| Literature DB >> 26657651 |
Bimal Bhindi1, Thomas Hermanns1,2, Yanliang Wei1, Julie Yu3, Patrick O Richard1, Marian S Wettstein2, Arnoud Templeton4,5, Kathy Li1, Srikala S Sridhar4, Michael A S Jewett1, Neil E Fleshner1, Alexandre R Zlotta1,6, Girish S Kulkarni1,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We sought to determine which parsimonious combination of complete blood count (CBC)-based biomarkers most efficiently predicts oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BC).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26657651 PMCID: PMC4815810 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.432
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Cohort characteristics
| Age in years, median (IQR) | 70 (61–76) |
| Female sex, | 96 (23.0) |
| Heavy smoking (⩾30pack-years), | 133 (32) |
| BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR) | 27 (24–30) |
| Charlson co-morbidity index, median (IQR) | 1 (0–2) |
| Hydronephrosis, | 117 (28) |
| Concurrent CIS, | 188 (45) |
| pT0 | 25 (6) |
| pTa/Tis/T1/T2 | 202 (48) |
| pT3/T4 | 191 (46) |
| pN0 | 282 (68) |
| pN+ | 115 (27) |
| pNx | 21 (5) |
| Lymphovascular invasion, | 141 (34) |
| Positive surgical margin | 33 (8) |
| 1992–2005 | 208 (50) |
| 2006–2012 | 210 (50) |
| Continent diversion, | 89 (21) |
| Node total, median (IQR) | 12 (7–19) |
| Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, | 28 (7) |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 87 (20) |
| Salvage chemotherapy, | 54 (13) |
| Haemoglobin (g/dl), median (IQR) | 13.2 (11.6–14.5) |
| WBC (× 109/l), median (IQR) | 7.6 (6.0–9.1) |
| Neutrophils (× 109/l), median (IQR) | 4.8 (3.8–6.5) |
| Monocytes (× 109/l), median (IQR) | 0.6 (0.5–0.7) |
| Lymphocytes (× 109/l), median (IQR) | 1.7 (1.3–2.1) |
| Platelets (× 109/l), median (IQR) | 253 (204–303) |
| NLR, median (IQR) | 2.9 (2.1–4.3) |
| MLR, median (IQR) | 0.36 (0.26–0.50) |
| LMR, median (IQR) | 2.8 (2.0–3.8) |
| PLR, median (IQR) | 150 (103–202) |
Abbreviations: BMI=body mass index; CBC=complete blood count; CIS=carcinoma in situ; IQR=interquartile range; LMR=lymphocyte monocyte ratio; MLR=monocyte lymphocyte ratio; NLR=neutrophil lymphocyte ratio; PLR=platelet lymphocyte ratio; WBC=white blood cell count.
Positive surgical margins rates are based on permanent sections (paraffin-embedded) and exclude ureteral carcinoma in-situ.
Figure 1Kaplan–Meier analyses of associations between CBC-based predictors (above vs below median for haemoglobin (row 1), neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (row 2), lymphocyte–monocyte ratio (row 3), and platelet–lymphocyte ratio (row 4)) and oncologic outcomes.
Univariate associations between predictors and oncologic outcomes following radical cystectomy
| Haemoglobin, per 1 g/dl | 0.90 (0.86–0.94) | <0.001 | 0.87 (0.82–0.91) | <0.001 | 0.84 (0.82–0.87) | <0.001 |
| Neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, per 1-log unit | 1.49 (1.22–1.81) | <0.001 | 1.58 (1.32–1.90) | <0.001 | 1.74 (1.43–2.11) | <0.001 |
| Lymphocyte–monocyte ratio, per 1-log unit | 0.66 (0.55–0.79) | <0.001 | 0.69 (0.53–0.91) | 0.009 | 0.70 (0.55–0.88) | 0.002 |
| Platelet–lymphocyte ratio, per 100 units | 1.22 (1.08–1.38) | 0.002 | 1.21 (1.05–1.41) | 0.01 | 1.16 (1.02–1.33) | 0.03 |
Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio.
Log-transformed.
Final parsimonious multivariable models for recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival
| T-stage, pT3-4 | 1.58 (1.03–2.42) | 0.03 |
| N-stage, N+ | 2.15 (2.82–2.53) | <0.0001 |
| Lymphovascular invasion | 1.72 (1.04–2.86) | 0.03 |
| Positive surgical margin | 2.16 (1.42–3.28) | <0.001 |
| Neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, per 1-unit increase | 1.52 (1.17–1.98) | 0.002 |
| T-stage, pT3-4 | 1.67 (1.07–2.62) | 0.02 |
| N-stage, N+ | 2.13 (1.27–3.57) | 0.004 |
| Lymphovascular invasion | 1.75 (0.94–3.28) | 0.08 |
| Positive surgical margin | 1.82 (0.88–3.79) | 0.11 |
| Haemoglobin (per 1 g/l increase) | 0.91 (0.86–0.95) | <0.001 |
| Neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, per 1-unit increase | 1.47 (1.20–1.80) | <0.001 |
| Age, per 1 year increase | 1.03 (1.01–1.04) | 0.008 |
| Charlson co-morbidity index, per 1-point increase | 1.16 (1.03–1.32) | 0.01 |
| T-stage, pT3-4 | 1.42 (0.83–2.45) | 0.20 |
| N-stage, N+ | 1.55 (1.12–2.14) | 0.008 |
| Lymphovascular invasion | 1.74 (1.03–2.93) | 0.04 |
| Positive surgical margin | 1.86 (0.90–3.82) | 0.09 |
| Haemoglobin, per 1 g/dl increase | 0.90 (0.88–0.93) | <0.001 |
| Neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio, per 1-unit increase | 1.56 (1.16–2.10) | 0.004 |
Abbreviations: AIC=Akaike Information Criterion; CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio.
Likelihood ratio omnibus test: χ2=84.8, dF=5, P<0.001; AIC=1407.0.
Variable was log-transformed, and therefore hazard ratios represent effect per 1 log-unit.
Likelihood ratio omnibus test: χ2=68.9, dF=6, P<0.001; AIC=1101.6.
Likelihood ratio omnibus test: χ2=111.0, dF=8, P<0.001; AIC=1780.7.