| Literature DB >> 35476895 |
Haim Herzberg1,2, Karin Lifshitz1,2,3, Shay Golan2,3,4, Jack Baniel2,3, Kamil Malshy5,6, Azik Hoffman4,5,6, Gilad E Amiel5,6, Rani Zreik6,7, Yuval Freifeld4,6,7, Yoram Dekel6,7, Rinat Lasmanovich2,8, Alon Lazarovich2,8, Barak Rosenzweig2,4,8, Zohar Dotan2,8, Ofer Yossepowitch1,2, Roy Mano1,2,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the associations of peri-operative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and change in NLR with survival after radical cystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a multicentre cohort of patients with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy between 2010 and 2020. Preoperative NLR, postoperative NLR, delta-NLR (postoperative minus preoperative NLR) and NLR change (postoperative divided by preoperative NLR) were calculated. Patients were stratified based on elevation of preoperative and/ or postoperative NLR above the median values. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the associations of peri-operative NLR and NLR change with survival.Entities:
Keywords: #BladderCancer; #blcsm; #uroonc; bladder cancer; neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratio; prognosis; radical cystectomy; survival
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35476895 PMCID: PMC9544470 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15757
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BJU Int ISSN: 1464-4096 Impact factor: 5.969
Clinical and pathological characteristics of the study cohort (n = 346).
| Characteristic | |
|---|---|
| Age, median (IQR), years | 69 (64, 76) |
| Sex, | |
| Female | 78 (22.5) |
| Male | 268 (77.5) |
| Charlson Comorbidity Index, | |
| <3 | 252 (73) |
| ≥3 | 94 (27) |
| Local clinical stage, | |
| Non‐muscle‐invasive | 50 (14) |
| Muscle‐invasive | 294 (85) |
| NA | 2 (1) |
| Surgical approach, | |
| Open | 270 (78) |
| Robotic | 76 (22) |
| Diversion type, | |
| Ileal conduit | 280 (81) |
| Orthotopic neobladder | 60 (17) |
| Indiana pouch | 2 (1) |
| NA | 4 (1) |
| Pathological T‐stage, | |
| T0–T1 | 126 (36) |
| T2 | 59 (17) |
| T3–T4 | 161 (47) |
| Pathological lymph node involvement, | |
| Negative | 260 (75) |
| Positive | 86 (25) |
| Surgical margin status, | |
| Negative | 317 (92) |
| Positive | 29 (8) |
| Neoadjuvant treatment, | |
| Gemcitabine‐cisplatin | 94 (27) |
| MVAC | 14 (4) |
| Gemcitabine‐carboplatin | 18 (5) |
| Immunotherapy | 5 (1) |
| Other | 9 (3) |
| No treatment | 203 (59) |
| NA | 3 (1) |
| Adjuvant treatment, | |
| Gemcitabine‐cisplatin | 32 (9) |
| MVAC | 2 (1) |
| Gemcitabine‐carboplatin | 17 (5) |
| Immunotherapy | 9 (3) |
| Other | 8 (2) |
| No treatment | 271 (78) |
| NA | 7 (2) |
| Preoperative NLR, median (IQR) | 2.55 (1.83, 3.9) |
| Postoperative NLR, median (IQR) | 3.33 (2.21, 5.2) |
| Delta‐NLR, median (IQR) | 0.43 (−0.50, 2.08) |
| NLR change, median (IQR) | 1.2 (0.82, 1.96) |
| NLR increase group, | |
| None | 110 (32) |
| Preoperative or postoperative | 126 (36) |
| Preoperative and postoperative | 110 (32) |
IQR, interquartile range; MVAC, methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin; NA, not available; NLR, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio.
Fig. 1(A) Boxplot of preoperative and postoperative neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) values. (B) Plot depicting individual patient changes in NLR values; colour lines represent delta‐NLR and black line represents change between the median values. (C) Pie chart of peri‐operative NLR status. For parts (A) and (B) 27 patients with preoperative and/or postoperative NLR values >10 were excluded. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Fig. 2Kaplan–Meier curves of (A) cancer‐specific survival and (B) overall survival after radical cystectomy, stratified by peri‐operative NLR status: NLR not elevated vs preoperative or postoperative NLR elevated vs preoperative and postoperative NLR elevated. P <0.001 on log‐rank test for both. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Multivariable Cox regression models evaluating the association between peri‐operative neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio and overall and cancer‐specific survival after radical cystectomy.
| Variable | Overall survival | Cancer‐specific survival | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
| Preoperative NLR | 1.09 (1.04, 1.14) | <0.001 | 1.09 (1.03, 1.15) | 0.002 |
| Postoperative NLR | 1.1 (1.06, 1.14) | <0.001 | 1.1 (1.05, 1.14) | <0.001 |
| Delta‐NLR | 1.04 (0.99, 1.09) | 0.08 | 1.05 (1, 1.1) | 0.04 |
| NLR change | 1.02 (0.99, 1.05) | 0.22 | 1.03 (0.99, 1.06) | 0.08 |
| Elevated NLR | ||||
| Not elevated | Reference | Reference | ||
| Preoperative or postoperative | 1.5 (0.87, 2.53) | 0.14 | 1.31 (0.7, 2.4) | 0.4 |
| Preoperative and postoperative | 2.97 (1.78, 4.95) | <0.001 | 2.41 (1.3, 4.4) | 0.004 |
Each line represents a separate model, all models were adjusted for patient age at surgery, Charlson Comorbidity index (categorized as <3 vs ≥3), clinical stage (categorized as non‐muscle invasive vs muscle invasive), tumour T‐stage (categorized as T0–1, T2 and T3–4), lymph node involvement, surgical margin status, neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy treatment.
CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; NLR, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio.
Calculated as postoperative NLR minus preoperative NLR.
Calculated as postoperative NLR divided by preoperative NLR.