Mitra Tavakoli1, Maryam Ferdousi1, Ioannis N Petropoulos1, Julie Morris2, Nicola Pritchard3, Andrey Zhivov4, Dan Ziegler5, Danièle Pacaud6, Kenneth Romanchuk6, Bruce A Perkins7, Leif E Lovblom7, Vera Bril8, J Robinson Singleton9, Gordon Smith9, Andrew J M Boulton1, Nathan Efron3, Rayaz A Malik10. 1. Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Institute of Human Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K. 2. Medical Statistics Unit, University of Manchester and University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, U.K. 3. Institute of Health Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany. 5. Institute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center at Heinrich Heine University, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research, Düsseldorf, Germany Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany. 6. Alberta Children's Hospital, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. 7. Division of Endocrinology, Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 8. Division of Neurology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 9. Department of Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. 10. Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Institute of Human Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K. Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, Ar Rayyān, Qatar rayaz.a.malik@man.ac.uk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Corneal confocal microscopy is a novel diagnostic technique for the detection of nerve damage and repair in a range of peripheral neuropathies, in particular diabetic neuropathy. Normative reference values are required to enable clinical translation and wider use of this technique. We have therefore undertaken a multicenter collaboration to provide worldwide age-adjusted normative values of corneal nerve fiber parameters. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 1,965 corneal nerve images from 343 healthy volunteers were pooled from six clinical academic centers. All subjects underwent examination with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph corneal confocal microscope. Images of the central corneal subbasal nerve plexus were acquired by each center using a standard protocol and analyzed by three trained examiners using manual tracing and semiautomated software (CCMetrics). Age trends were established using simple linear regression, and normative corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve fiber branch density (CNBD), corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), and corneal nerve fiber tortuosity (CNFT) reference values were calculated using quantile regression analysis. RESULTS: There was a significant linear age-dependent decrease in CNFD (-0.164 no./mm(2) per year for men, P < 0.01, and -0.161 no./mm(2) per year for women, P < 0.01). There was no change with age in CNBD (0.192 no./mm(2) per year for men, P = 0.26, and -0.050 no./mm(2) per year for women, P = 0.78). CNFL decreased in men (-0.045 mm/mm(2) per year, P = 0.07) and women (-0.060 mm/mm(2) per year, P = 0.02). CNFT increased with age in men (0.044 per year, P < 0.01) and women (0.046 per year, P < 0.01). Height, weight, and BMI did not influence the 5th percentile normative values for any corneal nerve parameter. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides robust worldwide normative reference values for corneal nerve parameters to be used in research and clinical practice in the study of diabetic and other peripheral neuropathies.
OBJECTIVE: Corneal confocal microscopy is a novel diagnostic technique for the detection of nerve damage and repair in a range of peripheral neuropathies, in particular diabetic neuropathy. Normative reference values are required to enable clinical translation and wider use of this technique. We have therefore undertaken a multicenter collaboration to provide worldwide age-adjusted normative values of corneal nerve fiber parameters. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 1,965 corneal nerve images from 343 healthy volunteers were pooled from six clinical academic centers. All subjects underwent examination with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph corneal confocal microscope. Images of the central corneal subbasal nerve plexus were acquired by each center using a standard protocol and analyzed by three trained examiners using manual tracing and semiautomated software (CCMetrics). Age trends were established using simple linear regression, and normative corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve fiber branch density (CNBD), corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), and corneal nerve fiber tortuosity (CNFT) reference values were calculated using quantile regression analysis. RESULTS: There was a significant linear age-dependent decrease in CNFD (-0.164 no./mm(2) per year for men, P < 0.01, and -0.161 no./mm(2) per year for women, P < 0.01). There was no change with age in CNBD (0.192 no./mm(2) per year for men, P = 0.26, and -0.050 no./mm(2) per year for women, P = 0.78). CNFL decreased in men (-0.045 mm/mm(2) per year, P = 0.07) and women (-0.060 mm/mm(2) per year, P = 0.02). CNFT increased with age in men (0.044 per year, P < 0.01) and women (0.046 per year, P < 0.01). Height, weight, and BMI did not influence the 5th percentile normative values for any corneal nerve parameter. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides robust worldwide normative reference values for corneal nerve parameters to be used in research and clinical practice in the study of diabetic and other peripheral neuropathies.
Authors: Nathan Efron; Katie Edwards; Nicola Roper; Nicola Pritchard; Geoff P Sampson; Ayda M Shahidi; Dimitrios Vagenas; Anthony Russell; Jim Graham; Mohammad A Dabbah; Rayaz A Malik Journal: Eye Contact Lens Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 2.018
Authors: Mitra Tavakoli; Cristian Quattrini; Caroline Abbott; Panagiotis Kallinikos; Andrew Marshall; Joanne Finnigan; Philip Morgan; Nathan Efron; Andrew J M Boulton; Rayaz A Malik Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-04-30 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Omar Asghar; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Uazman Alam; Wendy Jones; Maria Jeziorska; Andrew Marshall; Georgios Ponirakis; Hassan Fadavi; Andrew J M Boulton; Mitra Tavakoli; Rayaz A Malik Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Krista I Kinard; A Gordon Smith; J Robinson Singleton; Margaret K Lessard; Bradley J Katz; Judith E A Warner; Alison V Crum; Mark D Mifflin; Kevin C Brennan; Kathleen B Digre Journal: Headache Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 5.887
Authors: Daniel Scarr; Leif E Lovblom; Julie A Lovshin; Geneviève Boulet; Mohammed A Farooqi; Andrej Orszag; Alanna Weisman; Nancy Cardinez; Yuliya Lytvyn; Mylan Ngo; Hillary A Keenan; Michael H Brent; Narinder Paul; Vera Bril; David Z I Cherney; Bruce A Perkins Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Harriet I Kemp; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Andrew S C Rice; Jan Vollert; Christoph Maier; Dietrich Strum; Marc Schargus; Tunde Peto; Scott Hau; Reena Chopra; Rayaz A Malik Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: B S Kowtharapu; K Winter; C Marfurt; S Allgeier; B Köhler; M Hovakimyan; T Stahnke; A Wree; O Stachs; R F Guthoff Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 3.775