| Literature DB >> 35477496 |
Marija Glisic1,2, Joelle L Flueck3, Belinda Ruettimann3, Anneke Hertig-Godeschalk3, Ezra Valido1, Alessandro Bertolo1, Gerold Stucki1, Jivko Stoyanov4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) may cause an autonomic imbalance in the gastrointestinal tract, leading to deficits in colonic motility, mucosal secretions, vascular tone, and an increase of intestinal barrier permeability. Autonomic denervation and factors such as age, physical activity, antibiotic use and stress may cause intestinal bacterial translocation, decreased microbiota diversity, known as gut dysbiosis and thus increase susceptibility to experiencing gastrointestinal discomfort. Probiotic treatment in individuals with SCI may normalize the gut microbiota and improve overall health. We aim to assess the feasibility of probiotic and prebiotic intervention in athletes with SCI and collect information necessary for sample size calculation of a definite trial on improving health outcomes in para-athletes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Elite Swiss para-athletes (aged> 18 years), being shortlisted for the Paralympic Games 2021 in Tokyo or a member of a national team (n = 43), will be invited to participate in this single-center randomized crossover trial. Athletes suffering from chronic inflammatory bowel diseases, those currently taking antibiotics or other medication to alleviate gastro-intestinal complaints will not be eligible to be included in the study. Athletes will be randomized (1:1) to receive for 4 weeks a daily dose of either 3 g of probiotic preparation or 5 g of prebiotic (organic oat bran) supplementation in addition to usual diet, followed by a 4-week washout period or vice versa. The primary outcome is the feasibility of the study, measured by recruitment and dropout rates, feasibility of the measurements, acceptability and adherence to the intervention. Secondary outcomes include gastrointestinal health assessment, diet and training information, handgrip strength, blood diagnostic parameters, and intestinal microbiome characterization. The changes in clinically relevant secondary outcome values will be used to make a power calculation for definite trial. DISCUSSION: This pilot trial will address two common challenges in SCI research: the difficulty to recruit enough participants for a sufficiently powered study and the ability to collect data within the limits of a realistic budget and time frame. Upon demonstrated feasibility of the intervention and study procedures, the intervention will be evaluated in a definitive controlled trial comprising a larger sample of para-athletes (elite, engaged, or recreationally active) individuals with a SCI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04659408.Entities:
Keywords: Clinical trial design; Feasibility trial; Prebiotic; Probiotic; Spinal cord injury
Year: 2022 PMID: 35477496 PMCID: PMC9044645 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01048-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud ISSN: 2055-5784
Fig. 1The participant flow diagram
Fig. 2Summary of study design. Participants are randomized to either probiotic (Bactosan pro-FOS) or prebiotic (oat bran), both taken once a day for 4 weeks (T1), followed by a washout period of 4 weeks (T2) and cross-over to the other intervention for another 4 weeks (T3)
Overview of feasibility outcomes and progression criteria
| Feasibility criteria | Assessment | Progression criteria to a subsequent trial |
|---|---|---|
| Recruitment and eligibility | Number of eligible athletes | N/A |
| Percentage assessed for eligibility; fulfilling inclusion criteria, recruited and included (of total number identified) | > 25% agreed to participate of total eligible population | |
| Reasons for ineligibility and non-participation | Information to be descriptively summarized. If necessary inclusion/exclusion criteria are to be reconsidered. | |
| Data collection | Percentage of completed assessments/questionnaires | > 75% answering all questions at all assessments |
| Numbers of missing items (e.g., laboratory measurements), reasons for missing data collection | < 20% missing information for primary outcomes [ | |
| Adherence to intervention | A rate of adherence to protocol for both intervention and control interventions | > 80% of participants at baseline |
| Retention | The number of randomized participants retained/who managed to complete the study protocol Collect the reasons for premature study termination | > 80% of participants at baseline |
| Feasibility of procedures and experimental setting | Number of: 1. Fasting blood samples collected 2. Correctly taken stool samples by study participants 3. Successfully analysed microbiome composition | > 75% of analytic procedures successfully completed |
| Acceptability of intervention | Evaluated among participants post-trial: 1. Rating (from 0 to 10) of study procedures (intervention, measurements, time burden, personal value) 2. Willingness to participate again 3. Open feedback | Having an average of at least 5 points for each rating > 50% willing to participate again |
| Resources needed to complete the study and the intervention | Length of time required for: 1. Study personnel to collect the data the monthly visits 2. Participants to provide data at the monthly visits | < 60 min to complete questionnaires and physical examinations during monthly study visits |
| Safety analyses | Number of serious adverse events | No serious adverse events related to the study intervention or other procedures. |
aIf one or more criteria are not met revisions should be considered before proceeding to a definite trial