to biopsy) and patients with reduced (red) and normal (blue) intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) at time of biopsy (right end of bar). Each patient is represented by a bar, with the sum of the left and right values representing the total time from symptom onset to the time of biopsy. The distribution of patients with reduced fiber density is evenly distributed across the cohort
Fig. 5Correlation scatter plot matrix of fiber densities (z-score IENFD) and clinical data. i.e. time between symptoms onset and start of ERT (duration symptoms to ERT), start of ERT therapy to time of biopsy (duration ERT to biopsy) and PDQ-score in patients with reduced (red) and normal (blue) fiber densities. The lines indicate a linear fit (and confidential intervals) for visual guidance of possible correlations. The diagonal shows the data distribution as probability density function
Average scores of corneal nerve parameters
| P. Nr | CNFD | CNBD | CNFL | CCM Appraisal | Distal IENFD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 15,62 | Abnormal | Reduced | ||
| 3 | 32,81 | 21,87 | 16,72 | Normal | Reduced |
| 5 | 14,06 | 20,31 | Abnormal | Normal | |
| 18 | 17,19 | 26,56 | Abnormal | Reduced |
Pathological results illustrated in bold.
CNFD, corneal nerve fiber density; CNBD, corneal nerve branch density; CNFL, corneal nerve fiber length; CCM, corneal confocal microscopy; IENFD, intraepidermal nerve fiber density